Rags / @YourPalRags / 1-800-GET-RAGS / Lawrence "Tanner" Angyal + his altfurry sex partners - PC gaming and anti-SJW e-celebrity who's taking nudes and commissioning dog porn from the altfurry

AsbestosFlaygon

Get raped Tetra.
kiwifarms.net
Is this the channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHH-ybUwH1CfJrXxnqw6Ljw/videos ? Looks like an extended podcast format looking at the thumbnails and my god, these videos are even longer.

This is 8 hours. Shitting on that awful movie and character is funny, but I can't do it. People got shit to do, Rags
Yep, I'm kind of surprised you weren't already aware, it's been mention a bit in the Mauler thread already. Again I really doubt that these autists have a clue on how to condense jack shit, the content they make certainly doesn't make me confident.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FuckedUp

KingofNothing

Arise, Sir Leg of Lamb
kiwifarms.net
Yep, I'm kind of surprised you weren't already aware, it's been mention a bit in the Mauler thread already. Again I really doubt that these autists have a clue on how to condense jack shit, the content they make certainly doesn't make me confident.
I don't actively follow his content. His name kept getting plugged, so I checked out his channel. Didn't even know he existed until a month or so ago.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: AsbestosFlaygon

AsbestosFlaygon

Get raped Tetra.
kiwifarms.net
Jesus christ, what kind of trog would actually go through all of this. That's a full fucking work day
They're just like Rags' content as well, so they stop every couple of seconds to comment on it, granted I think they cover multiple videos most of the time, so it's slightly less autistic. But yes, I don't understand how people can seat through these things, personally my brain just completely melts from these ultra long videos after about an hour. I don't feel that you learn anything more from Mauler or Rags than someone that makes a shorter video, all you need to hammer's the main point with a few examples to back them up. It's pointless to go after literally every single insistence of that point when the take away for most people is going to be that same as if just listed two or three times, maybe use that time to fact check and refine what you have instead, or hell, just rest and have fun more. They underestimate the value of cutting shit, just because it's more detailed and through doesn't mean it's more informative.
 
F

FH 721

Guest
kiwifarms.net
They're just like Rags' content as well, so they stop every couple of seconds to comment on it, granted I think they cover multiple videos most of the time, so it's slightly less autistic. But yes, I don't understand how people can seat through these things, personally my brain just completely melts from these ultra long videos after about an hour. I don't feel that you learn anything more from Mauler or Rags than someone that makes a shorter video, all you need to hammer's the main point with a few examples to back them up. It's pointless to go after literally every single insistence of that point when the take away for most people is going to be that same as if just listed two or three times, maybe use that time to fact check and refine what you have instead, or hell, just rest and have fun more. They underestimate the value of cutting shit, just because it's more detailed and through doesn't mean it's more informative.
I do enjoy some of Mauler's content, and I certainly prefer him a whole lot more over Rags and Wolf. But fucking hell, it would not hurt him one bit to learn to trim down and remove the fat in his work. Think of his Captain Marvel review, it's 110 minutes long. It's only 14 minutes shorter than the actual movie itself. He could have made it 45 minutes, or maybe even an hour would have been fine, but 110 minutes? Fuck off with that shit. And he does this a lot too. His critique of Outlast is split into 11 goddamn videos, each one about 20-30 minutes long, that's a game you can complete in no more than 4 hours. How much of an austitic, rambling fuck do you have to be to make an analysis of such a short game THAT tediously long?
 

Meowthkip

My smug aura mocks you.
Moderator
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
I do enjoy some of Mauler's content, and I certainly prefer him a whole lot more over Rags and Wolf. But fucking hell, it would not hurt him one bit to learn to trim down and remove the fat in his work. Think of his Captain Marvel review, it's 110 minutes long. It's only 14 minutes shorter than the actual movie itself. He could have made it 45 minutes, or maybe even an hour would have been fine, but 110 minutes? Fuck off with that shit. And he does this a lot too. His critique of Outlast is split into 11 goddamn videos, each one about 20-30 minutes long, that's a game you can complete in no more than 4 hours. How much of an austitic, rambling fuck do you have to be to make an analysis of such a short game THAT tediously long?
At least with an RLM review there's lots of jokes and skits and stuff.
 

