Dramacow Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese

  • There is a bug with the post editor. Images pasted from other websites from your clipboard will automatically use the [img] tag instead of uploading a copy as an attachment. Please manually save the image, upload it to the site, and then insert it as a thumbnail instead if you experience this.

    The [img] should essentially never be used outside of chat. It does not save disk space on the server because we use an image proxy to protect your IP address and to ensure people do not rely on bad third party services like Imgur for image hosting. I hope to have a fix from XF soon. I REALLY WISH THEY'D HOTFIX THIS SO I CAN REMOVE THIS NOTICE.

ConSluttant

Because everyone needs advice. Even Thots.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
If you’ve been following this or the subpoena thread, you likely know that I’m the individual currently identified as “John Doe 37” in the case Milwaukee County Case Number 2021CV000500 Patrick S Tomlinson vs. JOHN DOES 1-60 NAMES UNKNOWN, (L, Captcha blocks archive), which was filed on January 26th, 2021.

In the complaint (L , Captcha blocks archive) submitted with the filing, I’m mentioned in the nineteenth entry under the “Factual Allegations” heading, where a series of outrageously false allegations are leveled against me. In this post, I will provide copious evidence of this, mostly provided by the Plaintiff himself. The aforementioned allegation reads as follows:

View attachment 2237102



My response to Allegation 19 is divided into the following sections:
  • 19a. The false claim that the cherry-picked quote “Patrick Tomlinson understands that desperate times call for desperate measures, including beating women….” is false and defamatory, considering evidence in the form of the Plaintiff’s own statements.
  • 19b. The false claim that I doxed the Plaintiff in the 1-20-2020 post mentioned in the claim
  • 19c. The false claim that the dox posted by someone else in the Kiwifarms thread led to John Does 1-60 continuously contacting Plaintiff and his family members with unwelcome, obscene, and distressing phone calls and texts.
  • 19d. Because I am named as John Doe 37, the “John Does 1-60” claim falsely accuses me of participating in the aforementioned phone calls and texts to Patrick and his family members, without providing any reason or evidence in support.


19a. The false claim that the cherry-picked quote “Patrick Tomlinson understands that desperate times call for desperate measures, including beating women….” is false and defamatory, considering evidence in the form of the Plaintiff’s own statements



The above is the full quote from which the Plaintiff’s counsel extracted only the first sentence for their complaint. Where it is originally posted, the paragraph is immediately followed by screenshots of and links to several public statements by Patrick that corroborate the claim that he considers it acceptable to beat women who wear MAGA hats.

The following are screenshots of the “Repost” of the Plaintiff’s to his personal website (A, L) . He deleted the original from Facebook (A, original deleted by Plaintiff) ) for fear of being reported and suspended yet again, as he states in the first paragraph. That paragraph and a spacing correction, are the only differences between the two.

View attachment 2237109
View attachment 2237110

It would be best if the post, in which the Plaintiff ascribes many terrible beliefs to specific hat wearers, to be read in full, but the following quotes are especially relevant to the case:



Some might find the wording, "got herself a black eye" questionable.



According to the Plaintiff, a woman who merely wears a MAGA hat is "on the side of" terrorists.







Would it be possible to ask Judge Ashley whether Mr. Tomlinson's claims about socking people in their "stupid face" are correct?



Those who argue that a man would never hit a woman, even over something as grievous as headgear, are “pearl-clutchers”? Also, who comprises “we,” Mr. Tomlinson? If, and only if, it is decided by “pearl-clutchers” that you and other men in your group (“we”) are not allowed to beat a woman over a hat, why would you then scout out lesbian roller derby talent to carry out beatings at your behest? How do you now argue that you do not condone violence against women for the reasons I stated in the original thread? How do you salvage your false claim that my statement was defamatory?

He would go on to state on Reddit that to claim beating women just for wearing Trump hats is evil is “wrong” (A, L).

On GoodReads, when asked about striking a woman in a MAGA hat, he would respond, “‘Punch Nazis’ is not a controversial statement, child.”
View attachment 2237124(A, Deleted)

When confronted with a screenshot of his post on Twitter, he responded as follows:
View attachment 2237126 (A, L)

View attachment 2237135(A, L)


According to the Plaintiff, one way to qualify as a Nazi or punchable equivalent is to wear a MAGA hat. No word yet on the acceptability of punching minors.
View attachment 2237178(A, L)
View attachment 2237181(A, L)


Relevant to the hat-punch tweets, the Plaintiff also had this to say about MAGA hat wearers being robbed at knifepoint:
View attachment 2237142
View attachment 2237143(A, L)

On the topic of throwing drinks on "fascists" for political reasons:
View attachment 2237147(Archive doesn't work, L)
(Milkshaking is the act of throwing milkshakes and other drinks at targets as a means of political protest in a manner similar to egging or pieing)

The Plaintiff's hope.
View attachment 2237159(A, L)

63,000,000 evil people.
View attachment 2237162(A, L)
View attachment 2237163 (A, L)

Only utterly and forever.
View attachment 2237200
View attachment 2237199(A, deleted by Plaintiff)


View attachment 2237202 (A, L)


View attachment 2237203(A, L)


Traitor classification and policy.
View attachment 2237206
View attachment 2237207
View attachment 2237208(A, L)

View attachment 2237212(A, L)

View attachment 2237222(A, L)


Punching aside, could the Plaintiff clarify whether women who wear MAGA hats should be raped and executed?
View attachment 2237224
View attachment 2237225(A, L)




19b. The false claim that I doxed the Plaintiff in the 1-20-2020 post linked in the claim

The complaint claims I posted the Plaintiff's dox in the first post of the thread.

I didn't post those dox. In fact, I even deleted them at one point, but they were added back in. If the XenForo forum software tracks edits, it will show that other users were altering the post(s).

View attachment 2237252 (A, L)


19c. The false claim that the dox posted by someone else in the Kiwifarms thread led to John Does 1-60 continuously contacting the Plaintiff and his family members with unwelcome, obscene, and distressing phone calls and texts


According to the Plaintiff himself, he was already doxed by members of the O&A Community long before my thread appeared on Kiwifarms (January 2020), as far back as September 2018.

(34s clip of 1:08:00 video found here)
View attachment 2237269


Other instances of Patrick revealing he had already been doxed.

