I want to make sure YOU ARE aware of this. Your online behavior speaks to differing attitudes.You could have figured that out by a google search.
I want to make sure YOU ARE aware of this. Your online behavior speaks to differing attitudes.You could have figured that out by a google search.
I am aware that Alan is not a fed, yes. Everyone is.I want to make sure YOU ARE aware of this. Your online behavior speaks to differing attitudes.
It's an affirmative answer.I am neither Alan, nor did I say yes. If you could read, you would have realised I was talking about FBI, not Alan. It was very clearly stated: "FBI probably spied on Biden"
That is what he said. It's recorded on CSPAN. CNN merely showed clips. The full Dershowitz speech is available by transcript and by media outlets and youtube.Court determined in Dershowitz v. Cable News Network, Inc. (0:20-cv-61872), that this is not what he said.
Not to the question you alleged I answered to. You asked me if Alan spied on Biden. I answered with a no, and few paragraphs later suggested that FBI might have.It's an affirmative answer.
Literally not. The judges agreed that this is false:That is what he said.
"Thus, Dershowitz argues, CNN presented an official proceeding in a misleading manner and the fair report privilege does not apply. The Court agrees. CNN presented an abridgment of Dershowitz’ answer to Senator Cruz’ question. The abridgment is not accurate, to the extent that it omitted a crucial qualification: that an illegal motive for a quid pro quo would be corrupt. As a result, the commentators’ statements – that Dershowitz believes a President can do anything, even commit crimes if it would help his re-election – are not based upon a fair and accurate summary of Dershowitz’ statement to the Senate.'
Did Alan Dershowitz assert that Donald Trump abused his presidential power and excused it by saying other presidents did so?Not to the question you alleged I answered to. You asked me if Alan spied on Biden. I answered with a no, and few paragraphs later suggested that FBI might have.
Literally not. The judges agreed that this is false:
Funny how you keep moving the goal posts. IIRC Alan said Trump did not abuse his powerDid Alan Dershowitz assert that Donald Trump abused his presidential power and excused it by saying other presidents did so?
Nowhere did he say Trump abused his power. Tldr on these screenshots:
No, you are quite literally moving goal posts.These aren't my goal posts, Donny Jr. These are Dershowitz' goal posts. I'm just asking questions.
He not only said Trump abused his power, he said other presidents abused power. The only thing he didn't do is differentiate the different circumstances of the appearance of abuse of power. You can properly explain the text if you think it's being misinterpreted.Nowhere did he say Trump abused his power. Tldr on these screenshots:
1. Many presidents have been accused of what Trump has been
2. Many accused others of abuse of power as a political rhetoric
3. It should be used that way.
Trump is not even mentioned. Learn to read mayhaps?
No. I am going on the information on the transcript. Those are the goalposts. You need to grow the fuck up and read what is posted and answer accordingly.No, you are quite literally moving goal posts.
I would recommend you to take your own adviceYou need to grow the fuck up and read
Yes
I did answer your questions. Is your memory that bad?answer accordingly.
You are horrible at reading. That's not what your screenshots say at all. Learn to read.He not only said Trump abused his power, he said other presidents abused power.
Why do you think he had any power over DoJ?Donny Trump Jr frequently allowed illegal surveillance by being the illegal hidden person in charge of the DOJ during the Trump Administration
You are retarded if you believe this.Or were you in charge? IS that why he is prevaricating about this issue?
I am very good at reading and reading comprehension AND questioning. If Trump Jr is confused and the detailed script of Dershowitz' speech is being misinterpreted, I am all for and open to the best interpretation that they can provide and let the conclusion make itself obvious.I would recommend you to take your own advice
Between my alcoholism and your brain rot it will be a close race. Considering how elderly and full of spite you are and how I am younger and full of cheer, I'll be placing my bets on myself. I'm just checking in on notifications. Sorry I don't have time to fully catch up. I'm killin it right now and I just don't have time for you even though I enjoy our time together. Looks like the other spergs are keeping you plenty of company though. Have fun seething Pam.No. And you'll go first.
Seething about what, pray tell? I have no about you or your ramblings.Between my alcoholism and your brain rot it will be a close race. Considering how elderly and full of spite you are and how I am younger and full of cheer, I'll be placing my bets on myself. I'm just checking in on notifications. Sorry I don't have time to fully catch up. I'm killin it right now and I just don't have time for you even though I enjoy our time together. Looks like the other spergs are keeping you plenty of company though. Have fun seething Pam.
You don't need to lie.I am very good at reading and reading comprehension
1. It is misinterpreted.If Trump Jr is confused and the detailed script of Dershowitz' speech is being misinterpreted, I am all for and open to the best interpretation that they can provide and let the conclusion make itself obvious.
Everything you just detailed is retarded and delusional.Here is what I believe happened
This sounds like retarded conspiracy from a schizo.Does this sound about right, Hill?
Catherine Brannon
These people aren't here.Tony Robbins,
I didn't. It wasn't my testimony I used. I used Alan Dershowitz. You can say it's misinterpreted, but please point out in the testimony how it is, don't just say "It's misinterpreted".You don't need to lie.
1. It is misinterpreted.
2. To see why, see this and this (for your quid pro quo bit misinterpretation).
3. I am not Jr.
4. The only one confused here is you.
5. Your reading abilities are aweful.
4. Jr. is not here.
Everything you just detailed is retarded and delusional.
This sounds like retarded conspiracy from a schizo.
These people aren't here.
You did.I didn't
I did. I linked you to two of my posts explaining how you misinterpreted it.but please point out in the testimony how it is, don't just say "It's misinterpreted".
Robbins' alleged affair is not the retarded bit. Everything else is. In a somewhat related manner, cheating on wife does not count as sexual deviantism.Tony Robbins is a verified sexual deviant known for cheating on his wife. This is not from me.
You'd be wrong (like always).I would assume you wouldn't like a narrative that exposes these men's true deviant
I'm pretty sure he divorced her in 2001. Did he get a new one?He still lives and breathes cheating on his wife
About what did I lie about specifically?You did.
No, I don't think you did. I was speaking of the transcript posts from Dershowitz's impeachment speech where he said that Donald Trump abused his presidential power.I did. I linked you to two of my posts explaining how you misinterpreted it.
It is if he's forcing women to engage in sexual relations via threats and derogatory and libel mental health statements.Robbins' alleged affair is not the retarded bit. Everything else is. In a somewhat related manner, cheating on wife does not count as sexual deviantism.
Soon enough. Just establishing a few points of reality and fact beforehand.You'd be wrong (like always).
When's your lawsuit?
I wasn't talking specifically about quid pro quo, but only of Dershowitz admission of Trump's abuse of power.
About what did I lie about specifically?
No, I don't think you did
Yes, yes, Big Robbins big bad like Epstein, but unlike Epstein, there is just magically no proof, other than self admitted troll trolling you.It is if he's forcing women to engage in sexual relations via threats and derogatory and libel mental health statements
Any specific date.Soon enough.
Ah, yes, that might be problematic for you.Just establishing a few points of reality and fact beforehand.
That's the first link. Although, yes you were, before you moved the goal post.I wasn't talking specifically about quid pro quo, but only of Dershowitz admission of Trump's abuse of power.
You know what. I have no clue. Maybe his new bride is a common-law wife that makes him feel free to engage sexually with other women.I'm pretty sure he divorced her in 2001. Did he get a new one?
Were you talking about his former wife then?You know what. I have no clue. Maybe his new bride is a common-law wife that makes him feel free to engage sexually with other women.