South China Sea and Chinese Military Developments - While everyone is distracted by the pandemic, China's aggression in the SCS grows.

Intensening Rapeye

Duke
kiwifarms.net
I don't know dude, have you seen the crazy stuff constructed on the Spratly Islands? Theres a ton of stuff that doesn't look like its meant for anything other than a war.

Caveat: it could be just Chinese battery-dog farms and sports areas.
 

Archeopthryx

kiwifarms.net
You could accelerate shit a year ago if the CIA just shot one of Duterte's kids. Now he's cucking to the US to play it and China against each other so that's a no-go. All ya need is one small domino.
 

tehpope

My Face Everyday | Archivist
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net



By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-393), the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019 (Public Law 116-76), the Hong Kong Autonomy Act of 2020, signed into law July 14, 2020, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, determine, pursuant to section 202 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, that the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong (Hong Kong) is no longer sufficiently autonomous to justify differential treatment in relation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC or China) under the particular United States laws and provisions thereof set out in this order. In late May 2020, the National People’s Congress of China announced its intention to unilaterally and arbitrarily impose national security legislation on Hong Kong. This announcement was merely China’s latest salvo in a series of actions that have increasingly denied autonomy and freedoms that China promised to the people of Hong Kong under the 1984 Joint Declaration of the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on the Question of Hong Kong (Joint Declaration). As a result, on May 27, 2020, the Secretary of State announced that the PRC had fundamentally undermined Hong Kong’s autonomy and certified and reported to the Congress, pursuant to sections 205 and 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended, respectively, that Hong Kong no longer warrants treatment under United States law in the same manner as United States laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1, 1997. On May 29, 2020, I directed the heads of executive departments and agencies (agencies) to begin the process of eliminating policy exemptions under United States law that give Hong Kong differential treatment in relation to China.

China has since followed through on its threat to impose national security legislation on Hong Kong. Under this law, the people of Hong Kong may face life in prison for what China considers to be acts of secession or subversion of state power –- which may include acts like last year’s widespread anti-government protests. The right to trial by jury may be suspended. Proceedings may be conducted in secret. China has given itself broad power to initiate and control the prosecutions of the people of Hong Kong through the new Office for Safeguarding National Security. At the same time, the law allows foreigners to be expelled if China merely suspects them of violating the law, potentially making it harder for journalists, human rights organizations, and other outside groups to hold the PRC accountable for its treatment of the people of Hong Kong.

I therefore determine that the situation with respect to Hong Kong, including recent actions taken by the PRC to fundamentally undermine Hong Kong’s autonomy, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. I hereby declare a national emergency with respect to that threat.

In light of the foregoing, I hereby determine and order:

Section 1. It shall be the policy of the United States to suspend or eliminate different and preferential treatment for Hong Kong to the extent permitted by law and in the national security, foreign policy, and economic interest of the United States.

Sec. 2. Pursuant to section 202 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5722), I hereby suspend the application of section 201(a) of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended (22 U.S.C. 5721(a)), to the following statutes:

(a) section 103 of the Immigration Act of 1990 (8 U.S.C. 1152 note);

(b) sections 203(c), 212(l), and 221(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1153(c), 1182(l), and 1201(c), respectively);

(c) the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.);

(d) section 721(m) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. 4565(m));

(e) the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.); and

(f) section 1304 of title 19, United States Code.

Sec. 3. Within 15 days of the date of this order, the heads of agencies shall commence all appropriate actions to further the purposes of this order, consistent with applicable law, including, to:

(a) amend any regulations implementing those provisions specified in section 2 of this order, and, consistent with applicable law and executive orders, under IEEPA, which provide different treatment for Hong Kong as compared to China;

(b) amend the regulation at 8 CFR 212.4(i) to eliminate the preference for Hong Kong passport holders as compared to PRC passport holders;

(c) revoke license exceptions for exports to Hong Kong, reexports to Hong Kong, and transfers (in-country) within Hong Kong of items subject to the Export Administration Regulations, 15 CFR Parts 730-774, that provide differential treatment compared to those license exceptions applicable to exports to China, reexports to China, and transfers (in-country) within China;

(d) consistent with section 902(b)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (Public Law 101-246), terminate the export licensing suspensions under section 902(a)(3) of such Act insofar as such suspensions apply to exports of defense articles to Hong Kong persons who are physically located outside of Hong Kong and the PRC and who were authorized to receive defense articles prior to the date of this order;

