lol listening to shamela audio book for 1700s we've gotten 2020s level of basedness.
Last edited by a moderator:
what did he mean by this?lol listening to shamela audio book for 1700s we've gotten 2020s level of basedness.
basically it's a parody of Pamela basically gist is unlike Pamela where the protagonist is constantly under threat of rape; shamela actively leads him on.what did he mean by this?
read it it's awesome.Literally who
basically it's a parody of Pamela basically gist is unlike Pamela where the protagonist is constantly under threat of rape; shamela actively leads him on.
I'm sorry have you read a book? the book is from the 1700s and is a parody of another book. but you're the one to talk of delusion you think harvey Weinstein wants to fuck you.Oh look, delusional fiction. Go figure
I'm sorry have you read a book? the book is from the 1700s and is a parody of another book. but you're the one to talk of delusion you think harvey Weinstein wants to fuck you.
Pot calling the kettle black, again?Oh look, delusional fiction. Go figure
Pot calling the kettle black, again?
I mean, I thought it was pretty known that the 1700s was based? It was the year of 1776 after all.
a novel equivalent of an epic shitpost.This entire thread is a dumpster fire but "Shamela" is a famous work of parody worth discussing. @Niggaplease, try writing a proper OP for it.
The culmination of this line of reaction against "damsel in distress" novels was, of course, the Marquis de Sade's "Justine" where the virtuous heroine is punished at every turn.