Their targets used to be creationists, who were easy to dunk on. It wasn't hard to debunk the likes of VenomfangX and Kent Hovind. That site has no real reason to keep updating, keeping the same goal, after everybody stopped caring about creationism.Was RationalWiki always this bad or have my standards just improved? I remember they had some funny articles like a decade ago debunking weirdos like Kent Hovind and Youtube creationists as well as the ones describing bizarre New Age beliefs. Is RationalWiki full of parodists now writing stupid shit like this in the same way Conservapedia was mostly parodists?