Manosphere Nathan Larson / Tisane / Lysander / Leucosticte - Creepy pedo "incel" LOLbertarian Putin and Breivik lovechild.

Will you vote for him?

  • Yes, I want to rape my little sister

    Votes: 24 18.0%
  • No, I want to remain a virgin.

    Votes: 109 82.0%

  • Total voters
    133

Dacarts

heartless wiatch
kiwifarms.net
Apparently he ran a wordpress blog called the dailyantifeminist but instead of focusing on general manosphere stuff he kept ranting about wanting to fuck children.
http://archive.md/y7Y1v
actually thedailyantifeminist is another person named tom grauer (and that link is to another guy named holocaust21) wordpress pedophiles all seem to link to each other so they are easy to be confused with each other

tom grauer had a youtube channel of many videos but i could only find and download four of them

edit: forgot his new blog https://triweeklyantifeminist.wordpress.com/
edit, 2: grammar
 
Last edited:

NimertiS

Chaotic Neutral
kiwifarms.net
New Leucosticte's post on incels.me

"I view white supremacy as just a means to an end. The goal is to maintain America's status as a first world country, rather than letting it degenerate into a third world country like Haiti or Zimbabwe, which wouldn't serve any race's interests (other than maybe whatever non-white despots took over). I have nothing against, say, interracial marriage; I think it should be up to fathers to decide which men their daughters should marry. Some non-white husbands might be better than some white husbands.

Allowing incestuous marriage is just a logical extension of that same general idea. It might be logical for a dad to decide, "My daughter would be better off of I impregnated her than if I left her to Jeremy Meeks to impregnate." Some studies suggest that inbreeding causes offspring to have lower intelligence, but Jeremy Meeks's offspring might not have high intelligence either. Also, maybe the girl's dad doesn't feel like hanging out with Jeremy Meeks at family get-togethers (if the dude would even stick around in the girl's life), or maybe he doesn't feel like having to help his daughter raise another man's bastard kid (if Meeks didn't hang around).

I'm just saying, let each father make his own decisions about what's best for his daughter, based on his own judgment, familial traditions, etc. Eventually, natural selection will encourage the spread of the best genes and familial culture, and cull the family lines of those who make poor decisions for their daughters. We tried the social experiment of letting girls make their own decisions, and it didn't work.

Some would say, "Just like familial decision-making needs to be centralized by letting the father choose what's best for his family, the nation's decision-making needs to be centralized in the national leader(s), who will choose what mating practices are best." So, e.g., a legislature might pass laws against incest, in an attempt to force patriarchs to do what's eugenic.

I think the arguments for a national authority to make those kinds of decisions for families are weaker, because individual families can build walls to separate themselves from other families, and each family has its own patriarch and its own goals (e.g. perpetuating the family line) that may conflict with those of other families. This is in contrast to the situation within a family, where the household's goals and resources are shared and females must look to the patriarch for leadership because they lack their own leadership capability.

Institutions like the church serve as a middle ground between having a centralized national authority, using police to enforce its laws; and devolving authority to individual patriarchs. The church imposes social pressure, which families are free to ignore if they don't mind losing out on the benefits of being part of the church. But it also provides a community for those who value the shared culture.

The way incels fit into all this is that you have a much better chance of getting pussy, especially virginal pussy, if fathers can take into account your less superficial characteristics and make a decision that they think is going to be in the long-term interests of their daughters. Once we conclude that girls can't make their own sexual decisions, and need their fathers to make those decisions for them, then it's easy to say that girls should be allowed to marry at a young age, because the father is going to be old enough that he's competent to give the okay. It gets rid of the whole argument, "But she's too young to make that choice" if we acknowledge that older females are incompetent to decide too.

White supremacy, by the way, doesn't have to be explicitly codified in the laws. It's not explicitly codified now, for example, but it's one of the unstated goals of, say, having an Electoral College that gives the white rural states more representation. Our system also gives wealthy candidates like Donald Trump a lot of advantages when it comes to getting elected, which helps filter out those who didn't have what it takes to be successful in business. (Curtis Yarvin suggests implementing neocameralism as a way of harnessing capitalist forces to more efficiently choose better leaders and give them incentives to look out for the long-term interests of the country.)

