That or they blame the deep state for killing him since he was saving America or something.
Infected Q-anon community: r/CBTS_Stream, /cbts/, /thestorm/, etc - The natural extension of Pizzagate, subreddit's banned
- Thread starter proteus4994
- Start date
-
Sister services, email, and search will continue to be negatively effected by the attacks. I made a thread to talk about it, if you're into networking.
X22 Report, one of the more popular Q-related podcasts, mentioned how the voting machines had SQL software on them. He talks about SQL like it's horrible software designed to let you easily alter the database of ballots, with no awareness that the SQL software is the database.
If you've never heard of SQL, here's an excerpt from the infamous banned book Master Hacker's Cookbook to Election Fraud and Child Trafficking, Volume 666:
https://x22report.com/aiovg_videos/...icking-ready-for-the-offensive-hold-the-line/ At around the 39 minute mark.
Here's a clip:
If you've never heard of SQL, here's an excerpt from the infamous banned book Master Hacker's Cookbook to Election Fraud and Child Trafficking, Volume 666:
https://x22report.com/aiovg_videos/...icking-ready-for-the-offensive-hold-the-line/ At around the 39 minute mark.
Here's a clip:
I would be shocked if the votes were stored in anything except SQL. It's a great database language. It's got some security flaws if implemented incorrectly, but so does every database system on the planet
-
Seems like a legit source
-
Seems like a legit source
Boris Johnson got along with Biden? He must be a pedo!
Red Sparrow
kiwifarms.net
What do you call it when a group says a word so much that it ends up meaning nothing? Because that's what Q-Spergs and Trump sycophants are doing to the word, paedophile.
The tards over at greatwakening are still coping hard.
Another retard almost gets it but not quite... Even if fraud was 100% proven to have occurred (lol) the electoral college already voted so it doesn't matter
---
Lots of wasted taxpayer dollars all because a career conman can't come to grips with the fact that he lost and his cult is going along with it. So much for the GOP being the party of financial responsibility
They can audit and recount and investigate all they like. Biden's win was legit and nothing will change.
On a related note, Rudy Giuliani's New York law license has been indefinitely suspended pending a full hearing for his advocacy of "Trump wuz robbed" quackery. In his specific case it may as well be a lifetime ban given that he is in his 70s and the suspension order remarked that they were likely to add additional sanctions at the full hearing. He can't even practice in a state other than New York because of reciprocity - any other bar he applies to will see the New York suspension and consider it to be a disbarment in their state or circuit as well. Note that suspension or disbarment prohibits any legal work including offering advice or running a law firm, not just appearing in court.
This does not augur well for Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, or any of the minor characters in the "Kraken" orbit either because the court (NY's legal system is structured oddly, the bar association is voluntary and the state judicial branch handles licensure and disciplinary action) explicitly considered and rejected the free-speech defense.
Suddenly this post I made a little while ago:
This does not augur well for Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, or any of the minor characters in the "Kraken" orbit either because the court (NY's legal system is structured oddly, the bar association is voluntary and the state judicial branch handles licensure and disciplinary action) explicitly considered and rejected the free-speech defense.
Suddenly this post I made a little while ago:
Now seems really, really silly.
But tying this back to Qanon, he inadvertently confirmed the whole "Biden lost" theory has to be taken on faith: Apart from claiming free speech, his defense statement to the Court was so inept it almost read like a parody. The affidavits he cited as proof were not even provided to the Court and contradicted his own statements, while some of his secret all-star witnesses have no identifying information provided at all - he literally cited "other witnesses" as a source for one of his claims. At least Sidney Powell was creative enough to give names and cute backstories to her fictional characters.
On a darker note this also means Giuliani is committing to grifting these retards for the rest of his life. He was already radioactive by virtue of being Trump's personal attorney and he may as well have told the New York judicial system to fuck itself with his response. Even if the disbarment does not prevent him from running his security consulting firm being a perennial defendant is not a good look to prospective clients.