(e) give notice of intent to suspend the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong for the Surrender of Fugitive Offenders (TIAS 98-121);

(f) give notice of intent to terminate the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong for the Transfer of Sentenced Persons (TIAS 99-418);

(g) take steps to end the provision of training to members of the Hong Kong Police Force or other Hong Kong security services at the Department of State’s International Law Enforcement Academies;

(h) suspend continued cooperation undertaken consistent with the now-expired Protocol Between the U.S. Geological Survey of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America and Institute of Space and Earth Information Science of the Chinese University of Hong Kong Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in Earth Sciences (TIAS 09-1109);

(i) take steps to terminate the Fulbright exchange program with regard to China and Hong Kong with respect to future exchanges for participants traveling both from and to China or Hong Kong;

(j) give notice of intent to terminate the agreement for the reciprocal exemption with respect to taxes on income from the international operation of ships effected by the Exchange of Notes Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong (TIAS 11892);

(k) reallocate admissions within the refugee ceiling set by the annual Presidential Determination to residents of Hong Kong based on humanitarian concerns, to the extent feasible and consistent with applicable law; and

(l) propose for my consideration any further actions deemed necessary and prudent to end special conditions and preferential treatment for Hong Kong.

Sec. 4. All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person, of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:

(a) Any foreign person determined by the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, or the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State:

(i) to be or have been involved, directly or indirectly, in the coercing, arresting, detaining, or imprisoning of individuals under the authority of, or to be or have been responsible for or involved in developing, adopting, or implementing, the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Administrative Region;

(ii) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have engaged in, directly or indirectly, any of the following:

(A) actions or policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions in Hong Kong;

(B) actions or policies that threaten the peace, security, stability, or autonomy of Hong Kong;

(C) censorship or other activities with respect to Hong Kong that prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of freedom of expression or assembly by citizens of Hong Kong, or that limit access to free and independent print, online or broadcast media; or

(D) the extrajudicial rendition, arbitrary detention, or torture of any person in Hong Kong or other gross violations of internationally recognized human rights or serious human rights abuse in Hong Kong;

(iii) to be or have been a leader or official of:

(A) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (a)(i), (a)(ii)(A), (a)(ii)
(B), or (a)(ii)(C) of this section; or

(B) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.

(iv) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section;

(v) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section; or

(vi) to be a member of the board of directors or a senior executive officer of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section.

(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the date of this order.

Sec. 5. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the types of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to section 4 of this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 4 of this order.

Sec. 6. The prohibitions in section 4(a) of this order include:

(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to section 4(a) of this order; and

(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 7. The unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section 4(a) of this order, as well as immediate family members of such aliens, or aliens determined by the Secretary of State to be employed by, or acting as an agent of, such aliens, would be detrimental to the interest of the United States, and the entry of such persons into the United States, as immigrants and nonimmigrants, is hereby suspended. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions). The Secretary of State shall have the responsibility of implementing this section pursuant to such conditions and procedures as the Secretary has established or may establish pursuant to Proclamation 8693.

Sec. 8. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 9. Nothing in this order shall prohibit transactions for the conduct of the official business of the Federal Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.

Sec. 10. For the purposes of this order:

(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;

(b) the term “entity” means a government or instrumentality of such government, partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization, including an international organization;

(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States; and

(d) The term “immediate family member” means spouses and children of any age.

Sec. 11. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to section 4 of this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 4 of this order.

Sec. 12. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA as may be necessary to implement this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions within the Department of the Treasury. All departments and agencies of the United States shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order.

Sec. 13. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

Sec. 14. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

Sec. 15. If, based on consideration of the terms, obligations, and expectations expressed in the Joint Declaration, I determine that changes in China’s actions ensure that Hong Kong is sufficiently autonomous to justify differential treatment in relation to the PRC under United States law, I will reconsider the determinations made and actions taken and directed under this order.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,
July 14, 2020.
 

BONE_Buddy

Guaranteed Same Day Delivery.
kiwifarms.net
Two U.S. Carriers Return to South China Sea After State Dept. Formally Rejects Chinese Claims

Back to back Two Carrier Operations inside the South China Sea. Nice.