I'm not a wealthy candidate like Trump, but what I do have is a willingness to speak what I see as the truth, and I have nothing to lose. If all you have is one poker chip, you may as well go all in rather than cashing out and walking away with just that. Why be volcel and LDAR, instead of fighting for the right to jailbait pussy? I could focus on wealthmaxxing (and maybe I will shift my focus to that at some point), but even the wealthy aren't allowed to have jailbait pussy. And now we're getting to the point where the wealthy and powerful can't even hit on the females who work for them.

Virginia's 10th congressional district is the wealthiest district outside of Silicon Valley. My message to the powerful men of this district is, "Look, I know the establishment has been good to you in a lot of ways, giving you a seemingly comfortable life in a suburban neighborhood. But one thing you don't have is some virginal jailbait pussy, and I'm the only candidate who will stand up for your right to have it. And another thing you don't have is any control over your own daughter, to marry her off to a good man at a young age, so that when she's a teenager, she doesn't rebel against you by giving her pussy to a bunch of lowlifes."

To the middle class normie, I would say, "Look, I know this life is driving you nuts, where you work all day and then gotta come home to this harpy who bitches at you and won't even open her legs to you half the time. Meanwhile, you gotta pay for her student loan and credit card debt that she took on before your relationship, when she was getting fucked by Chad, who didn't pay her way for anything because that's a role reserved for her eventual beta hubby (i.e. you).

"Meanwhile, she's become arrogant because of her seemingly impressive career (which boils down to glorified paper-shuffling), and she's probably fucking any alphas she meets in her line of work. This shit is for the birds, man. We need a return to traditional sex roles, so that instead of having to put up with this, you can get some fresh jailbait in your life that won't give you such a hard time."

To the females, I would say, "Look, you know you're not happy being a Strong and Independent Womyn. You would rather have a man take care of you. Well, if you want that, then you need to accept male leadership and stop chopping off men's balls, because emasculated men are not going to be able to look after your needs effectively."

But my appeal is mostly to the men. When they lead, the females will follow, because that's all they know how to do. But females will never follow any man who isn't strong. The way you show strength is by setting a goal and then striving after that goal with determination and ingenuity. So in this case, we say, "We want jailbait pussy, and we're taking it, by whatever means necessary." Kinda like Lester Burnham in American Beauty, who quit taking any shit from his wife, and musclemaxxed to go after his daughter's friend. Except we should actually use the political system, or whatever we need to use, to take that jailbait.

One of the reasons I made Incelocalypse's slogan "The Day We Make The Jailbaits Our Rape-Slaves" was to put that on every page, so that it would be really unmistakable to even the casual reader of Incelocalypse what we were after. A political platform has to be simplified to its essence, and in this case, what it boils down to is an image of sliding into some virginal jailbait pussy.

That's our goal, and it's a worthy goal, because it's by doing that (and constructing the patriarchal structure that enables and supports that) that we build strong families and replenish the human race, so that all the other work of civilization can continue. It's an aspiration that's currently beyond the reach even of most normies, because of how degenerate our society has become. A 19th-century man would have said that it's absurd that one wouldn't be able to get some virginal jailbait pussy. He definitely would not have seen anything abusive or perverted about wanting it.

Even though jailbait pussy is off-limits today, the tantalizing nature of it permeates our culture, even in the term itself, "jailbait," suggesting it's something tempting, and in the magazines and porn sites about "teen" or "barely legal" girls. The idea of getting jailbait pussy has a strong emotional appeal to it, and emotions are what move the masses to political action.

In America, we're pretty much satiated with everything we could need to fulfill our animal urges, except one. Are you hungry? You can go down to McDonald's, or your favorite fast-casual place, and get the supersized value meal or whatever. The only thing you can't get with your money is jailbait pussy. What a tragedy, to not only be forbidden from fulfilling a natural desire, but to be shamed for even wanting it, and to be regarded as basically a rapist for even looking at an attractive young girl lustfully.

