it's about ethics in journalism tbh fam
Snowflake shoe0nhead / June Lapine/Laporta & Armoured Skeptic / Gregory "Greg" Fluhrer - A poor man's Boxxy: rejected by Vaush, disowned by /pol/ for burning coal, sleeps in a dog's bed surrounded by trash, and her ex-boyfriend.
I think I understand what you're saying here. June has no moral compass.
No I'm saying your post has massive NotYourShield energy.
It's ok to shit on something/someone without making sure everybody knows you're a good boy who isn't shitting on some other sacred cow.
I don't understand what #notyourshield means in this context.
It's weird for a woman to shit on other women just for believing in some unorganized concept with no dogma. Hating women for believing loosely in a concept of women's rights in a way that appeals to men is just weird. It's an aesthetic masquerading as something more than it is, as opposed to all the trad wife stuff on YouTube that's more openly shallow, and at least to me, a lot more attractive.
Tasty Tatty
kiwifarms.net
No problem with the thread being moved here. "Beauty Parlor" is just another word(s) for Basic Bitch.
deangusmacteard
kiwifarms.net
Very much this. @LonesomeDud let the hate flow through you.
It is possible to creatively reimagine every major civilization-level question if you get all multidimensional on it, but that's often not helpful or worthwhile.
Many people, for instance, have different opinions on abortion depending on whether the context is moral, ethical, legal, constitutional, social, theological, spiritual or purely political. It is entirely possible - and, honestly, preferable to serious people - to boil down those positions to a binary "pro-choice" or "pro-life" for practical purposes while still remaining a nuanced human being.
There are dozens of different strains and definitions of feminism, and hundreds/thousands of distinct perspectives in the broader conversation. None of them are relevant except for the definition that everybody uses, which (if we're going to nuancebro about it) is intersectional radical feminism as marketed by corporations through mass media.
That's why the majority of women across America and across the planet do not believe in "feminism", even if they are technically "feminist" according to outdated, generalized definitions.
It is perfectly normal and decent and just to simply say that feminism is cancer. You don't have to dance around it.
Big gay take. Shoe is a perfectly serviceable female with 3 years until - according to the best data science has to offer - she becomes semi-objectively worthless.
She's got a symmetrical face, unblemished skin, healthy-looking hair, straight teeth and an hourglass figure. I wouldn't hit that, but it's nonsense to say she doesn't qualify as beautiful.
This woman is now thirty and has never held a real job other than embarrassing herself on the internet. She's reaching Sapphire Crimson Claw levels.
I'm glad this was moved to beauty parlour, because female perspective in regards to June is important just to understand how pathetic she is. What's next for her?
I'm glad this was moved to beauty parlour, because female perspective in regards to June is important just to understand how pathetic she is. What's next for her?
Plank
kiwifarms.net
From the few videos of her I've watched and the rare times I clicked on some tweet by her, it is painfully obvious that, unless I missed it, there are no books in her room.
There is only so long a audience can be sustained by hot takes and snark. It is like eating nothing but candy and potato chips. One will eventually get sick of them and seek out some real food.
The looks are obviously fading.
The videos on how crazy the SJW/leftist activists are is now mainstream.
Her clout chasing isn't really gaining her much.
Two and a half millennium of political thought isn't impossible for someone who is 30 to gain a reasonable ability to do reasonably well in the online political discourse, but it isn't something that is going to happen anytime soon even if she started immediately. Even the lowest tier political and social commentators have vastly more hard knowledge of the source material than she does.
If not that, then getting married or continue to fade into the 'I use to be cool and hip' unmarried wine aunt persona.
Lindsey Ellis is older than her yet does much better in the market because she abandoned her "cool girl" persona that appealed to men back in the day and nobody watches her for her looks (at least I hope they don't). She's also not insecure about her age or constantly attacking other women, which is a one up on June. I can't believe I'm complimenting Lindsey, but she's someone in June's circle who is doing much better with what she has. June has nothing to stand on.
