>inb4 Hitler
Controversial historical figures whose actions you don't disagree with. I'll Start:
Controversial historical figures whose actions you don't disagree with. I'll Start:
People Who Did Nothing Wrong -
- Thread starter Marco Fucko
- Start date
No irony. None.
Last edited:
Someone had to teach China a lesson.
Harvey McClout
I un-categorically deny all allegations against me. I did not touch that cat, I did not look at that cat, and most especially I did not cum on that cat. Anyone who repeats these rumors against me is committing slander and I will be suing you to the full extent of the law
I un-categorically deny all allegations against me. I did not touch that cat, I did not look at that cat, and most especially I did not cum on that cat. Anyone who repeats these rumors against me is committing slander and I will be suing you to the full extent of the law
He just wanted some power. Nothing wrong with that.
Ughubughughughughughghlug
kiwifarms.net
The Federal government was out of control (Waco was only one of a handful of massacres/government-sanctioned murders under the Clinton Administration) and it was about time somebody bloodied their nose.
McVeigh put an admirable amount of thought into his attack, selecting a target that would have all three of the guilty government agencies present while attempting to minimize civilian casualties. He considered the presence of the daycare to be tit-for-tat for the deaths of the Waco children.
McVeigh's manifesto was written logically and from what I can tell, he had a sense of humility around him that most terrorists don't. He was much better than the Alt-Right dipshits we have now (screw your optics, I'm going in).
Quality terrorist, definitely my all-time favorite (although Osama and Tarrant are strong competition).
If some motherfuckers gotta die, I'd do it with a smile too
Franjevina
kiwifarms.net
Gilles de Rais
There has been growing evidence he was innocent of the crimes levied at him, and only confessed to avoid excommunication.
There has been growing evidence he was innocent of the crimes levied at him, and only confessed to avoid excommunication.
nagant 1895
kiwifarms.net
Augusto Ride-Or-Die Pinochet.
Okay, maybe not nothing wrong, it was a complex situation and he might not have been as good at running a country as he was at saving it...
But, if a group of people are threatening to violently overthrow the government, modeling themselves after maoist cultural revolutionaries, promising to take peoples stuff after they win, and demonstrating willingness to kill anyone who tries to stop them, then it is morally good to make them disappear.
Growing evidence like what? no sarcasm intended but on a case that old how much new evidence is there to pop up?
Last edited:
- Highlight
- #11
Press F to pay respects.
All he did was win and get hated for winning. Hoes mad.
Adolf Hitler. He took Weimar Germany and turned it around, making it an industrial powerhouse and a formidable military presence were it once was an impoverished, badly weakened nation. How many people could do that in a country where a loaf of bread cost literally millions of German Marks? If he had just robbed and expelled the Jews as opposed to murdering them, he might've been looked upon as a misunderstood genius.
Trump!
- Highlight
- #16
The citizens have a right to know how their government is fucking them and the government punishes that.
Giordano Bruno
Free thinker, philosopher, scientist, renaissance man.
Burned at the stake by the Catholic church in 1600 for heresy.
The Catholic church still maintains it was justified and refuses to apologize despite popular opinion to the contrary.
Patricia Campbell Hearst
She was brainwashed. She was raped and tortured. She was fearful for her life so of fucking course she's going to rob a bank.
- Highlight
- #20
Null.