They're pieces of meat, dude; what's the big deal? Nothing wrong with salivating over something cooking that smells good, when you're hungry. (Thus, there's nothing really all that weird about checking out the barely prepubescent girls who are about to blossom.) And there's nothing wrong either with preferring to enjoy it while it's still fresh and hot, rather than leftover."

Treating plants and animals as property has given us an abundance of cheeseburgers, pizzas, tacos, etc. so that no one needs go hungry. When we treat girls as property, there will likewise be an abundance of pussy. Let's go forward and establish patriarchy."
 

Fangsofjeff

♡ meow vey ♡
kiwifarms.net
New Leucosticte's post on incels.me

"I view white supremacy as just a means to an end. The goal is to maintain America's status as a first world country, rather than letting it degenerate into a third world country like Haiti or Zimbabwe, which wouldn't serve any race's interests (other than maybe whatever non-white despots took over). I have nothing against, say, interracial marriage; I think it should be up to fathers to decide which men their daughters should marry. Some non-white husbands might be better than some white husbands.

Allowing incestuous marriage is just a logical extension of that same general idea. It might be logical for a dad to decide, "My daughter would be better off of I impregnated her than if I left her to Jeremy Meeks to impregnate." Some studies suggest that inbreeding causes offspring to have lower intelligence, but Jeremy Meeks's offspring might not have high intelligence either. Also, maybe the girl's dad doesn't feel like hanging out with Jeremy Meeks at family get-togethers (if the dude would even stick around in the girl's life), or maybe he doesn't feel like having to help his daughter raise another man's bastard kid (if Meeks didn't hang around).

I'm just saying, let each father make his own decisions about what's best for his daughter, based on his own judgment, familial traditions, etc. Eventually, natural selection will encourage the spread of the best genes and familial culture, and cull the family lines of those who make poor decisions for their daughters. We tried the social experiment of letting girls make their own decisions, and it didn't work.

Some would say, "Just like familial decision-making needs to be centralized by letting the father choose what's best for his family, the nation's decision-making needs to be centralized in the national leader(s), who will choose what mating practices are best." So, e.g., a legislature might pass laws against incest, in an attempt to force patriarchs to do what's eugenic.

I think the arguments for a national authority to make those kinds of decisions for families are weaker, because individual families can build walls to separate themselves from other families, and each family has its own patriarch and its own goals (e.g. perpetuating the family line) that may conflict with those of other families. This is in contrast to the situation within a family, where the household's goals and resources are shared and females must look to the patriarch for leadership because they lack their own leadership capability.

Institutions like the church serve as a middle ground between having a centralized national authority, using police to enforce its laws; and devolving authority to individual patriarchs. The church imposes social pressure, which families are free to ignore if they don't mind losing out on the benefits of being part of the church. But it also provides a community for those who value the shared culture.

The way incels fit into all this is that you have a much better chance of getting pussy, especially virginal pussy, if fathers can take into account your less superficial characteristics and make a decision that they think is going to be in the long-term interests of their daughters. Once we conclude that girls can't make their own sexual decisions, and need their fathers to make those decisions for them, then it's easy to say that girls should be allowed to marry at a young age, because the father is going to be old enough that he's competent to give the okay. It gets rid of the whole argument, "But she's too young to make that choice" if we acknowledge that older females are incompetent to decide too.

White supremacy, by the way, doesn't have to be explicitly codified in the laws. It's not explicitly codified now, for example, but it's one of the unstated goals of, say, having an Electoral College that gives the white rural states more representation. Our system also gives wealthy candidates like Donald Trump a lot of advantages when it comes to getting elected, which helps filter out those who didn't have what it takes to be successful in business. (Curtis Yarvin suggests implementing neocameralism as a way of harnessing capitalist forces to more efficiently choose better leaders and give them incentives to look out for the long-term interests of the country.)