Otis Boi

Happy Cow man extraordinaire
kiwifarms.net
I do enjoy some of Mauler's content, and I certainly prefer him a whole lot more over Rags and Wolf. But fucking hell, it would not hurt him one bit to learn to trim down and remove the fat in his work. Think of his Captain Marvel review, it's 110 minutes long. It's only 14 minutes shorter than the actual movie itself. He could have made it 45 minutes, or maybe even an hour would have been fine, but 110 minutes? Fuck off with that shit. And he does this a lot too. His critique of Outlast is split into 11 goddamn videos, each one about 20-30 minutes long, that's a game you can complete in no more than 4 hours. How much of an austitic, rambling fuck do you have to be to make an analysis of such a short game THAT tediously long?
Mauler is what happens when someone take the Objectively right opinion meme seriously. Both Rags and Mauler think that if they spew out enough words and talking points then they will prove why they are objectively right. It mostly just ends up being a impossible to dissect with out falling into Gotchas. It pretty much is the Video essay equivalent of a Gish Gallop .
 

AsbestosFlaygon

Get raped Tetra.
kiwifarms.net
I do enjoy some of Mauler's content, and I certainly prefer him a whole lot more over Rags and Wolf. But fucking hell, it would not hurt him one bit to learn to trim down and remove the fat in his work. Think of his Captain Marvel review, it's 110 minutes long. It's only 14 minutes shorter than the actual movie itself. He could have made it 45 minutes, or maybe even an hour would have been fine, but 110 minutes? Fuck off with that shit. And he does this a lot too. His critique of Outlast is split into 11 goddamn videos, each one about 20-30 minutes long, that's a game you can complete in no more than 4 hours. How much of an austitic, rambling fuck do you have to be to make an analysis of such a short game THAT tediously long?
I'll actually agree with Mauler here that it doesn't matter how long the analysis is in comparison to what it's talking about, there's single lines or scenes that can take ages to break down and I agree with him on that. But on the whole I agree with you, he could combine many of his points and that alone with make his content much better. I also find it ironic that Mauler doesn't understand how to condense shit, despite the fact that it's one of the most important skills to have in film making.
 
Last edited:

juwo

kiwifarms.net
I used to enjoy EFAPs when it came to dunking on the most egregious videos like the Shut Up About Plotholes one, but now I can't watch the episodes purely because of Rags and Wolf. The furfags' entire contribution to the discussion is always "lol ur so dumb kys and learn how to critical thinking". Thanks furries, what rich perspectives on the content in question. Rags is especially obnoxious as him being a fart-huffing liberalistist makes his attitude 20 times more pissy and pouty. I wish Mauler did his own thing without the faggots.

I'll actually agree Mauler that it doesn't matter how long the analysis is in comparison to what it's talking about, there's single lines or scenes that can take ages to break down and I agree with him on that.
I agree as well, but I feel like he took his approach from the Dark Souls 2 series (which purposefully analyzed every line hbomberguy said so nobody could claim Mauler took things out of context like hbomberguy did with Matthewmatosis) and applied it to everything else he does, no matter if it's beneficial to the video or not.
 

FuckedUp

Dinner Blaster
kiwifarms.net
I'll actually agree Mauler that it doesn't matter how long the analysis is in comparison to what it's talking about, there's single lines or scenes that can take ages to break down and I agree with him on that. But on the whole I agree with you, he could combine many of his points and that alone with make his content much better. I also find it ironic that Mauler doesn't understand how to condense shit, despite the fact that it's one of the most important skills to have in film making.
He doesn't even need to "learn to condense shit." If it's anything like Rags, he could literally just cut out 90% of his "analysis" post-recording without losing any actual details.
 

