I have a couple of questions if you don't mind me:I've tried to be charitable about interpreting this, but my charity runs out at some point. These assholes literally want to use evidence against Millo that he isn't even allowed to see.
This is fucking bullshit.
1) Given that the action seems like a civil suit (from reading the OP), are civil suits appealable?
2) If the answer to 1 is "Yes", would this constitute grounds for appeal? Or does the info contained in the document have bearing on that?
"It seems to me that I'm going to represent myself"
Did Milo actually file something to indicate that he will be a pro se litigant? Or is he just saying out loud that he may operate as his own counsel, so he can see the document and then bring in a new lawyer.
Because if he didn't, then the judge may not have assurance that Milo isn't just dicking him around.
But the thing is, is what the judge doing even legal? Is there any kind of precedent for this practice? And if so, then it may enlighten us to the judge's perspective and rationale.