Are you still going to be crowing about this when you get 0 winnings for "emotional damages"?
The default was entered, PERMANENTLY. The default judgment is simply an extension of that.
I'll give Mr. Joshua Moon his EYE FOR EYE as long as I can!
Fuck you Joshua Moon!
More about Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. In Virginia, it was only used 44 times.
Russo v. White, 241 Va. 23 (1991)Jan. 11, 1991 · Supreme Court of Virginia
McDermott v. Reynolds, 260 Va. 98 (2000)June 9, 2000 · Supreme Court of Virginia
Mahony v. Becker, 246 Va. 209 (1993)Sept. 17, 1993 · Supreme Court of Virginia
Jordan v. Shands, 255 Va. 492 (1998 )April 17, 1998 · Supreme Court of Virginia
Ely v. Whitlock, 238 Va. 670 (1989)Nov. 10, 1989 · Supreme Court of Virginia
Out of 5, I looked out, 5 were dismissed. Not good for Mel. I probably put in more effort into researching this than she did.
For anyone Tl;Dr-ing, look at the first case's second citation. It single-handedly kills her case.
She barely understands basic English, lets not mention law.
The first thing we covered in 1L was IIED
Man, she's so delirious that she can't even make actual responses and just laughs like a fuckin child.
Is this what you teach your children? Is this the kind of show you show them is fine to be? Almost makes me hope Marshall takes the kids tbh
EYE FOR EYE is exactly what I teach my children
can't prove damages to her book sales due
That's factually inaccurate. Since you posted my book here. But I'm not giving my battle plan away, you can wait for the hearing.
I've been trying to look for a case where a stay-at-home mother proved damages in a defamation case and all I've found is cases where a stay-at-home mother was taken to court over defamation. Also, Melinda will have a hard time proving that being a stay-at-home mom is actually a job. The only real source of income she has is given to her by the government. No matter what Null or anyone in this thread (or Andrew's thread for that matter) can change the amount that is given to her. She can't prove damages to her book sales due to the fact she went to a vanity publisher and it's easy to show the court how they set up their business practices.
Hell the idea she was defamed could also be wrong since no one in her community liked her prior to either Andrew's thread or Melinda's thread existed. She had no reputation to harm, and any harm that could be argued was done by her by her over sharing on the internet and being a very unlikable person. Offensive or otherwise unpleasant statements against her are not defamatory either.
You don't have to prove financial damages for IIED, that's what you're missing
Hold your horses, woman. You’ve still got to convince Jones about the damages. Or is this manic outburst part of your evidence that your fee fees are so hurt you compulsively have to come on here to unstably ree at the big bad mean kiwis. Most of which probably aren’t even aware your thread exists. That’ll show ‘em!
The default is entered, PERMANENTLY. Default judgment is simply an extension of that.
Null at any point can contest this. Hell, if he needs a lawyer there are a few that are more than happy to help him out
Joshua Moon is a coward
That's an awful lot of "ha ha you lost" from someone who hasn't even won yet.
The default is entered, PERMANENTLY
Default judgment is simply an extension of that
"College success" what college success? You've done nothing with your life other than to pop out retards.
Graduating is success in an of itself. I have used my college education every single day of my life, including knowing how to search case law and sue the dumbest person ever Joshua Moon
That's right YOU LOST JOSHUA MOON
Melinda here can't understand English common law, she has no hope of understanding French laws. They have some fun rulings. Like how communicating false information is not a wrongful act.
The French don't make the best choices when it comes to politics and law