Nicholas J. Fuentes / America First / "Nick the Knife" - Catboy Aficianado, Latinx White Nationalist, Manlet, Trump Dickrider, Age of Consent Abolitionist

[BlueSpark]

then clearly other platforms without censors would see a massive influx of users. Right?

What other platforms? There aren't any that have anywhere close to the infrastructure and financial incentives as mainstream platforms like Youtube, Twitch and twitter. And the leftist tech companies, media, financial institutions will shut down companies that try to build them (as they did with Parler).

 

[BiggieSlonkLoyalist]

He's not entirely incorrect within the "Age of Consent being a feminist construct" thing, because feminists were the spearhead of legislation for it, but it's such a bizarre thing to mention if you're right wing at all. I think it stems from this idea that girls below 18 aren't "riding the cock carousel" and therefore younger girls are the only chance at getting a virgin gf

Why do all reactionaries think women only start to lose their virginity when they go to college? It's not 1960 anymore. They're all completely delusional and naive about people's experiences.

I don't really buy the "Nick is a homosexual" stuff, but I do think the age of consent talk is really suspect, it's such a bizarre hill to die on for anyone unless you have some personal stake in it, just like all the weirdos who vehemently defend lolicon but totally don't jerk it to it.

It's not a throwaway comment from him, he keeps talking about it and doubling down and gets reinforcement for his views from his followers. Clear to see why he has no problem with the Chaggot situation. He's spreading the idea that its okay to have sex with and marry girls that have fully developed bodies by age 13 because then they're post pubescent. They're fully developed and "not children".

They also have this delusion that everybody in the past was marrying teenage girls which is completely false and easy to disprove if you do the research, but all they all jerk each other off with fake graphs and stupid anecdotes that are exceptions to the rule.

This newspaper segment is from the early 60s. The guy in the article would sit in his car opposite the street where the girl would get off the school bus and watch her. One day he went up to her and took her to the ice cream parlor. She had just turned 14. The parents didn't agree to their relationship and had him arrested many times but he frequently skipped bail or broke out of whatever place jail or institution he was sentenced to and went on the lam with the girl from state to state. They were fugitives for the duration of their sham marriage that they had in Vegas. The marriage didn't last because he was revealed to a conman, a bum, and a drunk that put their newborn baby in a footlocker. Nick would have defended this marriage as based and red pilled.

I'm getting tired of this "underage girls with older adult men as having been socially acceptable until the feminists ruined it" myth. They're creeps with a sexual disorder. Pedophile, ephebophilia, and hebephilia have the philia suffix in common because theyre abnormal sexual fixations for men past a certain age. Fuck these sickos, call them out for what they are.

 

[gaystoner]

I'm getting tired of this "underage girls with older adult men as having been socially acceptable until the feminists ruined it" myth. They're creeps with a sexual disorder. Pedophile, ephebophilia, and hebephilia have the philia suffix in common because theyre abnormal sexual fixations for men past a certain age. Fuck these sickos, call them out for what they are.

This is the same argument homosexual pedophiles make.

 

[anuscabbage12]

Why do all reactionaries think women only start to lose their virginity when they go to college? It's not 1960 anymore. They're all completely delusional and naive about people's experiences.

It's not a throwaway comment from him, he keeps talking about it and doubling down and gets reinforcement for his views from his followers. Clear to see why he has no problem with the Chaggot situation. He's spreading the idea that its okay to have sex with and marry girls that have fully developed bodies by age 13 because then they're post pubescent. They're fully developed and "not children".

They also have this delusion that everybody in the past was marrying teenage girls which is completely false and easy to disprove if you do the research, but all they all jerk each other off with fake graphs and stupid anecdotes that are exceptions to the rule.

View attachment 2261743View attachment 2261775This newspaper segment is from the early 60s. The guy in the article would sit in his car opposite the street where the girl would get off the school bus and watch her. One day he went up to her and took her to the ice cream parlor. She had just turned 14. The parents didn't agree to their relationship and had him arrested many times but he frequently skipped bail or broke out of whatever place jail or institution he was sentenced to and went on the lam with the girl from state to state. They were fugitives for the duration of their sham marriage that they had in Vegas. The marriage didn't last because he was revealed to a conman, a bum, and a drunk that put their newborn baby in a footlocker. Nick would have defended this marriage as based and red pilled.