10-11-2018
View attachment 2237283(A, L)

05-21-2019
View attachment 2237280(A, L)

A year before 08-14-19
View attachment 2237281
View attachment 2237282(A, L)

View attachment 2237284(A, L)

View attachment 2237285(A, L)

View attachment 2237286(A, L)

Doxxed for “weeks” prior to Aug 20, 2019
View attachment 2237287(A, L)

View attachment 2237288(A, L)



As for the site-that-shall-not-be-named operated by John Doe 1, Patrick was already “doxxed” using publicly available documents (from Zillow) four weeks before my thread was posted on Kiwifarms. I’m not going to link to that site here for the time being, because I could be accused of driving traffic to a “shaming site,” as the Plaintiff’s counsel calls it, but I can produce proof. Additionally, John Does 1, 8, 29, and 32 named in the lawsuit also joined the website before my thread was posted here. Several of the usernames are references to the pre-ban sub, or events that took place long before my Kiwifarms thread was posted.

I remind you that my thread was posted to Kiwifarms on January 20th, 2020 to the private (visible to members only) Prospering Grounds forum, and did not even enter the main forums until May 19th, 2020, receiving only 70 posts from users other than myself before Null posted about the subpoena on April 7th, 2021.

Patrick saying no one on Kiwifarms cared about the thread in the 12-15-2020 podcast. He filed his complaint on 1-26-2020.

(18:31)
View attachment 2237313


A timeline of the Patrick S. Tomlinson Kiwifarms Thread that nearly no one cared about before the Plaintiff's subpoena
  • 01-20-2020 Part 1 and Part 2 Posted in Prospering Grounds, Part 2 Reserved () Post 2 updated between May 12th and May 19th. Dox posted by someone else.
  • Feb 3rd
    • Dox reposted after I deleted them at some point.
  • 2-16-2020 Update
  • No new posts until 05-17-2020
  • 05-19-2020 Moved out of Prospering Grounds
  • 06-15-2020 Minor Update one month later.
  • 09-19-2020 Update over 3 months later.
  • 09-24-2020 Minor Update
  • 11-19-2020 Answered question posed on 10-31-2020.
  • 12-15-2020 SS Update
  • 01-27-2021 Lawsuit Update
  • 03-16-2021 Defendant Update 1/2
  • 03-27-2021 Defendant Update 2/2 (Patrick mentioned first dox was 2-19-2017)
  • 04-27-2021 Null (Post 92) 20 posts by me, mostly seeking feedback
    • Only 71 posts in 15 months by other users prior to subpoena notice


I've compiled over 50 of the Plaintiff’s posts on Twitter and Reddit in which he claims to be the victim of an online harassment campaign into a spreadsheet. As you can see below, I used the date the each post was submitted and subtracted the number of months claimed to find the date, in the Plaintiff’s own words, the harassment would have begun. I was conservative with every date in favor of the Plaintiff. For example, “over 18 months” was treated as 18 months; “years-long” was treated as 24 months. I wanted to make the point of how much earlier it was than the date of this thread being posted (1-20-2020).

View attachment 2237322
View attachment 2237323


Of the posts I’ve found so far, 7 claim the “campaign” began in June 2018.
View attachment 2237373(A, L)View attachment 2237375(A, L)
View attachment 2237376(A, L)View attachment 2237377(A, L)
View attachment 2237378(A, L)View attachment 2237379(A, L)
View attachment 2237380(A, L)


Seven posts claim it began in July 2018.

View attachment 2237381(A, L)
View attachment 2237382(A, L) View attachment 2237383(A, L)
View attachment 2237384(A, L)View attachment 2237386(A, L)
View attachment 2237387(A, L)
View attachment 223738815 (A, L)


Six posts claim it began in August 2018.
View attachment 2237389(A, L) View attachment 2237390(A, L)
View attachment 2237391(A, L)View attachment 2237392(A, L)
View attachment 2237393(A, L) View attachment 2237279(A, L)


Eighteen posts claim it began in September 2018.

View attachment 2237394(A, L) View attachment 2237396(A, L)
View attachment 2237397(A, L)View attachment 2237398(A, L)
View attachment 2237399(A, L)View attachment 2237400(A, L)
View attachment 2237401(A, L)
View attachment 2237402(A, L)
View attachment 2237403(A, L)
View attachment 2237404(A, L)
View attachment 2237405(A, L)
View attachment 2237406(A, L)View attachment 2237407(A, L)
View attachment 2237408(A, L)View attachment 2237409(A, L)
View attachment 2237410(A, L)View attachment 2237411(A, L)
View attachment 2237412(A, L)


Three posts claim it began in October 2018.

View attachment 2237414(A, L)
View attachment 2237415(A, L)
View attachment 2237416(A, L)


Three posts claim it began in November 2018

View attachment 2237417(A, L)View attachment 2237418(A, L)View attachment 2237419(A, L)


Three posts claim it began in December 2018

View attachment 2237420
View attachment 2237421(A, L)

View attachment 2237422(A, L)View attachment 2237423(A, L)


One post claims it began in January 2019
View attachment 2237424(A, L)


Two posts claim it began in February 2019

View attachment 2237425(A, L)View attachment 2237426(A, L)


One post claims it began in March 2019.

View attachment 2237427(A, L)



Two posts made in November 2019 claim it began a year or more prior, placing it at November 2018 at the latest.

View attachment 2237367(A, L) View attachment 2237368(A, L)



Finally, in the Strictly Stalking appearance, he recounts being banned for a second time (on October 20th, 2020) as a result of stalkers who had been “stalking him for two years, every day,” meaning he was being trolled as early as October 20th, 2018.
View attachment 2237349


The following is a list of posts made by Patrick on his Instagram in April 2019, showing his eagerness to engage with trolls even while banned from Twitter (the first time).

Banned from Twitter and Facebook, documented his back and forth with the trolls. April on IG (Archives no longer work)


View attachment 2237353(L)View attachment 2237354(L)
View attachment 2237355(L)View attachment 2237356(L)
View attachment 2237357(L)View attachment 2237358(L)
View attachment 2237359(L)View attachment 2237360(L)
View attachment 2237361(L)View attachment 2237362(L)

Speaking of April 2019, two videos by well-known content creators were made on Patrick's feud with the r/OpieAndAnthony subreddit were posted to YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8UJbg2ymGE 04-13-2019 Metokur Doc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v307lugcOo 04-15-2019 Porsalin Doc

The events described by the Plaintiff in the following clip would have taken place between June and September:
View attachment 2237343


Why would a group targeting Patrick, allegedly based on the site belonging to John Doe (where Patrick’s dox could already be found before my Kiwifarms thread was posted) rely on me to post an off-site thread that received extremely low traffic prior to his subpoena of Cloudflare for Kiwifarms’ owner’s information, when there is an uninterrupted period of conflict between him and the former r/opieandanthony community from September 2018?

