SCP Foundation - Creepypasta with roid rage - now ITT: SCP fans

[alanshaffer3293]

I mean, it seemed like he was just stepping back? Just because he's leaving doesn't mean he doesn't still have enough trust in the community to be an admin. Whether he deserves that trust or not.

Is there a pattern of them removing modship from those who 'retire with dignity'?

Now, whether this will backfire is a different story.

As far as I know, this is normal practice. Admins who step back or become inactive aren't demoted unless they explicitly ask to be.

 

[Walter Grace]

I mean, it seemed like he was just stepping back? Just because he's leaving doesn't mean he doesn't still have enough trust in the community to be an admin. Whether he deserves that trust or not.

Is there a pattern of them removing modship from those who 'retire with dignity'?

Now, whether this will backfire is a different story.

They don’t usually go with “Honorable Retirement” more than they do punish people that have done terrible things with super vauge listed reason for what they did. But also, if you read the new policies, that for sure Dr. Bright fell under, it’s pretty sus. He also must have read them considering he was so high up.

From SCP’s updated off site NSFW policies, what is punishable-

“Attempting to use one's status as staff as leverage for NSFW behavior, sexual favors, or similar.”


Hmmmm.

The Brighter Side of Life — So for those who may have noticed, tommor…

archived 28 Dec 2019 23:03:44 UTC

archive.md

 

[John Merston]

I really like SCP-288. They'd wreak havoc if they were real.

You don't say.

Spoiler: DATA EXPUNGED

 

[Disc]

Update to Site Charter regarding activity on adult platforms. - O5 Command

05command.wikidot.com

https://archive.md/MnWjG

Staff are not to directly advertise their current position in the SCP Wiki’s staff structure on platforms where adult activity is expected or the norm. “I am [REDACTED], Moderator of SCP Wiki” is unnecessary; “[REDACTED], writer at SCP Wiki” is more acceptable, if among other hobby listings. It’s not necessary to fully isolate one’s self identity between the Wiki with other platforms, but a level of division is expected and heavily encouraged.

This is what makes me think 'covering their asses' more than 'trying to root out corruption'.

 

[Godd Howard]

This is what makes me think 'covering their asses' more than 'trying to root out corruption'.

Not to mention their continued refusal to acknowledge what Bright has done.
They don't actually care about anything that's been happening, they're just realizing people are starting to learn about it. Bright isn't even properly retired, he's still an admin.
Doctor Doctor Doctor's from 2010, why no one spoke up about how fucked it was to Bright or any of the other staff, or why if they did nothing was done about it is something that shows how unreliable SCP staff really is.

 

[kiwi-identified cow]

This is what makes me think 'covering their asses' more than 'trying to root out corruption'.

Not to mention their continued refusal to acknowledge what Bright has done.
They don't actually care about anything that's been happening, they're just realizing people are starting to learn about it. Bright isn't even properly retired, he's still an admin.
Doctor Doctor Doctor's from 2010, why no one spoke up about how fucked it was to Bright or any of the other staff, or why if they did nothing was done about it is something that shows how unreliable SCP staff really is.

Exactly. I see that Dexanote was the one to make the 05 thread about a policy ~limiting~ sexual interaction between users and staff. Come a long way from jerking off to the idea of wielding that admin power over someone whose father was providing free housing for your fellow admin friend, have you Dexanote?

Spoiler

If Dexanote has changed (magically, suddenly, right after the exact same things he's known for months or years were posted and noticed in a place staff cannot censor) then I think the community would like to know why. Why don't you tell 05command how you decided you no longer enjoy masturbating to the idea of banning someone from your site, Dexanote? Right now I'm wondering why -- figuratively speaking -- the CEO of a company wants to be able to fuck his secretary as long as he's not wearing his CEO hat at the time:

The above is not only asinine reasoning, it also creates an even more 'sexy-taboo' potential relationship dynamic, in which "we have to keep our kinky sex a secret, even from other admins " becomes a factor when the inevitable hotel hookup(s) occur(s); so many admins and staff are into BDSM too that I simply cannot imagine how they discussed sexual ethics That Much and concluded That Bullshit without considering the notion during discussions.