I'm getting tired of this "underage girls with older adult men as having been socially acceptable until the feminists ruined it" myth. They're creeps with a sexual disorder. Pedophile ephebophilia and hebephilia have the philia suffix in common because theyre abnormal sexual fixations for men past a certain age. Fuck these sickos, call them out for what they are.

One other thing as well, is the Hajnal line, which is were the modern western world/civilization comes from, which is birth/marriage patterns

Inside the Blue and Red lines, and note this is before feminism, starting around the 1500s the west of the red line, the average age of marriage was 23 or older for women and 26 or older for men.

West of this line, the average age of marriage for women was 23 or older,[19] men 26, spouses were relatively close in age,[20] a substantial number of women married for the first time in their thirties and forties, and 10% to 20% of adults never married.[21][22][23] East of the line, the mean age of both sexes at marriage was earlier, spousal age disparity was greater and marriage more nearly universal. Subsequent research has amply confirmed Hajnal's continental divide, and what has come to be known as the 'Western European marriage pattern', although historical demographers have also noted that there are significant variations within the region; to the west of the line, about half of all women aged 15 to 50 years of age were married while the other half were widows or had never married; to the east of the line, about seventy percent of women in that age bracket were married while the other thirty percent were widows or nuns.[24] That a number of widows remarried also kept the age of marriage comparatively high;[25] if women married for the first time at 21 years of age and twenty percent of all weddings featured a widowed bride and the average age of remarriage was forty years then the average marriage age for women would be 24.8 years: (21 × 0.8 ) + (40 × 0.2) = 24.8.[26] The proportion of marriages that were remarriages (widows and/or widowers marrying again) in the late 1500s was as high as thirty percent; that proportion had fallen to just over eleven percent in the early 1800s.[27]

While the average age at first marriage had climbed to 25 for women and 27 for men in England and the Low Countries by the end of the 16th century,[28] and the percentage of Englishwomen marrying fell from over 90% to just over 80% through the 17th century and their average age at first marriage rose to 26,[29] there was nonetheless great variation within Western Europe; while Lowland Scotland saw patterns similar to England, with women married in the middle twenties after a period of domestic service, the high birth rate of Highland Scotland and the Hebrides imply a lower age of marriage for the bride.[30] Similarly, in 1620 the average age of first marriage for Swedish women was roughly 20 years and the proportion of single women was less than 10%, but by the end of the 18th century it had risen to roughly 26 years and continued to climb with the celibacy rate as a result of falling infant mortality rates, declining famines, and other factors.[31] Similarly, Ireland's age of marriage in 1830 was 23.8 for women and 27.5 for men where they had once been 21 and 25, respectively, and only about 10% of adults remained unmarried;[32] in 1840, they had respectively risen to 24.4 and 27.7;[33][34] in the decades after the Great Famine, the age of marriage had risen to 28–29 for women and 33 for men and as much as a third of Irishmen and a fourth of Irishwomen never married due to chronic economic problems that discouraged early marriage.[35]

So this idea that in western society it was normal to fuck and marry kids is just not true. I dont know where this myth comes from. And this started BEFORE feminism in the 1500s.

 

[Chris Mclean]

He's not entirely incorrect within the "Age of Consent being a feminist construct" thing, because feminists were the spearhead of legislation for it, but it's such a bizarre thing to mention if you're right wing at all. I think it stems from this idea that girls below 18 aren't "riding the cock carousel" and therefore younger girls are the only chance at getting a virgin gf or something, but what do they think will happen if the age of consent stops being a thing? They'll have a better opportunity to get based and redpilled Christian girls who totally aren't whores? No, what will happen is that with the abolition of the age of consent, porn and the broader rampant sexualization of society will affect younger people even more than it already is. If anything, the right wing should be pushing for harder punishments towards it and the punishment of websites and other things that market sexuality towards children. It's well known that the average age kids first find porn is around the 10-12 range, and basically all porn sites target kids to get them hooked and they get by the law with the *nudge nudge wink wink* "You're 18, right? You wouldn't lie to us, right? "
I don't really buy the "Nick is a homosexual" stuff, but I do think the age of consent talk is really suspect, it's such a bizarre hill to die on for anyone unless you have some personal stake in it, just like all the weirdos who vehemently defend lolicon but totally don't jerk it to it.