EDIT: The Court's exact ruling also strengthens Dominion's defamation claim against Giuliani: Their position is that Giuliani acted with actual malice, defined as reckless disregard for the truth or knowingly making a false claim. Proving actual malice is difficult because it relies on subjective intent and one of their supporting arguments is that Giuliani's decision to repeatedly make these claims publicly but not before a judge meant he had serious doubts. The Court independently came to the same conclusion in issuing its suspension order: Giuliani conceded that his fraud claim was false but tried to argue he should not be disciplined because a member of his staff forwarded him the allegations and claimed they were based on numbers from a Pennsylvania state site which made his claims non-actionable negligence. He did not provide a name, affidavit, or even URL to back this up. The court took the claims of Rudy's imaginary friend with all the seriousness they deserved.
I am not following the Coomer (Dominion's cybersecurity head, yes that's really his name) and Smartmatic defamation suits against Giuliani nearly as closely but I imagine this ruling will be submitted into evidence there as well.
But tying this back to Qanon, he inadvertently confirmed the whole "Biden lost" theory has to be taken on faith: Apart from claiming free speech, his defense statement to the Court was so inept it almost read like a parody. The affidavits he cited as proof were not even provided to the Court and contradicted his own statements, while some of his secret all-star witnesses have no identifying information provided at all - he literally cited "other witnesses" as a source for one of his claims. At least Sidney Powell was creative enough to give names and cute backstories to her fictional characters.
On a darker note this also means Giuliani is committing to grifting these retards for the rest of his life. He was already radioactive by virtue of being Trump's personal attorney and he may as well have told the New York judicial system to fuck itself with his response. Even if the disbarment does not prevent him from running his security consulting firm being a perennial defendant is not a good look to prospective clients.
EDIT: The Court's exact ruling also strengthens Dominion's defamation claim against Giuliani: Their position is that Giuliani acted with actual malice, defined as reckless disregard for the truth or knowingly making a false claim. Proving actual malice is difficult because it relies on subjective intent and one of their supporting arguments is that Giuliani's decision to repeatedly make these claims publicly but not before a judge meant he had serious doubts. The Court independently came to the same conclusion in issuing its suspension order: Giuliani conceded that his fraud claim was false but tried to argue he should not be disciplined because a member of his staff forwarded him the allegations and claimed they were based on numbers from a Pennsylvania state site which made his claims non-actionable negligence. He did not provide a name, affidavit, or even URL to back this up. The court took the claims of Rudy's imaginary friend with all the seriousness they deserved.
I am not following the Coomer (Dominion's cybersecurity head, yes that's really his name) and Smartmatic defamation suits against Giuliani nearly as closely but I imagine this ruling will be submitted into evidence there as well.
Last edited:
I like to think reality is going to really crash these tards, but they'll just double down instead
They're also lying: Of the states targeted by the Kraken, two (AZ, GA) did statewide recounts, one (WI) did a limited one and the rest (MI and PA) did not do one because nobody asked. I don't know if MI and PA have automatic recount laws but they generally don't trigger for margins greater than 1 point (Biden won MI by 2.8 points and PA by 1.2 points).
Georgia and Arizona officials seriously deserve a medal for their professionalism in all this. Arizona was consistently leaning towards Biden, most likely because absentee voting has been standard there for ages including for GOPers, while Georgia flipped from Trump to Biden a few days after Election day because 2020 was the first time widespread absentee voting was used. The Governor and Secretary of State in both states worked together to do a full statewide recount and the number of flipped ballots was within tolerances (machines are not perfect). In Georgia they even did the magical "forensic audit" in Metro Atlanta and it came up clean.
Wisconsin did a limited recount at the request of then-President Trump: Notably, it was "limited" in that it only took place in the large blue counties which flipped the state to Biden (he lost by about 250k votes outside of Milwaukee and Dane (Madison) counties but won those two by a combined 270k). If the Illuminati were stealing the election, it begs the question why they would respect county lines - Dominion was hardly a partisan or household name before mid-November 2020 after all.
