Matthew Soltys / Nitro Rooski / Capital City Fur Con / Spark the Dalmatian / Cyder the Donkey / DJMSOL Entertainment / Nitro Production Company - Stole $4000+ from charity at his short-lived convention. Spent months failing to re-brand and sneak back into the fandom. Long history of abusive dating behavior. Currently impersonating and harassing a far more likable furry.

[Pinball 2000]

I decided to revamp the OP a bit, replacing the "updates" section with a timeline of all the known notable events, from early 2019 to now.

Some of the "sagas" intersect with each other, so this should help make it easier to process everything that's happened so far.

 

[Pinball 2000]

So it seems that DontHugCacti actually finished the Dalmatian suit, sent it to Matthew, and he let someone photograph him wearing it

https://twitter.com/DalmatianPatch/status/1402290465026629637 (archive)

EDIT: Someone sent me the full picture of the Dalmatian suit (without an X over it):

 

[Corn Flakes]

So it seems that DontHugCacti actually finished the Dalmatian suit, sent it to Matthew, and he let someone photograph him wearing it

View attachment 2244523View attachment 2244528
https://twitter.com/DalmatianPatch/status/1402290465026629637 (archive)

Man, one would expect DHC to not want any further bad press since their last fuckup but... here we are. Awesome.

 

[OccamsShaveClub]

Man, one would expect DHC to not want any further bad press since their last fuckup but... here we are. Awesome.

Given the magnitude of their last fuckup, they probably are assuming they've already been tried, found guilty, and hanged in the court of public opinion... which they should've been, if not for the fact that some furries will forgive anyone who can still supply them with cutesy uwu shit to fawn over, regardless of their sins.

 

[shoplifter7]

ive met this man and sadly i have no stories

 

[JethroTullamore]

ive met this man and sadly i have no stories

Well thank God you shared that with us, It’s very informative and adds a lot to the conversation.

 

[CommonSenseWYAHoney]

my god, I just feel bad for Patch. He did absolutely nothing except buy a fur suit and now he’s the target of the raging lunatic known as Matthew.

 

[Pinball 2000]

Looks like #TeamNitro is having some internal strife if this comment I spotted on the BBrackets video is anything to go by:

Comment highlight (archive)

Kyle, if you're reading this (and I know you are since most of #TeamNitro is lurking in this thread), and you're truly done with the guy, I'd love to hear more about what it was like being around him. Nobody is stopping you from registering and posting here. Hell, if your information is good, I'll even consider censoring some of the information about you.

 

[Pinball 2000]

Nobody's said it yet, so I'm just gonna say it; One of the funniest things about Matthew's attempts to reinvent himself as "Spark the Dalmatian" is that he never took the ten seconds to google that fursona name to make sure there weren't any other notable furries already using it. Because 1) there already is, and 2) they're a babyfur who has been arrested twice. The first arrest was for child molesting, and the second for child porn possession.

He literally could not have picked worse things to impersonate. So just to reiterate, not only did Matthew spend thousands to impersonate another furry's suit, but he then chose the same name as a sex offender Dalmatian with multiple convictions. That Wikifur page I linked is literally the first google result for Spark the Dalmatian, meaning there is absolutely no way Matthew could not have known about this.

(First pic sauce) (Second pic sauce)

The resemblance is uncanny. Not just because they're both Dalmatian characters, but because they both absolutely should never be around children. While I don't have hard proof that Matthew did anything inappropriate with kids (yet), I would say that given his incredibly creepy behavior with the original owner of the Patch suit (whom he knew was underage), as well as the fact that nearly all of Matthew's exes were 18-20 years old (at the time he asked them out), I wouldn't be shocked if he tried to at some point.

 

[Corn Flakes]

I was wondering about that. "Spark" has got to be one of those dime-a-dozen names for furries, so there was bound to be at least one more that shared the same species. That this one was a convicted pedo is just perfect.

 

[Pinball 2000]

I was wondering about that. "Spark" has got to be one of those dime-a-dozen names for furries, so there was bound to be at least one more that shared the same species. That this one was a convicted pedo is just perfect.

My best guess is that Matthew's logic is "Spark" was generic enough so he could lay low among furries without raising too much suspicion, and handwave anything about his past being brought up as "oh, that's not me, that's just some other dalmatian named Spark."

And to be honest, he might have been able to get away with it if he hadn't already drawn a shitload of attention to himself beforehand, especially since fursuits based on canines (dogs, foxes, wolves, etc) are so incredibly prevalent. With Dalmatians specifically, he could even potentially steal other people's art using the flimsy excuse of "well the artist didn't draw my spots EXACTLY spot-on, but it's totally me."

Considering Matthew is already known to have bought at least one piece of yiff of his character, I wouldn't be shocked if he looked up other dalmatian art and tried to do just that. Hell, knowing him, he could do the very reverse and claim his yiff is actually of Patch and not him, but that's just getting into weird theory territory without concrete evidence behind it.

 

[Wheezy Asthmatic]

Nobody's said it yet, so I'm just gonna say it; One of the funniest things about Matthew's attempts to reinvent himself as "Spark the Dalmatian" is that he never took the ten seconds to google that fursona name to make sure there weren't any other notable furries already using it. Because 1) there already is, and 2) they're a babyfur who has been arrested twice. The first arrest was for child molesting, and the second for child porn possession.

He literally could not have picked worse things to impersonate. So just to reiterate, not only did Matthew spend thousands to impersonate another furry's suit, but he then chose the same name as a sex offender Dalmatian with multiple convictions. That Wikifur page I linked is literally the first google result for Spark the Dalmatian, meaning there is absolutely no way Matthew could not have known about this.

View attachment 2292619View attachment 2292622
(First pic sauce) (Second pic sauce)

The resemblance is uncanny. Not just because they're both Dalmatian characters, but because they both absolutely should never be around children. While I don't have hard proof that Matthew did anything inappropriate with kids (yet), I would say that given his incredibly creepy behavior with the original owner of the Patch suit (whom he knew was underage), as well as the fact that nearly all of Matthew's exes were 18-20 years old (at the time he asked them out), I wouldn't be shocked if he tried to at some point.

I was dead ass thinking about this last night after my work out. Wanted to post to the thread but my fucking square brain headass forgot.