Just cause femenists came up with it doesnt mean that its a bad thing. Bad ideolgies can have good ideas just not the proper rational behind them. In this case it proably was about protecting young women which is a noble cause.
This whole its different in other countries is also such bs. Yes by the book its differnt but in no other way. In my country the age of consent is 15. But any adult man or woman that sleep with someone that young is disgraced and viewed as a pedo.

The age of constent stuff is just really and issue for fags as they view sexuality differntly then we do.

View attachment 2261241

https://twitter.com/DaltonReport/status/1404164516988874752?s=20

View attachment 2261244

He is so creepy in this clip. Im gettiner 'error' on my archiver but holy shit is it gross.

Fuentes has got to be a plant by the goverment i cant come up with any other rationalisation for his behaviour. Hes like a caricature of a creepy uncle all thats missing is the mail order thai bride.

So this idea that in western society it was normal to fuck and marry kids is just not true. I dont know where this myth comes from. And this started BEFORE feminism in the 1500s.

In a livestream with baked he said that "he wanted to go back to the 14th century cause thats when it was awesome"

 

[Harlay de Champvallon]

Studies of marriage in earlier times indicate that the ordinary run married at ages that might be young now, but not illegal. Early marriages was more a thing with monarchs. Richard II married as his second wife Isabella of Valois when she was six, but there was no question of living with her husband as wife. She was looked after by governess and ladies in waiting, raised as a child, and sometimes visited her husband. The purpose was alliance with France. Given that Richard quite strongly identified with Edward II and tried to get him canonised (his remains were already a place of pilgrimage and reported miracles), probably her virtue would have been utterly safe if Isabel had been older. Earlier King John's lust for his wife Isabella of Angoulême, who was probably 12 when she married him in 1200, was something of black mark against him.

 

[lyga]

I think Nick is a little weird on the age of consent and equating it with feminism.

Clock me if this has already been said, but a lot of French intellectuals and feminists activists were quite on board with abolishing the age of consent laws.

French petition against age of consent laws - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Simone de Beauvoir signed the French petition against age of consent laws, and she's considered by many to be one of the most seminal figures in feminism. In my mind, she and Judith Butler would probably be the two biggest names in 20th-century feminism.

Of course, there is also a lot of buzz in the LGBTQ world about the age of consent "being weaponized to criminalize homosexuality."

 

[BiggieSlonkLoyalist]

Studies of marriage in earlier times indicate that the ordinary run married at ages that might be young now, but not illegal. Early marriages was more a thing with monarchs.

I'm aware of this. These abnormal marriages with children and young teenage girls were done for reasons of diplomacy (mostly) and to perpetuate and maintain an aristocratic or monarchic title (some marrying siblings and cousins); these reactionary lunatics think it's representative of the wider population instead of a small, elite minority that have been inbred freaks for millennia anyway.

 

[AnOminous]

He's spreading the idea that its okay to have sex with and marry girls that have fully developed bodies by age 13 because then they're post pubescent. They're fully developed and "not children".

They aren't "fully developed" though. If they do get pregnant, they're vastly more likely to have miscarriages or stillborn babies, require Caesarian sections, or even die. The fact there were child molesters in the past doesn't make it good that we have them now too.

Simone de Beauvoir signed the French petition against age of consent laws, and she's considered by many to be one of the most seminal figures in feminism. In my mind, she and Judith Butler would probably be the two biggest names in 20th-century feminism.

Perverts will say or do anything to justify their perversions, even contradict everything they claim to believe in and literally side with the radical feminists they claim to be opposed to.

Earlier King John's lust for his wife Isabella of Angoulême, who was probably 12 when she married him in 1200, was something of black mark against him.

That would be John Lackland, mainly remembered as a murderer and a shitty king. I forgot he was a pervert, too.

In my country the age of consent is 15. But any adult man or woman that sleep with someone that young is disgraced and viewed as a pedo.

The actual age of consent matters little to any normal person. Countries have it set anywhere from 15 to 18, and society hasn't collapsed. But anyone who is too interested in that issue usually has a reason, and it usually isn't good.