Patrick himself states that, in September of 2018, there were “a few hundred that were actively engaged” and thirty-thousand “hangers on.”
View attachment 2237332

When properly examined, the allegation makes absolutely no sense at all. The record of his interactions with trolls since 09-11-18 is the material that makes up the 1-20-20 thread, the thread they claim in their 1-26-2020 filing caused Patrick to be targeted by a campaign of cyberharassment....



19d. Because I am named as John Doe 37, the “John Does 1-60” claim falsely accuses me of participating in these phone calls and texts to Patrick and his family members, without providing any reason or evidence for believing so

Let me be clear, I have never
  • called or texted Patrick or any of his family members.
  • left a review or rating on any of his books on any site.
  • posted anything on any obituary site
  • even been to Wisconsin (and I live many hundreds of miles away from Wisconsin)
  • harassed him on YouTube or any social media (Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc.)
  • instructed anyone to take any action against him.
I do not know the identity of any other John Does. See this December 2020 clip SAVE StSt video.
(49:50)
View attachment 2237337


Despite researching for a while now, I honestly still don’t understand how this process works at this stage as a “John Doe” at all. I’m willing to talk to Null, Robert Barnes, or Judge Ashley by email or phone in the event that’s both wanted and allowed. In the meantime, I’m going to continue preparing a motion to quash, as unnecessary as that should be.

The baselessness of the allegations against me, and the fact that they are disproven in the very same posts from which they were drawn, has been very embittering for me. Naming me in this lawsuit is nothing but a ploy by a hateful, narcissistic liar seeking to erase a record of years of his shameful behavior.
Honestly don't let it make you upset. I understand the outrage completely. All he wants to do is get a rise out of you. Don't let him win. Write your motion. It is your best weapon. Annihilate him with it. Even if you never get to file it it will be cathartic for you. Keep your receipts close. Archive everything. You are Kiwi. You can do this. ❤️
 

Melissa Sanchez

kiwifarms.net
If you’ve been following this or the subpoena thread, you likely know that I’m the individual currently identified as “John Doe 37” in the case Milwaukee County Case Number 2021CV000500 Patrick S Tomlinson vs. JOHN DOES 1-60 NAMES UNKNOWN, (L, Captcha blocks archive), which was filed on January 26th, 2021.

In the complaint (L , Captcha blocks archive) submitted with the filing, I’m mentioned in the nineteenth entry under the “Factual Allegations” heading, where a series of outrageously false allegations are leveled against me. In this post, I will provide copious evidence of this, mostly provided by the Plaintiff himself. The aforementioned allegation reads as follows:

View attachment 2237102



My response to Allegation 19 is divided into the following sections:
  • 19a. The false claim that the cherry-picked quote “Patrick Tomlinson understands that desperate times call for desperate measures, including beating women….” is false and defamatory, considering evidence in the form of the Plaintiff’s own statements.
  • 19b. The false claim that I doxed the Plaintiff in the 1-20-2020 post mentioned in the claim
  • 19c. The false claim that the dox posted by someone else in the Kiwifarms thread led to John Does 1-60 continuously contacting Plaintiff and his family members with unwelcome, obscene, and distressing phone calls and texts.
  • 19d. Because I am named as John Doe 37, the “John Does 1-60” claim falsely accuses me of participating in the aforementioned phone calls and texts to Patrick and his family members, without providing any reason or evidence in support.


19a. The false claim that the cherry-picked quote “Patrick Tomlinson understands that desperate times call for desperate measures, including beating women….” is false and defamatory, considering evidence in the form of the Plaintiff’s own statements



The above is the full quote from which the Plaintiff’s counsel extracted only the first sentence for their complaint. Where it is originally posted, the paragraph is immediately followed by screenshots of and links to several public statements by Patrick that corroborate the claim that he considers it acceptable to beat women who wear MAGA hats.

The following are screenshots of the “Repost” of the Plaintiff’s to his personal website (A, L) . He deleted the original from Facebook (A, original deleted by Plaintiff) ) for fear of being reported and suspended yet again, as he states in the first paragraph. That paragraph and a spacing correction, are the only differences between the two.

View attachment 2237109
View attachment 2237110

It would be best if the post, in which the Plaintiff ascribes many terrible beliefs to specific hat wearers, to be read in full, but the following quotes are especially relevant to the case:



Some might find the wording, "got herself a black eye" questionable.



According to the Plaintiff, a woman who merely wears a MAGA hat is "on the side of" terrorists.







Would it be possible to ask Judge Ashley whether Mr. Tomlinson's claims about socking people in their "stupid face" are correct?



Those who argue that a man would never hit a woman, even over something as grievous as headgear, are “pearl-clutchers”? Also, who comprises “we,” Mr. Tomlinson? If, and only if, it is decided by “pearl-clutchers” that you and other men in your group (“we”) are not allowed to beat a woman over a hat, why would you then scout out lesbian roller derby talent to carry out beatings at your behest? How do you now argue that you do not condone violence against women for the reasons I stated in the original thread? How do you salvage your false claim that my statement was defamatory?

He would go on to state on Reddit that to claim beating women just for wearing Trump hats is evil is “wrong” (A, L).