AsbestosFlaygon

Get raped Tetra.
kiwifarms.net
I agree as well, but I feel like he took his approach from the Dark Souls 2 series (which purposefully analyzed every line hbomberguy said so nobody could claim Mauler took things out of context like hbomberguy did with Matthewmatosis) and applied it to everything else he does, no matter if it's beneficial to the video or not.
I can understand the logic behind it, but the funny thing is that the Hbomberguy analysis is what made me realize how overly long he makes his videos. A regular viewer doesn't need a seven hour video series to understand that his point can often be stupid, and I think most people just end up losing patience with that video, at least that's what happened with me. Also Harris and his fanbase are a brick wall, if you're going in trying to change his mind or convince his fanbase that he's flawed you're fighting a battle you can't win. Matthewmatosis knows this, and that's why he didn't bother to try and responded to it, it's not worth wasting everyone's time by trying to tell those that can't move to move. Mauler doesn't seem to understand that you don't make content for those you'll never please, and as a result I think he ends up making his content more inaccessible to those that are less opinionated.
 

Watcher

Cishet dudebro
kiwifarms.net
Mauler is what happens when someone take the Objectively right opinion meme seriously. Both Rags and Mauler think that if they spew out enough words and talking points then they will prove why they are objectively right. It mostly just ends up being a impossible to dissect with out falling into Gotchas. It pretty much is the Video essay equivalent of a Gish Gallop .
The objectivity thing has more to do with how people chose to defend The Last Jedi. When TLJ came out people claimed that the bizarre plot devices the film employed weren't "flaws" because there was no such thing as objectivity, so if you claimed the film was bad you're just making the experience "less fun for everyone else". As if something can't be bad or poorly made and it's all just a matter of opinion.
I wish Mauler did his own thing without the faggots.
I agree with this, Rags is insufferable in these videos.
I can understand the logic behind it, but the funny thing is that the Hbomberguy analysis is what made me realize how overly long he makes his videos. A regular viewer doesn't need a seven hour video series to understand that his point can often be stupid, and I think most people just end up losing patience with that video, at least that's what happened with me. Also Harris and his fanbase are a brick wall, if you're going in trying to change his mind or convince his fanbase that he's flawed you're fighting a battle you can't win. Matthewmatosis knows this, and that's why he didn't bother to try and responded to it, it's not worth wasting everyone's time by trying to tell those that can't move to move. Mauler doesn't seem to understand that you don't make content for those you'll never please, and as a result I think he ends up making his content more inaccessible to those that are less opinionated.
I don't really agree that MauLer makes his videos longer on purpose just to try to appeal to people who disagree with his videos. He's stated numerous times that he rewrites his script several times (something Rags doesn't even bother to do once) and keeps things as condensed as possible while not removing actual content.

In terms of length a big trend with video essayists now is they tend to use a lot of time to say very little at all. Like if you took a look at any Clean Prince of Gaming or the person this thread is about, Rags's videos and cut them together into the same length they say extremely little in the amount of time they have. And mostly over-inflate their video length for ad revenue while getting them out in a very fast amount of time. I consider this far worse than anything MauLer does since I'd rather something be long than boring and pointless to listen to.
 

Doctor Stan

Fake Doctor
kiwifarms.net
Ask and ye shall receive @Hank Salagna , back at it again with a case of PBR and self loathing, ready for the cringe! Time for another Doctor Stan Special

Who wants the TLDR? Well, it was a video, Rag's takes were pretty bland, said Furries have the worse reputation, called the guy biased, and said that Artemis wasn't giving gamers a fair shake despite trying to act like he was going to be a little impartial. I mostly ended up talking about the Artemis video I think instead of the Rags response because I found it more cringy and terrible, at the very least I found it more interesting to talk about, and a lot of the stuff Rags said felt like stuff he's said before.

Alright, well it's opening with new music, and that new animation of the dancing shiba inu was tinted blue I assume to go with the aesthetics of the song, like some synthwave, so I was more than pleased by it. Description is somewhat interesting "Memes aside, I don't really care about furries one way or another all that much. So let's listen to a guy in his dog costume talk about furries and gamers and which is better. Don't worry, guys. It's just a joke video. A joke video that catalogs my descent into madness. " So he's still going with the 'totally not a furry narrative, aight cool. But this still seems like the most worthless video he's made, and that's really saying something

Also, little thing, he shows a bunch of patron icons at the start, and there's an unsurprisingly high amount of them with furry avatars, or paw prints and the like. At least he knows what his audience want I guess. He's also saying he's not sure how this video came to his attention, but eh whatever, there's cringe to be had!

