rich people are basedIf you want to hit Spencer where it hurts and show how he's a lolcow, stuff like this is I think best in that regard because it shows how fake he is and how he was funded by glowniggers out of thin air into leading the NPI.
View attachment 2067479View attachment 2067481
Fun fact, the Grandfather of Henry Regnery the 2nd was the one who founded the "America First committee" which is where the modern origins of the phrase "America First" comes from (Woodrow and Harding both used it as a campaign slogan but it fell dead for about 20 years as a phrase). So yea, Nick Fuentes got the name of his movement from the Grandfather of the guy who hired Richard Spencer to run the National Policy Institute.
View attachment 2067500
View attachment 2067520
Burgers are one of the best foods, if you disagree, you're just wrong.
We won.And who won in wignats vs. amnats? As far as I can tell amnats are doing better, and he absolutely hates them. In fact he hates wignats as well.
Yes, 99.8% (which is wrong, more like 98%, whatever).a 99.8% survival rate
95% have permanent damage to organs? I’m going to need to see a source for that.Burgers are one of the best foods, if you disagree, you're just wrong.
We won.
Anyway, smugness aside. I agree with the common ground found in all this autism. Spencer is just some rich White kid, above average looks, with a degree and he's well spoken. He's assmad at Fuentes probably because he is no longer that relevant. Isn't Spencer also an atheist? Or at least, he's one of these cringe spiritual pagan larpers (correct me if I'm wrong).
Yes, 99.8% (which is wrong, more like 98%, whatever).
0.2% is 665,055 dead. The size of small countries. (575,829 as of now, just shows how wrong this retarded number is, oh and not everything is linear, maybe people should listen in their high school mathematics classes)
Among the 331,862,563 alive, 95% has permanent damage to organs. So only shy of 17 million are fully healthy.
A good half of the 95% will suffer heart and brain problems, severe enough to lower their life expectancy.
A good 75% now have liver, lung, and kidney issues, potentially left infertile.
Yeah, 99.8% will live, 95% of which will be miserable. This is assuming there's enough fucking hospitals for an entire nation, which there isn't, so a nation-wide infection will probably decrease that 99.8% of yours (again, wrong) to 96%. Oh, what about remote locations without adequate hospitals, they rely on farming... which provides us with you guessed it, fucking food. What about a rona infection there?
Keep telling us how it's not worth fucking up the economy that will be fucked anyway and how covid-19 is just some nothingburger chinkflu commievirus. The second worst and only choice beside a national infection leaving 95% miserable is nuking the economy while a shitty, unsafe, but very high chance of working jab is rushed out. It'll leave 0.1% with blood issues and maybe 0.2% in total will suffer major illnesses, but compared to over 50 holocaust units of miserable shits?
I thought conservatives were meant to conserve, what's left to conserve if over 300,000,000 now have fucked organs? This isn't doomer talk, this is very simple division a primary school child can do.
Here's some info about PhalanxI'm actually surprised this thread has almost no info about his Phalanx scam and the lore behind it. I remember hearing a lot of stuff about it and the different tiers and practices that were planned, when it first came to light.
It's not worth fucking the economy over a flu.Keep telling us how it's not worth fucking up the economy that will be fucked anyway and how covid-19 is just some nothingburger chinkflu commievirus.
I thought conservatives were meant to conserve, what's left to conserve if over 300,000,000 now have fucked organs? This isn't doomer talk, this is very simple division a primary school child can do.
Apparently Texas is magic. The Savior of the White Race is probably seething that there's not more dead Americans than there should be.It's not worth fucking the economy over a flu.
Because the current covid restrictions are doing wonders for conservatives.
The same reason they adore every Western Neoliberal politician: they've pivoted to hating conservatives more than anything. They have nothing but bile for Tucker Carlson saying something they said in 2017, and nothing but love for Liberals doing what Trump wanted a few years ago, while also hating Trump. Like Macron suddenly getting tough on Islam.Can somebody give me a QRD on why these idiots seem to like Macron so much? Because to me he doesn’t seem to anything other than a typical Western Neoliberal politician.
it's also because richard is terrified of appearing low-status (which is absurd as being "racist" is the lowest status thing in 2021). he wants to come across as being "above" maga.The same reason they adore every Western Neoliberal politician: they've pivoted to hating conservatives more than anything. They have nothing but bile for Tucker Carlson saying something they said in 2017, and nothing but love for Liberals doing what Trump wanted a few years ago, while also hating Trump. Like Macron suddenly getting tough on Islam.
The plan appears to be hoping Neoliberals become racist communists and spending the rest of their time saying the Right is irredeemable.
OK, now found it: https://kiwifarms.net/attachments/k06ghxe37di2gcxz-mp4.361623/Can't be bothered to scroll all the thread pages but what was the source Richard Spencer supports or wants to legalize child pornography? Can someone provide the source or quotes?
trollpedia.miraheze.org
Correct. Correlational studies are pretty bullshit and shouldn't be used to make policies.Yea, this is disgusting also there's no reliable evidence whatsoever for the claim giving pedophiles access to child pornography will reduce child molestation.
I'm reading the article and I think you're really reaching with that interpretation. The entre article is about the extreme overlap between homosexuality and child abuse and pedophilia, I don't think the takeaway should be that he is a child rape apologist.In the article Dutton makes the dubious claim that homosexual pedophilia "is not really pedophilia" because "homosexual pedophiles prefer significantly older children, often those that are already pubescent, and the abusers themselves are also more feminine than heterosexual abusers."
So gay men fucking pubescent 12 or 13 year old boys is somehow not "really pedophilia" according to Dutton.