Sarah Nyberg / @srhbutts / Sarah Butts / Nicholas Nyberg - 2809 UNION ST MADISON WI 53704-4513 USA (Pedophile, Tax Evader）

[Hellfire]

@Portajohn Old cow crossover, Jake Alley's attempt at damage control when the cousin Nyberg was trying to groom was tracked down. There must have been more of course, three tweets is unusual for Jake.

 

[Portajohn]

@Portajohn Old cow crossover, Jake Alley's attempt at damage control when the cousin Nyberg was trying to groom was tracked down. There must have been more of course, three tweets is unusual for Jake.

Oh ya, Jake tweeted up a storm in defense of Nyberg during the few weeks after Milo announced he was writing his first piece on that pedophile.

View attachment 430002

In that particular case, I'm pretty sure that Jake was repeating Izzy Galvez's half-assed attempt to "debunk" @Sunosis' #ffshrine logs, which Izzy had tweeted and posted on /r/gamerghazi several hours prior. (Side note: it looks like Izzy purged all of his previous reddit posts around the same time he was applying for a job that would require a security clearance background check. Interesting.)

Anyway, Izzy's "debunking" of the logs was, itself, thoroughly debunked on the same day using my WebCitation archives of the logs I'd found that May plus the fact that @Sunosis' logs lined up perfectly with the Internet Archive's snapshots of the front page of Galbadia Hotel (gh.ffshrine.org), where Sarah used to embed a live feed of #ffshrine. Izzy responded to this not by trying to rework his argument, but by crying to the WebCitation admins about harassment and getting the archives taken down. Sarah responded by blacklisting gh.ffshrine.org from the Internet Archive's snapshot archive, which she'd already done with forums.ffshrine.org and ffshrine.org previously after damning evidence was found on both.

 

[Meowthkip]

Oh ya, Jake tweeted up a storm in defense of Nyberg during the few weeks after Milo announced he was writing his first piece on that pedophile.

In that particular case, I'm pretty sure that Jake was repeating Izzy Galvez's half-assed attempt to "debunk" @Sunosis' #ffshrine logs, which Izzy had tweeted and posted on /r/gamerghazi several hours prior. (Side note: it looks like Izzy purged all of his previous reddit posts around the same time he was applying for a job that would require a security clearance background check. Interesting.)

Anyway, Izzy's "debunking" of the logs was, itself, thoroughly debunked on the same day using my WebCitation archives of the logs I'd found that May plus the fact that @Sunosis' logs lined up perfectly with the Internet Archive's snapshots of the front page of Galbadia Hotel (gh.ffshrine.org), where Sarah used to embed a live feed of #ffshrine. Izzy responded to this not by trying to rework his argument, but by crying to the WebCitation admins about harassment and getting the archives taken down. Sarah responded by blacklisting gh.ffshrine.org from the Internet Archive's snapshot archive, which she'd already done with forums.ffshrine.org and ffshrine.org previously after damning evidence was found on both.

Jesus, Sarah hasn't done anything useful for anybody except preening on Twitter and joining in on the anti-GG circlejerk.

Nothing of value will be lost by throwing her under the bus.

 

[Hellfire]

Jesus, Sarah hasn't done anything useful for anybody except preening on Twitter and joining in on the anti-GG circlejerk.

Nothing of value will be lost by throwing her under the bus.

As far as I can tell, the only reason they were doing all of that to cover up for Nyberg is because he was already brought into Zoe Quinn's inner circle of the anti-GG/Crash Override Network chat group and was also considered a friend and asset against Gamergate. If they cut him free there was a good chance he would betray them, and at the time the group's members believed they would be fucked if the existence of the chat group was known, let alone all the bullshit they had done and planned to do. As stupid and hypocritical as it was, they decided to lie their asses off to try and defend and hide Nyberg's vast history of self-admitted pedophilia.

Dan Olson, the chat group member who infamously viewed and downloaded CP to attack 8chan/Gamergate with a Medium blog, still talks to Nyberg as recently as last month, even with everything that has come out conclusively proving Nyberg is a sick fuck that tried to groom his little cousin.