On GoodReads, when asked about striking a woman in a MAGA hat, he would respond, “‘Punch Nazis’ is not a controversial statement, child.”
View attachment 2237124(A, Deleted)

When confronted with a screenshot of his post on Twitter, he responded as follows:
View attachment 2237126 (A, L)

View attachment 2237135(A, L)


According to the Plaintiff, one way to qualify as a Nazi or punchable equivalent is to wear a MAGA hat. No word yet on the acceptability of punching minors.
View attachment 2237178(A, L)
View attachment 2237181(A, L)


Relevant to the hat-punch tweets, the Plaintiff also had this to say about MAGA hat wearers being robbed at knifepoint:
View attachment 2237142
View attachment 2237143(A, L)

On the topic of throwing drinks on "fascists" for political reasons:
View attachment 2237147(Archive doesn't work, L)
(Milkshaking is the act of throwing milkshakes and other drinks at targets as a means of political protest in a manner similar to egging or pieing)

The Plaintiff's hope.
View attachment 2237159(A, L)

63,000,000 evil people.
View attachment 2237162(A, L)
View attachment 2237163 (A, L)

Only utterly and forever.
View attachment 2237200
View attachment 2237199(A, deleted by Plaintiff)


View attachment 2237202 (A, L)


View attachment 2237203(A, L)


Traitor classification and policy.
View attachment 2237206
View attachment 2237207
View attachment 2237208(A, L)

View attachment 2237212(A, L)

View attachment 2237222(A, L)


Punching aside, could the Plaintiff clarify whether women who wear MAGA hats should be raped and executed?
View attachment 2237224
View attachment 2237225(A, L)




19b. The false claim that I doxed the Plaintiff in the 1-20-2020 post linked in the claim

The complaint claims I posted the Plaintiff's dox in the first post of the thread.

I didn't post those dox. In fact, I even deleted them at one point, but they were added back in. If the XenForo forum software tracks edits, it will show that other users were altering the post(s).

View attachment 2237252 (A, L)


19c. The false claim that the dox posted by someone else in the Kiwifarms thread led to John Does 1-60 continuously contacting the Plaintiff and his family members with unwelcome, obscene, and distressing phone calls and texts


According to the Plaintiff himself, he was already doxed by members of the O&A Community long before my thread appeared on Kiwifarms (January 2020), as far back as September 2018.

(34s clip of 1:08:00 video found here)
View attachment 2237269


Other instances of Patrick revealing he had already been doxed.

10-11-2018
View attachment 2237283(A, L)

05-21-2019
View attachment 2237280(A, L)

A year before 08-14-19
View attachment 2237281
View attachment 2237282(A, L)

View attachment 2237284(A, L)

View attachment 2237285(A, L)

View attachment 2237286(A, L)

Doxxed for “weeks” prior to Aug 20, 2019
View attachment 2237287(A, L)

View attachment 2237288(A, L)



As for the site-that-shall-not-be-named operated by John Doe 1, Patrick was already “doxxed” using publicly available documents (from Zillow) four weeks before my thread was posted on Kiwifarms. I’m not going to link to that site here for the time being, because I could be accused of driving traffic to a “shaming site,” as the Plaintiff’s counsel calls it, but I can produce proof. Additionally, John Does 1, 8, 29, and 32 named in the lawsuit also joined the website before my thread was posted here. Several of the usernames are references to the pre-ban sub, or events that took place long before my Kiwifarms thread was posted.

I remind you that my thread was posted to Kiwifarms on January 20th, 2020 to the private (visible to members only) Prospering Grounds forum, and did not even enter the main forums until May 19th, 2020, receiving only 70 posts from users other than myself before Null posted about the subpoena on April 7th, 2021.

Patrick saying no one on Kiwifarms cared about the thread in the 12-15-2020 podcast. He filed his complaint on 1-26-2020.

(18:31)
View attachment 2237313


A timeline of the Patrick S. Tomlinson Kiwifarms Thread that nearly no one cared about before the Plaintiff's subpoena
  • 01-20-2020 Part 1 and Part 2 Posted in Prospering Grounds, Part 2 Reserved () Post 2 updated between May 12th and May 19th. Dox posted by someone else.
  • Feb 3rd
    • Dox reposted after I deleted them at some point.
  • 2-16-2020 Update
  • No new posts until 05-17-2020
  • 05-19-2020 Moved out of Prospering Grounds
  • 06-15-2020 Minor Update one month later.
  • 09-19-2020 Update over 3 months later.
  • 09-24-2020 Minor Update
  • 11-19-2020 Answered question posed on 10-31-2020.
  • 12-15-2020 SS Update
  • 01-27-2021 Lawsuit Update
  • 03-16-2021 Defendant Update 1/2
  • 03-27-2021 Defendant Update 2/2 (Patrick mentioned first dox was 2-19-2017)
  • 04-27-2021 Null (Post 92) 20 posts by me, mostly seeking feedback
    • Only 71 posts in 15 months by other users prior to subpoena notice


I've compiled over 50 of the Plaintiff’s posts on Twitter and Reddit in which he claims to be the victim of an online harassment campaign into a spreadsheet. As you can see below, I used the date the each post was submitted and subtracted the number of months claimed to find the date, in the Plaintiff’s own words, the harassment would have begun. I was conservative with every date in favor of the Plaintiff. For example, “over 18 months” was treated as 18 months; “years-long” was treated as 24 months. I wanted to make the point of how much earlier it was than the date of this thread being posted (1-20-2020).

View attachment 2237322
View attachment 2237323


Of the posts I’ve found so far, 7 claim the “campaign” began in June 2018.
View attachment 2237373(A, L)View attachment 2237375(A, L)
View attachment 2237376(A, L)View attachment 2237377(A, L)
View attachment 2237378(A, L)View attachment 2237379(A, L)
View attachment 2237380(A, L)


Seven posts claim it began in July 2018.

View attachment 2237381(A, L)
View attachment 2237382(A, L) View attachment 2237383(A, L)
View attachment 2237384(A, L)View attachment 2237386(A, L)
View attachment 2237387(A, L)
View attachment 223738815 (A, L)


Six posts claim it began in August 2018.
View attachment 2237389(A, L) View attachment 2237390(A, L)
View attachment 2237391(A, L)View attachment 2237392(A, L)
View attachment 2237393(A, L) View attachment 2237279(A, L)


Eighteen posts claim it began in September 2018.

View attachment 2237394(A, L) View attachment 2237396(A, L)
View attachment 2237397(A, L)View attachment 2237398(A, L)
View attachment 2237399(A, L)View attachment 2237400(A, L)
View attachment 2237401(A, L)
View attachment 2237402(A, L)
View attachment 2237403(A, L)
View attachment 2237404(A, L)
View attachment 2237405(A, L)
View attachment 2237406(A, L)View attachment 2237407(A, L)
View attachment 2237408(A, L)View attachment 2237409(A, L)
View attachment 2237410(A, L)View attachment 2237411(A, L)
View attachment 2237412(A, L)


Three posts claim it began in October 2018.

