And what about a woman or man who rapes a child of the opposing gender? Both of which do in fact occur.
Milwaukee County children's court judge arrested on child porn charges - Pedos? In my lgbtq activism?
- Thread starter Unpaid Emotional Labourer
- Start date
- Highlight
- #722
Recently I was taken a bit off guard to learn that "based" Camille Paglia is also a pedo (or at the very least a pedo apologist, which is just as bad).
Fuck this cunt. I should have been cynical enough to expect it by now: none of these "queer" intellectuals can be trusted, period.
Last edited:
For me, it’s about willingness and use of force, not the sex of the offender.
‘Raping’ a willing teen who’s 17 years and 11 months old is a legal transgression: very different to raping an unwilling prepubescent child using force, which is actual ‘rape’ in the classic sense.
Both of them are legally crimes, which is as it should be, as laws require a line to be drawn. But in terms of harm, there is a massive moral and ethical difference between the two.
Divisiveness aside, I stand by my prior comment that anyone who enjoys and disseminates the kind of child abuse material Brett Blomme is accused of sharing is deserving of a long drop with a sudden stop.
Child molesters automatically get protective custody because they tend to experience grisly accidents in gen pop. Additionally, well-connected people and celebrities don’t go into gen pop either, and this guy’s definitely connected.
Bullets or rope are cheaper and easier, plus you can raffle off the rights to press the button.
Last edited:
The issue people take with your prior statement is the exclusion of it being homosexual offenders. If you just said "I want to see every pedo skinned, dragged through salted lemon juice, and left on an ant hill", about 99.999% of people would agree with you.
Bosmadden
kiwifarms.net
Jensen is a radical leftist and extremist, deep green, environmentalist. However he is anti pedophilia which makes him 'controversial' among the LBTQ+ community.
Ponder this for a second, He wrote a book exposing the links between queer theory's foundational thinkers and pedophilia and it was pulled by his publisher for being 'hateful'.
Governments across the west have legally recognized this ideology. From employment regulations to family law queer theory has informed and guided legislative reform. But asking why we are pandering to an ideology that was dreamt up by practising pedophiles will see you censored or worse.
Is it a conspiracy theory to think that the end point of this is to be the normalization of child rape?
The law already takes account of this. You're dredging up a complete non issue because reasons?
As far as I can tell he's conflating two separate crimes and basically saying only homosexual pedophiles do the worst one. Only way it makes sense. Its... factually just wrong so confusing.
Last edited:
Bosmadden
kiwifarms.net
If she'd dropped an N bomb on twitter 5 years ago she'd be immediately cancelled, and likely have her house fire bombed.
But make an apology for raping children? Well that's fine, we all have our opinions.
Fuck this world.
'People', meaning those that would defend forcing an adult-sized erect penis into the colon of an terrified, agonised, screaming toddler?
Yeah, I'm not concerned if those 'people' have an issue with me judging them.
It comes down to consent. A toddler (regardless of their sex) can neither consent, nor endure these kinds of assault without severe physical and psychological damage.
Your desire to chop logic over the orientations of the offender implies that either you're a natural contrarian, or you have skin in the game when it comes to gays raping children.
I hope it's the former.
But I don't, because I know that the legal definition of 'pedo' and the practical definition of 'pedo' are two different things. As a species, humans have been biologically ready to pair-bond and reproduce from the age of about 15 onwards. I respect biology more than laws, but I still respect laws.
Your subtle conflation of toddler-raping aggressive gay males, with female teachers that consent to fuck aggressive straight students three days off turning eighteen, is beyond stupid. Stop looking for a wedge.
An interesting point. Let's see what Blomme is sentenced to, assuming he's convicted instead of dying suddenly and unexpectedly in a tragic tumble dryer accident.
You have more faith in 'the law' than I do.
No, I'm arguing degrees of crime.
Forcible violent sodomy upon someone who's physiologically, socially and psychologically incapable of consenting is different to accepting consent that can't 'legally' be granted despite biological maturity. And it's concerning that you're looking for a gray area on that position.
I stand by my prior posts that there needs to be a line in the sand. I'm happy with that line being 18; but given the greater harm gay pedos do, and their massive over-representation in child sex abuse cases, I support a quick execution and an unmarked grave for them.
Maybe I'm hyperbolic, but I'm doing the best I can at 0.15 BAC on a Sunday night.
