Milwaukee County children's court judge arrested on child porn charges - Pedos? In my lgbtq activism?

[Unyielding Stupidity]

Is...is it just me, or is there some kind of Cassandra Syndrome at work where the people most loudly trying to bring attention to the problems brought upon by "current year" status quo mentality are themselves absolute lunatics? Like how so many of the people most loudly trying to point out the faults of transnational corporate globalism and how it undermines the rights and freedoms of peoples and nation states are also the type of people that go on insane tangent about how Happy Merchants are conspiring to enslave the White Race by stealing their foreskins?

That's just because the sort of people who are going to bring attention to these sorts of problems tend to be people who are usually invested in other strange theories. If you're the sort of person who's going to question established media narratives, you're also going to question other things that may or may not make you look like a lunatic. There's also the fact that people who are generally in support of the status quo are going to put the crazies up on a pedestal to try and label anyone that questions them as being similarly crazy.

 

[Fliddaroonie]

He's definitely into men his own age. You must surely see how he's pining after Patrick Stewart.

And Stewart is in turn, fucking a woman like 30 years younger than he.


McKellan is pals with Stephen Fry and bollocks deep in Stonewall. Sorrynotsorry, he is guaranteed to at least be into the same shit as Tatchell is re lowering the age of consent and the idea that older gay men grooming and fucking underage boys is somehow a gay rite of passage.

 

[StarkRavingMad]

Fuck.... them both. Don't tell me that the beta in the arrangement did not know what the butt fucker of a judge was doing. He fucking knew.

This is why I pulled funding from the Alphabet Community years ago (because I had a friend who died horribly in the early 90's). IMHO, they were NOT standing for equal rights when I stopped giving money to them... IMHO they were protecting the ever increasing deviants in grooming children. And that is just fucking sick.

Isn't it sad and disgusting with what's happened to the LGBT movement?

In Current Year (tm), I associate LGBT activism with child abuse. 10-15 years ago, it was about equal rights, equal opportunities, and individual autonomy. Now it's about "inject your kids with hormones that cause actual medical problems, or be called a bigot and have your kid be taken away from you!" and "If kids want to perform a strip tease at a night club, it's okay!"

Fucking sick, indeed.

 

[X Prime]

What happened to?

Don't you mean "always was?"

You just didn't know.

 

[Unpaid Emotional Labourer]

This is exactly the mindset globohomojudaism wants you to have. Discredit anyone saying actual problems with society by mentally conflating them with "nutjobs" talking about "conspiracy theories".

Exactly. Ask yourself why the most easily dismissed voices are magnified to be “the loudest,” while reasonable people are deliberately intimidated and silenced. There’s a reason the troons are absolutely determined to maintain the absurd lie that everyone who disagrees with them is either a Nazi or a dupe of Nazis.

When you make the price of speaking up the absolute ruination of your life, family, and ability to continue to support yourself financially, people who have these things to ruin are going to have a lot of overlap with people who are reasonable and can state things in a rational way. So they have to be stopped.

 

[MembersSchoolPizza]

Isn't it sad and disgusting with what's happened to the LGBT movement?

In Current Year (tm), I associate LGBT activism with child abuse. 10-15 years ago, it was about equal rights, equal opportunities, and individual autonomy. Now it's about "inject your kids with hormones that cause actual medical problems, or be called a bigot and have your kid be taken away from you!" and "If kids want to perform a strip tease at a night club, it's okay!"

Fucking sick, indeed.

I got fed up with the LGBT "community" about 15 years ago and told them to go fuck themselves. Without my moderating voice, apparently they descended into a horror show.

Sorry about that. Mea culpa.

...

I'm being facetious, but only kind of. Ten or fifteen years ago was when the "equal rights" part of the LGBT community basically "won". We got what we wanted - we can get married, adopt a kid, and not expect to get fired from our job if our sexuality comes out. That's really all most of us ever wanted.