 

[lyga]

He's not entirely incorrect within the "Age of Consent being a feminist construct" thing, because feminists were the spearhead of legislation for it, but it's such a bizarre thing to mention if you're right wing at all. I think it stems from this idea that girls below 18 aren't "riding the cock carousel" and therefore younger girls are the only chance at getting a virgin gf or something, but what do they think will happen if the age of consent stops being a thing? They'll have a better opportunity to get based and redpilled Christian girls who totally aren't whores? No, what will happen is that with the abolition of the age of consent, porn and the broader rampant sexualization of society will affect younger people even more than it already is. If anything, the right wing should be pushing for harder punishments towards it and the punishment of websites and other things that market sexuality towards children. It's well known that the average age kids first find porn is around the 10-12 range, and basically all porn sites target kids to get them hooked and they get by the law with the *nudge nudge wink wink* "You're 18, right? You wouldn't lie to us, right? "
I don't really buy the "Nick is a homosexual" stuff, but I do think the age of consent talk is really suspect, it's such a bizarre hill to die on for anyone unless you have some personal stake in it, just like all the weirdos who vehemently defend lolicon but totally don't jerk it to it.

Yeah, I think these are good points. The age of consent talk is weird because if you're young you can still court a young woman and marry her in a chaste way by the laws of most states; i.e., most states don't prevent teenagers of a certain age from being married with parental consent. My best friend's parents got married when they were both 16. (Whether or not this is wise is another discussion.) Age of consent really comes in more if you're talking about a dating relationship where both parties are unmarried and sleeping together, which seems off-brand for Nick.

I think Nick spends too much time online and it's warped his view of women a lot. I spend a ton of time on the internet, but am from a smaller city, have always interacted with girls who attend church, were homeschooled, etc. My wife was a virgin when we married; I actually was her first kiss. Every one of my male friends who got married were average-looking guys who probably married at least even or above their level, and their wives had not had sex before marriage. It's not nearly as impossible as some people make it out to be. You need to put yourself in social circles where women are still virtuous. The world of right-wing media has people saying the correct stuff, but most of them aren't genuine. I spent some time working in some of those circles and some of those "conservative" women were inappropriate and made me feel uncomfortable at times.

If I were young and on TikTok, Twitter, etc., working in media, I'd definitely believe every woman above the age of 18 (and a lot below) are whores and that's probably were some of this is coming from.

 

[StBonaventureFren]

Fuentes has got to be a plant by the goverment i cant come up with any other rationalisation for his behaviour. Hes like a caricature of a creepy uncle all thats missing is the mail order thai bride.

In a livestream with baked he said that "he wanted to go back to the 14th century cause thats when it was awesome"

My take is that Fedentes knows that he will get a curtain call at some point and is trying to bank whatever he can in terms of tradable information to shave time off his punishments.

Personally, I think he is actually a perverted freak who likes men and possibly young girls; this is just him being the degenerate faggot that he is. With that said, at this point, I suspect that he appreciates that his purpose always has been to be a new kind of Richard Spencer to embarrass and humiliate genuine RW Whites. And, he's hamming up the role.

Let's think about this for just half a moment. The 110lb Judeo-Mexican boy leader of the White race was slavishly dedicated to optics: "Don't be like those bad optics wignat trash. They will turn off normal people!" Meanwhile, he lusted over some who named Paultown, a bisexual bodybuilder, and an Australian degenerate homosexual who sucked on horse dildos.

Now, Fedentes has gone to the level of saying that it's cool to have cocaine fueled orgies and pass around 17 year olds... and we need to abolish AoC! Superior optics, indeed. Nothing will get the normies on your side to chat with coworkers like saying child molester physiognomy case studies should be able to defile "developed" 13 year olds.

Let's keep in mind that the entire, and I mean ENTIRE, circle of associates are demented freaks who either harass women or tried to prey on them. I know personally one woman who Beardson and his crew went after. Malkik "Smooth" Sanchez constantly harassed White women. Baked Alaska used a psychologically damaged woman (women if you include Ashton Birdie.) Chaggot's saga has been well covered.

I think one episode in this whole thing is the Prince Hubris (Shawn Deats?) character who admitted that he was cruising Catholic chapels to try to find a mid teens girl. These people are the definition of predators and in another context would be on the candid camera being asked to take a seat by Chris Hansen.

While it is probably hoping for too much, my best case scenario is, as I mentioned some time ago, for lower level FBI guys to push hard on the grooming/pedophilia/CP angles of the investigation. Frankly, this collective of sickos should not be walking free, pushing their luck further and further. What I think probably will happen is there will be a selective inclusion of some of the grooming stuff; just enough to tar Rightists generally with perverted garbage, but not enough to totally take down this Mercer backed hive of scum.

 

[NynchLiggers]

My take is that Fedentes knows that he will get a curtain call at some point and is trying to bank whatever he can in terms of tradable information to shave time off his punishments.

