They still keep "Trusting the Plan"
--
"My roommate has a Biden jacket, so I will put it on a trashbag and claim she regrets voting Biden now!"
Infected Q-anon community: r/CBTS_Stream, /cbts/, /thestorm/, etc - The natural extension of Pizzagate, subreddit's banned
- Thread starter proteus4994
- Start date
-
Sister services, email, and search will continue to be negatively effected by the attacks. I made a thread to talk about it, if you're into networking.
They still keep "Trusting the Plan"
--
"My roommate has a Biden jacket, so I will put it on a trashbag and claim she regrets voting Biden now!"
Wouldn't microchips be impossible to put into a mass produced vaccine during a semiconductor shortage? I highly doubt that shortage is because all the chips are going into vaccines.
There is no shortage, it's all a lie made up by the liberal elite to cover up their dastardly plans.
Have these idiots ever considered that maybe Trump ran for president for the purposes of being known in history as well? Since with history it has much more long lasting fame than regular celebrity fame.
Cutlass Supreme
kiwifarms.net
The shortage was caused by the sudden demand for vaccine chips taking up all manufacturing capacity, silly.
QAnoners still coping hard
Why do they think a candidate needs to concede to lose an election?
It's amusing they're still convinced that they will find evidence of fraud when so far they've found precisely jack and shit.
It's amusing they're still convinced that they will find evidence of fraud when so far they've found precisely jack and shit.
The Qverse is a mystical and exciting place.
Because in their mind there has to be a path to victory. They can't handle the fact that there's no way for Trump to win, it would destroy them.
I'll have to keep this tactic in mind next time I'm playing a board game or something. When I lose, I'll just refuse to concede, which means I actually won. Galaxy brained!
Didn't he concede after January 6th when talking about how he is transitioning to a new administration
Then again these tards thought he was a deepfake.
(It still amuses me when people invested into politics are enlightened yet enslave themselves to corrupt people.)
He said "a new Administration will take office" but he did not say "Joe Biden won" let alone "Joe Biden won fair and square" and did not attend the inauguration. It was clever, he did not come right out and say he was robbed but left it just vague enough for true believers to interpret it as "he's not giving up".
EDIT:
There is also a whole ecosystem of grifters who are scamming these retards: I followed the Kraken suits with all my autism and the lead attorneys, particularly Giuliani, clearly knew it was BS (more in the spoiler) and didn't even try to make a plausible case. It makes sense when you realize they were getting paid and could keep peddling the same arguments even if they lost. Specific to Giuliani he is probably so radioactive after his time as Trump's personal attorney that this might be more lucrative than his old law practice.
Giuliani's sole appearance in court was Trump v Boockvar in Pennsylvania. During his press conference at the Philadelphia Four Seasons he claimed to have hard proof that Trump won Pennsylvania by approximately 300,000 votes (about Obama's margin in 2012 or four percentage points using 2020 turnout numbers) and only lost due to fraud. You'll never guess what he didn't claim in his lolsuit. It didn't help that his requests for relief would be extreme even with pervasive evidence of fraud (decertification of all votes) or transparent attempts to rig the vote (decertification of absentee votes or all votes in deep blue counties only; he also did not show that large red counties were in compliance with his reading of the law). After the judge said "let's not be absurd", the remaining argument was that different counties having different standards on letting voters correct deficient absentee ballots was unfair and corrected ballots should be inadmissible. I agree this is something which should be clarified by either the courts or Pennsylvania State Legislature but the urgency disappeared when this was his only argument because the number of disputed ballots was much less than then-President Elect Biden's victory margin; the judge went out of his way to explain this in his ruling. This little roadbump did not stop Giuliani from making the exact same arguments in TV appearances and even at the horrifying "Stop the Steal" rally. By incredible coincidence, making fabricated claims on TV is much less likely to get one disbarred than making them in front of a judge.
