Who decides what "better" is?
We all do, by who we want to procreate with.
Who decides what "better" is?
But there's another type of bullying. This kind usually happens in groups. The "victim" is usually socially deviant, and deals with it in one of two ways.
1. They sperg out and ends up like the people on the Lolcow boards
2. They buck the fuck up. They consider their life choices and actions. They think about what led them to be ostracized. And maybe, just maybe...they change for the better.
I'm gonna preface this by saying I am of the belief that the group is more important the the individual, because it can exist without the individual but the individual cannot exist without the group. People are kind of like cells in the organism of society. Genetics has shown us that throughout natural history that the genes of "desirable" traits get passed on in society, and "undesirable" ones eventually die off. On an individual level, if all other error correction during cell replication fails, that cell is destroyed by the immune system, unable to continue to pass on its code.
Might is right, don't you know that? OP told me.Who decides what "better" is?
Where do procreation and schoolchildren bullying each-other interact? More importantly, how could your sluggish biologically driven instinct to bang certain types of people possibly keep up with society's actual needs when even the relatively fast socioculture that fights or informs those instincts can't?We all do, by who we want to procreate with.
A good behaviorist would say 'don't create the environment that generates the bullying interaction' and agitate for actual changes to how school schedules, policies, or faculty are assigned to the kids. Unfortunately, all of the good behaviorists were dragged out to the back of the barn and shot, so now we're left with a lot of quacks prescribing medication and a staunch refusal to admit that the gen ed experiment failed. Granted again that a lot of the degradation in the new generations are due to tech, but the damage "rigorous" and "modern" academic environments in South Korea and Japan have done to their youth can't be ignored. The further you go down this particular path, the worse the mental health outcomes get, that much seems clear.Though if you think about it, though bullying is bad, how could you stop it?
I agree as long as those things that people are fucking don't include children or animals.when rights of a group is more important than those of one individual, you got socialism. Fuck that shit.
People can and will survive as individuals or in a company of non-assholes. Some things like weird ass fetishes or love for anime pillows should be kept in private life, not flaunted as a fucking banner for other pervs to rally around. I really don't care who or what you fuck in the privacy of your home.
Where do procreation and schoolchildren bullying each-other interact? More importantly, how could your sluggish biologically driven instinct to bang certain types of people possibly keep up with society's actual needs when even the relatively fast socioculture that fights or informs those instincts can't?
A good behaviorist would say 'don't create the environment that generates the bullying interaction' and agitate for actual changes to how school schedules, policies, or faculty are assigned to the kids. Unfortunately, all of the good behaviorists were dragged out to the back of the barn and shot, so now we're left with a lot of quacks prescribing medication and a staunch refusal to admit that the gen ed experiment failed. Granted again that a lot of the degradation in the new generations are due to tech, but the damage "rigorous" and "modern" academic environments in South Korea and Japan have done to their youth can't be ignored. The further you go down this particular path, the worse the mental health outcomes get, that much seems clear
In other words, a "behavior" could just as easily be an unpopular opinion, so your argument really boils down to the mob always being right.
Might is right, don't you know that? OP told me.