Kiwi Farms

Dear normies,
A romantic relationship (which naturally includes intimacy) is something which I would venture MANY people believe is one of the most significant contributors of value to life. Just considering real violence over broken hearts and the absolutely massive tradition of art responding to the condition of unrequited love one can quickly ascertain the scope of this sort of thing in human affairs.
I know you won't understand the meaning of this, since you -- in some kind of intentionally obtuse trolling strategy -- keep conflating "sex" and "relationships" and treating each as a mutually exclusive absolute. Is it possible for you to consider for a fraction of a nanosecond the likelihood that gamers are upset this ENTIRE avenue of self-realization and connection to humanity (see: art, family, societal expectations) is being denied them, not just the sex? "Sex doesn't matter bro!" Ok, you first? If sex doesn't matter, why are "dead bedrooms" a problem? BTW, I know that some fucking retards will bring up asexuality -- asexual people represent a VERY small fraction of the population. Thus this is no counter-argument.
The true insight, of course, is to realize that all of the aforementioned brooding is a cope -- a very high-level cope. I think that -- on some deep level -- we have all been transformed by hardcore Darwinism. We all know about natural selection.
Yet, the common ideology is perverse, wholly infected by the "just-world" fallacy. The logic is as such: good things only go to virtuous people. A relationship is a good thing. Therefore, If I am in a relationship, it must mean I am a virtuous person. Conversely, if someone is not in a relationship, it must be because of a certain evil or malice they express.
This may be true, but this truth is only coincidental and by no means necessary. Is it possible that a relationship is in fact an "indeterminate" thing?
Initial sexual attraction is a combination of pre-cognitive and conscious factors, but never solely the latter. Nobody goes around laying out axioms sizing up a person and THEN decides they are attractive. Similarly, nobody acts under the assumption that there is an external world because of propositions X, Y, and Z; one acts assuming there is an external world and then uses reasons X, Y, and Z to understand the belief after the fact.
There are no "reasons" you feel that someone is attractive, you just feel it. You feel the attraction first; all "reasons" are actually post-hoc rationalizations.
Furthermore, it is quite true that sexual attraction (let's call it "love" or "lust"), like any other kind of emotion, cannot be forced. I do not want to force someone to love me, I merely want to lament the fact with others of like mind. But alas, I cannot be allowed to do that. You will not allow it.
There is a certain tension between normie faith in "civilized" factors vs. the kind of person they would describe as succeeding in mating. On the one hand, you have to represent regressive protector and aggressor roles from the neolithic era or you will never get laid, but on the other hand, modern moral V I R T U E determines sexual selection (and thus neolithic attitudes toward women are actually misogynistic and wrong...?)
This also conflicts with capitalist attitudes about merit and success having a 1:1, direct input-output relationship. "If you aren't successful with women, you obviously just haven't tried hard enough." Muh fucking bootstraps. A normie will berate you for "not trying hard enough" with females and then turn around and excuse an impoverished family as mere victims of circumstance. Pure ideology.
Why are normies (especially females) so upset by gamers? It causes anxiety. "Starving African kid on TV" anxiety. You can pay that starving, bug-eyed kid to go away -- Sarah McLachlan told you so. There are no saccharine TV ads for gamers. You can't pay an gamer to go away, but you can try to convince him (and yourself) that it's his fault. gamers, of course, do the same, but for different reasons beyond the scope of this discussion. Let's narrow our scope a little -- if I say "gamer" here, I mean a LDAR "black-pilled" gamer with no illusions as to the natural order of genetics or biology.
Women are exceedingly defensive when confronted with the gamer problem because the very confrontation with the fact of gamerdom causes anxiety. Another thread linked here recently was extraordinarily enlightening in this regard -- one single sentence at last made clear the motive for roast rage: they feel like they, personally, individually, are having a finger pointed at them each time a kissless virgin makes a self-pitying post. Females think back to times where they rejected romantic advances ---- and they want to pretend as though these interactions carry no negative or traumatic charge. gamers remind them of reality. Every female has turned someone down. Why? Because the man in question was not good enough. Not a random dude at a bar, but some typical beta male "friendzone" candidate. EVERY female has had this interaction. This obviously harms the man; but, also, while it may be very, very difficult to believe, this is psychologically harmful to the female as well. Wait, why? This ideological construct may be illuminating: "he's a good guy who deserves to find someone someday................................... just not me." What does that imply? "I find myself clearly superior to this human specimen. This human cannot find reciprocal love in me, but only in some hypothetical lesser human who may or may not exist." This kills the ideology. Eugenics ahoy?
This reminds people of the sheer brutality in nature, of the very existence of winners and losers resulting from participation in "life". Winning necessitates the suffering of someone else. Monogamy is a zero-sum game. The only way for non-Chads to pair with females is by sheer, extraordinary luck; otherwise, all must submit to full-on beta provider cuckoldry. Again, this kills the ideology.
Normies, if you cannot consider all of the above, then you have no right to comment on the gamer condition. Please stop posting -- please stop tormenting -- please stop attempting to invade and alienate in the ONLY space remaining for such unfortunate creatures. And, above all, stop fucking acting like you know the one true thing that'll be our salvation. We've all tried. We've tried everything. Nothing (and I mean NOTHING) has ever worked.
P.S. Nobody comments without some kind of motive; given the highly emotional and combative tone used by females and normie apologists, I can scarcely believe that mere "entertainment" is the only motivation. When ideology is challenged, harsh reactions ensue. Always keep this in mind.