Pennsylvania was never even asked to perform a recount and instead had to deal with the "Kraken" via lolsuit: The request to invalidate all absentee ballots, or absentee ballots in large blue counties only, was dismissed as inherently absurd while the request to invalidate ballots which had been subject to notice-and-cure (red-flagged as deficient by the county elections board and sent back for correction) was dismissed because this request was straight up inventing new law in the state. More importantly the number of ballots subject to notice-and-cure was much less than Biden's victory margin even if one grants that they were all legitimate and cast for him (even Philly only voted for him by 81-1
. Michigan wound up in a similar situation but due to different geography the issues were limited to only Wayne County (Detroit). I have family in Pennsylvania so I read that suit out of concern for them but Sidney Powell's antics in Michigan made that a more fun lolsuit to read.
Rackets bitched about how the courts effectively said there is never a time when one could file a suit against these practices (filing before the election means the injury is speculative, filing after makes the proposed remedy inappropriate) but this is nothing new - Justice Antonin Scalia was highly conservative and once remarked that he could identify a large number of plainly unconstitutional laws that he would have no choice but to leave intact because he could not imagine a situation where a plaintiff attempting to challenge the laws would not be thrown out on procedural issues.
Wisconsin did a limited recount at the request of then-President Trump: Notably, it was "limited" in that it only took place in the large blue counties which flipped the state to Biden (he lost by about 250k votes outside of Milwaukee and Dane (Madison) counties but won those two by a combined 270k). If the Illuminati were stealing the election, it begs the question why they would respect county lines - Dominion was hardly a partisan or household name before mid-November 2020 after all.
Pennsylvania was never even asked to perform a recount and instead had to deal with the "Kraken" via lolsuit: The request to invalidate all absentee ballots, or absentee ballots in large blue counties only, was dismissed as inherently absurd while the request to invalidate ballots which had been subject to notice-and-cure (red-flagged as deficient by the county elections board and sent back for correction) was dismissed because this request was straight up inventing new law in the state. More importantly the number of ballots subject to notice-and-cure was much less than Biden's victory margin even if one grants that they were all legitimate and cast for him (even Philly only voted for him by 81-1
. Michigan wound up in a similar situation but due to different geography the issues were limited to only Wayne County (Detroit). I have family in Pennsylvania so I read that suit out of concern for them but Sidney Powell's antics in Michigan made that a more fun lolsuit to read.Rackets bitched about how the courts effectively said there is never a time when one could file a suit against these practices (filing before the election means the injury is speculative, filing after makes the proposed remedy inappropriate) but this is nothing new - Justice Antonin Scalia was highly conservative and once remarked that he could identify a large number of plainly unconstitutional laws that he would have no choice but to leave intact because he could not imagine a situation where a plaintiff attempting to challenge the laws would not be thrown out on procedural issues.
They're also lying: Of the states targeted by the Kraken, two (AZ, GA) did statewide recounts, one (WI) did a limited one and the rest (MI and PA) did not do one because nobody asked. I don't know if MI and PA have automatic recount laws but they generally don't trigger for margins greater than 1 point (Biden won MI by 2.8 points and PA by 1.2 points).
Georgia and Arizona officials seriously deserve a medal for their professionalism in all this. Absentee ballots flipped the state from Trump to Biden a few days after election night. The Governor and Secretary of State in both states worked together to do a full statewide recount and the number of flipped ballots was within tolerances (machines are not perfect). In Georgia they even did the magical "forensic audit" in Metro Atlanta and it came up clean.
Wisconsin did a limited recount at the request of then-President Trump: Notably, it was "limited" in that it only took place in the large blue counties which flipped the state to Biden (he lost by about 250k votes outside of Milwaukee and Dane (Madison) counties but won those two by a combined 270k). If the Illuminati were stealing the election, it begs the question why they would respect county lines - Dominion was hardly a partisan or household name before mid-November 2020 after all.
