My point is that human behavior is more complex than "white good, niggers bad". There's respectable black scientists and disgusting white wife beating crackheads. It's 60IQ retarded to believe everyone with similar ancestry behaves the same way or that nurture plays no role in how people turn out.They don't really have a choice for most of it. It's not like you can choose to stop having 60IQ or severely reduced capacity for delayed gratification or understanding that actions have consequences. It's like saying "You don't have to act retarded just because you were born retarded."
If you truly care about the third world, you could move there yourself. Be the change you want to see.Yes, two things that are now less likely to exist where they left since now there is one less person to enact change in that nation.
What country hasn't had immigration? The USA in particular is a result of mass immigration, lmfao.Yet somehow the nations they want to move to somehow managed to do that without mass immigration for most of their history.
Yikes, and this is why I don't think it's a good idea to tell most people about race realism. You're forgetting how complex human behavior is and you're tying wide ranging societal problems to individuals.As I have said, behaviors like that stem from genetics.
By your logic, wouldn't the natives who aren't successful be failing because their genes won't let them adapt to the current state of society? Wouldn't the current state of society be caused by their genetically influenced maladaptive voting habits? If so, wouldn't it make sense to replace them with superior foreigners who have proven their usefulness?What will they benefit? From the increased labor pool driving down the value of said labor and lowering wages? From displacing natives? From driving up the price of housing? From imposing new cultural norms? From being completely unable to understand them over the phone? From their genetically influenced voting habits? Those other countries are more than welcome to go ahead and swallow that poison. If a nation wants more good workers then there is absolutely nothing stopping them from producing them domestically and paying them a fair wage. It's absolutely disgusting to imply that you should throw away the people you already have in your nation and instead import new people because it's cheaper to do so.
If you're so brave, you're free to go replace the rats. With your high IQ, maybe you could even make the change the natives are too genetically indisposed to make on their own.I don't give a shit how "difficult" it is to flee from a sinking ship like a rat and often times those people who flee tend to use their newfound citizenship to bring over their families so that point is entirely moot.
Most countries do not focus on their people. A single individual cannot fix that. Having a big brain does not mean being a politician or a revolutionary.If we focus on our people and they focus on their people then everything will be sorted out and the quality of life can finally start to go up again for more than a tiny fraction of the species. Constantly focusing on the short-term gains of inherently selfish actions is anathema to civilization.
They're not necessarily part of the problem though. You can be born in a shitty place and become a great person. If they were successful in their home country and are willing to put in the effort to immigrate legally, I think it's safe to say they're good folks.Sure. And I'd want them to stay as far away as possible.
How many successful legal immigrants have you met..? You sound like you've lived most of your life in a small town far from minorities.Even if we assume that these immigrants are all rocket surgeons, one thing you won't benefit from is them continually acting in their ethnic interest at your expense. You see they haven't been brainwashed into the Jordan Peterson tier notion of "treating everyone as individuals".