Oh good now we've gotten to the part of the thread where people are arguing about what pedophilia "actually" is, neat
Yeah, classic signs of apologists entering the thread.
He's an idiot, I realize this now.
Unpaid Emotional Labourer
I’m Diana Moon Glampers. Let’s talk about equity.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Is there a legal definition of pedophilia? What purpose would it serve, you can’t charge people with being a narcissist, for example, so you can’t charge them with being a pedo. Similarly, the nonsense apologia that is “ephebophilia.”
What you can do is create tiers of criminality wrt sex crimes against minors, which identifies the intersection of violence and depravity of a given crime. The younger the victim, the more inherently violent and depraved. Other aggravating factors like inflicting injury, relative position of authority, degree of premeditation, occurring during commission of other crimes like robbery and kidnapping, etc.
And while of course laws vary in the US on this because they do on everything in the US, generally speaking that’s how these things are charged. So if we found the toddler sodomizer, he would be charged with a much more serious tier of offense than your theoretical 20-yo whose girlfriend turned 18 three minutes after he nutted.
Pedo is something we say to indicate we don’t want you around any kids at all, because we recognize that deviance and disregard for children’s boundaries deserves blanket protection, not negotiating with the deviant over minutiae like their exact tastes in perversions. I don’t care if your AoA is 4 or 14, you don’t need access to kids, because I’m pretty sure you’d still rather rape the 14-yo than an adult, and you telling me that nah I only want to rape 4-yos and would no sooner rape a 14-yo than an adult is not reassuring in the least.
What you can do is create tiers of criminality wrt sex crimes against minors, which identifies the intersection of violence and depravity of a given crime. The younger the victim, the more inherently violent and depraved. Other aggravating factors like inflicting injury, relative position of authority, degree of premeditation, occurring during commission of other crimes like robbery and kidnapping, etc.
And while of course laws vary in the US on this because they do on everything in the US, generally speaking that’s how these things are charged. So if we found the toddler sodomizer, he would be charged with a much more serious tier of offense than your theoretical 20-yo whose girlfriend turned 18 three minutes after he nutted.
Pedo is something we say to indicate we don’t want you around any kids at all, because we recognize that deviance and disregard for children’s boundaries deserves blanket protection, not negotiating with the deviant over minutiae like their exact tastes in perversions. I don’t care if your AoA is 4 or 14, you don’t need access to kids, because I’m pretty sure you’d still rather rape the 14-yo than an adult, and you telling me that nah I only want to rape 4-yos and would no sooner rape a 14-yo than an adult is not reassuring in the least.
How quickly you’ve moved on from ‘it’s wrong to single out homosexual pedophiles’ to ‘it’s idiotic to try to differentiate harm based on ability to consent’.
Just be honest and admit you’re a gay pedophile apologist.
the statutory rapist defender cries out in pain as he attacks you
why do rape defenders always compare adults raping teenagers to adults raping other minors and try to cast the adults raping teens as being unfairly persecuted? It's rape all the way down, stop giving cover to rapists.
Maybe you missed the part where I explicitly stated that I respect the rule of law?
Recognising different degrees of inflicted harm within a greater criminal offence is hardly being a ’rapist defender’.
Would you have sex with a willing 15 year old?
"i respect the rule of law i just wish that people didn't condemn the rapist who attacks a victim that's only one month away from 18 as hard as they do a toddler rapist"
newsflash bro RAPING MINORS IS BAD and it DOESN'T MATTER HOW OLD THEY ARE AT THE TIME. they are still rapists and they should both be treated as such, stop simping for people who attack teenagers
What a phenomenally stupid question to ask. I mean, not just stupid, but turbostupid. Yeah, thanks to your devious master plan you’ve exposed me as a closet pedo, you sherlockian genius.
Of course I wouldn’t, for three reasons.
The first being it’s FUCKING ILLEGAL, and the second being I’m in my late 40’s and have been happily married to a woman around my age that I met when I was 19 and in college. The third, of course, is that I’m not attracted to children.
And with those strawmen, I can confidently ignore anything you have to say going forward. Have a nice day.
Last edited:
Similar threads
*insert unoriginal Florida man one liner here*
- Poll
Twice convicted pedophile. Mad about his shitty 10yo suit + being a registered sex offender