Please do not rate @aioi yuuko's posts dumb or autistic, thank you -

[Kirito]

@Yuuko Aioi is very sensitive about what people think of his posts. Someone rated two of his posts dumb so he tracked them down to chat to call them out.

I saw this and hit him with saint Terry's gorilla nigger quote.

"Don't do that"

 

[SIGSEGV]

I'll rate them MATI instead lol

 

[Exorbital Columnations]

B-but he's baste and he hates the Stacies!!!

 

[A_Skellington]

It's a shame there's not a combo dumb and mati, cause he deserves both.

 

[nyess]

this guy sounds pretty dumb and/or autistic

 

[Kirito]

It's a shame there's not a combo dumb and mati, cause he deserves both.

If I recall correctly mad at the internet affects their score more, so if you have to negrate his posts dont use that one.

 

[Exorbital Columnations]

It's a shame there's not a combo dumb and mati, cause he deserves both.

I thought that's what autistic meant, in both ratings and reality.

 

[Medical Hawaii]

I thought that's what autistic meant, in both ratings and reality.

isn't it a neutral rating though? We should make a rating for Yuuko that combines dumb and MATI that's worth double "downvotes"

 

[SIGSEGV]

If I recall correctly mad at the internet affects their score more, so if you have to negrate his posts dont use that one.

Oops.

 

[MemeGrey]

R A T I N G S M A T T E R
A
T
I
N
G
S
M
A
T
T
E
R

 

[Kirito]

@Yuuko Aioi I did this all for you. You wanted a place to discuss why people rated your posts and I made it for you

 

[CrippleThreat]

I think I shall rate them however I please. No personal armies after all.

 

[Agent Abe Caprine]

Okay. They can have some Islamic Contents.

 

[Exorbital Columnations]

I still maintain that we need a "have sex" rating for users like this.

 

[The Fool]

Guys, this isn't funny. You may think ratings are just a silly thing to take seriously, but they seriously affect how users view your posts and you as a person. Imagine if you got a negative rating score, how would anyone ever take what you say seriously? Could you even reasonably show your face in high quality boards like Deep Thoughts? Seriously, stop it with this shit, this is more important than you think it is.

 

[SIGSEGV]

Personally, I understand both sides of the sticker issue.

On the one hand, you have those who give out neg-rates, and then they don't contribute in any real discussion. They believe as if the sticker should be the signifier of their opinions and viewpoints and nothing more. They don't feel the need to add to the discussion to make it more autistic or to get validation for their opinion. Their sticker speaks for itself and they move on with their day. Or sometimes, they add the sticker because "lol ur (this sticker)". After all, that's what they're there for. That's their purpose. To be a representation of your approval or disapproval or just your reaction.

But then you have those who get those negrates and are desperate in wanting someone to come at them with a rebuttal to their viewpoints or whatnot. But they grow increasingly dissatisfied with the idea that LOL IT'S JUST STICKERS. Well obviously, the person using those ratings rated the person's response with the sticker, the sticker being the thing that represents their beliefs on a situation. The person rated with that sticker wants to hear more from that person beyond the sticker shitposting to see if their arguments have weight. So if you don't give any sort of rebuttal and just leave it at a sticker, the person becomes increasingly angry at you or whatnot, irrationally. This is what led to that utterly hilarious thread with @crocodilian sperging out about @snailslime and @zedkissed60. After all, it's a forum where we can say whatever the fuck we want almost as long as it doesn't inconvenience Our Dear Leader.

There's an interesting grasp of psychology to it all. To the way we use the internet, the way we communicate, interactions, and whatnot. How the stickers are so specific in their purpose in response to other people's posts. How one can become obsessed with people's opinions and perspectives and what they meant by just one sticker. They are quite an interesting weapon.

 

[Fromtheblackdepths]

Oh no,how will he show his friends how kewl he is on Kiwifarms?

 

[whatever I feel like]

People should just use ratings for their assigned purpose.

Tracking people down to rate everything they say as dumb is for faggots. Getting offended that someone thought a single one of your posts was dumb is also for faggots.

 

[SIGSEGV]

People should just use ratings for their assigned purpose.

Tracking people down to rate everything they say as dumb is for faggots. Getting offended that someone thought a single one of your posts was dumb is also for faggots.

>caring about how other people use ratings
ISHYGDDT

 

[The Fool]

People should just use ratings for their assigned purpose.

Tracking people down to rate everything they say as dumb is for faggots. Getting offended that someone thought a single one of your posts was dumb is also for faggots.

I know ratings are explicitly for the purpose of expressing your thoughts without having to reply with a post, but I wanted to reply with a post after rating you Dumb to say that I rated you Dumb.