the coronavirus breakout. It’s on the Happenings box on the home page
I'm such an idiot, I was afraid to ask the same question. Luckily internet shutins will be the only survivors, we should start organizing the new society posthaste.
the coronavirus breakout. It’s on the Happenings box on the home page
Because some of those are meant only for True and Honest fans. They used to not be visible to non-paying plebes.Why arent I able to use all the reaction options?
(And what is the horrifying react image? A metal bar?)
And the metal bar is a penis piercing.
I googled what on earth that looks like, and behold! I found a thread from our dear leader!correction: taint piercing
Fixed this for you buddy, I would tag everyone else but I'm sure they'll never forget it. The fact an old thread of mine can horrify users after so long makes me happy, disturbing people on a site full of autistic faggots truly is my pathetic calling. never forget that destiny is a squirter.correction: rejected infected taint piercing
But then how will we know Amber was indeed fat and not worth having sex with in 2019??Former reddit tards STOP commenting on old threads when it's completely irrelevant. It just bumps it to the top and no one cares what you have to say about a year old alr vlog.
Former reddit tards STOP commenting on old threads when it's completely irrelevant. It just bumps it to the top and no one cares what you have to say about a year old alr vlog.
I'm seeking clarification to avoid future fuckery. Does reacting to a post within a thread bump said thread or does it simply notify the author of the reaction? Would that notification be considered a violation of netiquette rule 4 within the context of this forum? Clearly, the best practice is to never comment on old threads (duh) but I'd like to understand the impact reactions have on thread visibility, if any.
I know it wouldn't make sense to resurrect a dead thread, so I suppose if we have a question about old content, should we quote the post/content in the main thread and attach the question/take we might have?
What if we make a thread for questions about old news/wanting to talk about old stuff? At the same time, though, I doubt there is sufficient demand for that...
Imo that counts as cow tipping and I think the treatment of the animals, while not ideal, gets blown way out of proportion. Amber is most certainly a lazy pet owner but it's glaringly obvious that she isn't kicking or hitting her pets. They are kept fed and seem to get a reasonable amount of attention. I don't want to get on a soapbox but it is not our place to interfere in the life of an exceptional and (relatively) harmless lolcow that we gossip about on an online forum. If she were putting someone else in some kind of grave danger and no one else was doing anything about it, then maaaybe, but interfering in Amberlynn's life just to virtue signal is something people from FB and Reddit do. So no, we are not "allowed to get animal control called." Lurk moar.I have a serious question
Are we allowed to get animal control called because of how they treat Twinkie? That house is not good for a dog to live in and there's evidence they treat Twinkie like shit