I've got somewhat mixed feelings on this; 20-year-olds can be just as stupid and immature as teenagers since they still aren't fully developed yet mentally. You don't just hit 18 and suddenly know how to be a human being, and there are a lot of people up to like 23 who are going to have some really stupid opinions or still be parroting the same misinformation that they came to accept as normal. A lot of people (particularly from Eevee's generation; this is a continuation of my previous post on this subject) thought that getting someone drunk and having sex with them wasn't rape even into university; it doesn't make it not-rape, but just that ignorance is a very broad subject in that regard and a lot of young adults (or even old adults) failed to grasp just how bad it could be.
However, I think it's safe to say there's a very broad disconnect from someone who is fresh out of high school believing something like "I think animals might be smart enough to consent" or "cp should only be illegal for people creating it, not people collecting it" or "rape is only rape if someone says no; loopholes don't matter" in an ignorant, but largely theoretical sense vs. someone who is using that to justify their direct acts of bestiality or pedophilia or sexual assault. Eevee is no longer a teen or even a 20-year-old. Eevee and Glip are both into their thirties and, despite claiming publically otherwise, are still getting caught spitting up the same "theoretical" rhetoric they were spoon-fed from the child predators and zoophiles they hung out with back then and their desperate clinging to such a "theoretical" narrative for this long is enough for me to be suspicious about their reasons as to why. Namely, every time Eevee posts something about how banning CP is "bad for everyone" or whatever, it sounds less and less like a "theoretical" belief and more and more like justifying an act that has already happened.