Pennsylvania was never even asked to perform a recount and instead had to deal with the "Kraken" via lolsuit: The request to invalidate all absentee ballots, or absentee ballots in large blue counties only, was dismissed as inherently absurd while the request to invalidate ballots which had been subject to notice-and-cure (red-flagged as deficient by the county elections board and sent back for correction) was dismissed because this request was straight up inventing new law in the state. More importantly the number of ballots subject to notice-and-cure was much less than Biden's victory margin even if one grants that they were all legitimate and cast for him (even Philly only voted for him by 81-1
Rackets bitched about how the courts effectively said there is never a time when one could file a suit against these practices (filing before the election means the injury is speculative, filing after makes the proposed remedy inappropriate) but this is nothing new - Justice Antonin Scalia was highly conservative and once remarked that he could identify a large number of plainly unconstitutional laws that he would have no choice but to leave intact because he could not imagine a situation where a plaintiff attempting to challenge the laws would not be thrown out on procedural issues.
eternal dog mongler
kiwifarms.net
At some point somebody should have realized that the reason the SCOTUS ruled against Gore was that he was doing the exact same shit. Wanting recounts in blue counties only in order to try to flip Florida. The judicial system doesn't like picking and choosing.
I guess this is what you get when your legal team is full of clowns though.
It also doesn't like radical proposals when more reasonable ones exist. One of the complaints in Trump v Boockvar was that inconsistent standards meant voters who submitted a defective absentee ballot in the defendant counties were informed of the mistake and allowed to fix it (notice and cure) while some of the co-plaintiffs lived in counties which did not allow it. In his opinion dismissing the suit the judge remarked that allowing voters in counties without notice and cure procedures to cure their ballots would have resolved the issue in a much more limited and appropriate way. He even slammed Trump and Giuliani for not naming the co-plaintiffs' home counties as defendants because it meant the counties which were being sued could not grant his proposed remedy.
That's because any reasonable attorney would have realized Biden's victory margins in the swing states were just too large to be overturned via recounts and refused to take on a pointless suit. For perspective the Green candidate requested a statewide recount in Wisconsin in 2016 and it flipped about 150 votes, compare that to Biden's 10,000-plus vote margin in his closest states. Trump wouldn't hear that, so he turned to unreasonable attorneys and arguments which led directly to the "Kraken" farce.
Also to avoid a double post here the Powell/Giuliani/Wood orbit is not the only group pushing election lolsuits. There were three more I am aware of and they're summarized below for your 'tism and amusement:
Also I can't believe nobody has pointed this out: Q clearance is a Department of Energy clearance which is mostly issued to staff at nuclear weapons labs. Have these speds explained how how "Q" can have this clearance despite being in intelligence or how an Energy Department employee is keyed into every big CIA/State/DoD decision?
Also to avoid a double post here the Powell/Giuliani/Wood orbit is not the only group pushing election lolsuits. There were three more I am aware of and they're summarized below for your 'tism and amusement:
If "Voters Alliance" sounds familiar it's because the Thomas More Society, a nonprofit with ties to Rudy Giuliani, set up "Voters Alliance" groups in multiple states and had each of them file copycat lolsuits in state and federal court over absentee voting and ballot boxes. These suits all flopped so they took the next logical step: Sue then-Vice President Pence, the US House, the Senate, and the Electoral College claiming the electoral votes from the six closest Biden states (AZ, GA, MI, NV, PA, WI) needed to be disqualified because they were not subject to "post election legislative certification". It is true but irrelevant that there was no legislative certification because the Constitution only orders state legislatures to direct a way of appointing electors while the 3 USC 6 requires that electors be certified by the governor and does not provide a role for any other state official. The lolsuit also did not mention was that by this standard most or all electoral votes since 3 USC 6 was passed in the 1870s would be illegitimate. They also copy pasted huge chunks of all the "Kraken" suits alleging fraud despite claiming the suit was not about fraud because this was a shamelessly transparent PR stunt.