Personally, I think he is actually a perverted freak who likes men and possibly young girls; this is just him being the degenerate faggot that he is. With that said, at this point, I suspect that he appreciates that his purpose always has been to be a new kind of Richard Spencer to embarrass and humiliated genuine RW Whites. And, he's hamming up the role.

Let's think about this for just half a moment. The 110lb Judeo-Mexican boy leader of the White race was slavishly dedicated to optics: "Don't be like those bad optics wignat trash. They will turn off normal people!" Meanwhile, he lusted over some who named Paultown, a bisexual bodybuilder, and an Australian degenerate homosexual who sucked on horse dildos.

Now, Fedentes has gone to the level of saying that it's cool to have cocaine fueled orgies and pass around 17 year olds... and we need to abolish AoC! Superior optics, indeed. Nothing will get the normies on your side to chat will coworkers like saying child molester physiognomy case studies should be able to defile "developed" 13 year olds.

Let's keep in mind that the entire, and I mean ENTIRE, circle of associates of Fedentes are demented freaks who either harass women who tried to prey on them. I know personally one woman who Beardson and his crew went after. Malkik "Smooth" Sanchez constantly harassed White women. Baked Alaska used a psychologically damaged woman (women if you include Ashton Birdie.) Chaggot's saga has been well covered.

I think one stream in this whole thing is the Prince Hubris (Shawn Deats?) character who admitted that he was cruising Catholic chapels to try to find a mid teens girl. These people are the definition of predators and in another context would be on the candid camera being asked to take a seat by Chris Hansen.

While it is probably hoping for too much, my best case scenario is, as I mentioned some time ago, for lower level FBI guys to push hard on the grooming/pedophilia/CP angles of the investigation. Frankly, this collective of sickos should not be walking free, pushing their luck further and further. What I think probably will happen is there will be a selective inclusion of some of the grooming stuff; just enough to tar Rightists generally with perverted garbage, but not enough to totally take down this Mercer backed hive of scum.

I think the glowniggers plan a large scandal using Fuentes as the key to frame actual figures that are taken seriously in not only white nationalist but also even boomercon circles.
The reason this operation is taking so long is simply because anyone that takes their far-right/moderate right ideology seriously or isn't a deranged troon who A-logs thinking it will help in tarnishing the image of rightism knows that Fuentes is a fed or at the very least a grifter.
Glowniggers are not omnipotent, so the diversity hires will keep beating the same hammer like a groid beating his son for eating his Jordans, regardless of results.
I'm pretty sure even Charlie Kirk and TPUSA know the glowing nature of America First.

 

[DarkSoulsPhil]

Yeah, I think these are good points. The age of consent talk is weird because if you're young you can still court a young woman and marry her in a chaste way by the laws of most states; i.e., most states don't prevent teenagers of a certain age from being married with parental consent. My best friend's parents got married when they were both 16. (Whether or not this is wise is another discussion.) Age of consent really comes in more if you're talking about a dating relationship where both parties are unmarried and sleeping together, which seems off-brand for Nick.

I think Nick spends too much time online and it's warped his view of women a lot. I spend a ton of time on the internet, but am from a smaller city, have always interacted with girls who attend church, were homeschooled, etc. My wife was a virgin when we married; I actually was her first kiss. Every one of my male friends who got married were average-looking guys who probably married at least even or above their level, and their wives had not had sex before marriage. It's not nearly as impossible as some people make it out to be. You need to put yourself in social circles where women are still virtuous. The world of right-wing media has people saying the correct stuff, but most of them aren't genuine. I spent some time working in some of those circles and some of those "conservative" women were inappropriate and made me feel uncomfortable at times.

If I were young and on TikTok, Twitter, etc., working in media, I'd definitely believe every woman above the age of 18 (and a lot below) are whores and that's probably were some of this is coming from.

This

If you look for women in vice ridden positions, then you'll only find vice ridden women

If you look for women in virtuous positions then you'll find virtuous women

 

[ScamL Likely]

You never go full "it depends on the child".

 

[StBonaventureFren]

I think the glowniggers plan a large scandal using Fuentes as the key to frame actual figures that are taken seriously in not only white nationalist but also even boomercon circles.
The reason this operation is taking so long is simply because anyone that takes their far-right/moderate right ideology seriously or isn't a deranged troon who A-logs thinking it will help in tarnishing the image of rightism knows that Fuentes is a fed or at the very least a grifter.
Glowniggers are not omnipotent, so the diversity hires will keep beating the same hammer like a groid beating his son for eating his Jordans, regardless of results.
I'm pretty sure even Charlie Kirk and TPUSA know the glowing nature of America First.

