Opinions that are rational but not everyone may agree with -

Y2KKK Baby

The Codex of Ultimate Wisdom???
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
The Confederates were clearly the bad guys and the deep south has always been a dysfunctional hellhole.

Southern aristocrats hated losing their control over the country and poor whites were basically peasants with so little political consciousness that all they cared about was preserving a racial hierarchy that was detrimental to their own interests.
Corrupt aristocratic shithole with a dickhold on the economy clearly trying to fuck the other side over using its political dominance (still racist) that had to resort to using mercenaries vs. Aristocratic economic basket case that owned slaves.
Implying the north was actually democratic at the time
L O L


All the deep south does is soak up federal money like a sponge and create exceptional people that occasionally migrate north and cause trouble. How does one region produce so many lolcows?
Fuck off, nigger.
 
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: ICametoLurk

DrainRedRain

you're not real fuck you
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
White people are superior to all other ethnic groups they are just too modest to admit it.
Dubbed anime as long as it's not edited in any way is superior to subbed anime if people are watching anime they don't want to read a book they'd read the Manga if they wanted to do that.
Women shouldn't have the right to vote
Most of the modern Jewish population of larping Europeans
Most people who believe in the Jq have never actually met a Jew
No one would ever rape a feminist academic
There's no right side of History just people who won and lost major Wars
The only form of Socialism that work is national socialism
Housewives Are happier than women with jobs
Everybody wants to be white
There's nothing wrong with having Gladiator matches with condemned prisoners as long as the voluntary and if people want to become Gladiators that is also okay.
Most atheists are more annoying than any other fire and brimstone preacher
can you elaborate on these or you're just jamming your fat fingers on the keyboard trying to be edgy
 

Crunchy Leaf

cronch
kiwifarms.net
The Confederates were clearly the bad guys and the deep south has always been a dysfunctional hellhole.

Southern aristocrats hated losing their control over the country and poor whites were basically peasants with so little political consciousness that all they cared about was preserving a racial hierarchy that was detrimental to their own interests.

The deep south is literally shit and all that saves it is the food that was created by the black and french influences. And mind you, most southerners never had access to that kind of food. Since the end of slavery, most southerners were sharecroppers who ate cheap canned food that caused crippling malnutrition that lead to deformities and disease outbreaks.

All the deep south does is soak up federal money like a sponge and create exceptional people that occasionally migrate north and cause trouble. How does one region produce so many lolcows?

FDR should be remembered for stopping these primitive people from literally dying of a famine through his new deal.



And why do these people insist upon eating dirt in the modern age?
are you aware that many parts of the north are also dysfunctional hellholes? (don't forget that west virginia is a northern state!)
 

Anonymous For This

Flying pierogis at vienna.
kiwifarms.net
The Civil War was the most morally gray war in U.S history.
The knee-jerk is to say the south seceded for slavery (Which is true.), but doesn't take into account the North wasn't fighting for the freedom of slaves and individual Confederate soldiers didn't fight to keep them either. Southern politicians were scum sucking trash, but their northern counterparts weren't that far behind.

Seceding over slaves is a shitty reason to secede, but does that mean if they had a better reason, they would have had the right to secede? Who determines what is a good reason? I place the blame more firmly on Confederate shoulders, but this guy is right, it was morally grey.
 
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Y2KKK Baby

Quoookie

kiwifarms.net
Your driver's license should be embedded on or in your ass, so when people want to see it they have to kiss or lick it up until the get what they want. Example cop pulls you over for dumbass reason they better be willing to make the effort and get the DL that way. Shouldn't have lazy fucking cops any way. You could have any further info available though or to store food for the winter or if one is on the run. Least food will be already marinated as well.
 

AbyssStarer

kiwifarms.net
Long distance relationships don't not work, some people don't work with long distance. It's tough, it takes a lot of trust but plenty of couples have had to bear long distance.
Young Adult literature should be purged and far less authors should be published in general. It's not a great incentive to start reading when you walk into a bookstore and the shelves are overflowing with soulless tripe.
 

SpergPatrol

You're a faggot Harry
kiwifarms.net
Ehh I believe that pedophiles who been convicted with evidence of them committing the crime should be away from any area that has any kids completely and monitored heavily when using the internet.

I didn't think people would disagree with this view but I have had people disagree with this because it was violating their privacy and personal rights and they served their time.

I am on the camp still of "they can go fuck themselves they raped kids," but I digress.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cuddle striker

rabbitgay

lobotomy chic
kiwifarms.net
Fatherhood is an important role, a two parent household is ideal for the wellbeing of children, and growing up with healthy family dynamics is the backbone to a mentally stable and productive population. Our culture's growing apathy, and even disdain, towards family life and childrearing is a recipe for disaster.
 

AnOminous

do you see what happens
True & Honest Fan
Retired Staff
kiwifarms.net
Fatherhood is an important role, a two parent household is ideal for the wellbeing of children, and growing up with healthy family dynamics is the backbone to a mentally stable and productive population. Our culture's growing apathy, and even disdain, towards family life and childrearing is a recipe for disaster.
Pretty sure this is just objectively proven fact and the only people who object to it are horrible degenerates who nobody should take any advice from.
 

