MLP Reviews -

[chimpburgers]

Guys, please, don't get angry at the oldfags. If we got them to stick around it'd be a great service to this subforum .

In any case, yes, the fact that he's a brony at all is pretty autistic on itself. What we're doing here is analyzing his autism.

Well said. I think the more we attempt to analyze his autism, the more lolcow worthy stuff we'll find. We've just scratched the surface.

 

[Teddy]

Here's his Equestria Girl review:

Complete with obviously traced title card!
View attachment 17635
View attachment 17636

Twilight looks more black than purple.. He can't even get skin color right when tracing. Geez.


Oh yeah, that movie sparked some of the most negative reactions I've seen a cartoon fandom have.

 

[chimpburgers]

Enter used a Josh scorcher clip at the beginning of this review.

16 minutes long and he actually critiques the animation.

 

[BlackFlag01]

I don't mind his MLP reviews.

His Putting Your Hoof Down review was pure autism though.

 

[TL 611]

Deleted a load of weenery. I'm currently trying to write up a set of rules for this subforum. It is fine to summarise an episode for the sake of clarity, however it is spergy as fuck (as well as off-topic) to get into discussions about the topic.

To be honest, there are no examples of the latter in this thread, but it's pretty prevalent in this subforum.

Also guiz, don't bait the trolls. This entire subforum is a bit of a laughing stock at the moment so you're going to attract weens.

 

[BlackFlag01]

I can smell the JULAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY from here.

 

[The Jumping Dwarf]

That's what I keep telling them.

It'd be nice if you could tell the chatbox to stop sperging over how terrible this subforum and the Tumblr one is, though.

 

[TL 611]

It'd be nice if you could tell the chatbox to stop sperging over how terrible this subforum and the Tumblr one is, though.

Chatbox will stop laughing at this place when it becomes less laughably autistic. There's a certain quality control this place lacks.

 

[The Jumping Dwarf]

We know. That's why we're trying to write rules.

A bunch of weens coming here to start shit doesn't help matters, though.

 

[BlackFlag01]

Yeah man that makes sense

 

[Swiggity Swooty]

Well since we're calming down I guess I should apologize for getting a little angry back there.
I try to stay calm in situations like this but today was kinda hectic.

 

[Cgame]

I don't think I did Mrenters essay on One Bad Apple enough justice by only making a small reference to it in the summary, because this essay really shows how little MrEnter understands psychology. Contrary to popular belief, not everyone is a psychologist, psychology isn't common sense, it is a science and should be treated as such. I am by no means a professional psychologist, but I do go to school to study it, so I do have a some what basic understanding of it. My review will be focused on his errors regarding knowledge of psychology more than the episode he is reviewing.

http://mrenter.deviantart.com/journal/One-Bad-Apple-s-Bullying-Portrayal-458818647

Spoiler: Long and Autistic Review of MrEnters Essay

Mrenter states that the episode is not just bad, but it is insulting because it doesn't consider the fact that people could have bad parents. This is a great example of Mrenter missing the point, the point of the episode was to tell someone that can be trusted about a bullying problem, and not necessarily a parent, the episode covers this by having one of the children suggest going to other people besides the parent. This is also seen during the moral of the episode where two of the children goes to the third childs parent, thus showing that you don't necessarily have to go to your own parents to resolve a bullyin problem.

Mrenters third paragraph isn't clear, the language he is using makes it difficult to determine what he is trying to suggest. I believe he is trying to say that the show isn't being realistic enough by having a situation where schools don't care about bullying problems. If this is the case, Mrenter is partially correct, but for the wrong reasons. While students seem to overwhelmingly believe that teachers are not doing an ideal job preventinh bullying, many teachers believe that they. It is not a case of apathy, but rather ignorance.

An idea that MrEnter fails to consider when consider when someone decides to bully is this person's mental state. Children are at risk of bullying other children when they themselves are subjected to bullying as well. What I mean by this is that bullies aren't bullies because they are sociopaths, but (in the case of Babs) are bullies due to the fact they have low self esteem and are more vulnerable to peer pressure (http://www.stopbullying.gov/what-is-bullying/roles-kids-play/index.html).