JelloJerk
kiwifarms.net
Well her hair is a wig, but I think her biggest issue is that she tries to go for the OnlyFans e-girl look now which is usually used by girls that are 10 years younger than her, so when she does it you can tell that she's way older than the other girls, and to my brain that translates to "Something is really wrong here"/uncanny valley vibes. It borderline creeps me out lol.
Skinwalker indeed.
Berrakh
kiwifarms.net
I just think it's a mistake for women to need male validation just like it's bad for men to need female validation. You're basically putting your self-esteem in the hands of people who don't really get who you are and have a real conflict of interest in what you should be.
justhereforments
kiwifarms.net
Women who can't get pregnant still have value. Women who choose not to have children and then end up terminally child-less do not have value.
It's sadly one of the curses the Internet has given us. Millions want to be special, just like their favorite social media icons. But how do you stand out from the others? Flash your tits, create some questionable thumbnails, have retarded takes, or do anything and everything that will draw others towards you. The more followers/subscribers/friends you have, the godlier you are. No more would you be bullied in school, oh no. Your bullies would eat literal shit just for a single ounce of your clout.
None of these people-- June included-- want to accept that there's a possibility that they will die and eventually be forgotten. If being remembered means having your 22-year-old nude body on the Internet for the rest of its lifespan, then that's what people will do.
What about those who can get pregnant but have health complications (such as PCOS) that could jeopardize the baby? What about those who are addicted to a dangerous substance such as heroin?
Just because somebody can get pregnant doesn't mean they should get pregnant.
If that were the case, we'd surely have no issue with furfags reproducing and increasing the size of their autistic community.
Last edited:
Poe's Law, you strike again. And here I thought the Onision thread was a honeypot for spergs. Using shoe0nhead to judge all voluntarily childless women is like using Lucas Werner to judge all childless men: you're literally referring to the exception as the actual rule.
You do realise that having children is a two-person endeavour, right? If women who choose to not have children despite being able to do so have no value, then men who choose to not procreate are just as worthless. However, we have clear examples of men who made the conscious decision to not reproduce, and yet their lives are far from worthless.
If Richard Stallman had a kid when he was in his late 20s/early 30s, he would've never had the time to dedicate working in the MIT AI laboratory, which in and of itself, was the birthplace of so many milestones in technological innovation (i.e. Incompatible Timesharing System, Emacs, the GNU Project and every piece of software licensed under the GPL that's used in a commercial setting like the Linux kernel, etc).
I'm not saying that every barren spinster who chose to not have children is a mind along the likes of RMS, but the point is that time not spent raising children is time that could be spent on endeavours that benefit society in some way. Shoe's life is only worthless because she chooses to prioritise attention-seeking over contributing to society. Any child born to her would invariably come out fucked up psychologically because they never had stable role models to anchor themselves with.
If Shoe actually did have children, she'd still be a worthless human being because we have a woman who hasn't aged beyond 16 mentally responsible for human lives that can't take care of themselves. Why the fuck would anyone want Shoe to have kids in the first place?
Since this thread is still technically for Greg, he hasn't said anything about what he was supposed to be cancelled over a week or whatever ago, but he just uploaded a twenty second video of him apparently being stressed out. The thumbnail says "What am I doing?" and I'm not sure if that's referring to what he's doing in the video, or if he's having some kind of crisis over his current content style. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZC-aglcogxo
Can't archive it at the moment, but will if it's still up when I can later.
Can't archive it at the moment, but will if it's still up when I can later.
As pathetic as Shoe is there's definitely a ton of mental illness just under the surface of Greg that's ready to burst out.
He's so stressed out he can take time out of his crisis to stage, edit, and upload a 20 second video. Poor dear, he must be on the verge of collapse.
(Also holy shit that room is packed with junk. I catch flack from my father when he visits for having a bookcase with board games in it in my living room, he'd pop a blood vessel if he saw this.)