 

[Meowthkip]

As far as I can tell, the only reason they were doing all of that to cover up for Nyberg is because he was already brought into Zoe Quinn's inner circle of the anti-GG/Crash Override Network chat group and was also considered a friend and asset against Gamergate. If they cut him free there was a good chance he would betray them, and at the time the group's members believed they would be fucked if the existence of the chat group was known, let alone all the bullshit they had done and planned to do. As stupid and hypocritical as it was, they decided to lie their asses off to try and defend and hide Nyberg's vast history of self-admitted pedophilia.

Dan Olson, the chat group member who infamously viewed and downloaded CP to attack 8chan/Gamergate with a Medium blog, still talks to Nyberg as recently as last month, even with everything that has come out conclusively proving Nyberg is a sick fuck that tried to groom his little cousin.

They let Brianna Wu go from their inner circle but kept Sarah Nyberg.

At least Wu's not a fucking pedophile.

 

[Rokko]

https://www.revenue.wi.gov/delqlist/ctallm.htm (Search "nyberg" to see his debts)
More than 70.000$ owed in taxes. When does it get really serious for him?

 

[Abortions4All]

https://www.revenue.wi.gov/delqlist/ctallm.htm (Search "nyberg" to see his debts)
More than 70.000$ owed in taxes. When does it get really serious for him?

Never. There are hundreds of people who owe as much or more. He'll never collect a state tax refund, and the state will take their pound of flesh with penalties and interest from his estate when he dies. Yes, it's unlikely this particular person will ever have an estate worth that much, but when that's the case it's usually not worth it for the state to spend money chasing down a tiny wage garnishment (you can only garnish wages to a multiplier of the poverty line).

 

[Portajohn]

https://www.revenue.wi.gov/delqlist/ctallm.htm (Search "nyberg" to see his debts)
More than 70.000$ owed in taxes. When does it get really serious for him?

If by "really serious" you mean prison, probably never. Unless Nyberg tries or tried to defraud the State of Wisconsin or the IRS with false statements or forged documents or something, that's not going to happen. I don't think she's that dumb.

Never. There are hundreds of people who owe as much or more. He'll never collect a state tax refund, and the state will take their pound of flesh with penalties and interest from his estate when he dies. Yes, it's unlikely this particular person will ever have an estate worth that much, but when that's the case it's usually not worth it for the state to spend money chasing down a tiny wage garnishment (you can only garnish wages to a multiplier of the poverty line).

Agreed, but I think it's worth elaborating for people who live outside the US.

This has been mentioned before in this thread, but the Breitbart background check in Sept 2015 also turned up a $103k tax lien from the IRS that was from back in 2010. I think many outside the US don't know that most of us have to pay income taxes at both the state level (in Sarah's case, to the Wisconsin Dept. of Revenue, where she owes about $70k now) and the federal level (the IRS, where she owes at least $103k). Sarah's total known tax debt is over $173k right now between both. I am no tax/legal expert, so I don't know the particulars of tax warrants in Wisconsin ("tax warrants" being Wisconsin's equivalent of tax liens). But I do know from some cursory research that tax liens imposed by the IRS can't generally be discharged by declaring bankruptcy and can stay on your credit report forever. Effectively, this means Nyberg will probably not be able to qualify for a loan for a house/car/etc. without a cosigner or insane interest rates, will have difficulty getting credit cards without insane interest rates or at all, will have a hard time passing a background check for rental property in her name at any decent place that does a background check, etc. - all the negatives of having a terrible credit report. Basically, Nyberg dug herself into a financial hole that she's unlikely to ever escape.

 

[Captain Cockpunch]

It's even better than that... a tax lien means probably never even being able to get a bank account/debit card/whatever again, because it carries the implication that at any time the taxman could suddenly take all your money, and no bank wants to deal with that considering you'll just walk away and leave them to deal with the inevitable incomplete transactions, paperwork, fees, etc.

I hope Nicky likes walmart money center and/or ripoff check cashing places, because he's going to be using them for the rest of his life.

 

[Hellfire]

Nyberg's bofriend is back on Twitter (after having locked down his account when the Crash Override Skype logs were released). https://twitter.com/Nibelbarfing http://archive.md/P18bS

He seems to spend his time playing video games and sperging out on Twitter. Several members of the CON clique were in contact with him still, including Katherine Cross, Athena Hollow, and A Man in Black. He also plays games with pedophile Nyberg, Nora Reed, and lonelyfrontier/ramonasewage/James Corbett.