Really good take. I was talking to someone a few weeks ago about how Nickelodeon is almost a fixture now at InfoWars and how if he is branded a groomer, etc., it would tarnish anyone who gave a platform to this guy.

Now, for years people in RW circles have told me that Alex Jones was perhaps the most prolific FBI informant (which is my position.) In fact, Alex Jones admitted in the second hour of his show on the Monday or Tuesday after the Jan 6 honeypot that "of course I talk to the FBI. They come to me for intel.... The good ones." I can try to find the exact clip and timestamp it, but the way I and others took it was he was doing some pre-emptive damage control in the event it comes out that he has been turning people in for decades (and that is why he has been allowed to make tens of millions of dollars in profit.)

But, why would he host a punk who is about to go down for being a Jan 6er AND and pervert? Maybe something in my assessment is wrong. Or, maybe, Jones also knows that his time is almost up and he will have to spin off Infowars to something like TheBlaze while he "goes back to home broadcasting because the message is too explosive for a fixed office" or some similar nonsense.

Meanwhile, by this point he has humiliated the Right not just once with his approach to Sandy Hook but again by giving a platform to an extraordinarily toxic personality. Since Alex Jones reaches or at least influences millions, maybe this is a step to the intentional humiliation of, as you say, BoomerCon and moderately RW types. It's worth noting that it appears Jones' lawyer sidekick Barnes seems to anticipate this given how direct and thorough his rejection of Fed has been (meanwhile, Alt Lite types and PJW praise Nickers as a "Rosa Parks of our generation." (To be clear I am NOT agreeing with Barnes and his neocon take on Israel.)

I haven't seen what David Knight has been up to since January. He probably would consider the Afro-Latino Campus Conservative exactly as you say, Nynch, a circus performer intended to grab attention and infect those around him. And maybe because no one is taking the bait (rather they needed to astroturf him as mentioned), the planned op is stalled. On the other hand, my working theory last month was that the higher level types are going to time things for the maximum humiliation effect and to get more mileage from the braindead masses (e.g., oh we just have to suspend normal law for Right Wingers because that Nick Fuentes is so unbelievably....)

Then again, there is always the possibility that the 400+ randos picked up and thrown into DC torture pits has been enough for this go. I don't think this is the case because I think they want more legislative pretenses for locking down finances, especially through crypto wallets. The story about NF getting the $600,000 supposedly from a Frenchman who committed suicide seems like too juicy an opportunity to leave on the table.

 

[BiggieSlonkLoyalist]

They aren't "fully developed" though. If they do get pregnant, they're vastly more likely to have miscarriages or stillborn babies, require Caesarian sections, or even die. The fact there were child molesters in the past doesn't make it good that we have them now too.

I know that and so does everybody else. Fuentes thinks otherwise and keep in mind this is somebody that believes girls that turn 18 have hit ‘the wall’. According to him 13 - 17 year olds are okay enough to be married off to a 30 year old man because they are menstruating and have a rack.

This is also called ‘the Chaggot clause.’

 

[Samson Pumpkin Jr.]

Inside the Blue and Red lines, and note this is before feminism, starting around the 1500s the west of the red line, the average age of marriage was 23 or older for women and 26 or older for men.

that's very interesting because we constantly hear that in medieval times if you lived to 30 you were considered an elder. these are the lies the enlightenment tells you. from all sources on the medieval times people regularly lived to 70

 

[REGENDarySumanai]

You never go full "it depends on the child".

The only correct answer when it comes to age of consent is 18 years of age + Romeo and Juliet laws.

 

[AnOminous]

that's very interesting because we constantly hear that in medieval times if you lived to 30 you were considered an elder. these are the lies the enlightenment tells you. from all sources on the medieval times people regularly lived to 70

The average was dragged way down by newborn deaths, plagues, and the like. If you lived to adulthood, were lucky enough to avoid the common disasters of the time, and were reasonably wealthy, you'd stand a good chance of living to an old age.

 

[Lobster Cult High Priest]

Why is a 23 year old closeted homosexual virgin talking about the age of consent? It's not like the fag wants to fuck any woman at any age.

Cause he is attracted to some of his 15 year old male interns