MrEnter also seems to believe that retaliating against a bully is the equivolant of defending yourself, its not, and it is something that you should never encourage your children to do as it can get them into trouble (http://www.cms.k12.nc.us/mediaroom/backtoschool/Documents/Bullying-Prevention Tips for Parents/Tips-What To Do If Child Is Being Bulliedpdf.pdf). Just to make it clear, the act that MrEnter believes to be "self defense" was sabotaging a float in order to cause it to crash into a lake, the characters even refer to this as revenge.

The biggest irony here is the harm that Mrenter has done by making this essay. He is actually promoting a mind set which reduces the likelihood that children who bullies will stop bullying. Not just because he is using the label of "bully," this would be too much of a nitpick if it was the only reason, but actively stating that a bully could not realistically realize they were doing something wrong. This encourages children to continue acting the way they have been acting since they would believe they could never change. (http://www.stopbullying.gov/what-is-bullying/roles-kids-play/index.html)

I am fairly certain I surpassed MrEnter in terms of being a sperg with writing this response. I also believe it is important for people to be informed about bullying, even if I come off spergy, try to consider the information I have provided. I am fairly certain that I did more research while writing this than he did writing this essay. MrEnter should seriously do some research before tackling a topic like this, especially if he has a broad audience who takes his word as law, it could lead to some unfortunate consequences if he continues.

TL;DR: MrEnter does not understand the psychology of bullying and should do some research before writing about a topic.

 

[NZDROW]

So the "super serial reviews" thing is actually just a cover up for you spergs to watch MLP?

I have no idea what the lot of the people who browse these forum really do, but that would seem to be the case with more than a few.

 

[CatParty]

maybe merge the content from this thread to the proper thread
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/my-little-brony-ii-the-cloppening.6186/

 

[HG 400]

Partially agreed, this is basically an MLP spergout thread. And partially disagree, since anyone moderating the brony thread would immediately delete this clopping faggotry for being too autistic.

All in all, send it to the brony thread and let Hellblazer or w/e turn it all to glue.

 

[Blindrainbow]

Come to think of it, why is this it own thread? From the way you people are describing them (Because no way in hell am I wasting my already worthless time watching a man be "deep" about ponies ) it seem like his regular reviews , why not post them in thread with his other reviews? or merge it with the brony thread like other CatParty suggested.

 

[Vitriol]

This thread highlights whats wrong with this whole subforum: you should be laughing at a grown man watching cartoons for little girls. Instead you complain he is coming to the wrong conclusions in his reviews.

if you genuinely can't see what's wrong in that picture you are well on your way to your very own thread.

 

[Cgame]

This thread highlights whats wrong with this whole subforum: you should be laughing at a grown man watching cartoons for little girls. Instead you complain he is coming to the wrong conclusions in his reviews.

if you genuinely can't see what's wrong in that picture you are well on your way to your very own thread.

If being a brony was the only thing lulzy with MrEnter, then he wouldn't deserve his own subforum. What I find to be the more hilarious part of him is the fact that he not only is a brony, but is also a psuedointellectual who over analyizes MLP and to comopound on this issue, the fact that his beliefs are wrong makes it more hilarious. Looking through his reviews can provide us with very revealing details about MrEnters personality.

 

[NZDROW]

If being a brony was the only thing lulzy with MrEnter, then he wouldn't deserve his own subforum. What I find to be the more hilarious part of him is the fact that he not only is a brony, but is also a psuedointellectual who over analyizes MLP and to comopound on this issue, the fact that his beliefs are wrong makes it more hilarious. Looking through his reviews can provide us with very revealing details about MrEnters personality.

He is vastly more than just another generic pseudointellectual brony though. He's got a ridiculous family history, he's pretty delusional about quality and his projects in general, etc. The brony bit is just something that complements the other parts of him.

 

[Blindrainbow]

This thread highlights whats wrong with this whole subforum: you should be laughing at a grown man watching cartoons for little girls. Instead you complain he is coming to the wrong conclusions in his reviews.

if you genuinely can't see what's wrong in that picture you are well on your way to your very own thread.

I find it funnier that people are paying him for this, there grown men paying another grown man to watch what is a intended to be a toy comical for little girls.