- Highlight
- #1
Source: https://kiwifarms.cc/notice/A8ecDvfLAvkt1mbGDY
"Regarding the man,
1. Men should lead.
2. Men should provide.
3. An ideal man would focus on themselves first, nuclear family second, distant family (relatives, society) last.
4. Men who do not lead, do not provide, and lack selfish instinct are not men.
Regarding the woman,
1. Women desire safety and stability.
2. Women want families and can raise one.
3. An ideal woman would be educated and responsible, capable of raising a healthy family but not a slave to the whims of unhealthy people which negatively impact their chlildren.
4. Women who are unsafe, unstable, who reject responsibility and seek unhealthy relationships are not women.
Regarding non-men + non-women,
1. A human which does not reproduce is a non-reproductive.
2. Non-reproductives should not have a say in society. Their lack of investment in the future means they cannot be trusted to plan for it.
3. Non-reproductives include homosexuals, transgenders,pedophiles, incels, volcels, infertiles, cat ladies, the mentally ill, etc.
I'm tired of arguments about fertility: If you cant or wont have kids, you're not invested in the future.
If you can't raise a child to be a functional adult, you are not an equal member of our society.
Regarding the family,
1. A family is a man, woman, and children.
2. The ideal age to start a family is when both parents are emotionally and physically mature enough to raise healthy offspring.
3. The point of family is to develop children into a healthy adults capable of raising their own healthy offspring, as to ensure the survival of our subspecies and way of life.
Ordinarily, you're looking at 30-45 for men, 25-30 for women. This varies wildly. There are pros and cons for starting sooner or later than those ages.
In general, people who fetishize the young are attracted to the idea of an emotionally juvenile codependent who cannot compare them to other men. It is insecurity dressed as something more sophisticated.
This is chapter one of my manifesto, thanks for reading."
Thoughts?
"Regarding the man,
1. Men should lead.
2. Men should provide.
3. An ideal man would focus on themselves first, nuclear family second, distant family (relatives, society) last.
4. Men who do not lead, do not provide, and lack selfish instinct are not men.
Regarding the woman,
1. Women desire safety and stability.
2. Women want families and can raise one.
3. An ideal woman would be educated and responsible, capable of raising a healthy family but not a slave to the whims of unhealthy people which negatively impact their chlildren.
4. Women who are unsafe, unstable, who reject responsibility and seek unhealthy relationships are not women.
Regarding non-men + non-women,
1. A human which does not reproduce is a non-reproductive.
2. Non-reproductives should not have a say in society. Their lack of investment in the future means they cannot be trusted to plan for it.
3. Non-reproductives include homosexuals, transgenders,pedophiles, incels, volcels, infertiles, cat ladies, the mentally ill, etc.
I'm tired of arguments about fertility: If you cant or wont have kids, you're not invested in the future.
If you can't raise a child to be a functional adult, you are not an equal member of our society.
Regarding the family,
1. A family is a man, woman, and children.
2. The ideal age to start a family is when both parents are emotionally and physically mature enough to raise healthy offspring.
3. The point of family is to develop children into a healthy adults capable of raising their own healthy offspring, as to ensure the survival of our subspecies and way of life.
Ordinarily, you're looking at 30-45 for men, 25-30 for women. This varies wildly. There are pros and cons for starting sooner or later than those ages.
In general, people who fetishize the young are attracted to the idea of an emotionally juvenile codependent who cannot compare them to other men. It is insecurity dressed as something more sophisticated.
This is chapter one of my manifesto, thanks for reading."
Thoughts?