View attachment 2237414(A, L)
View attachment 2237415(A, L)
View attachment 2237416(A, L)


Three posts claim it began in November 2018

View attachment 2237417(A, L)View attachment 2237418(A, L)View attachment 2237419(A, L)


Three posts claim it began in December 2018

View attachment 2237420
View attachment 2237421(A, L)

View attachment 2237422(A, L)View attachment 2237423(A, L)


One post claims it began in January 2019
View attachment 2237424(A, L)


Two posts claim it began in February 2019

View attachment 2237425(A, L)View attachment 2237426(A, L)


One post claims it began in March 2019.

View attachment 2237427(A, L)



Two posts made in November 2019 claim it began a year or more prior, placing it at November 2018 at the latest.

View attachment 2237367(A, L) View attachment 2237368(A, L)



Finally, in the Strictly Stalking appearance, he recounts being banned for a second time (on October 20th, 2020) as a result of stalkers who had been “stalking him for two years, every day,” meaning he was being trolled as early as October 20th, 2018.
View attachment 2237349


The following is a list of posts made by Patrick on his Instagram in April 2019, showing his eagerness to engage with trolls even while banned from Twitter (the first time).

Banned from Twitter and Facebook, documented his back and forth with the trolls. April on IG (Archives no longer work)


View attachment 2237353(L)View attachment 2237354(L)
View attachment 2237355(L)View attachment 2237356(L)
View attachment 2237357(L)View attachment 2237358(L)
View attachment 2237359(L)View attachment 2237360(L)
View attachment 2237361(L)View attachment 2237362(L)

Speaking of April 2019, two videos by well-known content creators were made on Patrick's feud with the r/OpieAndAnthony subreddit were posted to YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8UJbg2ymGE 04-13-2019 Metokur Doc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v307lugcOo 04-15-2019 Porsalin Doc

The events described by the Plaintiff in the following clip would have taken place between June and September:
View attachment 2237343


Why would a group targeting Patrick, allegedly based on the site belonging to John Doe (where Patrick’s dox could already be found before my Kiwifarms thread was posted) rely on me to post an off-site thread that received extremely low traffic prior to his subpoena of Cloudflare for Kiwifarms’ owner’s information, when there is an uninterrupted period of conflict between him and the former r/opieandanthony community from September 2018?

Patrick himself states that, in September of 2018, there were “a few hundred that were actively engaged” and thirty-thousand “hangers on.”
View attachment 2237332

When properly examined, the allegation makes absolutely no sense at all. The record of his interactions with trolls since 09-11-18 is the material that makes up the 1-20-20 thread, the thread they claim in their 1-26-2020 filing caused Patrick to be targeted by a campaign of cyberharassment....



19d. Because I am named as John Doe 37, the “John Does 1-60” claim falsely accuses me of participating in these phone calls and texts to Patrick and his family members, without providing any reason or evidence for believing so

Let me be clear, I have never
  • called or texted Patrick or any of his family members.
  • left a review or rating on any of his books on any site.
  • posted anything on any obituary site
  • even been to Wisconsin (and I live many hundreds of miles away from Wisconsin)
  • harassed him on YouTube or any social media (Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc.)
  • instructed anyone to take any action against him.
I do not know the identity of any other John Does. See this December 2020 clip SAVE StSt video.
(49:50)
View attachment 2237337


Despite researching for a while now, I honestly still don’t understand how this process works at this stage as a “John Doe” at all. I’m willing to talk to Null, Robert Barnes, or Judge Ashley by email or phone in the event that’s both wanted and allowed. In the meantime, I’m going to continue preparing a motion to quash, as unnecessary as that should be.

The baselessness of the allegations against me, and the fact that they are disproven in the very same posts from which they were drawn, has been very embittering for me. Naming me in this lawsuit is nothing but a ploy by a hateful, narcissistic liar seeking to erase a record of years of his shameful behavior.
Hoooly crap. Nice sleuthing brotherman. I hope you aren't genuinely worried about this. He will run out of money long before he is in a position to serve people, and the vast majority of the "John Does" named, including yourself, have done absolutely nothing wrong.
 

Hey Fatrick FUCK YOU

kiwifarms.net
Fatrick Hamlinson is fat, and I don't even like Trump but I'd wear a MAGA hat in front of him just to watch him seethe impotently and fatly, and if he tried shit he'd be leaving in an ambulance.

He wouldn't do shit. Patrick is a bitch. He let another man steal his woman right in front of him and all he did was nervously smile and try to pretend like he wasn't dying inside. He is very timid and soft spoken. All the tough guy shit he does online is to compensate for the shame that he feels about who he really is in real life.
 

GeorgeFloyd

George Floyd did 9/11
kiwifarms.net
He wouldn't do shit. Patrick is a bitch. He let another man steal his woman right in front of him and all he did was nervously smile and try to pretend like he wasn't dying inside. He is very timid and soft spoken. All the tough guy shit he does online is to compensate for the shame that he feels about who he really is in real life.
He's the real deal.
 

lolwatagain

kiwifarms.net
If you’ve been following this or the subpoena thread, you likely know that I’m the individual currently identified as “John Doe 37” in the case Milwaukee County Case Number 2021CV000500 Patrick S Tomlinson vs. JOHN DOES 1-60 NAMES UNKNOWN, (L, Captcha blocks archive), which was filed on January 26th, 2021.

In the complaint (L , Captcha blocks archive) submitted with the filing, I’m mentioned in the nineteenth entry under the “Factual Allegations” heading, where a series of outrageously false allegations are leveled against me. In this post, I will provide copious evidence of this, mostly provided by the Plaintiff himself. The aforementioned allegation reads as follows:

View attachment 2237102



My response to Allegation 19 is divided into the following sections:
  • 19a. The false claim that the cherry-picked quote “Patrick Tomlinson understands that desperate times call for desperate measures, including beating women….” is false and defamatory, considering evidence in the form of the Plaintiff’s own statements.
  • 19b. The false claim that I doxed the Plaintiff in the 1-20-2020 post mentioned in the claim
  • 19c. The false claim that the dox posted by someone else in the Kiwifarms thread led to John Does 1-60 continuously contacting the Plaintiff and his family members with unwelcome, obscene, and distressing phone calls and texts.
  • 19d. Because I am named as John Doe 37, the “John Does 1-60” claim falsely accuses me of participating in the aforementioned phone calls and texts to Patrick and his family members, without providing any reason or evidence in support.