I'm not a wealthy candidate like Trump, but what I do have is a willingness to speak what I see as the truth, and I have nothing to lose. If all you have is one poker chip, you may as well go all in rather than cashing out and walking away with just that. Why be volcel and LDAR, instead of fighting for the right to jailbait pussy? I could focus on wealthmaxxing (and maybe I will shift my focus to that at some point), but even the wealthy aren't allowed to have jailbait pussy. And now we're getting to the point where the wealthy and powerful can't even hit on the females who work for them.

Virginia's 10th congressional district is the wealthiest district outside of Silicon Valley. My message to the powerful men of this district is, "Look, I know the establishment has been good to you in a lot of ways, giving you a seemingly comfortable life in a suburban neighborhood. But one thing you don't have is some virginal jailbait pussy, and I'm the only candidate who will stand up for your right to have it. And another thing you don't have is any control over your own daughter, to marry her off to a good man at a young age, so that when she's a teenager, she doesn't rebel against you by giving her pussy to a bunch of lowlifes."

To the middle class normie, I would say, "Look, I know this life is driving you nuts, where you work all day and then gotta come home to this harpy who bitches at you and won't even open her legs to you half the time. Meanwhile, you gotta pay for her student loan and credit card debt that she took on before your relationship, when she was getting fucked by Chad, who didn't pay her way for anything because that's a role reserved for her eventual beta hubby (i.e. you).

"Meanwhile, she's become arrogant because of her seemingly impressive career (which boils down to glorified paper-shuffling), and she's probably fucking any alphas she meets in her line of work. This shit is for the birds, man. We need a return to traditional sex roles, so that instead of having to put up with this, you can get some fresh jailbait in your life that won't give you such a hard time."

To the females, I would say, "Look, you know you're not happy being a Strong and Independent Womyn. You would rather have a man take care of you. Well, if you want that, then you need to accept male leadership and stop chopping off men's balls, because emasculated men are not going to be able to look after your needs effectively."

But my appeal is mostly to the men. When they lead, the females will follow, because that's all they know how to do. But females will never follow any man who isn't strong. The way you show strength is by setting a goal and then striving after that goal with determination and ingenuity. So in this case, we say, "We want jailbait pussy, and we're taking it, by whatever means necessary." Kinda like Lester Burnham in American Beauty, who quit taking any shit from his wife, and musclemaxxed to go after his daughter's friend. Except we should actually use the political system, or whatever we need to use, to take that jailbait.

One of the reasons I made Incelocalypse's slogan "The Day We Make The Jailbaits Our Rape-Slaves" was to put that on every page, so that it would be really unmistakable to even the casual reader of Incelocalypse what we were after. A political platform has to be simplified to its essence, and in this case, what it boils down to is an image of sliding into some virginal jailbait pussy.

That's our goal, and it's a worthy goal, because it's by doing that (and constructing the patriarchal structure that enables and supports that) that we build strong families and replenish the human race, so that all the other work of civilization can continue. It's an aspiration that's currently beyond the reach even of most normies, because of how degenerate our society has become. A 19th-century man would have said that it's absurd that one wouldn't be able to get some virginal jailbait pussy. He definitely would not have seen anything abusive or perverted about wanting it.

Even though jailbait pussy is off-limits today, the tantalizing nature of it permeates our culture, even in the term itself, "jailbait," suggesting it's something tempting, and in the magazines and porn sites about "teen" or "barely legal" girls. The idea of getting jailbait pussy has a strong emotional appeal to it, and emotions are what move the masses to political action.

In America, we're pretty much satiated with everything we could need to fulfill our animal urges, except one. Are you hungry? You can go down to McDonald's, or your favorite fast-casual place, and get the supersized value meal or whatever. The only thing you can't get with your money is jailbait pussy. What a tragedy, to not only be forbidden from fulfilling a natural desire, but to be shamed for even wanting it, and to be regarded as basically a rapist for even looking at an attractive young girl lustfully.

They're pieces of meat, dude; what's the big deal? Nothing wrong with salivating over something cooking that smells good, when you're hungry. (Thus, there's nothing really all that weird about checking out the barely prepubescent girls who are about to blossom.) And there's nothing wrong either with preferring to enjoy it while it's still fresh and hot, rather than leftover."

