This is not a topic about porn, though I'm sure that subject will come up. This is about masturbation itself. I think the mainstream idea is that masturbation is healthy, that everyone should do it because it's fun and that you shouldn't overdo it.
The history of views on masturbation is a tumulteous one. Many historical views seem to be that masturbation (in men) saps the strength and vigor. And that it makes women crazy(er). Some american colonies leveled the death penalty on masturbators, based on the views in the Onassia book by Tissot.
Circumcision of men in the US derives directly from Kellog believing masturbation to be worse than war, plague, small-pox. His suggestion to burn the clitoris with acid wasn't as long lived.
Now many of those views I presume are not subscribed to by any of the people reading this (correct me if wrong). Though speaking purely personally, I have noticed significant difference in energy with or without masturbation that is different from with or without ejaculation through sex (possibly for all the positive effects of sex). But it's hard to judge if those things are placebo, with a dataset of one.
There are more contemporary people who take a negative view on masturbation, including the whole nofap thing and no nut november and fringe people like e. michael jones who consider it a form of sexual /political control. On the other end of the insanity spectrum you have things like the "all about me" sex education in Birmingham that was aimed at teaching masturbation to 4-5 year olds. I'm just curious to know if there other people who have divergent positions than the mainstream, and why? Or if they have unorthodox reasons for their orthodox position. Share your thoughts and experiences.
The history of views on masturbation is a tumulteous one. Many historical views seem to be that masturbation (in men) saps the strength and vigor. And that it makes women crazy(er). Some american colonies leveled the death penalty on masturbators, based on the views in the Onassia book by Tissot.
Circumcision of men in the US derives directly from Kellog believing masturbation to be worse than war, plague, small-pox. His suggestion to burn the clitoris with acid wasn't as long lived.
Now many of those views I presume are not subscribed to by any of the people reading this (correct me if wrong). Though speaking purely personally, I have noticed significant difference in energy with or without masturbation that is different from with or without ejaculation through sex (possibly for all the positive effects of sex). But it's hard to judge if those things are placebo, with a dataset of one.
There are more contemporary people who take a negative view on masturbation, including the whole nofap thing and no nut november and fringe people like e. michael jones who consider it a form of sexual /political control. On the other end of the insanity spectrum you have things like the "all about me" sex education in Birmingham that was aimed at teaching masturbation to 4-5 year olds. I'm just curious to know if there other people who have divergent positions than the mainstream, and why? Or if they have unorthodox reasons for their orthodox position. Share your thoughts and experiences.
Last edited: