Damnit, you all so dense, that it's paintful...
When are you going to understand that I'm not trying to convince any of you that you're wrong?
I'm just:
1) Trying to figure out what you think, and why you think it.
2) Telling some of you (not all) that they're making assumptions, and that I want to know where that come from.
So...
@MCG_Raven : Okay, valid viewpoint, I still didn't see anything proving it and I'm very skeptical about this definition because I don't think a TCPA hearing is on the merits of the case.
@LuNaS : Your exemple of cars IS NOT ME, it's what I wrote, but what I wrote was an inquiry of her logic. I do not think that I wrote is right, and I don't think she does either, but I'm not sure, and I want to be sure. I agree that a ford is not a sedan.
@AnOminous : Your logic is flawed. You're saying that a dismissal under TCPA can't be refiled, and that a judgement can't be refiled, therefore a dismissal is a judgement. You're actually the guy arguing that a sedan is a ford because they're both cars.
@Sheryl Nome : Please anwser the questions so I can read your message in the light of your viewpoint.
Do you think a dismissal is a final decision on the merits of the case? YES OR NO?
Do you think a judgement is a final decision on the merits of the case? YES OR NO?
Do you think a dismissal is a judgement? YES OR NO?
I'm not asking for a lecture about the law, simply trying to get where you come from because I still don't understand what the first thing you replied to me as to do with what I initially wrote (and since then, you're pilling on a thing that doesn't seems related to my message to begin with).
You all think I'm wrong, for different reasons, but Sheryl Nome is the only one who cited something saying that a dismissal is a decision on the merits of the case, but I'm not so sure it applies to a TCPA hearing, because I still have no context for that citation, and she further aknowledged that they are exception to that citation.
When are you going to understand that I'm not trying to convince any of you that you're wrong?
I'm just:
1) Trying to figure out what you think, and why you think it.
2) Telling some of you (not all) that they're making assumptions, and that I want to know where that come from.
So...
@MCG_Raven : Okay, valid viewpoint, I still didn't see anything proving it and I'm very skeptical about this definition because I don't think a TCPA hearing is on the merits of the case.
@LuNaS : Your exemple of cars IS NOT ME, it's what I wrote, but what I wrote was an inquiry of her logic. I do not think that I wrote is right, and I don't think she does either, but I'm not sure, and I want to be sure. I agree that a ford is not a sedan.
@AnOminous : Your logic is flawed. You're saying that a dismissal under TCPA can't be refiled, and that a judgement can't be refiled, therefore a dismissal is a judgement. You're actually the guy arguing that a sedan is a ford because they're both cars.
@Sheryl Nome : Please anwser the questions so I can read your message in the light of your viewpoint.
Do you think a dismissal is a final decision on the merits of the case? YES OR NO?
Do you think a judgement is a final decision on the merits of the case? YES OR NO?
Do you think a dismissal is a judgement? YES OR NO?
I'm not asking for a lecture about the law, simply trying to get where you come from because I still don't understand what the first thing you replied to me as to do with what I initially wrote (and since then, you're pilling on a thing that doesn't seems related to my message to begin with).
You all think I'm wrong, for different reasons, but Sheryl Nome is the only one who cited something saying that a dismissal is a decision on the merits of the case, but I'm not so sure it applies to a TCPA hearing, because I still have no context for that citation, and she further aknowledged that they are exception to that citation.