(A pair of) B-1 bombers deploy to Guam as Navy carriers continue readiness training in South China Sea

It should be noted that each B-1B can deploy 24 Long Range Anti-Ship Missiles
 
Last edited:

Archeopthryx

kiwifarms.net
Let's say that Xinnie the Ping goes tits up along all of the government. Will Taiwan take up the governance of the mainland or will they take a look and see the raging fire and say "Ew, no." and just be independent?

Seriously, enough generation has passed and a Taiwanese probably has better life than someone in the PRC. So why drain their resources to manage/get in control of an empire that probably will have warlords that came from provincial governors? I'm sure Sun Yat Sen and Chang Kai Shek will understand. Probably because Taiwan was friendly with Japan even before WWII and the ROC got exiled in there and was not native to Taiwan forcibly taking authority away from the Taiwanese in the vain dream of retaking China from Mao Zedong. Let the ghosts take over China if they want it so much.
 

The golden neckbeard

Professor of goon study's
kiwifarms.net
so is ww3 gonna happen yet?

I suspect chinese exercises that end on the 28th will switch from invasion simulation to real war. Keep an eye on dongshu and kinmen islands. The taiwan ministry of defense is on red alert because they believe the same thing.


We are obviously about to recognize taiwan as an independent country which is a redline for china and India is on it aswell.


None of this would of happened had their stupid virus not happened. Fuck them

Its blatantly obvouis and Russia is in on it also with snap exercises ending on the 28th. They have 100,000 men on the ukrainian border practicing an invasion and this is way to much of a coincidence to dismiss.

Not sure which one happens first but The table has been set for some happenings 4 days from now.


Its completely possible we will be at war with an China-north korea-Russia-pakistan-Syria-Iran alliance next week
 
Last edited:

PozzedByCoronachan

Oikophobiaphobic
kiwifarms.net
Let's say that Xinnie the Ping goes tits up along all of the government. Will Taiwan take up the governance of the mainland or will they take a look and see the raging fire and say "Ew, no." and just be independent?

Seriously, enough generation has passed and a Taiwanese probably has better life than someone in the PRC. So why drain their resources to manage/get in control of an empire that probably will have warlords that came from provincial governors? I'm sure Sun Yat Sen and Chang Kai Shek will understand. Probably because Taiwan was friendly with Japan even before WWII and the ROC got exiled in there and was not native to Taiwan forcibly taking authority away from the Taiwanese in the vain dream of retaking China from Mao Zedong. Let the ghosts take over China if they want it so much.
If anything, I'd be more worried about the reverse happening: that if China goes belly up a non insignificant percentage of its 1.3 billion people will try and emigrate for a better life to Taiwan, potentially taking over. Imagine the 2015 Mediterranean migrant crisis but there's no Sahara desert to separate the West from the horde, and instead of a whole continent receiving the migrants it's just one country the size of the Netherlands.
 
I suspect chinese exercises that end on the 28th will switch from invasion simulation to real war. Keep an eye on dongshu and kinmen islands. The taiwan ministry of defense is on red alert because they believe the same thing.


We are obviously about to recognize taiwan as an independent country which is a redline for china and India is on it aswell.


None of this would of happened had their stupid virus not happened. Fuck them

Its blatantly obvouis and Russia is in on it also with snap exercises ending on the 28th. They have 100,000 men on the ukrainian border practicing an invasion and this is way to much of a coincidence to dismiss.

Not sure which one happens first but The table has been set for some happenings 4 days from now.


Its completely possible we will be at war with an China-north korea-Russia-pakistan-Syria-Iran alliance next week
I guess it's completely possible. But it's also completely possible that aliens from the moon could land next week and broker world peace.

I've read a lot of your posts and you really seem intent on this war angle. I'm not sure what information leads you to believe that China is in any condition to open up another destructive front right now.

They're already dealing with massive flooding in their industrial and agricultural heart, the virus has devastated their cities and commerce, further disease is spreading through their meat supply, trade deals around the world are falling apart, and the international community is growing increasingly skeptical of the promise of Chinese partnership from projects large to small. Compound that with the simple fact that China can in no way handle a shooting war with Western powers, it seems incredibly unlikely that we're going to be at war with China, North Korea, Russia, Pakistan, Syria, and Iran next week. Especially when you consider that every single one of those countries you've mentioned is morbidly crippled in one way or another. The riots in the English-speaking world right now are a pittance compared to the problems happening in those nations; they have been treating the current round of disorder with kids gloves all the while going on with the usual business of the day without any interruption whatsoever. There's no comparison to be had, the West is in an infinitely better position in this hypothetical war of yours and China has no chance of a victory, no matter how many low-information goons say otherwise.

