"RepresentUS" & the American Anti-Corruption Act -

[Uncle Warren]

The beautiful thing about the US is we have the freedom to express ideas, even the stupid ones, and that we can discuss them without having some pinko niggerfaggot come in and black bag us for it. The even MORE beautiful thing about said freedom is we can also make fun of retards who propose stupid fucking ideas like vote by mail.

It's the kind of shit that makes me feel relatively ok about this country yes.

 

[Haim Arlosoroff]

it's possible to separate money from politics

Oh, thats so easy. You just need to meet political inertia with crazy eyed fanaticism. However, once they were done removing the bribe-takers by impromptu lynching you would discover that they of course have further plans. You are going to be handed such wonders, and such horrors exist for those who resist. Gulags and Auschwitz will look like Disneyland. American liberty is the knife-edge of political corruption taking away your speech and guns because of a too-compliant population to the left of you, and militias actually installing horrifying fanaticisms to the right of you. Only the shitty middle used to offer a liberty between too much order and too much chaos.

Now, the American people and their representatives lack two things which America used to have in abundance.

1. Long decision making times where politicians had a month to answer accusations of serious scandal in 1800, a week until 1950, a day until 1980, an hour until 2015, and now we want a tweet and a video explaining themselves to us the moment we hear of a rumor. There can be no careful response, no debate within their circle and learning, and only raw emotion caricaturing the politician until they are so much more extreme or broken then before. All subjected to the same journalism which is owned by their bribers, to weaken those who Tulsi Gabbard and strengthen those who Kamala Harris.
2. It used to take decades for politics to roll out the new system, then years, then months, weeks, days, now mask mandates went into effect in an afternoon as we are so centralized that to simply listen to the character of the executive and the actually passed laws of congress is so behind the ball you are monstrously incompetent to even suggest the notion. Deeper and deeper, the American people then have to scrutinize their government in order to control their republic, exposing bribery but also shutting out the moral ambiguity that once allowed politicians to take the campaign funds and still follow their conscience. We follow their speech and daily actions too closely for there to be any wiggle room to accommodate both parties, they are either with us or the enemy.

Every system emerging in America must be weighed and measured by the electorate harshly because the problem persists if the slightest crack is discovered. Its a sick unfixable system of government which will either succeed to 2100 by sheer miracle, fall to the Image Management curation which is part of the journalist which the bribers own, or be ripped to shreds by revolutionists who point out all the sick truth inherit within Republican Government.

 

[Large]

 

[DeadFish]

Ok so I watched the videos about twice already.

The stated purpose of the idea is get more every day peoples votes heard. More accurate representation?
Yeah no. Thats not going to work. Most people who vote are voting for some very empty headed reasons. More nigger cattle voting wont make nigger cattle world go away.


The videos do not talk about how to deal with the issue the wealthy,s monopoly on media (and other means of manufacturing consent) which influence how people vote.

Ive tried to get people to think differently about politics. To think outside the current "menu" as you could put it.

Most people are not capable of independent thought. Their thought processes are more like a phone menu. Please press one for English. Press 2 for spainish. Press 3 for directory. Just like a phone menu trying to get them to think outside their pre programmed options nets the same response. Silence.
This proposal to fight against corruption is attempting to get people to think outside their menu. In short. Doomed to fail.


Also the videos proposes to change the system by using the very system which has gone to shit. Not going to work. Have you seen what happened to trump? The government critters who benefit from the current system will find a way to shut down any attempt to change things for the common good and threatens their vulture grasp on society. What makes you think this idea will fair any better or worse isnt an attempt to harness populist sentiment as a means to screw americans even further?

The only way you can fix corruption is weaponize it.
If you can get a society to self destruct via corruption then that society wasnt worth a damn to begin with. Over time using corruption in such a manner will weed out the crap systems and leave the good ones left standing. Think just how a virus kills off people who are not built to withstand said virus? Then leaves those who were build to withstand virus to survive? Same idea.

 

[Lemmingwise]

No seriously What the fuck is 'Diversity is Our Strength' supposed to mean?

2) The bad guys means diversity is good for them, because it divides the peasants.
(That's more of a skitzo thinking, if you believe in the occult etc.)

This is it, there's nothing schizo about it. It was used to further colonialism, to conquer america, africa and control asian trade in the past. It is being used by corporations presently to control its workforce.


Amazon warehouses track diversity as sufficiently diverse workforces are too disorganised that they don't form unions.

When they say "diversity is our strength" it means that amazon's profitability and strength comes from its divided and conquered work force.

Diversity was the strength of the spanish when they conquered the aztec empire using aztec enemies.

Diversity was the strength of various europeans when they played out african tribes against each other.

"Diversity is our strength" is a way to make a population swallow something that makes them weak.