I'd guess most of the people abused by staff don't trust the exact same staff to make policies allegedly intended to prevent the exact same abuse, Dexanote. Y'all are going to have to find someone on staff who's not a pervert and/or abuse apologist to address this objectively, and you won't be able to do it because you're not sorry you did it, you're sorry you can't do it anymore. And it's because you are malicious, predatory people who know how to talk and lie and cheat until the larger SCP community is complacent enough for you to conceal, maintain, and enjoy a blissfully unaware sphere of the inner circle that is just as abhorrent as it always was. The only difference is that this time, you want to get away with it forever under new duplicitous bureaucratic proceedings -- this time, designed specifically to allow the people in positions of power -- staff -- to decide whether staff in any given case are guilty of abusing their power as staff.

In great confidence, I speculate that under these parameters, any user abused by a staff member would be silenced further and told that their case had been "investigated and did not fall under relationship policy parameters for inappropriate conduct" or some shit like that. They will investigate themselves and find themselves guilty of no wrongdoing. They always do.

Aww, so wholesome and punctual, Mr. Beattie. So, are y'all going to reopen cases, or just cases you hadn't changed over months to benefit your narrative wherever possible all while confusing the community? Hell, are there any examples of 'normal' cases anyway? I'll make sure to keep an eye out for any Wikidot PMs from you and Dex.

Edit: As staff search for viable distractions to cause, it may be worth it to put CC-by-SA 3.0 licensing attribution at the top of the first post in the thread or somewhere else plainly visible, just to be safe.

 

[Lil' Misogynist]

Never forget that the guy who’s currently the captain of Anti-Harassment (Dr. Mann) let Roget get away with this.

Spoiler: Old meme

 

[Adamska]

Alright boys, buckle your fuckle.

Dr. Bright faked his resignation and is still a site-admin.

View attachment 1273579
They’re keeping him despite policy updates, I guess.

Given that not a single thing mentioned what they should do, ie purge the abusive pedophiles and report them to authorities, that's not surprising.

They're literally only doing this now because they're getting caught on their creepery and they're terrified of getting made irrelevant to the lore (too late you useless faggots) or going to prison to get beaten to death by murderers in their respective countries.

Also I don't get the defense of Bright; I actually found his OC to be the shittiest. What else did he do beyond self-insert himself as this immortal dude who can swap bodies like a more autistic Proteus from X-men?

 

[Eskisehir]

It's somewhat common for staff to be moved to an 'inactive' or legacy position when they leave. I don't think people get demoted unless it's specifically for disciplinary reasons and even then we've only had one person banned through being censured since it was put into place as a policy (Cimmerian).

So it's not that he faked his resignation, per se, but that actually looking at his wiki and staff activity is a much better metric.

 

[vdnb6]

Big edit: Ohhh shit I missed some things. Check these out, they’ve made public statements and new policies:

http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-13292997/a-statement-on-recent-events https://archive.md/m3kYG

Now that I’ve slept on it, I don’t think I’m all that happy with the public statement. Assuming that everything here is truthful, calling the situation a “staff member and former staff member having sent NSFW messages to a minor” is greatly downplaying what the actual situation looked like. Also, there’s no mention of the fact that the issue with staff and the community extends far among these two. I’ve seen no word on whether anything is going to be done about Roget, DjKaktus, Uncle Nicolini, Randomini, or any of the other weirdos who’ve been discussed in this thread or been reported to AH only for the problem to fall on deaf ears.

Also I don't get the defense of Bright; I actually found his OC to be the shittiest. What else did he do beyond self-insert himself as this immortal dude who can swap bodies like a more autistic Proteus from X-men?

From what I’ve seen the actual answer to this is that Bright was a big deal in the earlier days of the SCP Foundation and put in a ton of work as an admin and he’s been riding that high ever since. Prior to retirement, though, he hadn’t done anything really significant for several years and his decade-long presence on the site has been full of abuses of power. I don’t fully understand it either.

