The American agriculture industry has a lobbying tactic they call "trees for them, farms for us" (or something similar), where they promote environmentalism abroad in countries that could possibly compete with the American agricultural industry, to prevent competition, while ignoring environmentalism domestically.According to American Thinker, it's about Michael Moore discovering that Environmentalism, and all laws pertaining to it, are heavily subsidized by corporate interests. The revolution was not only televised, but bought and sold like any other commodity on the market.
Moore still believes in Environmentalism though, and also insists that we need to cut down the number of humans to save the planet (while refusing to off himself first. What's good for the goose, lardo.)
It doesn't surprise me that they are 5 years late to that and even less surprised that the conclusion that Climate Change is still real despite the increased shadiness involved.According to American Thinker, it's about Michael Moore discovering that Environmentalism, and all laws pertaining to it, are heavily subsidized by corporate interests. The revolution was not only televised, but bought and sold like any other commodity on the market.
Moore still believes in Environmentalism though, and also insists that we need to cut down the number of humans to save the planet (while refusing to off himself first. What's good for the goose, lardo.)
I was going to say that "It took him this long to figure it out?" but the fat fuck has never been one for critical thinking.According to American Thinker, it's about Michael Moore discovering that Environmentalism, and all laws pertaining to it, are heavily subsidized by corporate interests. The revolution was not only televised, but bought and sold like any other commodity on the market.
Moore still believes in Environmentalism though, and also insists that we need to cut down the number of humans to save the planet (while refusing to off himself first. What's good for the goose, lardo.)
That's true. However, the countries they claim are "overpopulated" are almost universally third-world (and primarily inhabited by non-whites), and their culture dictates that having lots of children is the way to go. That cultural barrier needs to be overcome first.Or we could just reduce subsidies for popping out as many children as possible, teach responsible family planning, implement birth control measures in third world countries and support euthansian.
I mean there are other options before plan Final Solution.
That's true. However, the countries they claim are "overpopulated" are almost universally third-world (and primarily inhabited by non-whites), and their culture dictates that having lots of children is the way to go. That cultural barrier needs to be overcome first.
Besides, environmentalists like Moore are examples of "do as I say, not as I do." For example, he doesn't want anyone to live in large houses because it's not green, but he'll be damned if he gives up his mansion.
That's true. However, the countries they claim are "overpopulated" are almost universally third-world (and primarily inhabited by non-whites), and their culture dictates that having lots of children is the way to go. That cultural barrier needs to be overcome first.
Besides, environmentalists like Moore are examples of "do as I say, not as I do." For example, he doesn't want anyone to live in large houses because it's not green, but he'll be damned if he gives up his mansion.
Reducing subsidies is pointless since the people that pop tons of babies either does it for religious reasons or doesn't think of the economic ramifications due to stupidity. Teaching family planning is almost guaranteed to be done purely for white people and not for anyone else due to teachers being shit. And any plan to do anything to third world countries will be blockaded by international bodies, media and powerful people who will argue racism and fear losing their source of funding/modern slaves.Or we could just reduce subsidies for popping out as many children as possible, teach responsible family planning, implement birth control measures in third world countries and support euthansian.
I mean there are other options before plan Final Solution.
You know it's bullshit when the arguments against it are summarized as:
I'd recommend Gen IV nuclear power if I thought they were serious about cutting fossil fuels. But as Michael Moore learned, it was never about sustainability or saving the planet.You know it's bullshit when the arguments against it are summarized as:
* That's incorrect but I'll not go in depth why.
* Muh evil fossil fuel industry.
* Muh right wing trolls.
And calling to shut it down rather than actually debunk it.
Also "pointing out that these alternatives are now cheaper to run than fossil fuels such as coal. ", besides the X to dubt. I wonder why they didn't say oil....