Hat tip to @nets_awesome for finding this:
http://clerk.house.gov/public_disc/financial-pdfs/2017/10016803.pdf
Official instructions on how this form should be used are here:
http://ethics.house.gov/sites/ethics.house.gov/files/2016 Instructions.pdf
As before, just going to drop the most interesting observations in one place.
Schedule A:
- The obvious takeaway is that Brianna has no assets whatsoever - or at least none worth more than $1000.
- A curiosity: apparently neither of the Wus has an interest-bearing bank account - or if they do, it doesn't have more than $1000 in it.
Schedule C:
- The Wu household brought in $217,490 last year, most of which was Frank's salary. Note that they don't have to report how much of the Patreon income is just their own money "recycled".
- "Honoraria" sounds bizarre but is apparently a legit way to report stuff like Patreon. The system was very much designed for people with real jobs.
- What on earth is the $12K in Relay.FM income from? Given that there are like 3 or 4 hosts to split the proceeds, does anyone really believe that those godawful podcasts are grossing $50K/year in ad revenue? Something is fishy there.
- Apple is presumably the Revolution 60 iOS income. Factoring in Apple's 30% cut of the revenues, this means approximately 200 people bought Rev60 at $6 apiece in 2016.
- "Future Network" is Wu's column in "Mac|Life" magazine. Example here:
https://www.pressreader.com/australia/mac-life/20170502/284189400634235
This column comes out monthly, so he gets paid about $200 for each one of these embarrassments. Looks like cronyism in action.
- There is no income reported for Rev60 PC version, which means either Frank screwed up filling out this form, or Rev60 made less than $200 total
Schedule D:
- Most interesting thing here is what's not present: a mortgage. This confirms that either they're renting that new house or bought it outright (which seems unlikely)
- It's also strange that John is a co-signer on the car loan when he has no income or assets. Why bother?
Schedule E:
Nothing here except they accidentally list John as a Novartis patent agent rather than Frank.
Start your digging, gentlemen!
http://clerk.house.gov/public_disc/financial-pdfs/2017/10016803.pdf
Official instructions on how this form should be used are here:
http://ethics.house.gov/sites/ethics.house.gov/files/2016 Instructions.pdf
As before, just going to drop the most interesting observations in one place.
Schedule A:
- The obvious takeaway is that Brianna has no assets whatsoever - or at least none worth more than $1000.
- A curiosity: apparently neither of the Wus has an interest-bearing bank account - or if they do, it doesn't have more than $1000 in it.
Schedule C:
- The Wu household brought in $217,490 last year, most of which was Frank's salary. Note that they don't have to report how much of the Patreon income is just their own money "recycled".
- "Honoraria" sounds bizarre but is apparently a legit way to report stuff like Patreon. The system was very much designed for people with real jobs.
- What on earth is the $12K in Relay.FM income from? Given that there are like 3 or 4 hosts to split the proceeds, does anyone really believe that those godawful podcasts are grossing $50K/year in ad revenue? Something is fishy there.
- Apple is presumably the Revolution 60 iOS income. Factoring in Apple's 30% cut of the revenues, this means approximately 200 people bought Rev60 at $6 apiece in 2016.
- "Future Network" is Wu's column in "Mac|Life" magazine. Example here:
https://www.pressreader.com/australia/mac-life/20170502/284189400634235
This column comes out monthly, so he gets paid about $200 for each one of these embarrassments. Looks like cronyism in action.
- There is no income reported for Rev60 PC version, which means either Frank screwed up filling out this form, or Rev60 made less than $200 total
Schedule D:
- Most interesting thing here is what's not present: a mortgage. This confirms that either they're renting that new house or bought it outright (which seems unlikely)
- It's also strange that John is a co-signer on the car loan when he has no income or assets. Why bother?
Schedule E:
Nothing here except they accidentally list John as a Novartis patent agent rather than Frank.
Start your digging, gentlemen!