If China leverages its war games into a invasion of Taiwan while simultaneously having Russia mount further incursions into Ukraine, what's to gain? Both of those countries will be smashed back to their respective capitals. That sort of conflict won't see the United States or its allies pull any punches. I just think you're talking crazy here. It makes no sense. I'll grant you that China makes nonsensical decisions, but not to this degree. There are two carrier strike groups on their doorstep, the UK has sent their own force to the South China Sea, and you've got weapons on land, sea, in the air, in outer space, and in cyberspace all ready to bring down the hammer on aggression by Chinese of Russian assets. You're overestimating China's hand here, something that I do not think China would do given the variables.

What is going to happen is a tit-for-tat as both sides reduce the number of consulates the other has. You'll see more posturing from both sides, but especially from China seeing as they are being hit with haymakers left and right by their rivals, by reality, and by the hand of god. Any movement on Taiwan will be met with devastating retaliation and it isn't like Taiwan can't hold their own for a while either. It would be very painful for China to make a move like that, especially right now. The aggressive posturing of China's diplomatic corps has not had the desired effects and wealth is fleeing the mainland to find safer harbors around Asia.

The shift you are seeing now is China finally being treated on a level playing field by the rest of the world after decades of claiming "developing" status and "developed" status simultaneously. China doesn't like this. They naively hoped that the world would forever treat them with low-interest loans and ship all of their business to the mainland while the CCP could slowly subvert the goodwill of others into the tools of their destruction. Those days are over, China is pissed, and China can deal with it. They wanted to be treated like a first-rate nation, so now they're getting it.

And starting a war this week or next isn't going to help further their goals. It will assure their rapid destruction and the decimation of the modern world as a new dark age falls upon the glowing crater where the major power centers of the planet used to be.
 

The golden neckbeard

Professor of goon study's
kiwifarms.net
I guess it's completely possible. But it's also completely possible that aliens from the moon could land next week and broker world peace.

I've read a lot of your posts and you really seem intent on this war angle. I'm not sure what information leads you to believe that China is in any condition to open up another destructive front right now.

They're already dealing with massive flooding in their industrial and agricultural heart, the virus has devastated their cities and commerce, further disease is spreading through their meat supply, trade deals around the world are falling apart, and the international community is growing increasingly skeptical of the promise of Chinese partnership from projects large to small. Compound that with the simple fact that China can in no way handle a shooting war with Western powers, it seems incredibly unlikely that we're going to be at war with China, North Korea, Russia, Pakistan, Syria, and Iran next week. Especially when you consider that every single one of those countries you've mentioned is morbidly crippled in one way or another. The riots in the English-speaking world right now are a pittance compared to the problems happening in those nations; they have been treating the current round of disorder with kids gloves all the while going on with the usual business of the day without any interruption whatsoever. There's no comparison to be had, the West is in an infinitely better position in this hypothetical war of yours and China has no chance of a victory, no matter how many low-information goons say otherwise.

If China leverages its war games into a invasion of Taiwan while simultaneously having Russia mount further incursions into Ukraine, what's to gain? Both of those countries will be smashed back to their respective capitals. That sort of conflict won't see the United States or its allies pull any punches. I just think you're talking crazy here. It makes no sense. I'll grant you that China makes nonsensical decisions, but not to this degree. There are two carrier strike groups on their doorstep, the UK has sent their own force to the South China Sea, and you've got weapons on land, sea, in the air, in outer space, and in cyberspace all ready to bring down the hammer on aggression by Chinese of Russian assets. You're overestimating China's hand here, something that I do not think China would do given the variables.

What is going to happen is a tit-for-tat as both sides reduce the number of consulates the other has. You'll see more posturing from both sides, but especially from China seeing as they are being hit with haymakers left and right by their rivals, by reality, and by the hand of god. Any movement on Taiwan will be met with devastating retaliation and it isn't like Taiwan can't hold their own for a while either. It would be very painful for China to make a move like that, especially right now. The aggressive posturing of China's diplomatic corps has not had the desired effects and wealth is fleeing the mainland to find safer harbors around Asia.

