[Citation needed]
Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believes Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. Filed 5 lawsuits and lost 5 lawsuits.
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
Marshall was talking to you before the night he got arrested for choking his wife, correct? You were talking to Marshall by phone and internet, right?
Is this in German?
Ja
By the way, given the posts you send to lolcows here.
Du schickst Snaps, werde wet, will mehr Bilder von dir would get you about the same response.
Last edited:
- Highlight
- #21,046
A guy commits a crime, gets arrested for said crime, pleads guilty to committing said crime, and serves time for committing said crime, and melinda claims that someone else is responsible for putting him in jail. Sounds about right. Fucking retard.
So how is a person supposed to defend themselves when Marshall is beating them and they can't overpower him? Just die while waiting for him to stop?
I don't think anybody puts this in question.
Everybody is qualified to make moral judgments based on their religion or ethical judgments based on their views. Your faith is the one true and special for you because it's, well, your faith... but for anybody else it's just another religion. Based on your faith you can reject those judgments but people have the right to make them.
Fixed that for you.
There is a big difference between an act that both parties consent to (which is in my opinion OK as long as both parties are having fun, are capable of consent and nobody gets permanently damaged) and a situation when one person is beating another person (which is in my opinion a big no-no).
Last edited:
As pointed out by nearly everyone in this thread, Melinda doesn't even follow the religion she professes she's a part of so I guess she's not qualified to know right or wrong.
- Highlight
- #21,049
This is retarded and you're both retarded for believing it.
If the Torah is the moral law of Elohim, and anything not mentioned in it doesn't go against Elohim's will, then does that technically mean child porn is not against the Torah?
I'm late but I'm curious, Melinda what are you talking about? How am I sabotaging you or anyone else? I don't call you names and I think I treat you pretty cordially, am I wrong? I don't agree with most of your beliefs/opinions but that doesn't mean I hate you. How can I stop sabotaging you? Please tell me.
I believe all video pornography using human beings (versus comics) is against The Torah because The Torah has clued shows that nudity was made for the purpose of Covenant. Showing one's nakedness outside of a Covenant is forbidden by The Torah. Prostitution, one night stands and sex outside of the intent to cleave to someone is forbidden.
There are books outside of the Masoretic Text, "lost" books I could say, that define what "nakedness" is. It mirrors instructions in Exodus for the priests to cover up. The point in all the instructions is that no one is to try to actively uncover others' nakedness. If someone accidentally falls over and you accident see up their skirt then it's not a direct violation, it's an accident.
Alsoif someone is working and they need to roll up their sleeves, or roll up their pants to their knees to swim in a lake, these are not violations of malice. They aren't doing it to seduce others. I happen to wear T-shirts if the temperature raises above 85 degrees and my long sleeve shirts would pose a risk of heat stroke. I'm not doing it to seduce, I'm doing it for safety.
But overall, The Torah commands full body covering, so porn is definitely out of the question.
The Torah also defines adulthood as age 20. Although it does not explicitly say that marriage under the age of 20 is forbidden, the Dead Sea Scrolls community suggested that no one marry until adulthood (age 20). So the removal of one's clothes for the purpose of sex before the age of 20 is not necessarily condemned, it just isn't a good idea. Girls and boys under the age of 20 lack the maturity and understanding that is required for marriage.
"Desire without knowledge is not good..." (Proverbs 19:2)
I have to disagree. The Torah says that righteous violence when provoked is acceptable in the following situations:
(1) Someone strikes you first (self defense)
(2) Your spouse commits adultery
(3) Kinsman Avenger
(4) Judges in the House of Israel decree death
(5) Judges in the House of Israel decree a flogging
Funny thing is, they still do public flogging in Central America. They call it "Golpiza Pública". An elder from the town marches down to your house, brings you to the town square and beats you with a large stick in front of everyone
Sounds good for society.
"Thou shalt not kill". The Torah forbids all murder as evil except:
(1) Kinsman Avengers
(2) Judges that decree death for a guilty party
(3) self defense to preserve one's life
In The Torah if you beat your slave so hard that even his or her eye falls out, you are required to free them. If that's the standard for a slave, how much more so one's friend, spouse, family member or fellow Israelite that you have hit? The Torah advocates kindness firstly.
The Torah does not condemn appropriate physical violence but it doesn't advocate that as the best course of action either.
No. Marshall and I did not start talking on the phone and internet until July 2016.
I'm not here to put his ex-wife (2012-2016) on trial. I just made a general statement according to my knowledge.
For one, she's not part of the House of Israel. I only judge those who are in The House of Israel. The Father is the one who judges the Goyim.
For two, you aren't Judges in The House of Israel. What you conclude about it all is irrelevant. I don't need to submit evidence to you.
It takes more than one person to get someone arrested.
