Pedophile acceptance on tumblr -

[wthfujoshis]

It's not a skeleton in your closet if you announce that you proudly love the idea of fucking kids. If they are non offending, then why is being a MAP something they have to tell everyone? How does that benefit anyone, other than letting everyone know to keep an eye on them or avoid as a kid? These people need psychiatric help, not ass pats. Using a sickness as a proud identity means that they are okay with it, as if everyone should look the other way.

They think they can get people to accept them and when that happens they'll try to get people to think that fucking kids is ok.
They're too stupid to realize they're just making it worse for themselves.

 

[Pargon]

They think they can get people to accept them and when that happens they'll try to get people to think that fucking kids is ok.
They're too stupid to realize they're just making it worse for themselves.

It's not stupid. It's how things are done. You push the "this is normal" narrative long and hard enough until it worms its way into the cultural subconscious and then all of a sudden if you do have a problem with it, you're a Bad Person and your opinions can be safely discarded out of hand.

Regardless of how you feel about it, this was how things like gay marriage were finally accepted in the US. I'd say the battle is more uphill in this case because lmao juvenile consent don't real but the plan is the same, and the plan works.

 

[wthfujoshis]

It's not stupid. It's how things are done. You push the "this is normal" narrative long and hard enough until it worms its way into the cultural subconscious and then all of a sudden if you do have a problem with it, you're a Bad Person and your opinions can be safely discarded out of hand.

Regardless of how you feel about it, this was how things like gay marriage were finally accepted in the US. I'd say the battle is more uphill in this case because lmao juvenile consent don't real but the plan is the same, and the plan works.

You can't compare adults marrying each other to adults fucking kids.

 

[Pargon]

You can't compare adults marrying each other to adults fucking kids.

I didn't, and I apologize if I came off that way. What I was saying was that the MAPs and their apologists are using the same method of normalizing pedophilia to turn it from a (largely) culturally unacceptable behavior to an acceptable one. The argument presented from about the 1970s onward was that gay people were just like heterosexual people, that being gay was not some all-encompassing degenerate lifestyle and that their ask was to have the same social and political rights to reflect that. The narrative has to be pushed universally and at every turn until the idea can take root. Once it has, then you'll start to see support from normies, and once Bob and Martha Johnson start thinking that having sex with kids is really just another lifestyle, that's the ballgame.

That was why I made mention of the MAP battle being more uphill, because they need to somehow present a convincing argument that a child can consent to sex, which they can't.

 

[Alberto Balsalm]

The MAP movement is essentially a revival of NAMBLA, an organization that never accomplished anything and imploded in child rape controversies, except this time it's stuffed with autistic furries and anime fans. They were fucked from the get-go.

 

[MemeGray]

That was why I made mention of the MAP battle being more uphill, because they need to somehow present a convincing argument that a child can consent to sex, which they can't.

If kids can take hormones and have srs then why can't they consent to sex?

The trans lobby is opening the path for pedophiles and before people cry slippery slope just look at how involved trannies and drag queens are trying to be with pre pubescent children.

 

[Alberto Balsalm]

If kids can take hormones and have srs then why can't they consent to sex?

The trans lobby is opening the path for pedophiles and before people cry slippery slope just look at how involved trannies and drag queens are trying to be with pre pubescent children.

Most of the big players there are very much aware that "children can't consent to sex" is as settled of a matter as it possibly can be. It's why parents of drag kids constantly insist it's not sexual!, and why Mermaids has disassociated from the LGBT to preempt any discussion about gay and lesbian children. They're still fucked, but they probably won't be making friends with the subjects of this thread any time soon.

 

[Meowthkip]

This is just indicative of the hardcore leftist mindset. They've lost their bearings completely when it comes to tolerance because they've spent their entire life living in a society that took over 3000 years to properly form the concepts of independence and freedom, liberty and justice, but were never once walked through it. They do not view the past as centuries of delicate experimentation and work up toward the future, but as the fetid bathwater which if not promptly disposed of, will kill their delicate baby.

But the pedophile. The pedophile has done nothing wrong. The pedophile has oppressed nobody.

