True & Honest Fan
- Apr 1, 2013
Even though I know no one who cares will ever see it, I'm willing to throw out an answer for Kitsu's question. Aneris is abrasive, but not abusive. The fact that Kitsu can't tell the difference does a lot to explain his friendship with Ryulong
I was almost about to add some documentation to share his history of his complete unhinged insanity and incredible abrasiveness nature to the point of physically threatening people (how do you not get permabanned for just that?)
You mean that ironically or did he really do that?
One comic is no evidence of any kind (not even circumstantial), that she's cheating with an Cuckstain with this mysterious Steve. You reading too much into stuff.Yes he is a literal and actual cuck irl. His fat hamplanet of a wife is fucking some guy called Steven who lives with them and she makes cutesy romantic comics about him and puts them on her facebook even though Andy has stated he doesn't really approve of the arrangement, I guess he lets it happen anyway because he's a big ol' cuckold who can't even stand up for himself irl. Check his thread's OP for the circumstantial but pretty convincing evidence.
Andrew Stallings AKA Cuckstain ; internet badass on the online, has to line up for a shot at his wife's fat pussy offline. It's hilarious.
One comic is no evidence of any kind (not even circumstantial), that she's cheating with an Cuckstain with this mysterious Steve. You reading too much into stuff.
One comic (directly referencing her going on a romantic date with Steven)
plus Steven's facebook status "in an open relationship"
plus the fact they live together, as confirmed by whitepages
plus cuckstain's guarded admission that he's not really comfortable with his 'arrangement'
plus cuckstain's off-the-wall anger at somebody saying cucks are 'not alpha males'
I don't think that I am. And I'm not suggesting that she's cheating on him, I'm suggesting that she's openly cucking him right in front of his face and he can't do shit about it. Because he's a betamax cuckold.
You know, I'd almost feel for the guy.
PPS. Anyone want to join RationalWiki? I will give you a sysop. I am quite literally trying to recruit editors here.
Says a literal cuck whose fat, ugly wife cucks him literally every day with every cock within grabbing distance.
David Gerard steps in to protect his little pet from being accused of 'using talk pages'.
The user talk page preservation rule is stupid and always was
It was adopted to be the opposite of Conservapedia. In five years, I have only ever seen it used as an excuse to harass people or demand they put up with harassment. It's a terrible rule and should be abolished - David Gerard (talk) 14:05, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
That is such a lame tu quoque. I would argue that's almost a bannable offence if that's best reply you can think off. Sorry mate, but you have just made yourself dumber by even responding to it.
It isn't antagonism. It's getting people to choose a side. One should always encourage others to do that, not to remain neutral. Remember, it is better to be confidently wrong than to be diffidently right. --[[Userastaigne2|Castaigne2]] ([[User talkastaigne2|talk]]) 21:58, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
I'm not being edgy; I'm being serious. I'd rather be totally, completely, absolutely wrong rather than be wishy-washy and end up doing the "right" thing.
Here's another maxim to consider. In any contest (be it debate, war, argument, whatever), neutrality only signifies a target to either be acquired or denied to the opponent. Thus, one should never be neutral in order to avoid such an entanglement. --[[Userastaigne2|Castaigne2]] ([[User talkastaigne2|talk]]) 22:11, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Wow. True SJW mentality in play here - "always encourage others to pick a side" and all that shit about neutrality being a bad thing is just idiotic.
This coop is an even bigger mess than the last one. Interesting how Hipocrite shows up to defend the cuck.