Then on the other hand we have Sidney "No reasonable person would think I was making a factual statement" Powell . Where Giuliani's scam protected him from repercussions, she went full retard. Feehan v. Wisconsin Elections Commission included fabricated quotes from a case in the public record while Bower v Ducey complained that an election in Arizona violated Georgia election law. Try not to laugh or cry at that last bit. Needless to say this level of ineptitude got her crucified even worse than Giuliani and she is now facing sanctions motions in multiple states.
"Now wait", I hear you asking, "how does getting sanctioned help her?". The answer is simple: Money. Sidney Powell was doing near-constant fundraisers and appearances on when she was not busy in court and is now claiming that she needs the money to be able to present smoking-gun proof that Trump was robbed in Dominion's defamation suit against her. I wouldn't be surprised if the donations + however much places like InfoWars pay their guests are more than what she was making as a no-name attorney. Obviously this all falls apart if Dominion wins and she's liable for even a fraction of the $1.3bn they are claiming but you know, details. Considering the glacial pace of our courts that case is unlikely to be concluded before the 2022 midterms at a minimum. I'd be more surprised if she didn't recycle those claims and start this whole farce over again, even if Republicans win easily.
Then on the other hand we have Sidney "No reasonable person would think I was making a factual statement" Powell . Where Giuliani's scam protected him from repercussions, she went full retard. Feehan v. Wisconsin Elections Commission included fabricated quotes from a case in the public record while Bower v Ducey complained that an election in Arizona violated Georgia election law. Try not to laugh or cry at that last bit. Needless to say this level of ineptitude got her crucified even worse than Giuliani and she is now facing sanctions motions in multiple states.
"Now wait", I hear you asking, "how does getting sanctioned help her?". The answer is simple: Money. Sidney Powell was doing near-constant fundraisers and appearances on when she was not busy in court and is now claiming that she needs the money to be able to present smoking-gun proof that Trump was robbed in Dominion's defamation suit against her. I wouldn't be surprised if the donations + however much places like InfoWars pay their guests are more than what she was making as a no-name attorney. Obviously this all falls apart if Dominion wins and she's liable for even a fraction of the $1.3bn they are claiming but you know, details. Considering the glacial pace of our courts that case is unlikely to be concluded before the 2022 midterms at a minimum. I'd be more surprised if she didn't recycle those claims and start this whole farce over again, even if Republicans win easily.
Last edited:
Isn't that why a bunch of them think he's still running things behind the scenes, while still being tardraged over everything Biden does?
It's funny this is the crowd that made Orwellian almost lost its meaning accussing everything from Twitter bans to video games designs being not so horny of being Orwellian, yet they are capable of having two complete opposite ideas: Trump still managing everything from the shadows, while Biden turning America into the Chinese Caliphate of American Soviets.
Not that I am aware of but there are various claims of a "Restoration" where Trump will be reinstated. So far "Q" has gotten the date wrong three times despite being privy to literally every government secret because that's how need-to-know works: 20 January (Inauguration Day), 4 March (Inauguration Day pre-1937), and some day in May (I cannot recall the exact date or its significance). The new date for this is when Arizona's farce of an audit wraps up. At this point I'm not sure Trump dying in broad daylight would convince them he's not coming back.
"Q said that Biden took a plea deal and that Trump is really running things behind the scenes!" "Ugh, I hate everything that communist Biden is doing to ruin America!"
Gonna be funny when the AZ audit finds some absurd lunacy as proof of fraud, and the Trump cult will eat it up.
What do you think would be the Q stance:
1.) "That was a body double to trick the Deep State! Now Trump is free to rule from behind the scenes because no one is looking for him! Patriots Are In Control #WWG1WGA"
2.)"That was a body double killed by the Deep State to trick us! Trump is still fighting for us. Patriots Are In Control! #WWG1WGA"
3.)"Trump may have died, but on the third day he will rise again! Patriots Are In Control! #WWG1WGA"
They have a lot of experience with option number one, so that's my guess.
Similar threads
In which reddit's finest minds solve the world's weirdest legal problems