But that's not what some people wanted. They were always there, in the wings. Everyone knew it. The people who were "radical queers" and shit. The ones who would pontificate about dismantling "heteronormative" values like monogamy and the age of consent. Most of us wanted nothing to do with them, and when the rest of us were still "aligned" with the greater community, mostly we managed to keep those fuckers from getting too much sway. You had the occasional humiliating TV interview or news piece where someone would dig up some alt-zine screed from one of these kiddlers and try to apply it to us all, but mostly we kept it sane.

Then, well... We won. And we drifted off to do boring things like go back to working our jobs and getting married and stuff. We were only a community because we shared a common problem and goal.

But some people weren't satisfied. They weren't done. They're now the core of the movement.

 

[Gehenna]

I got fed up with the LGBT "community" about 15 years ago and told them to go fuck themselves. Without my moderating voice, apparently they descended into a horror show.

Sorry about that. Mea culpa.

...

I'm being facetious, but only kind of. Ten or fifteen years ago was when the "equal rights" part of the LGBT community basically "won". We got what we wanted - we can get married, adopt a kid, and not expect to get fired from our job if our sexuality comes out. That's really all most of us ever wanted.

But that's not what some people wanted. They were always there, in the wings. Everyone knew it. The people who were "radical queers" and shit. The ones who would pontificate about dismantling "heteronormative" values like monogamy and the age of consent. Most of us wanted nothing to do with them, and when the rest of us were still "aligned" with the greater community, mostly we managed to keep those fuckers from getting too much sway. You had the occasional humiliating TV interview or news piece where someone would dig up some alt-zine screed from one of these kiddlers and try to apply it to us all, but mostly we kept it sane.

Then, well... We won. And we drifted off to do boring things like go back to working our jobs and getting married and stuff. We were only a community because we shared a common problem and goal.

But some people weren't satisfied. They weren't done. They're now the core of the movement.

I have mentioned this before. It's an endemic issue to the left who focus largely on collective action. Once the goal is reached, the primary pushers of that goal leave but the collective identity remains. Only now it's piloted towards whatever the next largest goal was.

The LGB movement is somewhat odd in that it... doesn't -have- a defined goal anymore. The trans movement comes closest but has too many internal detractors to be the root identity. So you have a lot of "rebel without a cause" types who want to stay in that collective identity and who get increasingly desperate to cling on to anything to give them a cause.

 

[X Prime]

The answer is the grift.

A lot of people make a lot of money by being very annoying agitators who don't actually do anything useful.

 

[JohnDoe]

The answer is the grift.

A lot of people make a lot of money by being very annoying agitators who don't actually do anything useful.

Booker T Washington called these grifters out at the turn of the century.

"There is another class of coloured people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs — partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs."

 

[AnOminous]

"If kids want to perform a strip tease at a night club, it's okay!"

More like "if a sick, twisted mother wants to pimp a little boy out to open pedophiles and literal murderers, you're a bigot if you think this is a problem."

 

[_giantmeteor2024_]

I got fed up with the LGBT "community" about 15 years ago and told them to go fuck themselves. Without my moderating voice, apparently they descended into a horror show.

Sorry about that. Mea culpa.

...

I'm being facetious, but only kind of. Ten or fifteen years ago was when the "equal rights" part of the LGBT community basically "won". We got what we wanted - we can get married, adopt a kid, and not expect to get fired from our job if our sexuality comes out. That's really all most of us ever wanted.

But that's not what some people wanted. They were always there, in the wings. Everyone knew it. The people who were "radical queers" and shit. The ones who would pontificate about dismantling "heteronormative" values like monogamy and the age of consent. Most of us wanted nothing to do with them, and when the rest of us were still "aligned" with the greater community, mostly we managed to keep those fuckers from getting too much sway. You had the occasional humiliating TV interview or news piece where someone would dig up some alt-zine screed from one of these kiddlers and try to apply it to us all, but mostly we kept it sane.