The suit was filed three days before Christmas 2020 or just over 2 weeks before the 6 January certification/4 weeks before Inauguration day on 20 January, and not all of the defendants were served by the time of the next hearing on 4 January even though the whole case would become moot after 6 January. The judge was understandably unhappy at being used for lolsuit purposes and ordered the lead attorney for plaintiffs to explain why he should not be referred for sanctions. The attorney's response cited a decision that undercut some of his arguments which he conveniently tried to ignore via cherry-picking quotes. With this kind of legal brilliance it should not be a surprise that he's now facing disciplinary hearings.
The suit was filed three days before Christmas 2020 or just over 2 weeks before the 6 January certification/4 weeks before Inauguration day on 20 January, and not all of the defendants were served by the time of the next hearing on 4 January even though the whole case would become moot after 6 January. The judge was understandably unhappy at being used for lolsuit purposes and ordered the lead attorney for plaintiffs to explain why he should not be referred for sanctions. The attorney's response cited a decision that undercut some of his arguments which he conveniently tried to ignore via cherry-picking quotes. With this kind of legal brilliance it should not be a surprise that he's now facing disciplinary hearings.
One of the requirements in civil practice is that attorneys cannot refile a case which has already been concluded or a case which raises the same questions as an already concluded one (the formal term is "foreclosed by precedent"). This is why the "Kraken" team could not keep refiling ad infinitum, after the judges dismissed the claims any attempts to revive them would be dismissed on the spot.
To get around this issue, a pair of Colorado based attorneys decided to take the exact same fraud claims but sue Facebook and Dominion instead. If I understand the complaint correctly Dominion is guilty of the exact same things as the governors and secretaries of state who already won the "Kraken" suits and is considered a state actor because reasons but somehow this is an entirely novel complaint. Facebook on the other hand is guilty of rigging the election by filtering comments claiming the election was rigged, so it needs to be stripped of CDA 230 protection. They also sued governors and secretaries of state in four states (GA, MI, PA, WI) despite even more obvious issues of precedent and claimed it was a new suit because they were asking for a different form of relief. Rather than change election outcomes, the defendants should be forced to pay $1,000 to each voter rather than changing the election outcome - they were literally asking the defendants to tell the voters "we stole your election, here's $1,000, we cool?". This is not a joke.
When the attorneys had their day in court, the presiding judge asked them point blank to identify cases which showed this should not be dismissed for the same reasons all the "Kraken" ones were. Their response was Brown v Board of Education (as in, the famous "separate but equal is inherently unequal" ruling ending school segregation) . The judge was not amused and refused to let the plaintiffs amend their complaint on grounds of futility.
Now that that's over with, the motions for sanctions are starting to emerge. As you might expect, an attorney dumb enough to think any of this was a good idea spazzed out and is now claiming that sanctions for filing lolsuits are contributing to the high suicide rate among attorneys
. The guy is basically Powell or Giuliani without the PR machine, he used this case as a grifting opportunity but does not have the legions of adoring retards who will support him if this costs him his law license.
To get around this issue, a pair of Colorado based attorneys decided to take the exact same fraud claims but sue Facebook and Dominion instead. If I understand the complaint correctly Dominion is guilty of the exact same things as the governors and secretaries of state who already won the "Kraken" suits and is considered a state actor because reasons but somehow this is an entirely novel complaint. Facebook on the other hand is guilty of rigging the election by filtering comments claiming the election was rigged, so it needs to be stripped of CDA 230 protection. They also sued governors and secretaries of state in four states (GA, MI, PA, WI) despite even more obvious issues of precedent and claimed it was a new suit because they were asking for a different form of relief. Rather than change election outcomes, the defendants should be forced to pay $1,000 to each voter rather than changing the election outcome - they were literally asking the defendants to tell the voters "we stole your election, here's $1,000, we cool?". This is not a joke.