Treating plants and animals as property has given us an abundance of cheeseburgers, pizzas, tacos, etc. so that no one needs go hungry. When we treat girls as property, there will likewise be an abundance of pussy. Let's go forward and establish patriarchy."
HAAAAHAHAHA, holy shit. He's actually running on a platform of child rape and nothing else. I really hope he gets a TV interview or something. This shit is hilarious, I can't believe he's a real person.

By the way, that's not his only new post. https://incels.me/members/leucosticte.3362/

actually thedailyantifeminist is another person named tom grauer (and that link is to another guy named holocaust21) wordpress pedophiles all seem to link to each other so they are easy to be confused with each other

tom grauer had a youtube channel of many videos but i could only find and download four of them

edit: forgot his new blog https://triweeklyantifeminist.wordpress.com/
edit, 2: grammar
Does he have a thread? I think he needs a thread. He's just as batshit as Larson and unsurprisingly enough they're friends. http://archive.md/LYgkb

Amusing quote from Larson from that archive.md link I posted:
I propose that an amendment be added to the Bill of Rights stating simply:

Section 1. The right of men to (a) put their penises, tongues, fingers, and other bodily implements of sexual penetration anywhere they want, at whatever time they want, so long as in doing so they do not violate the property rights of other men; and to (b) compel their wives’ compliance in fulfilling any other sexual wishes, desires, or fantasies they may have; shall not be infringed.

Section 2. Men shall have power to enforce this article by physically disciplining their wives.

When this amendment is passed, the Commonwealth will become a paradisiacal wonderland of sexual penetration opportunities, allowing men who have the means to do so, to fulfill some of their fondest fantasies. The government, at least, will not get in the way. No longer will it be necessary for so many men to close their eyes and imagine, while banging their post-prime wives, that they’re with a seventh-grade cheerleader. They’ll be actually able to go out and approach that girl’s father and ask for her hand in marriage.

That is, unless when he goes over there, her father doesn’t put his arm around her, glance at her fondly (and receive a happy and adoringly worshipful look in response, from the girl who luxuriates in his fatherly leadership, protection and love) and say, “Sorry, she’s already taken.” Because on the day this amendment passes, there will be a free-for-all of men finally making all their dreams realities. Formerly recalcitrant wives will undergo an amazing change of attitude and personality as they are spanked into submission with their husbands’ demands for anal sex, ass licking, or whatever else they want. They will be broken down into the most abject submission and, at their husbands’ insistence, like little kids will say, “Yes, daddy!” instead of resisting any longer.

(And those wives will be happier because of it, because the life of a slave of a powerful man is one that all women secretly crave. They want to be like Cinderella with her handsome prince, or Anastasia Steele with her Christian Grey. Polygyny will enable more women to live that kind of life.) Even if she’s a dignified queen outside of the bedroom, she can still take pride in doing what women (properly trained and motivated) do best, which is pamper her husband, and take joy in being utterly dominated by him both in the bedroom and elsewhere.

Daughters will spend more quality time with their fathers, as he becomes her new bedmate in her pink-colored room, waking up every day to the sight of sparkly unicorns all around him, before rolling over to look at the beautiful, young princess beside him, and touching her to make sure she’s real because this all seems like the “happily-after-ever” ending to a fairy tale, rather than reality. (Actually, most fathers wanting such a relationship would probably opt to bring their daughter into their own bedroom, and thus into the world of adults, rather than going into the world of childhood to be with her; but I just wrote the scenario in that way in an effort to be poetic.)

For many men of the 31st district, it has probably been a long time since they had teenage pussy, but I’m sure it comes to mind often, or else “teen” wouldn’t be among PornHub’s most-searched terms. Look around sometime, at a mall or other place where there are young people present, and decide for yourself whether you would like to live in a world in which you can leverage your hard work and success in life, and the confidence that has come with age, to attract the kind of woman you deserve.

