I'll keep it quick so I don't infect comicsgate autism with weeb wars autism.I think Vic was done Dirtier FWIW
As far as I can tell, Meyer was damaged in private, and in one instance (tor tortious interference). The defamation was also kind of anemic, like NAZI! and Muh soggy knees! and whatever.
If Vic's case, he was destroyed quite publicly, across several contracts, and the defamation was extremely damaging. Meyer was called woman-hater. Vic was called woman-raper.
Losing at the trial stage doesn't award the winner fees, right? I know that can happen with, say, a successful anti-SLAPP, but at trial it's every man for himself.There's a good chance your question answers itself.
Better to settle now and pay your lawyer than to go to court and pay everyone's lawyers. Proving damages was to dicey to risk.
When I think about it, at trial, the worst that could happen to Meyer would be he loses and has to pay his lawyer out of pocket (or out of the crowdfunding money). The winning scenario is he proves X amount of damages and gets a judgment against Waid. Waid then has the judgment looming over his head plus his own lawyers sending him invoices.
So I'm of two minds. On one hand, Meyer had Waid by the short and curlies, and Waid had the choice of losing money and losing even more money at trial
On the other hand, Meyer still had Waid by the short and curlies, and used that as leverage in some hidden settlement.