Says you, shitlordThe entire fucking distinction between those words is that gender is a (perhaps socially constructed) identity while sex describes your biological state.
Having a penis is not a social construction.
Says you, shitlordThe entire fucking distinction between those words is that gender is a (perhaps socially constructed) identity while sex describes your biological state.
Having a penis is not a social construction.
Actually, that's from the asexual side of tumblr. Apparently, one can experience romantic attraction without experiencing sexual attraction. This is something I kind of agree with, though I'm not sure where the border is between romantic and sexual attraction.One of my favorite sjw-isms is "heteroromantic" which is basically the tranny way of saying "I'm actually a straight person doing this for the attention."
Pardon my ignorance, but how does being against cultural appropriation result in that?they are all the negative aspects of 'cultural appropriation' - stereotyping, ignorance, commodifying
Pardon my ignorance, but how does being against cultural appropriation result in that?
Also, they seem ignorant of the fact cultural exchange actually helps improve relations.
Pretty much.That explains how The Mass Debater explained how the anti-cultural appropriation people are in ignorance, and I read those posts as well, but I was more curious about how it makes them commodify and stereotype. For stereotyping, my guess would be that if you think all cultures need to be segregated into tidy little compartments, you can end up stereotyping a culture by claiming what belongs to it and what doesn't.
That explains how The Mass Debater explained how the anti-cultural appropriation people are in ignorance, and I read those posts as well, but I was more curious about how it can be said that such a stance can make one commodify and stereotype. For stereotyping, my guess would be that if you think all cultures need to be segregated into tidy little compartments, you can end up stereotyping a culture by claiming what belongs to it and what doesn't.
Not to mention that the only reason anime exists is because the Japanese saw Disney cartoons and decided that they wanted to do it too. So anime, the thing that all so often gets pointed to as something white people are appropriating...is the product of cultural appropriation.Like anime is Japanese so only Japanese people can like it. I'd say that's buying into stereotypes.
Yup that’s basically what I meant. As with everyone, SJWs assign cultures their own little stereotypes, and cant comprehend that people are individuals. So all men are evil, all black people must like hip hop etc. On the rare occasion they mention something happening outside of America (because it would highlight their own privilege too much) they seem to believe all of Africa is a tribal society filled with noble savages. They seem to view anyone who isn’t white as a child that needs protecting.That explains how The Mass Debater explained how the anti-cultural appropriation people are in ignorance, and I read those posts as well, but I was more curious about how it can be said that such a stance can make one commodify and stereotype. For stereotyping, my guess would be that if you think all cultures need to be segregated into tidy little compartments, you can end up stereotyping a culture by claiming what belongs to it and what doesn't.
Well, many SJW's are middle class Americans. As for atrocities, I'm sure they would like to deny things done by the Japanese in WWII such as the Bataan Death March and the Nanking Massacre. Sure they can retort saying the allies also had done heinous things but really, that's just trying to scapegoat the horrors done by the other side, especially in time of a war that literally led to the deaths of not just soldiers but also civilians, from various European countries to places such as Nanking and Bataan. Sure, people within the white ethnic groups have done bad but so has people of from other ethnic groups, be it Aztec or Japanese.It's probably been said in the last thread, but it seems most SJWs live in the west. There are, of course, others around the world, but a large concentration of them come from North America. This has shown that most think the worst things to ever happen was the slave trade and the treatment of Native Americans. I'm not saying those things weren't horrible, but a lot of other horrible things have happened in the world.
They only concern themselves with horrible things that have happened that are related to North America. I bet half of them don't even know about the atrocities of the Bosnian War. I even remember one SJW completely deny that the Japanese did anything wrong during WWII, and paint the Japanese as innocent victims in the evil war with America. Not only are a lot of SJWs closeted nationalists, they also get to pick and choose what atrocities they want to believe.
The perfect storm of idiot.
Actually, that's from the asexual side of tumblr. Apparently, one can experience romantic attraction without experiencing sexual attraction. This is something I kind of agree with, though I'm not sure where the border is between romantic and sexual attraction.
I think it's ironic that SJWs tend to respond to any critisim with "educate yourself", yet it's clear that they know jackshit about anything (Such as Japan's very real warcrimes in WWII).
The people who claim that Japan did nothing wrong in WWII and were "da innocent victims attacked by da evil imperialist Americans" are just as bad as holocaust deniers.
b-but the poc's!!!
Seriously though, most SJW's are also weebs (or where weebs at one point) the fact that they'd deny japan did anything wrong isn't much of a surprise.
Regarding weebs, would it be surprising if SJW's derided them as cultural appropriators?b-but the poc's!!!
Seriously though, most SJW's are also weebs (or where weebs at one point) the fact that they'd deny japan did anything wrong isn't much of a surprise.
Regarding weebs, would it be surprising if SJW's derided them as cultural appropriators?