Then, well... We won. And we drifted off to do boring things like go back to working our jobs and getting married and stuff. We were only a community because we shared a common problem and goal.

But some people weren't satisfied. They weren't done. They're now the core of the movement.

What I find ironic is that I'm sure there are still people who are lesbian, gay and bi who face huge amounts of unnecessary discrimination in many parts of the US-- I'm talking the lower-income variety, particularly the ones living in very conservative areas, people who haven't harmed any children, haven't sexually assaulted anyone, are law abiding citizens--Even gay people in prison have a huge amount of issues to face, and many of them are in prison for petty crimes I'm sure. However, the alphabet soup doesn't seem to care about those people.

The po gay folk aren't work the time for the acronym activists- the tech-employed trans brigade and pedos are the ones with the big money.

I tend to see the gay rights movement as the BLM movement-- there are people who are legitimately concerned for the well-being of their group and have legitimate gripes. When I first heard the phrase "black lives matter", for example, I had no issue with it, because I couldn't disagree. I'm sure many people who actually marched for them thought they were doing the work of MLK and had no interest in supporting the troon brigade or in decapitating statues. I generally had no issues with gay marriage when the topic first came to public debate, since I knew there were a lot of legal repercussions in healthcare when a couple was "unmarried"... I could see all sorts of logical and practical reasons why a committed gay couple would want some equivalent of a legal marriage.

I suppose something similar could be said for feminism (although it's an amorphous category at this point). I want the right to work, own property, have job opportunities, avoid domestic violence, have access to affordable OBGYN care if I get pregnant, have some kind of law enforcement support available to me if I get assaulted. However, fringe elements have taken over "feminism", and pushed it towards the whole troon acceptance, "kink positivity" and "sex work is work!" propaganda-- which is diametrically against women's legal protections as a group. Even the whole "all men are rapists!" thing is unhelpful in terms of educating people about sexual assault, and offends women who love their fathers/spouses/brothers/sons. So many women cringe at the term "feminism", including myself, because there is this bizarre element that has taken over. Lower class women still face enormous amounts of old-world discrimination in terms of sexism, but the "movement" in academia and politics have left them behind.

What many of us naively didn't realize was that very wealthy multi-conglomerates and sociopathic billionaires with an agenda have co-opted the movements in order to push their "ideal vision" of the world onto others.

Who knows, maybe they're funding these fringe elements in order to destroy these movements from within. Although, I think the push to normalize pedophilia/prostitution by the conglomerates and billionaires is definitely profit-motivated, though. They've made a ton of money off porn, including harvesting user data, and they want more profit.

 

[7he47r0n]

Homosexuality is a sin for a reason. And you made it legal.

 

[AnOminous]

Homosexuality is a sin for a reason. And you made it legal.

It's been legal for forever. What was illegal was sodomy, not homosexuality.

 

[7he47r0n]

It's been legal for forever. What was illegal was sodomy, not homosexuality.

In your country, for sure, my good man. Also, my apologies for being too vague. I meant that they received, slowly but surely, every single right afforded to same-sex couples.

 

[Falcos_Commisar]

Booker T Washington called these grifters out at the turn of the century.

"There is another class of coloured people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs — partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs."

Goddamn Booker T was so fucking based.

Meanwhile, WEB DuBoise ran off to Liberia (lol)

 

[JohnDoe]

Goddamn Booker T was so fucking based.

Having clawed his way upwards with determination and hard work, he earned everyone's respect. And with that experience he because rightfully contemptuous of the lazy grifter jigaboos that surrounded him. You would have too.

 

[Jarolleon]

This is Salty Cracker and he's the next Ana Kasparian

It's safe to say normie dudebros are aware of the story now

View attachment 2010212

Salty Cracker's sub count is roughly the same size as The_Donald pre nuke, and Sargon's channel. Normie dudebros, or just the same audience following all 3?

Isn't it sad and disgusting with what's happened to the LGBT movement?