19a. The false claim that the cherry-picked quote “Patrick Tomlinson understands that desperate times call for desperate measures, including beating women….” is false and defamatory, considering evidence in the form of the Plaintiff’s own statements



The above is the full quote from which the Plaintiff’s counsel extracted only the first sentence for their complaint. Where it is originally posted, the paragraph is immediately followed by screenshots of and links to several public statements by Patrick that corroborate the claim that he considers it acceptable to beat women who wear MAGA hats.

The following are screenshots of the “Repost” of the Plaintiff’s to his personal website (A, L) . He deleted the original from Facebook (A, original deleted by Plaintiff) ) for fear of being reported and suspended yet again, as he states in the first paragraph. That paragraph and a spacing correction are the only differences between the two.

View attachment 2237109
View attachment 2237110

It would be best if the post, in which the Plaintiff ascribes many terrible beliefs to specific hat wearers, be read in full, but the following quotes are especially relevant to the case:



Some might find the wording, "got herself a black eye" questionable.



According to the Plaintiff, a woman who merely wears a MAGA hat is "on the side of" terrorists.







Would it be possible to ask Judge Ashley whether Mr. Tomlinson's claims about socking people in their "stupid face" are correct?



Those who argue that a man should never hit a woman, even over something as grievous as headgear, are “pearl-clutchers”? Also, who comprises “we,” Mr. Tomlinson? If, and only if, it is decided by “pearl-clutchers” that you and other men in your group (“we”) are not allowed to beat a woman over a hat, why would you then scout out lesbian roller derby talent to carry out beatings at your behest? How do you now argue that you do not condone violence against women for the reasons I stated in the original thread? How do you salvage your false claim that my statement was defamatory?

He would go on to state on Reddit that to claim beating women just for wearing Trump hats is evil is “wrong” (A, L).

On GoodReads, when asked about striking a woman in a MAGA hat, he would respond, “‘Punch Nazis’ is not a controversial statement, child.”
View attachment 2237124(A, Deleted)

When confronted with a screenshot of his post on Twitter, he responded as follows:
View attachment 2237126 (A, L)

View attachment 2237135(A, L)


According to the Plaintiff, one way to qualify as a Nazi or punchable equivalent is to wear a MAGA hat. No word yet on the acceptability of punching minors.
View attachment 2237178(A, L)
View attachment 2237181(A, L)


Relevant to the hat-punch tweets, the Plaintiff also had this to say about MAGA hat wearers being robbed at knifepoint:
View attachment 2237142
View attachment 2237143(A, L)

On the topic of throwing drinks on "fascists" for political reasons:
View attachment 2237147(Archive doesn't work, L)
(Milkshaking is the act of throwing milkshakes and other drinks at targets as a means of political protest in a manner similar to egging or pieing)

The Plaintiff's hope.
View attachment 2237159(A, L)

63,000,000 evil people.
View attachment 2237162(A, L)
View attachment 2237163 (A, L)

Only utterly and forever.
View attachment 2237200
View attachment 2237199(A, deleted by Plaintiff)


View attachment 2237202 (A, L)


View attachment 2237203(A, L)


Traitor classification and policy.
View attachment 2237206
View attachment 2237207
View attachment 2237208(A, L)

View attachment 2237212(A, L)

View attachment 2237222(A, L)


Punching aside, could the Plaintiff clarify whether women who wear MAGA hats should be raped and executed?
View attachment 2237224
View attachment 2237225(A, L)




19b. The false claim that I doxed the Plaintiff in the 1-20-2020 post linked in the claim

The complaint claims I posted the Plaintiff's dox in the first post of the thread.

I didn't post those dox. In fact, I even deleted them at one point, but they were added back in. If the XenForo forum software tracks edits, it will show that other users were altering the post(s).

View attachment 2237252 (A, L)


19c. The false claim that the dox posted by someone else in the Kiwifarms thread led to John Does 1-60 continuously contacting the Plaintiff and his family members with unwelcome, obscene, and distressing phone calls and texts


According to the Plaintiff himself, he was already doxed by members of the O&A Community long before my thread appeared on Kiwifarms (January 2020), as far back as September 2018.

(34s clip of 1:08:00 video found here)
View attachment 2237269


Other instances of Patrick revealing he had already been doxed.

10-11-2018
View attachment 2237283(A, L)

05-21-2019
View attachment 2237280(A, L)

A year before 08-14-19
View attachment 2237281
View attachment 2237282(A, L)

View attachment 2237284(A, L)

View attachment 2237285(A, L)

View attachment 2237286(A, L)

Doxxed for “weeks” prior to Aug 20, 2019
View attachment 2237287(A, L)

View attachment 2237288(A, L)



As for the site-that-shall-not-be-named operated by John Doe 1, Patrick was already “doxxed” using publicly available documents (from Zillow) four weeks before my thread was posted on Kiwifarms. I’m not going to link to that site here for the time being, because I could be accused of driving traffic to a “shaming site,” as the Plaintiff’s counsel calls it, but I can produce proof. Additionally, John Does 1, 8, 29, and 32 named in the lawsuit also joined the website before my thread was posted here. Several of the usernames are references to the pre-ban sub, or events that took place long before my Kiwifarms thread was posted.

I remind you that my thread was posted to Kiwifarms on January 20th, 2020 to the private (visible to members only) Prospering Grounds forum, and did not even enter the main forums until May 19th, 2020, receiving only 70 posts from users other than myself before Null posted about the subpoena on April 7th, 2021.

Patrick saying no one on Kiwifarms cared about the thread in the 12-15-2020 podcast. He filed his complaint on 1-26-2020.

(18:31)
View attachment 2237313


A timeline of the Patrick S. Tomlinson Kiwifarms Thread that nearly no one cared about before the Plaintiff's subpoena
  • 01-20-2020 Part 1 and Part 2 Posted in Prospering Grounds, Part 2 Reserved () Post 2 updated between May 12th and May 19th. Dox posted by someone else.
  • Feb 3rd
    • Dox reposted after I deleted them at some point.
  • 2-16-2020 Update
  • No new posts until 05-17-2020
  • 05-19-2020 Moved out of Prospering Grounds
  • 06-15-2020 Minor Update one month later.
  • 09-19-2020 Update over 3 months later.
  • 09-24-2020 Minor Update
  • 11-19-2020 Answered question posed on 10-31-2020.
  • 12-15-2020 SS Update
  • 01-27-2021 Lawsuit Update
  • 03-16-2021 Defendant Update 1/2
  • 03-27-2021 Defendant Update 2/2 (Patrick mentioned first dox was 2-19-2017)
  • 04-27-2021 Null (Post 92) 20 posts by me, mostly seeking feedback
    • Only 71 posts in 15 months by other users prior to subpoena notice


I've compiled over 50 of the Plaintiff’s posts on Twitter and Reddit in which he claims to be the victim of an online harassment campaign into a spreadsheet. As you can see below, I used the date the each post was submitted and subtracted the number of months claimed to find the date, in the Plaintiff’s own words, the harassment would have begun. I was conservative with every date in favor of the Plaintiff. For example, “over 18 months” was treated as 18 months; “years-long” was treated as 24 months. I wanted to make the point of how much earlier it was than the date of this thread being posted (1-20-2020).