Rio

Smug Ellen Page
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Young Adult literature should be purged and far less authors should be published in general. It's not a great incentive to start reading when you walk into a bookstore and the shelves are overflowing with soulless tripe.
I actually disagree strongly with this.

Art shouldn't have a high qualitative bar of entry, since arbitrary standards of what should and shouldn't be published based on subjective ideas of what is "good" is what opens the door to truly soulless tripe that's produced exclusively to ape existing "good" properties. Publishers define what's "good" as "what brings in the highest amount of money." If you're asking them to raise their standards for what they accept, what you're really asking for is for them to make "safer" choices.

Why is that a bad thing? Well, just look at how 99% of blockbusters are designed to be as safe and sterile possible, then apply that same concept to all other art. In the end you might end up with an overall higher quality of prose, but you remove room for authors to be creative, because they're encouraged to be more safe and take fewer creative risks in order to stand out. Providing a "You should be at least this good to publish your art" bar of entry is just going to stifle creativity and encourage monotony. There's a lot of bad art that gets published, and that is completely fine. The good works generally stand out from the crowd anyway.
 

Mr1930s

Bumbling Fuckhead
kiwifarms.net
Stopping anyone about to commit suicide is not equivalent to saving them. The only people you "save" from suicide are those who are below the age of consent and those with mental disabilities (in some cases, euthanasia might be good for them), removing them, we can now deduce that those who are suicidal are reasonable people, no different to you and I. When someone is on a ledge of a building, having made up their mind to kill themselves, there are two ways of stopping them, the first is to change their mind and the second is to pull them away from the ledge. In short, to stop someone from committing suicide, you either manipulate their mind or you physically coerce them not to commit suicide.

Suicide is a rational conclusion one reaches when they assess their current situation. When someone has made up their mind that they are going to kill themselves, the people around him stop him for various reasons, such as 'life is worth living' or 'there is so much to live for'. Why would you stop a rational man or woman from killing themselves? Their problems might not be worth dying for and are easily solved, but the option they have assessed to be the best is to commit suicide. Who are we to question their reasoning at that point in their lives and have the gall to tell them that they should not kill themselves? Are we better than those who are suicidal? It is their choice to commit suicide, let them do it in any manner they see fit, as long as it does not interfere with other people's business. From a utilitarian point-of-view, when you let someone commit suicide, you save him and his family from the enormous financial burden of therapy and anti-depressants. The cost of one funeral is lower than the overall cost of medical bills one will accrue over coming months and the family must be able to find solace in the fact fulfilling the dead man's wishes of being forgotten.

When someone is named in a suicide note, the people named must be able to cope with the facts with any manner they see fit, some of them might kill themselves from the guilt, but then again, who are we to stop them?

When people say suicidal people are selfish their reasoning goes as follows: when you kill yourself, you are selfish for depriving the people around you the memories you can make with them and giving them the burden of your death for the rest of their lives. Is it also not unreasonable to ascertain that to let someone deny the right to end their own lives, the person stopping another person from committing suicide is not only prolonging their pain and suffering that they feel, but is also removing their inherent right to pursue their own happiness? Must they also manipulate the suicidal person's mind by giving him drugs and let the suicidal man shoulder the costs of medicine he did not want to take in the first place? Who is more selfish in this situation? In the end the more selfish will be those who stop people from killing themselves. One must be able to have the freedom to choose what they can do to their lives, ending their own life is one of them. The only way to stop a person from killing themselves is to let the suicidal man change their minds ON THEIR OWN from committing suicide, they are also reasonable and rational people such as you and I, who is to say that they might change their minds in the end and ultimately decide not to commit suicide?

TL;DR
Don't stop people from killing themselves because FREEDOM
 
Tags
None

About Us

The Kiwi Farms is about eccentric individuals and communities on the Internet. We call them lolcows because they can be milked for amusement or laughs. Our community is bizarrely diverse and spectators are encouraged to join the discussion.

We do not place intrusive ads, host malware, sell data, or run crypto miners with your browser. If you experience these things, you have a virus. If your malware system says otherwise, it is faulty.

Supporting the Forum

How to Help

The Kiwi Farms is constantly attacked by insane people and very expensive to run. It would not be here without community support.

We are on the Brave BAT program. Consider using Brave as your Browser. It's like Chrome but doesn't tell Google what you masturbate to.

BTC: 1EiZnCKCb6Dc4biuto2gJyivwgPRM2YMEQ
BTC+SW: bc1qwv5fzv9u6arksw6ytf79gfvce078vprtc0m55s
ETH: 0xc1071c60ae27c8cc3c834e11289205f8f9c78ca5
LTC: LcDkAj4XxtoPWP5ucw75JadMcDfurwupet
BAT: 0xc1071c60Ae27C8CC3c834E11289205f8F9C78CA5
XMR: 438fUMciiahbYemDyww6afT1atgqK3tSTX25SEmYknpmenTR6wvXDMeco1ThX2E8gBQgm9eKd1KAtEQvKzNMFrmjJJpiino