 

[Lord of the Large Pants]

Is this the first time in the history of the world a website has had a "don't abuse your janitor position to sleep with (possibly underage) users" rule? Especially on a site with a theme that, in theory, has no particular sexual bent. Just saying it out loud makes my head hurt.

... maybe this very topic is some kind of SCP? Or maybe the real SCP was the friends we made along the way.

 

[ToS]

Mr. Beattie.

First:

Damn, them some good grammar sentences. Did they run this through the draft forums first?

Second:

Can someone legal savvy explain what actually would constitute “in an official capacity” here? I have no idea what that means.

Third:
I don't know if anyone else caught this, but I thought it was a chuckler:

I was wondering that myself last night, so I took a gander at the GoFundMe page to see if there's any updates. Unfortunately, they haven't posted an update since March 11th, however in that update message they mentioned that the next hearing date is April 21st (which was a week ago mind you). Now due to the Corona Virus situation going around, I wouldn't be too surprised if the hearing got postponed; but even then, I would imagine some sort of update in regards of being transparent, yknow?

-from this post on April 29th.

Then, almost as if taking notes:

Heh.

 

[John Merston]

One SCP that sticks out the most for me is SCP-818. He's a child that has literal godlike powers, but is autistic. Not the "socially awkward super-genius" type of autistic, but the "non-verbal, runs in circles, and hits self when upset" type of autistic. It even describes his autism as a disability. Did I mention that he's black?

Such an article would never fly in the modern SCP world.

 

[Walter Grace]

Well. Ain’t this a bit of a fucking mess. They’re in a quandary.

It speaks for itself how this could go wrong in so many ways,
Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad they’re trying to set things right.
But this? It opens up way too many cans of worms that could be spawned by this.

 

[Adamska]

Well. Ain’t this a bit of a fucking mess. They’re in a quandary.

It speaks for itself how this could go wrong in so many ways,
Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad they’re trying to set things right.
But this? It opens up way too many cans of worms that could be spawned by this.

View attachment 1276500

Or... you know... just be fucking transparent and break down your gay little private court. Then have tribunals like actual Wikipedia. Fuck, this isn't hard you elitist faggots.

 

[StoicMoose]

lmfao, holy shit a normal website doesn't need shit like this, only when you've got a ton of pedos who've gotten too comfortable do you need to do this stuff

 

[Mexican_Wizard_711]

The age requirement being raised is nothing more but a bandaid on the open axe wound that is the Pedophile cabal behind scenes within staff. In essence, this fixes nothing.

Also, we are going to do anti-scp memes, I suggest someone make an scp version of this.

Spoiler: Meme Edit Please

Here is a good one:


It's obvious we have pedophiles in the
SCP Foundation.
They be spy'in in your threads
They banning your friends
Tryna groom em so y'all need to
Hide your kids, hide your IP
And hide your email cuz they're grooming every minor out here
You don't have to come and confess
We're lookin for you
We gonna expose you
So you can run and tell that, Pedos

We got your porn accounts
You done left evidence and all
You guys are so dumb
You are really dumb--for real

 

[vdnb6]

lmfao, holy shit a normal website doesn't need shit like this, only when you've got a ton of pedos who've gotten too comfortable do you need to do this stuff

It’s gotten pretty bad. There are a lot more that haven’t been covered by this thread. Looking at you, HumidHermit/running4waifu. (Side note, I tried to find this guy’s disc thread again and couldn’t. I’m wondering if it was deleted.) A lot of the people in the Anti-Harassment Team log of bans fit the bill too. There are so many of them that just slip away quietly, whether or not they actually get banned.

 

[Baubius]

Also, we are going to do anti-scp memes, I suggest someone make an scp version of this.

I made this:

Also, "staff secret-keepers" lol. Nothing changes.

 

[Godd Howard]

If we're uploading memes, I suppose I might as well upload this here, its been bouncing around in the RPC discord for a while.

Spoiler: A Reading of Bright's double D 13 year old fantasies