View attachment 2237322
View attachment 2237323


Of the posts I’ve found so far, 7 claim the “campaign” began in June 2018.
View attachment 2237373(A, L)View attachment 2237375(A, L)
View attachment 2237376(A, L)View attachment 2237377(A, L)
View attachment 2237378(A, L)View attachment 2237379(A, L)
View attachment 2237380(A, L)


Seven posts claim it began in July 2018.

View attachment 2237381(A, L)
View attachment 2237382(A, L) View attachment 2237383(A, L)
View attachment 2237384(A, L)View attachment 2237386(A, L)
View attachment 2237387(A, L)
View attachment 223738815 (A, L)


Six posts claim it began in August 2018.
View attachment 2237389(A, L) View attachment 2237390(A, L)
View attachment 2237391(A, L)View attachment 2237392(A, L)
View attachment 2237393(A, L) View attachment 2237279(A, L)


Eighteen posts claim it began in September 2018.

View attachment 2237394(A, L) View attachment 2237396(A, L)
View attachment 2237397(A, L)View attachment 2237398(A, L)
View attachment 2237399(A, L)View attachment 2237400(A, L)
View attachment 2237401(A, L)
View attachment 2237402(A, L)
View attachment 2237403(A, L)
View attachment 2237404(A, L)
View attachment 2237405(A, L)
View attachment 2237406(A, L)View attachment 2237407(A, L)
View attachment 2237408(A, L)View attachment 2237409(A, L)
View attachment 2237410(A, L)View attachment 2237411(A, L)
View attachment 2237412(A, L)


Three posts claim it began in October 2018.

View attachment 2237414(A, L)
View attachment 2237415(A, L)
View attachment 2237416(A, L)


Three posts claim it began in November 2018

View attachment 2237417(A, L)View attachment 2237418(A, L)View attachment 2237419(A, L)


Three posts claim it began in December 2018

View attachment 2237420
View attachment 2237421(A, L)

View attachment 2237422(A, L)View attachment 2237423(A, L)


One post claims it began in January 2019
View attachment 2237424(A, L)


Two posts claim it began in February 2019

View attachment 2237425(A, L)View attachment 2237426(A, L)


One post claims it began in March 2019.

View attachment 2237427(A, L)



Two posts made in November 2019 claim it began a year or more prior, placing it at November 2018 at the latest.

View attachment 2237367(A, L) View attachment 2237368(A, L)



Finally, in the Strictly Stalking appearance, he recounts being banned for a second time (on October 20th, 2020) as a result of stalkers who had been “stalking him for two years, every day,” meaning he was being trolled as early as October 20th, 2018.
View attachment 2237349


The following is a list of posts made by Patrick on his Instagram in April 2019, showing his eagerness to engage with trolls even while banned from Twitter (the first time).

Banned from Twitter and Facebook, documented his back and forth with the trolls. April on IG (Archives no longer work)


View attachment 2237353(L)View attachment 2237354(L)
View attachment 2237355(L)View attachment 2237356(L)
View attachment 2237357(L)View attachment 2237358(L)
View attachment 2237359(L)View attachment 2237360(L)
View attachment 2237361(L)View attachment 2237362(L)

Speaking of April 2019, two videos by well-known content creators were made on Patrick's feud with the r/OpieAndAnthony subreddit were posted to YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8UJbg2ymGE 04-13-2019 Metokur Doc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v307lugcOo 04-15-2019 Porsalin Doc

The events described by the Plaintiff in the following clip would have taken place between June and September:
View attachment 2237343


Why would a group targeting Patrick, allegedly based on the site belonging to John Doe (where Patrick’s dox could already be found before my Kiwifarms thread was posted) rely on me to post an off-site thread that received extremely low traffic prior to his subpoena of Cloudflare for Kiwifarms’ owner’s information, when there is an uninterrupted period of conflict between him and the former r/opieandanthony community from September 2018?

Patrick himself states that, in September of 2018, there were “a few hundred that were actively engaged” and thirty-thousand “hangers on.”
View attachment 2237332

When properly examined, the allegation makes absolutely no sense at all. The record of his interactions with trolls since 09-11-18 is the material that makes up the 1-20-20 thread, the thread they claim in their 1-26-2021 filing caused Patrick to be targeted by a campaign of cyberharassment....



19d. Because I am named as John Doe 37, the “John Does 1-60” claim falsely accuses me of participating in these phone calls and texts to Patrick and his family members, without providing any reason or evidence for believing so

Let me be clear, I have never
  • called or texted Patrick or any of his family members.
  • left a review or rating on any of his books on any site.
  • posted anything on any obituary site
  • even been to Wisconsin (and I live many hundreds of miles away from Wisconsin)
  • harassed him on YouTube or any social media (Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc.)
  • instructed anyone to take any action against him.
I do not know the identity of any other John Does. See this December 2020 clip:
(49:50 in original video)
View attachment 2237337


Despite researching for a while now, I honestly still don’t understand how this process works at this stage as a “John Doe” at all. I’m willing to talk to Null, Robert Barnes, or Judge Ashley by email or phone in the event that’s both wanted and allowed. In the meantime, I’m going to continue preparing a motion to quash, as unnecessary as that should be.

The baselessness of the allegations against me, and the fact that they are disproven in the very same posts from which they were drawn, has been very embittering for me. Naming me in this lawsuit is nothing but a ploy by a hateful, narcissistic liar seeking to erase a record of years of his shameful behavior.

Edit: Fixed a date and removed an unneeded video clip filename meant to remind me to include it.
God, I hope you live in a state with strong Anti-SLAPP laws with fee-shifting provisions and find a lawyer who is willing to do this pro-bono and yet have enough experience to justify a high multiplier for the lodestar calculations for determining fee-shifting damages. That way Fatrick can give you money for his bullshit.
 