What religion did I profess to be a part of?
Because of the pending litigation, I can't answer this question. I have a lot I could say but I can't say anything that would give the defendants an edge.
- Highlight
- #21,053
They already have an edge. They’re being sued by a moron who has, at best, a tenuous grasp on how the law actually works.
We already established we have very different moral and ethical standards.
Torah means to me as much as any other religious text - an important cultural and historical artifact, nothing more.
OK, self defense I can get behind, when someone's in actual danger of losing their life or suffer serious damage any way of preventing it is acceptable.
There are more civilized ways of dealing with this kind of situation. Violence is a caveman's solution.
I'm not opposed to death penalty for murderers. I am opposed to lynching and people taking justice into their own hands. If an educated judge can make a mistake then think what an angry "avenger" can do.
As I said, I'm not opposed to death penalty for murderers. I am, of course, opposed to justice system based on religion.
I am opposed to justice system based on religion. That being said, I wouldn't oppose humiliating ways of punishment (like public flogging or pillory - of course if the flogging doesn't cause too much damage) if I accepted the justice system. Wife beaters, muggers, violent thugs could use some of this.
Already said what I think about those.
We have different definitions of kindness. Mine includes not beating anybody to the point of their eyes falling out.
It's still, in my opinion, giving too much leeway in terms of violence, with all this avenger of blood idea for example. Investigation, trail, possible violence, never without the first two steps or with letting amateurs handle them.
Usually three people: the victim, the criminal, the one making the arrest.
Is this more stuff about the Book of Enoch? Because I like The Prophecy as much as the next guy.
Have any of you guys ever read any of the Charlie Parker novels by John Connolly, btw? Highly enjoyable, supernatural/detective story/horror/crime thrillers with a religious bent. If you liked The Prophecy, you'll love these novels. They introduced me to the concept of the Honeycomb World, which I find fascinating. He's built up quite a self-contained mythology over the course of the series, especially from book three or so. They're not just good thrillers, I think they actually qualify as good literature. Which is rare enough to be notable.
Thank you for responding but I think you're completely full of shit. I'm not trying to be mean to you by saying that, if I think someone's full of shit I'll just say it so we can figure it out and move past it. No need to take it personally, I just think you're completely full of shit.
I am not listed as a defendant, how am I sabotaging you? We're just having a bizarre conversation on this bizarre website.
You don't truly understand that the reason why you have a thread here is because of your own actions, do you? You're completely convinced that it's all someone else's fault that you have a thread here, aren't you? Let's look at the sequence of events:
1. Andrew Carlson is given a thread on KF, your name is mentioned in the OP because his obsession with you (among other things) is what brought him to KF's attention.
2. You take real issue with your name being listed in the OP, you contact Null trying to threaten him into removing your name from the site (bad move, when you're at the mercy of others it's always good to be nice/respectful/polite).
3. Null laughs at you (which is a totally appropriate response to your nonsense imo) and provides encouragement/feedback on how to more competently sue him. Based. AF.
4. Null not taking you seriously and giving you advice on how to more competently sue him really grinds your gears, lmao. BY ELOHIM'S PENOR, JUSTICE MUST PREVAIL, UNLEASH THE IFP REQUESTS, IT'S LAWYERIN' TIME!
5. You sue KF, not just once but like 2-3 times.
6. You are given your own thread.
I might be wrong about some of it, but that's really the basic gist of it, yes? If you notice, item #1 was the only event completely out of your control.
Andrew didn't just mention you, he also mentioned his other family members like his brother. Did his bro show up to start threatening Null? No! Because from #2 and on (basically like your entire involvement) you display a recurring, persistent lack of judgement and maturity.
You demonstrate a very unsettling level of pettiness and hostility. No one needs to sabotage you, Melinda. You do a better job of it than any of us ever could. If you had just pretended to be a big girl and not a little fruitcake with their panties in a twist then you'd never been given your very own thread (probably).
Stop existing.
Stop sabotaging her by not telling her to kill herself every post. Can’t you get it through your skull everytime you’re cordial she can’t sue you for damages?!?! Stop damaging her suit, you asshole! She can’t have judges look on here and see people just doing their own thing. It has to be critiquing her shitty book advertisements and calling Marshall a mouth breather. How else can she be a victim here!
You're not wrong about any of it.
She also has no actual answer to your question, so like magic, there *is* an answer but it's a secret and she can't discuss it because reasons.
Last edited:
K. So taking into context the rest of your post, the Torah also doesn't explicitly condemn sexual relations between adults and children. Does that mean it's okay since it's God's law?
So for the record. You have no evidence and lying like usual. Got it.
Similar threads
Jewish/Christian Cult Leader, Stalker, Ugly af, dogfucker, mayor of spitsville
- Locked