When the attorneys had their day in court, the presiding judge asked them point blank to identify cases which showed this should not be dismissed for the same reasons all the "Kraken" ones were. Their response was Brown v Board of Education (as in, the famous "separate but equal is inherently unequal" ruling ending school segregation) . The judge was not amused and refused to let the plaintiffs amend their complaint on grounds of futility.
Now that that's over with, the motions for sanctions are starting to emerge. As you might expect, an attorney dumb enough to think any of this was a good idea spazzed out and is now claiming that sanctions for filing lolsuits are contributing to the high suicide rate among attorneys
. The guy is basically Powell or Giuliani without the PR machine, he used this case as a grifting opportunity but does not have the legions of adoring retards who will support him if this costs him his law license.This case is different because the lawyer filing it may be genuinely insane.
Paul Davis is an attorney from Western Texas who was at the "Stop the Steal" rally on 6 January. So far as anyone can tell he made some bog standard "why won't they do a recount if they have nothing to hide" statements, was not involved in the attack on the Capitol, and was not detained after the National Guard was brought in. After the 6 January riot, he was summarily fired from his job as an in-house lawyer for an insurance company for attending the rally and pretty much snapped. He sued every single member of Congress, every single Governor, and every single state Secretary of State for poorly defined violations of the Help America Vote Act (a 2002 federal law meant to clarify and standardize voting policies and prevent another mess like the 2000 recount in Florida). This suit was Latinos for Trump v. Sessions.
The proposed remedy was to give Davis + his clients absolute immunity from prosecution for whatever they may have done on 6 January, suspend every single member of Congress, invalidate the certification of Biden's victory, and let Trump remain in office indefinitely until a revote could happen. Due to the urgency the complaint even demanded that the remedy be granted without informing the defendants.
The suit also included a draft temporary restraining order for the judge's signature based on the initial suit. Rather than instate Trump as president-until-he-gets-bored with no Congress, the new request was for the Supreme Court to appoint an interim Congress and President + Cabinet. He even candidly admitted that this idea was borrowed from the Gondor storyline in "The Lord of the Rings". If nothing else I can't fault him for his originality or choice in reading material. Something then happened which I still don't understand, half his clients fired him as an attorney, and he submitted a request for fees against his former co-counsel which consisted mostly of screencapped text messages.
So far, so funny and now he's refiled it with different clients with the new title Bravo v. Pelosi. There was none of the sheer absurdity of Latinos for Trump v. Sessions even though it's a recycled version of the same claim, but his process servers have apparently been fabricating signatures while he has filed amended complaints beyond what is allowed by court policy. This resulted in motions to dismiss where the defendants weren't even sure which motion they were supposed to be responding to anymore. Then Paul went off the deep end and claimed someone in his own camp (I cannot tell who from either the complaint or the almost entirely blacked-out email he cites as evidence) had destroyed nearly all his evidence which retroactively voided one of his amended complaints and made the other one legitimate. This is not very dense legalese, this is a genuinely disturbed man breaking down because reality came knocking. At least the motion to dismiss from New Hampshire's officials included folksy quotes from President Lincoln to lighten the mood.
When I started writing this bit I mentioned that Paul appeared to be sincere if deranged in contrast with the other lolsuits. Then the other shoe dropped and he admitted what he was really after. I'll let his own filing speak for him: (quote is broken, no bully plz):
Specifically, Plaintiffs had been expecting an influx of financial resources, co-counsel, and staff to litigate this case, which did not materialize. Moreover, one of their own staff has now represented that he has destroyed evidence Plaintiffs intended to use to establish personal jurisdiction over various non-resident Defendants
Paul Davis is an attorney from Western Texas who was at the "Stop the Steal" rally on 6 January. So far as anyone can tell he made some bog standard "why won't they do a recount if they have nothing to hide" statements, was not involved in the attack on the Capitol, and was not detained after the National Guard was brought in. After the 6 January riot, he was summarily fired from his job as an in-house lawyer for an insurance company for attending the rally and pretty much snapped. He sued every single member of Congress, every single Governor, and every single state Secretary of State for poorly defined violations of the Help America Vote Act (a 2002 federal law meant to clarify and standardize voting policies and prevent another mess like the 2000 recount in Florida). This suit was Latinos for Trump v. Sessions.