AnOminous

μολὼν λαβέ
True & Honest Fan
Retired Staff
kiwifarms.net
God, I hope you live in a state with strong Anti-SLAPP laws with fee-shifting provisions and find a lawyer who is willing to do this pro-bono and yet have enough experience to justify a high multiplier for the lodestar calculations for determining fee-shifting damages. That way Fatrick can give you money for his bullshit.
Unfortunately, the case itself is in Wisconsin. On the good side, quite possibly the court doesn't even have personal jurisdiction.
 

Caverlock

kiwifarms.net
Unfortunately, the case itself is in Wisconsin. On the good side, quite possibly the court doesn't even have personal jurisdiction.

My understanding is that, since I'm not from Wisconsin, have never been to Wisconsin, and have never done business in Wisconsin, he would have no option but to sue me in my state of residence, which has a very strong, unanimously passed Anti-SLAPP law in place. I'd like to add that I live over 750 miles away from Patrick's wife's house.

From everything I've found so far, from the laws as written, to in practice in recent verdicts, he would be annihilated in court if he filed against me in my state, and be forced to reimburse my attorney's fees and all court costs; he would also potentially be subject to paying sanctions if his claim is deemed frivolous or intended to intimidate and/or wrongfully censor. I would have at least 60 days to file a petition under Anti-SLAPP. It would only get this far, of course, if my motion to quash failed (Patrick would be forced to reimburse my quash fees if I succeeded). After petitioning under Anti-SLAPP, Patrick would then be forced to make a prima facie case for each of his claims, which would fail utterly.

The two real issues for me are money (shelling it out rapidly by the thousands and likely not being reimbursed for many years), and Patrick getting my information. I naively thought that, since I was doing nothing remotely illegal, that this would never be an issue for me. It's truly been an education.

At this point, I'm doing everything I can to finish up the motion to quash (edit: I haven't been contacted by my ISP), formatting it properly in Chicago style (to which I am entirely new), and following online templates to get it as close to proper as possible. At some point, if it advanced, I would have to hire an actual lawyer to look over things, and my costs would quickly reach into the thousands just in consultation and to check over what I've done. I haven't done that yet, because I'm doubting even someone like Patrick will seek to actually file against me; however, he could still end up with my personal information without doing so, given incompetence like with Patrick's counsel getting Null's Cloudflare information before he had time to respond, the judge being overly permissive, or who knows what.

I have to be honest that, despite several hours of research on the specific topic, I'm still very confused about my rights and options as a John Doe. It hasn't helped that 99.9% of search results on the topic are John Does freaking out that they got busted pirating porn, video games, etc. and got a letter from their ISP about copyright holders demanding their info.
 

Illuminati Order Official

Supreme Judge in Deadpool's Circles of Heaven
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
I naively thought that, since I was doing nothing remotely illegal, that this would never be an issue for me. It's truly been an education.
You are not the first Kiwi to become a John Doe. Melinda tried to sue forum users so you may find her thread informative (that is, if you have the time to read through over 1000 pages).
 

Marvin

Christorical Figure
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Worst case scenario, if he does drag your dox out in a lawsuit, I'm sure you could collect donations for a defense. That'd probably be a bad ending for Fatrick though, because at that point I can't imagine you'd have much to lose, and you could collect all the donations you'd need. I think people would really give in this situation.

It'd still be gay if it came to that though.
 

The I Scream Man

You’re in the deep end now!
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Just constant spasms of "I know you are but what am I, stalker?" comments and the inability to roll with the punches at all, and yet he expects us to believe that he's any sort of combat capable. All he needs is to start making the soyface all the time and the transformation will be complete, he's mostly estrogen as it stands
 

Hey Fatrick FUCK YOU

kiwifarms.net
Unfortunately, the case itself is in Wisconsin. On the good side, quite possibly the court doesn't even have personal jurisdiction.
Wisconsin has absolutely no jurisdiction over people outside of the state. There are mountains of case law to back this up. At one of the hearings, Judge Ashley asked Fatrick's attorney (Brinton Resto), "Aren't we about to run into some issues with venue?", to which Brinton quickly replied "We have no reason to believe that any of the defendants live outside of Wisconsin". He knows that the case will be dropped as soon as out-of-state people are identified, and he will be forced to file in other states.
 

AnOminous

μολὼν λαβέ
True & Honest Fan
Retired Staff
kiwifarms.net
Wisconsin has absolutely no jurisdiction over people outside of the state. There are mountains of case law to back this up. At one of the hearings, Judge Ashley asked Fatrick's attorney (Brinton Resto), "Aren't we about to run into some issues with venue?", to which Brinton quickly replied "We have no reason to believe that any of the defendants live outside of Wisconsin". He knows that the case will be dropped as soon as out-of-state people are identified, and he will be forced to file in other states.
Wisconsin has a long-arm statute like any other state in the Union. He's also at least alleged some of the defendants physically entered the state to fuck with him, although I don't believe he's offered a trace of evidence for that. If none of the defendants are actually in Wisconsin, though, it could be removed to federal court for diversity of citizenship.

That said, just the fact of him being in Wisconsin himself doesn't confer jurisdiction over the whole country, and probably most or all of the defendants aren't subject to personal jurisdiction in Wisconsin just by calling some guy in Wisconsin fat.
 

Hey Fatrick FUCK YOU

kiwifarms.net
Wisconsin has a long-arm statute like any other state in the Union. He's also at least alleged some of the defendants physically entered the state to fuck with him, although I don't believe he's offered a trace of evidence for that. If none of the defendants are actually in Wisconsin, though, it could be removed to federal court for diversity of citizenship.

That said, just the fact of him being in Wisconsin himself doesn't confer jurisdiction over the whole country, and probably most or all of the defendants aren't subject to personal jurisdiction in Wisconsin just by calling some guy in Wisconsin fat.

For defamation law specifically, the case law indicates that defendants must have either lived or done business in Wisconsin for a significant amount of time in order to have jurisdiction.
 

Similar threads

Vexatious Litigant, Gun Fetishist, Armoured Closet Gay
Replies
5
Views
3K
Artist who’s obsessed with Fanboy & Chum Chum, regularly draws and writes fanfiction about child porn and child abuse
Replies
459
Views
137K
  • Locked
Elderly, Disabled Widower forced to take Turdsucking Pig to Court
Replies
3
Views
2K
Top