Recently I attended a talk on Papua New Guinea by an anthropology teacher. When the conversation turned to tribes which sodomize boys between the age of 7-13 because they don't believe you are born with semen, and you must consume it. It was argued that this was moral because the society does not judge the boys. There are no moral consequences. In fact, since the boys cannot become men without being sodomized, the boys want to have sex

and there stands the grass. Without the conservative, the child would not know anything wrong had happened. The child would not know they are victimized. Society would not judge the child. The crime would not exist if it was not persecuted.

Imagine how many years it took to formulate the idea that a child had agency of it's own that must be protected. That we had an obligation to not brainwash or indoctrinate children politically. That if you groom a child to have sex with them, that is still you taking advantage of them. The idea of someone's formative years as something sacred, disposed of in a blink because otherwise, you would have to criticize other cultures.

And once you permit some pedophilia, how can you fight it elsewhere?

I think my main problem with this reasoning is that "not fucking children" is somehow a conservative value, when within the context of this tribe, boy-fucking is a tradition that isn't questioned, making it conservative. This also ignores that most activists fighting against sexual exploitation of children and sex-trafficking would be considered classically progressive, especially if they're working in third-world countries where the governments or leaders don't really give a fuck to what's happening to these children.

Just because some fucking opportunistic pedos try and trick moral relativists into thinking kiddy-diddling is hunky-dory, doesn't make that a liberal problem. Most SJWs are really quick to call anybody they don't like a pedo, and let's not forget that apparently American conservatives don't see a problem promoting a child-fucker for Senate.

If kids can take hormones and have srs then why can't they consent to sex?

The trans lobby is opening the path for pedophiles and before people cry slippery slope just look at how involved trannies and drag queens are trying to be with pre pubescent children.

Yeah, the trans lobby is... not helping. I think a lot of them are just projecting onto these children and can't see past the idea of "I wish I was able to take hormones when I was that age, everything would have been better for me, obviously my situation is exactly the same as this child's that I don't even know!" And that's the generous interpretation.

 

[Crunchy Leaf]

And gosh, isn't the Catholic Church pretty dang conservative on social issues? Didn't stop them.

 

[Alberto Balsalm]

And gosh, isn't the Catholic Church pretty dang conservative on social issues? Didn't stop them.

Doesn't matter what it is - if your movement has any sort of loophole that allows people to molest children and still be morally pure, pedos will find it. It's happened all over the place.

It makes some sense to think of MAPs as the ones who are too socially inept to pull off that sort of scheme. Pedocels.

 

[Great Dane]

Is it possible to report someone for evading a ban?

https://twitter.com/konarneme/status/1121938770687877122

https://twitter.com/Lnomap

https://twitter.com/LeotheMAP

edit: other people are aware of this

 

[Fields Of Rye]

I think my main problem with this reasoning is that "not fucking children" is somehow a conservative value, when within the context of this tribe, boy-fucking is a tradition that isn't questioned, making it conservative. This also ignores that most activists fighting against sexual exploitation of children and sex-trafficking would be considered classically progressive, especially if they're working in third-world countries where the governments or leaders don't really give a fuck to what's happening to these children.

Just because some fucking opportunistic pedos try and trick moral relativists into thinking kiddy-diddling is hunky-dory, doesn't make that a liberal problem. Most SJWs are really quick to call anybody they don't like a pedo, and let's not forget that apparently American conservatives don't see a problem promoting a child-fucker for Senate.

Yeah don't get me wrong, that wasn't meant to be an end all descriptor. I used the term hardcore leftist to remove the average liberal, or even standard sjw progressive. As for SJW's calling people pedos, the average SJW is just an average person with different morals. I should have been more clear about that.

It ultimately comes down to world view. The average "conservative", or even center right, center leftist is firmly rooted in western ideals of justice. However, the far leftist academic is so rooted in their theoretical dogma that they have essentially reinvented the wheel.

Below is a study guide for an anthropology class I had to take awhile back. This was an intro class, not even getting into the specifics, and yet we were already critiquing human rights. Not in the "they aren't applied well", but in the unironic "Sodomizing young boys is fine because there's no social stigma",therefor, trying to stop it is actually what is causing harm, so actually any harm done is our fault kind of way.