The shift you are seeing now is China finally being treated on a level playing field by the rest of the world after decades of claiming "developing" status and "developed" status simultaneously. China doesn't like this. They naively hoped that the world would forever treat them with low-interest loans and ship all of their business to the mainland while the CCP could slowly subvert the goodwill of others into the tools of their destruction. Those days are over, China is pissed, and China can deal with it. They wanted to be treated like a first-rate nation, so now they're getting it.

And starting a war this week or next isn't going to help further their goals. It will assure their rapid destruction and the decimation of the modern world as a new dark age falls upon the glowing crater where the major power centers of the planet used to be.


You think the united states...which is 27 trillon dollars in debt and financed 98% of all of its total budget last month just to keep the lights on can even sustain itself for a month in a prolonged war without things collapsing like a jenga tower?

Thats alot of cope.


And i personally love reading about war...moreso the tactics and equipment and not the human cost
 

Niggaplease

are you dumb stupid or dumb?
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
I suspect chinese exercises that end on the 28th will switch from invasion simulation to real war. Keep an eye on dongshu and kinmen islands. The taiwan ministry of defense is on red alert because they believe the same thing.


We are obviously about to recognize taiwan as an independent country which is a redline for china and India is on it aswell.


None of this would of happened had their stupid virus not happened. Fuck them

Its blatantly obvouis and Russia is in on it also with snap exercises ending on the 28th. They have 100,000 men on the ukrainian border practicing an invasion and this is way to much of a coincidence to dismiss.

Not sure which one happens first but The table has been set for some happenings 4 days from now.


Its completely possible we will be at war with an China-north korea-Russia-pakistan-Syria-Iran alliance next week
:/ so the world would end because of a bunch of unknown islands in the South China Sea? shieeeet.
 

The golden neckbeard

Professor of goon study's
kiwifarms.net
:/ so the world would end because of a bunch of unknown islands in the South China Sea? shieeeet.

Well taiwan independence is a red line for beijing. We have known that for 50 years

Dont think it will be the end of the world but who is to say its 2020. They just admited they had a crashed vehicle not of this world so the crazy can still go up a notch
 

Niggaplease

are you dumb stupid or dumb?
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Well taiwan independence is a red line for beijing. We have known that for 50 years

Dont think it will be the end of the world but who is to say its 2020. They just admited they had a crashed vehicle not of this world so the crazy can still go up a notch
Well I suppose being nuked to oblivion is better than getting kissed and coofing to death by corona Chan. At least depending on whether or not your in impact zone.
 

Gustav Schuchardt

Local Moderator
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Probably because Taiwan was friendly with Japan even before WWII and the ROC got exiled in there and was not native to Taiwan forcibly taking authority away from the Taiwanese in the vain dream of retaking China from Mao Zedong. Let the ghosts take over China if they want it so much.

Taiwan was part of Japan from 1895 when Imperial China ceded it to Japan in the Treaty of Shimonoseki until 1945 when Japan lost WWII and ceded it back to the Republic of China.
 

Super-Chevy454

kiwifarms.net
Hard to know if it's another strategy from China but this one raise some eyebrows. https://www.thenewstribune.com/news/nation-world/national/article244479272.html
A strange package has been sent to people in multiple states: random, unidentified seeds from China.
Residents in Washington, Utah and Virginia have received small packages of seeds in the mail that appear to be sent from China, officials said.

“Today we received reports of people receiving seeds in the mail from China that they did not order,” the Washington State Department of Agriculture said Friday. “The seeds are sent in packages usually stating that the contents are jewelry. Unsolicited seeds could be invasive, introduce diseases to local plants, or be harmful to livestock.”


The seeds often come in sealed packages, and people should not open the packages, officials said. It should be reported to the U.S. Department of Agriculture for agricultural smuggling.
“Invasive species wreak havoc on the environment, displace or destroy native plants and insects and severely damage crops,” the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services said in a statement Friday. “Taking steps to prevent their introduction is the most effective method of reducing both the risk of invasive species infestations and the cost to control and mitigate those infestations.”
Lori Culley, who lives in Tooele, Utah, told Fox 13 that she found two small packages in her mailbox Tuesday that had Chinese writing on them.
 
Top