When polygyny is legalized, you needn’t break up the family you have, in order to have the freedom to, for the first time in so many long years, finally fulfill that fantasy of sliding into the tight pussy of a giggly, fun-loving teenage girl, and feeling her warm, passionate kisses on your neck and chest, and her hands caressing your back, as you thrust ever more deeply into her, going in and out (to enjoy that sensation of sliding back into her pussy all over again, just for the sake of reliving that glorious moment of first penetration) and all around, as your whim dictates; while her vagina clenches you ever more tightly with the mounting excitement expressed in her sighs and moans of delight, until finally you feel her body contract around yours with the kind of tightness that only the pussy of a young girl in the flower of her youth can muster, as she cries out loudly enough to inform the neighbors of your accomplishment at the moment of simultaneous orgasm.
 
Last edited:

Fangsofjeff

♡ meow vey ♡
kiwifarms.net
Some archived pages and screenshots from childwiki:

kids should have the right to vote
http://archive.md/bnuIA
tldr.png


kids should have the right to drink
alc.png


kids should have the right to drive (already posted before, but whatever)
gre.png


kids should have the right to work
wooo.png


kids should have the right to smoke weed
canna (1).png


kids should be allowed to ruin their lives
http://archive.md/pKYFn
probb.png
 
Last edited:

Fangsofjeff

♡ meow vey ♡
kiwifarms.net
How can this dude post this kinda shit without getting v&? And before any of you say "his views may be exceptional but they're not illegal", he linked to fucking CP. I'm sure he's in 755636753788457328 different watchlists at this point but that's not enough. Are the feds seriously waiting until he finally rapes a kid? Disgusting.
It might be because nudist videos aren't technically CP. Nudist stuff might be all he was linking on his site, I dunno.

He thinks that the only people who aren't cool with pedophiles are jealous old women.
ridi.png
 

Figuratively Stalin

kiwifarms.net
It might be because nudist videos aren't technically CP. Nudist stuff might be all he was linking on his site, I dunno.

He thinks that the only people who aren't cool with pedophiles are jealous old women.View attachment 464715
"lol these cucks at cucktears think we're sick pedos for jerking it to nude underage girls, lol they're just roasties who are jealous of jailbait, support me guys, look, incel whatevercel redpill femoids cuck cuck cuck, im one of you guys i swear!!" He's trying so hard to fit in with the incels it's not funny. He's desperate for attention and supporters.
 

GethN7

True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
I finally remembered an interesting fact about this guy.

Back when I first took over the Tropes Wiki on Wikia (before I rebranded it and replaced it's content base), it was run by some libertarian guy named Anime Addict, believe he was Romanian.

Anyway, around the time I got the keys to the place (he left it leaderless long enough I could apply to become the new founder), I looked into the guy.

Nathan Larson was a member of some of the same circles this guy ran in.

I didn't really look that deeply into Nathan at the time, I was more concerned about Anime Addict's apathetic approach to copyright law and letting some genuine creeps run wild while he ran things, but now that the overlap between the two is a little clearer I'm more grateful than ever I started cleaning house.
 

Fangsofjeff

♡ meow vey ♡
kiwifarms.net
Podawful interviewed him.

Edit: New thread about Nathan Larson's shenanigans. Most incels still think he's an idiot. Marjan is still sticking up for him and wants to help him make a new incelocalypse type of forum.
https://incels.me/threads/the-nathan-larson-scam-or-why-you-cant-trust-foreign-media.49961
https://archive.fo/8wFQn

The latest entry on Marjan's blog talks about said forum.
https://caamib.wordpress.com/2018/06/07/a-poll-on-the-forums-site-and-looking-for-ideas-on-our-name/
https://archive.fo/877Y5

This is unrelated to Larson, but Marjan has also created a new subreddit with himself and fschmidt as moderators.
https://www.reddit.com/r/incelconversations/
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MarineTrainedTard

You got the COVID! Coronavirus, big time!
kiwifarms.net
I've always laughed at people who advocate for private police. "Someone stole your car? We'll get it back for you for $999.99! Oh, you can't afford that? lol get wrekt poorfag"

Regardless, it's very clear that everything this guy says is in pursuit of his "right" to fuck children. (:_(