Good lord I really don't like this Artemis guys voice, it's such a badly put on British accent, even if he's actually from the UK, it comes across as forced and his use of a moving background of what looks to be ugly wallpaper is only making this worse. And he actually looks, just the way I'd expect. acurate.PNG He also uses Killing in the Name of as a transition song it seems, which is an, odd choice to say the least.

First topic is, who has the worse rep in society, gamers or furries? This is a weird point, and the guy refers to societies view on furries as 'a mixed bag' I'm really thinking he isn't very self aware, he does bring up fundraising events at conventions, and how cons have a positive impact on local economies or some shit,but, like, that's a thing a lot of groups do. Anime and gaming cons help stimulate economies, and there are charity related gaming things, the most obvious of which is the malignant cancer known as GDQ, there's Extra Life and Childs Play as actual charity organizations, hell a lot of streamers do charity streams. And for the negative, he brought up bestiality, and zoo. And put that to equal footing as the perception of gamers as unwashed neckbeards. And the score is now 1 good, 1 bad for furries, and 0 good for gamers, and 2 bad, which turned into 1?

And then there's online reputation. I think I'll leave it at that. Furries 3 bad, 1 good, Gamers are apparently a 2/0 because, reasons?

Oh boy, Online Personality! I'm strapped the fuck down for some cringe. Already brings up Uncle Kage, and gives furries a +1 for that, oh boy, they get a point for having some normal people in their community, what an accomplishment! And he gave them another positive for having 'mostly decent people in it' oh man. And then talks about the fame hungry people like Jasonafex, and the cringy 'owo what's this?' crowd. And this Artemis guy is again, not bring up the fact that, there are people who rape animals! And the gamers earn their first positive points here, for having people who have gone mainstream like Pewdiepie and Markaplier. And then tosses more negetive points because some of these people have said naughty things, then did 'fake cry' aplogy videos, and maintain fanbases after saying 'nigger' on stream once and paying Indian guys to hold up a sign saying to gas the jews or whatever, instead of being lynched. I wonder if this guy likes Hbomberguy.... Either way, Rags goes onto a rant about how Pewds has done a lot of good with charity work, very fair, and how people like Artemis are moral busybodies. Not a completely unwarranted thing to shit on this guy for, but he did launch into a 10 minute rant, goody goody gumdrops.

Oh lawd, Rags is defending the nazi furry subgroup, wasn't he connected with one or something? Whatever, they were snazzy dressers so I get it. And now Rags is on about people throwing milkshakes at UK politicians because this Artemis guy thinks it's cool, and about how it opens people up to the idea of chucking things like plaster and bricks at political rivals because of normalized violence as a response to political opposition. Though the image of Sargon covered in milkshake does make me laugh a bit, so I got one chuckle out of this. And this Artemis guy is saying gamers say bad no no words like Nigger, Spic, and Chink, so they're bad too, and Rags points out that, the internet isn't civilized society, fair point. Furries 7 bad 3 good, gamers 4 bad, 2 good

And then onto aesthetics. I am confused, like the gamer aesthetic isn't as much of a universal thing I think as Furry aesthetics? And Artemis comes out saying furries win because they're fluffy and cute, Rags speaks up and says that he thinks Artemis looks creepy in the suit, and most people feel that way. Very fair. Hooray for asspats. Artemis is saying that Gamer is pretty limited aesthetic wise, Rags is saying there is a lot of variety, I don't care. Also this forced accent is getting extremely grating, it's like, either forced gravely or heavily muffled by the fucking suit, mixed with a forced British Dialect that I can't really place, might be more northern or something, who cares. At least Rags just sounds boring and generic. Furries are at 8 bad, 7 good, gamers are at 7 bad, 3 good, why am I keeping track? I don't know, I'm trying to be informative.