He was chimping because the GOP was going to kill "millions" and he didn't know what he would do if his "Obamacare" was gone. He also frequently wishes for death on people he disagrees with.

Spoiler

He keeps trying to get a tugboat, claims he is "disabled" (and yet gets denied...)

And yes. this creep has pedophile tendencies as well.

From around when the CON Skype logs released.

He was butthurt about MILO and tried to celebrate his downfall.

He also cheering that Null was harassed into taking down this site. Not a word about it after it came back up.

 

[IAmNotAlpharius]

This is a really good point. Anarchism/Libertarianism, the idea that people can freely live among each other without any government entity "oppressing" them, is a fairy tale. All political ideologies are authoritarian by nature, and if an authoritarian presence doesn't already exist then one will eventually form. If you put together an anarchist/libertarian society where everyone works toward a common goal and the society winds up working, eventually some jerk is gonna say "this is mine" or "i think things would be run better if we organized a central government", and it would be authoritarian to challenge them.

Let me drop a little communist propaganda real quick. Its just a longer, smarter version of what i just said.

Spoiler: "On Authority" by Freddy "Freaker" Engels

A number of Socialists have latterly launched a regular crusade against what they call the principle of authority. It suffices to tell them that this or that act is authoritarian for it to be condemned. This summary mode of procedure is being abused to such an extent that it has become necessary to look into the matter somewhat more closely.

Authority, in the sense in which the word is used here, means: the imposition of the will of another upon ours; on the other hand, authority presupposes subordination. Now, since these two words sound bad, and the relationship which they represent is disagreeable to the subordinated party, the question is to ascertain whether there is any way of dispensing with it, whether — given the conditions of present-day society — we could not create another social system, in which this authority would be given no scope any longer, and would consequently have to disappear.

On examining the economic, industrial and agricultural conditions which form the basis of present-day bourgeois society, we find that they tend more and more to replace isolated action by combined action of individuals. Modern industry, with its big factories and mills, where hundreds of workers supervise complicated machines driven by steam, has superseded the small workshops of the separate producers; the carriages and wagons of the highways have become substituted by railway trains, just as the small schooners and sailing feluccas have been by steam-boats. Even agriculture falls increasingly under the dominion of the machine and of steam, which slowly but relentlessly put in the place of the small proprietors big capitalists, who with the aid of hired workers cultivate vast stretches of land.

Everywhere combined action, the complication of processes dependent upon each other, displaces independent action by individuals. But whoever mentions combined action speaks of organisation; now, is it possible to have organisation without authority?

Supposing a social revolution dethroned the capitalists, who now exercise their authority over the production and circulation of wealth. Supposing, to adopt entirely the point of view of the anti-authoritarians, that the land and the instruments of labour had become the collective property of the workers who use them. Will authority have disappeared, or will it only have changed its form? Let us see.

Let us take by way if example a cotton spinning mill. The cotton must pass through at least six successive operations before it is reduced to the state of thread, and these operations take place for the most part in different rooms. Furthermore, keeping the machines going requires an engineer to look after the steam engine, mechanics to make the current repairs, and many other labourers whose business it is to transfer the products from one room to another, and so forth. All these workers, men, women and children, are obliged to begin and finish their work at the hours fixed by the authority of the steam, which cares nothing for individual autonomy. The workers must, therefore, first come to an understanding on the hours of work; and these hours, once they are fixed, must be observed by all, without any exception. Thereafter particular questions arise in each room and at every moment concerning the mode of production, distribution of material, etc., which must be settled by decision of a delegate placed at the head of each branch of labour or, if possible, by a majority vote, the will of the single individual will always have to subordinate itself, which means that questions are settled in an authoritarian way. The automatic machinery of the big factory is much more despotic than the small capitalists who employ workers ever have been. At least with regard to the hours of work one may write upon the portals of these factories: Lasciate ogni autonomia, voi che entrate! [Leave, ye that enter in, all autonomy behind!]

