Those aren't things you'd be able to check for if you wanted to know a dog was being used like that. Those are things that lead to a suspicion that the dog is being raped instead of the other way around (I think I worded this weirdly but hopefully it still makes sense). There's a very low chance that if a dude is fucking a dog that it won't have any tears.Recurring bacterial infections and prostate issues are some signs that come to mind.
All we’ve got at the moment is possession and distribution of animal torture porn, which may be enough to get his dog taken away.So basically, it's unlikely that the rozzers are gonna swab a man and his dog to prove zoophilia. Perhaps someone should contact his local police force to confirm any lack of investigation, just to make him salty.
https://www.animalcare-austria.at/en/projekte/rumaenien/rettung/All we’ve got at the moment is possession and distribution of animal torture porn, which may be enough to get his dog taken away.
What is the “big name” animal welfare organization in Austria?
Thank you, I’ll contact them tonight when I’m on my laptop.
Jesus. Fucking. Christ. This kind of thing is prevalent enough that there is a serious debate about adding these guidelines to Veterinarians around the US. Fuck, dude. I think I'm going to buy some gear and fuck off to the wilderness. Bring a few gallons of Kharkov with me. "Do you think God stays in Heaven because he fears what he created?"To be fair, some vets are actually pushing for companion animal rape kits and there are guidelines for recognizing animal sexual abuse in the states, including rectal/vaginal swabs and blacklight examination (usually after a necropsy). As I understand though, this is after charges are pressed and the animal is confiscated and put down. Not sure about Europe though.
Source: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0300985816643574 (kind of an interesting read honestly)
Agreed this fucker is probably bullshitting though.
Well, all of the other degenerates that live in america are still alive, right? Funny that he picks the one asshole living across the ocean, not the ones he could actually kill (lol).I just read through the comments on that journal, and there is so much denial it's sickening. One recent comment was pretty fun though.
View attachment 583929
and this fucking gem.
View attachment 583930
We must invade Austria to kill every furfaggot like this and then build a big, beautiful fucking
Who knows? Maybe we'll get lucky and he's planning a short vacation to Pennsylvania. XDWell, all of the other degenerates that live in america are still alive, right? Funny that he picks the one asshole living across the ocean, not the ones he could actually kill (lol).
I don't have a furaffinity account - Can you confront him more on this? I saw you already commented but it'd be interesting to see what he'd say when presented with your post which makes many a good points, also would be a good thing to be on the board for other furries to see (Not that they'd change their mind, but hopefully it will still make them squirm)Earlier today he wrote a defensive journal concerning the allegations:
There are a few parts in it that bug me. First off he claims he had the dog checked out at a vet for because of the rape charges. We have no proof he has done this as it would be highly questionable for one to drag his dog to a vet and tell he is being accused of rape charges. Secondly I think no one has claimed that he has harmed his dog physically, only taught it to fuck with him. The defense that the dog gets regular long walks really means nothing in this context and feels like a desperate attempt at convincing the reader.
He tells that the police has found no zoo related material from his computer. The reason for this however has been revealed to us by none other than himself: https://img.aijaa.com/b/00025/14631577.jpg
Next he tells that he's been involved with animal shelter and welfare organisations for a long time and from the pictures he sent SnakeThing we know that he's been involved sexually with a number dogs (pictured below). Admittedly the connection between these two things isn't clear but in my logic an animal shelter would be the easiest possible place for a zoophile to get in touch with multiple animals. He even admits that at least on the dogs he screwed isn't his:
Next he claims that the chat is fake which is the exact same argument used by Kero before coming clean about it being real and on top of that SnakeThing he is conversing with is currently in custody for sexual assault on an animal among other criminal allegations. A further proof of the chat being genuine is the quality of English used by Sephius in both his journal and the chat, that being mostly comprehensible yet riddled with constant idiomatic and other mistakes most likely caused by German being his native spoken language.
"Photos every Zoo Furry has on his computer." This one especially seems like a Freudian slip to me. Just how exactly can he be aware of the exact pictures an average zoophile furry watches to pinpoint this information if he isn't himself one?
Finally in the end there is the empty defense that his friends and supporters just know that he is innocent. The Kero debacle proves more than well how much worth that argument has against empirical evidence.
Lastly I post a screenshot of his journal as it was when I made this post. I also wrote a comment on it which includes links to solid evidence against his claims, a screenshot of which I also include here in case he decides to delete it because in the case he does I'd find that highly suspicious in its own right.