And now onto, 'Variety of Activity' which, looking at most broad communities seems like a completely arbitrary and worthless thing to try and compare, but whatever, Artemis brings up Fursuiting, making fursuits, digital art, traditional, and yes, porn. He's also showing a lot of the bottoms of paws, both with his suit, and in an artpiece, I think someone's a footfag. And oh god, no, Rags stopped on that piece I saw, made a connection that this dude might be into feet, and mentioned he has his own 'weird shit' I'd really rather not hear about this. And he's comparing his fetish for pregnant chicks, to feet? Because he doesn't see the sexual relationship of feet and sex? I have no idea what is happening, there are niggas with a fetish for doornobs man, there's men that love getting their nuts smashed by high heels, people are fucking weird. Also Artemis brings up like, 6 'interests' and then doubles up on that with 'that interest, but PORN' I wasn't expecting him to be like, fair, that'd be stupid, but come on. And Rags played a clip from a really good BoTW episode, I could be watching that right now...

Unsurprisingly, Artemis says that 'gamers are just people that play games, and I don't know why this topic is here' like he's trying to be cute. He even says it's free points? He's literally handing himself free internet points, in a comparison nobody is making. Then Rags goes on about how Furries are really a lot smaller than gaming, with how many Instagram pages, YouTube channels, conventions and so on. Whatever, Furries 8 bad, 19 good, gamers 3 good, 7 bad.

And oh BOY general toxicity, my favorite subject for last! Artemis tries saying "Well we're known for being toxic but-" and to quote Rags "I can't think of a more toxic community than furries, aside from maybe SJWs" And then there is a little rant in here about them SJWs we all love hearing about. The it gets back to the video at hand where Artemis claims it's both a small and vocal minority being toxic, yet there are also 'some people' who would say that there are a ton of deep rooted problems that threaten to rip the furry group apart. On the gamer side, Artemis claims that gaming is toxic because it's a competitive family, not a welcoming one, because that's bad? Then Rags starts talking about how Sports are both competitive and cooperative like vidja. He's really been on a lot of stuff like this, about how Gaming isn't super inclusive because there's a lot of genres that people in the community don't like and whatever, and people are competitive and talk shit, heard it all before.

I'm a bit disappointed that Artemis didn't cite any specifics on the toxic people in the furry community, I'd at least respect him a little if he called out some of the people he sees as shitty in his community in a really public video, but he didn't, so boo. Anyways, his final and obviously completely sensible and fair scoring system, where bestiality is as much of a downside as trash talk and competitive groups, leaves us with Furries at 11 bad, 20 good points, so +9, and Gamers at 9 bad, and 5 good, with a -4 internet points. And then he pats himself on the back for winning the rigged game he had set up?

On his closing thoughts, Rags said that he doesn't consider himself a furry because he doesn't do anything comunity oriented, but jerks it to the art, says he's had a lot of issues with furries over the last few years, says he thinks there's positive elements, basic takes.
 

juwo

kiwifarms.net
Wait, where did that comparison even come from? Shouldn't it be fetish vs fetish, furfags vs footfags or something? Seems weird comparing a hobby with a sexual deviancy. Is it made just so that the guy can dab on those toxic gamers?
 

FuckedUp

Dinner Blaster
kiwifarms.net
Wait, where did that comparison even come from? Shouldn't it be fetish vs fetish, furfags vs footfags or something? Seems weird comparing a hobby with a sexual deviancy. Is it made just so that the guy can dab on those toxic gamers?
So he can try claiming he's not a furry
 
  • Agree
Reactions: AsbestosFlaygon
Tags
None

About Us

The Kiwi Farms is about eccentric individuals and communities on the Internet. We call them lolcows because they can be milked for amusement or laughs. Our community is bizarrely diverse and spectators are encouraged to join the discussion.

We do not place intrusive ads, host malware, sell data, or run crypto miners with your browser. If you experience these things, you have a virus. If your malware system says otherwise, it is faulty.

Supporting the Forum

How to Help

The Kiwi Farms is constantly attacked by insane people and very expensive to run. It would not be here without community support.

BTC: 1DgS5RfHw7xA82Yxa5BtgZL65ngwSk6bmm
ETH: 0xc1071c60Ae27C8CC3c834E11289205f8F9C78CA5
BAT: 0xc1071c60Ae27C8CC3c834E11289205f8F9C78CA5
LTC: LSZsFCLUreXAZ9oyc9JRUiRwbhkLCsFi4q
XMR: 438fUMciiahbYemDyww6afT1atgqK3tSTX25SEmYknpmenTR6wvXDMeco1ThX2E8gBQgm9eKd1KAtEQvKzNMFrmjJJpiino