You have a serious mental health problem
Fuck off Sam.
Sammay fails at summary judgement again. This, boys and girls, is Dunning Kruger in action. From reading this judgement it seems that Sammay takes points just to show off how clever he is.
There was some discussion in the hearing about the source of the tweets being an online forum, kiwi farms, which it is submitted has also posted live streaming of terrorist attacks. The claimant argued that therefore the annexes, coming from a disreputable forum, should not be of probative value.
Even the British court is telling Sammy to stop obsessing about Kiwi Farms.The pleadings should also not contain commentary or irrelevant matters. Although this application concerns the defendant's pleadings, I note that the claimant in his reply to defence and counterclaim has strayed, in my view, over the line of what is required or appropriate. I refer in particular to his response to the defendant's reliance on the kiwi farms forum posts. He raises matters which have nothing to do with this case and would potentially be distressing to third parties who have absolutely no involvement in this case if it were to come to their attention. Those details are not necessary in order to plead his case.
A court order he can use to remove things from the Internet. He did this with his case against John Doe on Encyclopedia Dramatica. Files his shitty little default judgment as a court order to de-index shit from UK Google and they just do it without question because nobody gives a fuck about the British.What does he possibly hope to achieve by this.
But the internet never forgets. So what does he hope to achieve from this.A court order he can use to remove things from the Internet. He did this with his case against John Doe on Encyclopedia Dramatica. Files his shitty little default judgment as a court order to de-index shit from UK Google and they just do it without question because nobody gives a fuck about the British.
Any win is a win in Samland.But the internet never forgets. So what does he hope to achieve from this.
That's like trying to think you get out of a murder case because you managed to strike out the part where you, the murderer who slaughtered the small child in the bathroom of a Denny's, did not happen to wear loafers, but sandals instead.Sammay is already crowing about how he managed to get one sentence from an extremely lengthy Court pleading struck out. Which he's parading round as a great success.
He also is prodding his prostate over how he has liberty to restore the application if modifications aren't made. All Esther Baker needs to do is get a real lawyer on board and get the pleadings rectified and it'll all rattle on regardless.
And yes, the tl;dr of that judgement is that this whole case is a giant autism-off. Sammay is suing someone who is bankrupt, for fuck's sake. What does he possibly hope to achieve by this. Even if the judgement is enforceable as it postdates the bankruptcy that doesn't mean Esther Baker will actually have the assets or anything to pay it.