The proposed remedy was to give Davis + his clients absolute immunity from prosecution for whatever they may have done on 6 January, suspend every single member of Congress, invalidate the certification of Biden's victory, and let Trump remain in office indefinitely until a revote could happen. Due to the urgency the complaint even demanded that the remedy be granted without informing the defendants.
The suit also included a draft temporary restraining order for the judge's signature based on the initial suit. Rather than instate Trump as president-until-he-gets-bored with no Congress, the new request was for the Supreme Court to appoint an interim Congress and President + Cabinet. He even candidly admitted that this idea was borrowed from the Gondor storyline in "The Lord of the Rings". If nothing else I can't fault him for his originality or choice in reading material. Something then happened which I still don't understand, half his clients fired him as an attorney, and he submitted a request for fees against his former co-counsel which consisted mostly of screencapped text messages.
So far, so funny and now he's refiled it with different clients with the new title Bravo v. Pelosi. There was none of the sheer absurdity of Latinos for Trump v. Sessions even though it's a recycled version of the same claim, but his process servers have apparently been fabricating signatures while he has filed amended complaints beyond what is allowed by court policy. This resulted in motions to dismiss where the defendants weren't even sure which motion they were supposed to be responding to anymore. Then Paul went off the deep end and claimed someone in his own camp (I cannot tell who from either the complaint or the almost entirely blacked-out email he cites as evidence) had destroyed nearly all his evidence which retroactively voided one of his amended complaints and made the other one legitimate. This is not very dense legalese, this is a genuinely disturbed man breaking down because reality came knocking. At least the motion to dismiss from New Hampshire's officials included folksy quotes from President Lincoln to lighten the mood.
When I started writing this bit I mentioned that Paul appeared to be sincere if deranged in contrast with the other lolsuits. Then the other shoe dropped and he admitted what he was really after. I'll let his own filing speak for him: (quote is broken, no bully plz):
Specifically, Plaintiffs had been expecting an influx of financial resources, co-counsel, and staff to litigate this case, which did not materialize. Moreover, one of their own staff has now represented that he has destroyed evidence Plaintiffs intended to use to establish personal jurisdiction over various non-resident Defendants
Also I can't believe nobody has pointed this out: Q clearance is a Department of Energy clearance which is mostly issued to staff at nuclear weapons labs. Have these speds explained how how "Q" can have this clearance despite being in intelligence or how an Energy Department employee is keyed into every big CIA/State/DoD decision?
Last edited:
It's all part of the deep state conspiracy to discredit him, I am sure.
Red Sparrow
kiwifarms.net
Found an interesting subreddit:
www.reddit.com
This for people who have had family members and friends who have gone down the Q-Anon path.
r/QAnonCasualties
r/QAnonCasualties: Do you have a loved one who's been taken in by the QAnon conspiracy theory? Look here for emotional support and a place to vent …
www.reddit.com
This for people who have had family members and friends who have gone down the Q-Anon path.
I've lurked in there and it's honestly depressing. People are mourning the loss of their family and friends who have just gone way too far off the deep end.Found an interesting subreddit:
r/QAnonCasualties
r/QAnonCasualties: Do you have a loved one who's been taken in by the QAnon conspiracy theory? Look here for emotional support and a place to vent …
This for people who have had family members and friends who have gone down the Q-Anon path.
Except voter ID laws (poll tax) and anonymous ballots, of course
The schizos over at greatawakening.win also posted this
I'm not a lawyer but wouldn't that just prohibit making people pay for ID as opposed to requiring ID?
Similar threads
In which reddit's finest minds solve the world's weirdest legal problems