People who believe in the statement are like the feminists that champion islam, they have internalised their greatest threat as a necessity.

Here take it from the european union eurocrat and tell me he isn't threatening people to embrace diversity:

 

[Lemmingwise]

Reading other people's opinions, this seems more like a typical trick of the left. Create a group with left money, left voices, left groups, etc. Then say your group is bipartisan, represents everyone's interests, etc. That way people if people on the right are skeptical of your group and don't want to join, the group can claim that the right simply doesn't want compromise or to work together, thus the right can be ignored.

Pretty much this. They even address their republican friends directly in why they're wrong on their diversity page.

I don't see them wagging their finger at liberals anywhere. It reminds me of "feminist allies", which usually just means "doormat".

 

[Lemmingwise]

Ok sorry for the triple phonepost, but I'm bedridden at the moment and I'll merge them if I can get to a desktop tomorrow.

Some other observations:

This initiative is being championed by sarah silverman:

https://twitter.com/representus/status/1391770005205917700

Their meme game is weak as fuck:





------


The whole thing is just retarded. Their analysis is that bills get passed on the basis of elite support of bills. But somehow this bill is exempt from that? And will somehow prevent it in the future?

 

[Shield Breaker]

thoughts: the intention is probably to enable more AOC or Trump situations, where an outsider blows out party establishment in primaries through populist agitation. not sure what to make of it though, opening up party primaries to the general public also sounds like it would make running a party in an area where it is small and weak near impossible because opposition parties could mobilize their voter base to get trojan horse candidates put on your partys election list.

This is what happened in my state for the longest time, and why we have closed primaries now. The result was one party rule for over a hundred years until Obama inadvertently killed the DINOs here.

 

[TFT-A9]

Ok sorry for the triple phonepost, but I'm bedridden at the moment and I'll merge them if I can get to a desktop tomorrow.

Some other observations:

This initiative is being championed by sarah silverman:

https://twitter.com/representus/status/1391770005205917700

View attachment 2179820


Their meme game is weak as fuck:

View attachment 2179822
View attachment 2179823


------


The whole thing is just retarded. Their analysis is that bills get passed on the basis of elite support of bills. But somehow this bill is exempt from that? And will somehow prevent it in the future?

yeah anything that 1. feels this inorganic to the point of fucking Sarah Silverman of all people shilling for it and 2. is doing the "HOW DO YOU DO FELLOW MEMESTERS" game is a fucking trap and should be discarded

memes are not a fucking political platform and they communicate little of use regarding policy proposals or... anything really, this is just some suits somewhere shitting out cold, sterile interpretations of the zeitgeist to try and get dumbasses to think they're so cool and totally organic and just like us!

 

[Cool Dog]

Ok sorry for the triple phonepost, but I'm bedridden at the moment and I'll merge them if I can get to a desktop tomorrow.

Some other observations:

This initiative is being championed by sarah silverman:

https://twitter.com/representus/status/1391770005205917700

View attachment 2179820


Their meme game is weak as fuck:

View attachment 2179822
View attachment 2179823


------


The whole thing is just retarded. Their analysis is that bills get passed on the basis of elite support of bills. But somehow this bill is exempt from that? And will somehow prevent it in the future?

Those maymays are pathetic, then again you get what you pay for and they pay nothing

 

[Mister Loser]

You know, a proper reevaluation of the United States' current constitution and governmental structure isn't necessarily a bad thing, but I can absolutely tell that these kinds of people don't want to have this discussion from a bipartisan viewpoint even though they're claiming so.

I'm probably way too low-IQ to actually explain or debate any of this from more than one viewpoint at a time though. I am a very easily swayed man and would prefer to see opinions from both sides without them just being blanket strawmen, or even responses to just videos that people put out. I don't want people talking at me, I want people talking with me.

 

[Lemmingwise]

I am a very easily swayed man and would prefer to see opinions from both sides without them just being blanket strawmen, or even responses to just videos that people put out. I don't want people talking at me, I want people talking with me.

Sure but if you're easily swayed when talked at, why would people talk with you?

Outside of your friends I mean.

 

[CreamyHerman’s]

It looks to be pretty gay, a way to speed up the great reset

 

[Carbonation Grimace]

All red flags I'm seeing point towards this being a political gay op. Keep in mind that the ultimate goal of those corrupt individuals pulling the strings is for them to be able to do so undetected. Some of the things outlined here (such as the push for more mail-in voting) really make sense when you are looking at it from that perspective.

 

[DeadFish]

I have an alternitves idea:
Give us our cut.
The idea is very simple.
Any time anyone buys influence they must pay a 25 percent influence buying tax. That 25 percent will be redistributed as UBI.

Its not straight up ubi. Its basically if you bribe one person then bribe us all.