I've always liked wypipo and, if Jim Snow laws become a thing I'll be considered huwite myself because of the One Drop Rule.
Social Justice is horseshit and bears no resemblance to the Aristotelian-Thomistic virtue of justice that everyone learned until the Left (of course) took over every institution. To wit: Justice is the virtue of rendering to each relation what is their proper due. Employers owe employees a just wage, employees owe employers labor. Countrymen favor their kin to foreigners and foreigners owe respect to the laws of the alien country. Parents owe children instruction, governance and the necessities of life while children owe parents honor and obedience. The relationship between sovereign and subject is similar; and all creatures owe God worship (this is the subvirtue of religion). In a punitive sense, an offender owes the victim recompense in proportion to damage; if he steals an item, he must either return it, or repay the equivalent amount. And if he takes a life, he must be executed.
Notice how this model presupposes a hierarchy between relations. In the post Enlightenment Social Justice model, the assumptions are twofold: first that all men are equal and that man, in a state of nature, is in constant conflict (hello Hobbes, Rousseau, Locke and Hegel). This model rejects all hierarchy between employer and employee, parents and children, male and female, foreigner and native. The only remaining hierarchy is between offender and offended--and anyone who attempts to create distinctions and hierarchies is by definition an offender, and so is subject to punitive justice.
If this sounds vaguely familiar to you, don't be surprised--this is basically every novel political theory since the Protestant Reformation. Oppressor, oppressed, war for liberation--lather, rinse repeat. It is highly modular and adaptable to many seemingly disparate struggles, like the American Revolution and the rise of Nazi Germany.
Social Justice is simply the current year iteration where the struggle has become multifactorial and increasingly stupid. Black vs. White, straight vs. LGBTQ, Yew vs. Gentile, etc. etc. But where People Of Color get off the SocJus crazy train is this--just because we're different, or even inferior, does not mean that our "opposite" did us any harm, nor must we extract goods from them to force an equality. I see this happening in Hispanic Rightist Twitter, where young mestizos are openly proud of the Habsburg and Bourbon dynasties as well as hardcore Catholics--even as they feel conscious of their indigenous roots.
The Christian/Catholic faith is an antidote to the SocJus mindset with it's teaching of turning the other cheek, loving one's enemies, and Jesus' own example of freely giving Himself as a sacrifice to save man, while it was God's right to destroy them utterly. No wonder leftists hate the religion so much.
Social Justice is horseshit and bears no resemblance to the Aristotelian-Thomistic virtue of justice that everyone learned until the Left (of course) took over every institution. To wit: Justice is the virtue of rendering to each relation what is their proper due. Employers owe employees a just wage, employees owe employers labor. Countrymen favor their kin to foreigners and foreigners owe respect to the laws of the alien country. Parents owe children instruction, governance and the necessities of life while children owe parents honor and obedience. The relationship between sovereign and subject is similar; and all creatures owe God worship (this is the subvirtue of religion). In a punitive sense, an offender owes the victim recompense in proportion to damage; if he steals an item, he must either return it, or repay the equivalent amount. And if he takes a life, he must be executed.
Notice how this model presupposes a hierarchy between relations. In the post Enlightenment Social Justice model, the assumptions are twofold: first that all men are equal and that man, in a state of nature, is in constant conflict (hello Hobbes, Rousseau, Locke and Hegel). This model rejects all hierarchy between employer and employee, parents and children, male and female, foreigner and native. The only remaining hierarchy is between offender and offended--and anyone who attempts to create distinctions and hierarchies is by definition an offender, and so is subject to punitive justice.
If this sounds vaguely familiar to you, don't be surprised--this is basically every novel political theory since the Protestant Reformation. Oppressor, oppressed, war for liberation--lather, rinse repeat. It is highly modular and adaptable to many seemingly disparate struggles, like the American Revolution and the rise of Nazi Germany.
Social Justice is simply the current year iteration where the struggle has become multifactorial and increasingly stupid. Black vs. White, straight vs. LGBTQ, Yew vs. Gentile, etc. etc. But where People Of Color get off the SocJus crazy train is this--just because we're different, or even inferior, does not mean that our "opposite" did us any harm, nor must we extract goods from them to force an equality. I see this happening in Hispanic Rightist Twitter, where young mestizos are openly proud of the Habsburg and Bourbon dynasties as well as hardcore Catholics--even as they feel conscious of their indigenous roots.
The Christian/Catholic faith is an antidote to the SocJus mindset with it's teaching of turning the other cheek, loving one's enemies, and Jesus' own example of freely giving Himself as a sacrifice to save man, while it was God's right to destroy them utterly. No wonder leftists hate the religion so much.