These aren't opportunistic pedos, people like Merry are actually quite important among cultural anthropologists, and this is the logical conclusion of the ideology. You have an entire class of people being told that it's okay to fuck a child as long as it consents and no one will judge him for it. Think about that. The damage done isn't on the pedo, it's on the people judging him. And the only people who raised a fuss were the conservatives or centrists.

That being said, outside of these specific circumstances you are correct. Maybe these classes have less of an effect than I imagined.

 

[Fields Of Rye]

And gosh, isn't the Catholic Church pretty dang conservative on social issues? Didn't stop them.

They had a pretty massive cover up didn't they? I think there's a line to draw between the act of fucking a child, and the act of being accepting of people fucking children. It's not like your opinions on socialized medicine have anything to do with actually fucking kids.

If I've missed something and they weren't just covering up to avoid backlash, but somehow actively promoting it I'll eat those words, but as far as I am aware they covered it up because they knew how bad it was.

 

[keyboredsm4shthe2nd]

Is it possible to report someone for evading a ban?

View attachment 745108

https://twitter.com/konarneme/status/1121938770687877122

View attachment 745106

https://twitter.com/Lnomap

View attachment 745102

https://twitter.com/LeotheMAP

edit: other people are aware of this
View attachment 745127

Wow, her bio doesn’t scream “I was sexually abused from the ages of 1-3 and now want to do the same to others” at all.

 

[wthfujoshis]

Wow, her bio doesn’t scream “I was sexually abused from the ages of 1-3 and now want to do the same to others” at all.

I don't know, I think she's just trying to be an edgelord, like what's up with the zoophilia and necrophilia? She can't be serious.

 

[Freddy Freaker]

I don't know, I think she's just trying to be an edgelord, like what's up with the zoophilia and necrophilia? She can't be serious.

Oh sweatie you sweet summer child. You've never been in Animal Control have you?

 

[FukuMuku]

do deviantart accounts work too for this thread?

hoarder-of-stories - Student, Traditional Artist | DeviantArt

Check out hoarder-of-stories's art on DeviantArt. Browse the user profile and get inspired.

www.deviantart.com

 

[GethN7]

do deviantart accounts work too for this thread?

hoarder-of-stories - Student, Traditional Artist | DeviantArt

Check out hoarder-of-stories's art on DeviantArt. Browse the user profile and get inspired.

www.deviantart.com

I checked that out, and while I disagree with their stance that some pedophiles can restrain themselves without needing therapy, they seem to be VERY careful to basically say "while we want to offer a community for MAPs to huddle around a water cooler together, it's so they don't act on their urges"

I noticed they get a-logged quite a bit in the comments, but I didn't find anything to suggest otherwise.

Then again, this could all be an elaborate smokescreen to recruit deviants to hang out together, so I can't say for sure.

 

[Alberto Balsalm]

I checked that out, and while I disagree with their stance that some pedophiles can restrain themselves without needing therapy, they seem to be VERY careful to basically say "while we want to offer a community for MAPs to huddle around a water cooler together, it's so they don't act on their urges"

I noticed they get a-logged quite a bit in the comments, but I didn't find anything to suggest otherwise.

Then again, this could all be an elaborate smokescreen to recruit deviants to hang out together, so I can't say for sure.

One of the communities they linked to was VirPed, which we had a thread on a few years ago. It's basically the pedo version of pro-ana. They're nominally "recovering" or "virtuous", but they really reject the notion that there's anything wrong with them, and instead asspat each other about how it's OK to watch CP or act sexually inappropriate around children.

 

[GethN7]

One of the communities they linked to was VirPed, which we had a thread on a few years ago. It's basically the pedo version of pro-ana. They're nominally "recovering" or "virtuous", but they really reject the notion that there's anything wrong with them, and instead asspat each other about how it's OK to watch CP or act sexually inappropriate around children.

Ok, that changes things.

If they are linked to those assholes, they yeah, they are holding AA meetings for pedos next to a bar full of CP.