If man, by dint of his knowledge and inventive genius, has subdued the forces of nature, the latter avenge themselves upon him by subjecting him, in so far as he employs them, to a veritable despotism independent of all social organisation. Wanting to abolish authority in large-scale industry is tantamount to wanting to abolish industry itself, to destroy the power loom in order to return to the spinning wheel.

Let us take another example — the railway. Here too the co-operation of an infinite number of individuals is absolutely necessary, and this co-operation must be practised during precisely fixed hours so that no accidents may happen. Here, too, the first condition of the job is a dominant will that settles all subordinate questions, whether this will is represented by a single delegate or a committee charged with the execution of the resolutions of the majority of persona interested. In either case there is a very pronounced authority. Moreover, what would happen to the first train dispatched if the authority of the railway employees over the Hon. passengers were abolished?

But the necessity of authority, and of imperious authority at that, will nowhere be found more evident than on board a ship on the high seas. There, in time of danger, the lives of all depend on the instantaneous and absolute obedience of all to the will of one.

When I submitted arguments like these to the most rabid anti-authoritarians, the only answer they were able to give me was the following: Yes, that's true, but there it is not the case of authority which we confer on our delegates, but of a commission entrusted! These gentlemen think that when they have changed the names of things they have changed the things themselves. This is how these profound thinkers mock at the whole world.

We have thus seen that, on the one hand, a certain authority, no matter how delegated, and, on the other hand, a certain subordination, are things which, independently of all social organisation, are imposed upon us together with the material conditions under which we produce and make products circulate.

We have seen, besides, that the material conditions of production and circulation inevitably develop with large-scale industry and large-scale agriculture, and increasingly tend to enlarge the scope of this authority. Hence it is absurd to speak of the principle of authority as being absolutely evil, and of the principle of autonomy as being absolutely good. Authority and autonomy are relative things whose spheres vary with the various phases of the development of society. If the autonomists confined themselves to saying that the social organisation of the future would restrict authority solely to the limits within which the conditions of production render it inevitable, we could understand each other; but they are blind to all facts that make the thing necessary and they passionately fight the world.

Why do the anti-authoritarians not confine themselves to crying out against political authority, the state? All Socialists are agreed that the political state, and with it political authority, will disappear as a result of the coming social revolution, that is, that public functions will lose their political character and will be transformed into the simple administrative functions of watching over the true interests of society. But the anti-authoritarians demand that the political state be abolished at one stroke, even before the social conditions that gave birth to it have been destroyed. They demand that the first act of the social revolution shall be the abolition of authority. Have these gentlemen ever seen a revolution? A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is; it is the act whereby one part of the population imposes its will upon the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannon — authoritarian means, if such there be at all; and if the victorious party does not want to have fought in vain, it must maintain this rule by means of the terror which its arms inspire in the reactionists. Would the Paris Commune have lasted a single day if it had not made use of this authority of the armed people against the bourgeois? Should we not, on the contrary, reproach it for not having used it freely enough?

Therefore, either one of two things: either the anti-authoritarians don't know what they're talking about, in which case they are creating nothing but confusion; or they do know, and in that case they are betraying the movement of the proletariat. In either case they serve the reaction.

"Decentralized" societies, such as nomadic pastoralists, have authority, it's just organized differently due to their circumstances. They had to structure their societies differently since the aristocrats didn't have a monopoly on force, information, mobility, or wealth. They were meritocratic because people would follow the most capable leaders. They were egalitarian since it was hard to monopolize livestock. They were libertarian because they couldn't police everyone and didn't have a monopoly of force. They had to make collective decisions since they couldn't control peoples' actions nor control what people heard.

Still, they had a social structure and a dominance heirarchy. Those on top had the most wives and wealth. Additionally, disobedience of such would result in being decapitated, drowned, trampled, or having molten metals poured down one's ortifices (George RR Martin based it off a Mongolian meme).

A lot of Americans like to think of Plains Indians as hippy anarchists that held hands and sang kumbaya till the white man taught them war. The truth is they had more in common with the Xiongnu, Huns, and Mongols than 1960s middle class teens. The Comanche for example had a trade-tribute empire built on slavery, extortion, and fear. They were imperialists too. The closest modern equivalents in the US would be organized crime, hacking groups, and hawkish libertarians (most I've met aren't Hawks).

The point is that authority & heirarchy are inevitable as it exists even in "decentralized" societies.