In Current Year (tm), I associate LGBT activism with child abuse. 10-15 years ago, it was about equal rights, equal opportunities, and individual autonomy. Now it's about "inject your kids with hormones that cause actual medical problems, or be called a bigot and have your kid be taken away from you!" and "If kids want to perform a strip tease at a night club, it's okay!"

Fucking sick, indeed.

Did they change, or did you just go down the rabbit hole?

It should be noted that the formation of the LGBTQwhateverthefuck shit as a "unified front" (in quotes because it's bullshit) and its use to possibly advance things nobody in their right mind wants (like opening the floodgates on pedophilia) is perfect for stoking division, causing polarization and putting people in positions where they feel they have to defend the indefensible, and it wouldn't be possible UNLESS the LGBTQ was in a minority.

Pedophile A snakes his way into a high position within the LGBTQ rat's nest. Basically has access to things like court records, purse strings, all of it. They then get outed as a pedophile. Instant, visceral response from the population at large. People inevitably make the association between homosexuals and pedophiles. This is the first big wedge - alphabet soup plebs are now on the defensive, and are compelled to "circle the wagons" because those BIG BAD HOMOPHOBES ARE COMING FOR ALL OF THEM. The pedophile now likely has a bunch of human shields and very likely a deadman's-fuse he can use to undermine people who try to cut him out like the cancer he is. "If you push me out completely and disavow me, I destroy you and leave you to the 'homophobes'".

Any LGBTwhatever now is faced with a dilemma, a rock and a hard place. They're usually reminded by other corrupt fucks in the activism stack that they're going to be "defenseless" if they cut against the grain, and their only chance is to show "solidarity" with whatever the corrupt fucks deem to be an acceptable narrative.

This is why "solidarity with X demographic" is fucking terrible, doesn't matter whether it's "BIPOC" or "LGBTQ" or whatever. The abandonment of the idea of the individual is one of the worst things to ever happen to society in general, the constant tying acts of an individual to an entire demographic shit is DESIGNED TO CAUSE THIS KIND OF SHIT. Putting people in a situation where they perceive their only option is to provide a "unified front" against the "other" (especially a "unified front" that happens to coalesce around someone that absolutely does not deserve any protection) is going to result in terrible shit. It alienates people from one another, abolishes the idea of the individual as an agent and elevates groupthink to dogma.

And now that the Left started this game, the right has to say shit like "Derek Chauvin did nothing wrong" to keep up.

And Stewart is in turn, fucking a woman like 30 years younger than he.


McKellan is pals with Stephen Fry and bollocks deep in Stonewall. Sorrynotsorry, he is guaranteed to at least be into the same shit as Tatchell is re lowering the age of consent and the idea that older gay men grooming and fucking underage boys is somehow a gay rite of passage.

So what you're saying is every "geek icon" was a thoroughly pozzed pedophile-enabling degenerate from the start? Was casting McKellen as Gandalf a subtle "Fuck You" to Tolkien's trad-cath inclinations? I guess that subculture was pure soy from the outset, and the 80's bullies were right. Perhaps it was a deliberate re-packaging of traditional European ideas and mythologies in order to co-opt them, to get people to think of them as mere tropes, just like Christianity incorporated Pagan holidays to more easily wipe out paganism.

Jensen is a radical leftist and extremist, deep green, environmentalist. However he is anti pedophilia which makes him 'controversial' among the LBTQ+ community.

Ponder this for a second, He wrote a book exposing the links between queer theory's foundational thinkers and pedophilia and it was pulled by his publisher for being 'hateful'.

Governments across the west have legally recognized this ideology. From employment regulations to family law queer theory has informed and guided legislative reform. But asking why we are pandering to an ideology that was dreamt up by practising pedophiles will see you censored or worse.

Is it a conspiracy theory to think that the end point of this is to be the normalization of child rape?


The law already takes account of this. You're dredging up a complete non issue because reasons?

