Ahhh, ok.That was I believe one of MrEnter's Tumblr quotes.
I feel dumb now. I'll just delete it.
Ahhh, ok.That was I believe one of MrEnter's Tumblr quotes.
Nice Enter quote you got there, would be a shame if Enter was lying out of his ass."People will point to whatever excuse they can to if they’re not secure in their opinions; although I’m sure there are some people who do take my word as law. You shouldn’t. You should have your own opinions. It’s better for everyone that way. It’s a lot easier to defend and explain your own opinion, than defend and explain my opinion. It’s one thing if I gave you a new perspective on things, it’s an entirely different one if you copy my opinion."
jesus fucking christ whenever this sperg comes here to failtroll some tard always swallows the bait oh my god
Rule One: autism finds a way.
Does this mean the thread is getting cleaned?When will you people learn to ignore this faggot, for fuck's sake. Stop feeding the troll.
Does this mean the thread is getting cleaned?
Okay.Maybe later. In any case, stop replying to NJA. This is a rule.
Enter is definitely "special"To help get this back on topic:
While I find Enter's views on education overall to be crazy and extreme. I'll agree with him that some kids don't learn well with the standard way of teaching. Thankfully there's special education to help. There's even alternative programs for students with emotionally based problems. (Ex. Severe depression, anger issues, and panic attacks.)
It's up to the students and their parents to ask for help though. Schools can't always tell if a student is having legitimate issues or are just lazy.
That doesn't even have to do with...Enter is definitely "special"
You know shit isn't real right. Who cares if a cartoon character is lazy? It creates friction and that's a key component to fiction.It's not bad from a storytelling perspective, but it's not an ideal trait to have in real life, if I'm making any sense.
You know shit isn't real right. Who cares if a cartoon character is lazy? It creates friction and that's a key component to fiction.
I do like the "I hate poorly written characters" bit. Like really? You hate them? I hate racism and bigotry. I just find poorly written media something to ignore. Hate just makes you look wack. #Priorities
Sorry.Maybe later. In any case, stop replying to NJA. This is a rule.
You know shit isn't real right. Who cares if a cartoon character is lazy? It creates friction and that's a key component to fiction.
I do like the "I hate poorly written characters" bit. Like really? You hate them? I hate racism and bigotry. I just find poorly written media something to ignore. Hate just makes you look wack. #Priorities
Actually I thought Enter was being completely dumb when he made this point. You can feel bad for a flawed character. Brian was an asshole but he wasn't irredeemable. Since each episode takes place independently of the others (for the most part) and the first half of the episode was establishing how Stewie and Brian were good friends it actually did work."You can't get sympathy out of a character as unlikable as Brian, so all attempts to get us to feel bad for him fell flat. Especially since we all knew he was coming back (and after just a few weeks, no less!)" from his "Life of Brian" review. As we can see, the ratings trap actually worked...
And? It's a cartoon, you can still feel bad for Stewie. The episode really wasn't a Brian episode, it was a Stewie episode. I think Mr. Enter over analyzes things and I feel like you're just latching onto whatever he says.It's not being dumb when his point actually holds true. While it's true that each episode is independent of each other, it doesn't mean they never happened. The episode aired right after some episodes where people would consider him unlikable.