 

[DragoonSierra]

It's even better than that... a tax lien means probably never even being able to get a bank account/debit card/whatever again, because it carries the implication that at any time the taxman could suddenly take all your money, and no bank wants to deal with that considering you'll just walk away and leave them to deal with the inevitable incomplete transactions, paperwork, fees, etc.

I hope Nicky likes walmart money center and/or ripoff check cashing places, because he's going to be using them for the rest of his life.

He always has Apple Pay and Paypal.

 

[LN 910]

Nyberg's bofriend is back on Twitter (after having locked down his account when the Crash Override Skype logs were released). https://twitter.com/Nibelbarfing http://archive.md/P18bS

He seems to spend his time playing video games and sperging out on Twitter. Several members of the CON clique were in contact with him still, including Katherine Cross, Athena Hollow, and A Man in Black. He also plays games with pedophile Nyberg, Nora Reed, and lonelyfrontier/ramonasewage/James Corbett.

He was chimping because the GOP was going to kill "millions" and he didn't know what he would do if his "Obamacare" was gone. He also frequently wishes for death on people he disagrees with.
View attachment 435434

View attachment 435435

View attachment 435436

Spoiler

He keeps trying to get a tugboat, claims he is "disabled" (and yet gets denied...)
View attachment 435516

And yes. this creep has pedophile tendencies as well.
View attachment 435469
View attachment 435470

View attachment 435487

From around when the CON Skype logs released.
View attachment 435523
View attachment 435521

He was butthurt about MILO and tried to celebrate his downfall.
View attachment 435502
View attachment 435500

He also cheering that Null was harassed into taking down this site. Not a word about it after it came back up.
View attachment 435510
View attachment 435511

View attachment 435438

View attachment 435440

View attachment 435443

View attachment 435444

View attachment 435458

View attachment 435467
View attachment 435468

View attachment 435473
View attachment 435474
View attachment 435478

View attachment 435485

View attachment 435489

View attachment 435490
View attachment 435491
View attachment 435493
View attachment 435494

View attachment 435497


View attachment 435513

View attachment 435515

Well it's a given the two pedos would play together, but do they rape together?

 

[Jaimas]

Dan Olson, the chat group member who infamously viewed and downloaded CP to attack 8chan/Gamergate with a Medium blog, still talks to Nyberg as recently as last month, even with everything that has come out conclusively proving Nyberg is a sick fuck that tried to groom his little cousin.

Why wouldn't he? He's downloaded CP, I'm sure they have shit they can discuss.

They let Brianna Wu go from their inner circle but kept Sarah Nyberg.

At least Wu's not a fucking pedophile.

Wu was a liability specifically because Wu had no volume control and would fuck over her own side in seconds if she thought it would benefit her. In Wu's worldview, the only one that matters is Brianna Fucking Wu, and everyone else is so much set dressing. Humorously that's the exact problem Lifschitz had with her and led to her being cut loose.

 

[Portajohn]

The State of Wisconsin filed yet another tax warrant against Nyberg a couple weeks ago. That makes nine so far.

 

[Marvin]

The State of Wisconsin filed yet another tax warrant against Nyberg a couple weeks ago. That makes nine so far.

View attachment 476571
View attachment 476572

Can they seize his shit?

 

[Sissy Galvez]

At what point does the tranny pedophile dog fucker go to jail?

 

[Abortions4All]

For failure to pay taxes? Never, they'll just put liens on his estate and he will never have a net worth above zero dollars.

 

[NQ 952]

At what point does the tranny pedophile dog fucker go to jail?

Tax Warrants are more like another kind of debt, but it takes precedent over your other debt and you can't bankrupt your way out of it (and in some states, Bankruptcy court won't even take into account your tax debts when it comes to your final monthly payments). You would have to intentionally file wrong tax information with the intent to deceive and hide money to really land in jail (ie, Kent Hovind went to jail not for failure to pay but for tax evasion), but before THAT even happens the state or federal government will inform you that they think you fucked up and ask for their money first.

:powerlevel:

 

[Portajohn]

The State of Wisconsin has filed their tenth tax warrant against Nyberg. Sarah now owes the state nearly $78k in addition to the six figures she owes to the IRS.