Gotta love the irony. Write about how you literally want Uncle Ted style guerrilla warfare to be waged against the very concept of civilisation? A-OK. Expose pedophiles in the French intelligentsia? Hate speech!

In the same way the suffragettes paved the way for rad fems, or the civil rights movement paved the way for BLM.

The left keeps suffering from the same folly. The issue is not the Gay Rights Movement, the issue is that the left are collectivists. They create a movement with legitimate grievances, it gains traction and public support and eventually becomes a powerful entity for change. They then win their issue (Women voting, civil rights laws, gay marriage, etc). The problem is that when they win, the movement doesn't stop. The movement itself becomes a collective identity. The problem that stems from this is that as part of that collective identity they must ensure no damage to the identity occurs. And if a leader in said identity is revealed to have committed a moral wrong, their only real option then is to circle the wagons and bury it.

So why do I bring this up here? Well, those moral wrongs don't just disappear. Instead, as the original followers of the movement slowly peel away due to winning their battle, that leaves much less of a bulwark against the more radical elements of the movement that latched on. Sometimes, this leads to them, transitioning down a still moral path as the one's in charge aren't completely nuts. For this, you get the various waves of feminism of the last century. Sometimes, it skips straight into bad with the embracing of ghettos culture with the civil rights movement or the embracing of troons for the gay rights movement.

Inevitably, as each shrinking stage wins its battle and more peels off, it always descends into immorality. With surrounding left wing movements insanity amplifying the speed of decay. Hence why the Gay Rights Movement jumped straight from "Gays" to "troons". At that point, the feminist circle had already descended into open misandry, and the civil rights movement group was well on its way to descent.

TL;DR: The issue, in the end, is not the Gay Rights Movement. Its that the left simply cannot oust the degenerate bastards in its own groups, and a slow series of hijacks occur whenever any of their groups wins their initial goals.

I'd say that you only think their initial causes were righteous because your morality was taught by the Left of 20 years ago and you never quite escaped from the Boomer Truth Regime, but that would be a Foucault style argument and therefore hypocritical.

 

[Terrorist]

Isn't it sad and disgusting with what's happened to the LGBT movement?

In Current Year (tm), I associate LGBT activism with child abuse. 10-15 years ago, it was about equal rights, equal opportunities, and individual autonomy. Now it's about "inject your kids with hormones that cause actual medical problems, or be called a bigot and have your kid be taken away from you!" and "If kids want to perform a strip tease at a night club, it's okay!"

Fucking sick, indeed.

What happened to?

Don't you mean "always was?"

You just didn't know.

McKellan is pals with Stephen Fry and bollocks deep in Stonewall. Sorrynotsorry, he is guaranteed to at least be into the same shit as Tatchell is re lowering the age of consent and the idea that older gay men grooming and fucking underage boys is somehow a gay rite of passage.

Lowering the age of consent was in the original gay rights charters, and NAMBLA marched at the first pride parades. Trannies were involved from the beginning too (a tranny kicked off Stonewall). They moderated some of those positions in public for optical reasons (which pissed off some radicals who were too dense to see the strategy), but it's always what they were about. You'll see elder fags like Tatchell and Harry Hay go mask off and defend pederasty occasionally.

 

[Sinner's Sandwich]

a tranny kicked off Stonewall).

Bullshit. Troons love to rewrite history including Stonewall. It was actually Stormé DeLarverie - a black lesbian. Troons claim it was a trans "woman" who actually stated that he was a gay man and he wasn't even there at the time.

 

[JohnDoe]

Bullshit. Troons love to rewrite history including Stonewall. It was actually Stormé DeLarverie - a black lesbian. Troons claim it was a trans "woman" who actually stated that he was a gay man and he wasn't even there at the time.

There were no black dykes at Stonewall, it was a White male bar - mostly, there were Italians there too. I get why Kangz want to go with the (((revisionists))) and re-write history but its a factual matter that blacks couldn't even get out of Africa.