South Korea voting fraud - QR codes kill democracy? -

  • There is a bug with the post editor. Images pasted from other websites from your clipboard will automatically use the [img] tag instead of uploading a copy as an attachment. Please manually save the image, upload it to the site, and then insert it as a thumbnail instead if you experience this.

    The [img] should essentially never be used outside of chat. It does not save disk space on the server because we use an image proxy to protect your IP address and to ensure people do not rely on bad third party services like Imgur for image hosting. I hope to have a fix from XF soon. I REALLY WISH THEY'D HOTFIX THIS SO I CAN REMOVE THIS NOTICE.


Early Votes, Digital Vote Counting Machine, and Digital Election Fraud Suspicions in South Korea

(...) The National Election Commission chose LG U+ 5G, which uses Huawei equipment, to provide internet and wifi for handling the pre-vote ballots. Instead of establishing its own secured network, which it could have had by using the very secure Gwangju/Daejeon Information Data Center (IDC), NEC chose an unsecured network, and worse, used a network that uses Huawei equipment notorious for control by China. (2:00) Here is what is possible: The servers used at the election sites can be connected to servers in China (or elsewhere), and the user on that end in China can send the instructions to the central server in South Korea, which in turn sends a message to the vote counting machines. It would be even more helpful for the server operator on the other end in China, if those with access to the central server in South Korea sent the user ID, password, and the port number to the server in China, which is also a possibility. The “other end” does not necessarily need to be in China. Again, this is a potential scenario. (...)

(...) The QR Codes were used on the early/mail-in ballots while Bar Codes were used on the election day ballots. Why were they not uniform? One theory is that the software in the central server needed the difference to instruct the vote counting machine to treat each differently. (10:52) For instance, the software can have instructions to count the Bar Codes as the citizens voted, but for QR Codes, count them differently regardless of how the voters voted. For instance, it can be instructed to re-route every 4th ballot that was voted for one party to another party. What kind of instructions the software contains really depends on the imagination of the programmer, given a specific purpose. (...)

(...) In addition to the above suspicions, statistics have provided further concern of fraud. A YouTuber Vasilia TV downloaded the data from the National Election Committee (NEC) website and conducted an analysis. He noticed a large difference between the 20th and 21st (April 2020) general elections. Whereas the difference between the early votes and the election day votes were in the 0-7% range and irregular, the 21st election showed that its was about 10-15% higher for the Democratic Party of Korea (Deobureo Minjoo), while about 10-15% lower for the United Future Party, and more consistently. (0:25)

He points out that the vote counting machine system is more than the vote counting machine, as it also includes the server, the software notebook, and the internet. (6:02)

Additional controversy arose when 37 districts had more voted ballots than eligible voters. The voters have demanded the National Election Commission to make public the source code used in the software for the early-vote operations, but the Commission refused. While making the source-code public seems like it would decrease the security of the voting machine, it actually increases security and transparency because security researchers are able to evaluate and propose solutions to make the software more secure. Also, it is much easier to conduct a forensic analysis to determine whether software has been tampered with when the code is made public. (...)
(...) Professor Walter MeBane’s report “Anomalies and Frauds in the Korea 2020 Parliamentary Election∗” is causing a stir. Walter MeBane is a professor of Political Science and Statistics at University of Michigan, and he is the leading expert on detecting fraud in elections. His Election Forensics (eforensics) is “a positive empirical model, developed by using a general Bayesian framework using finite mixture models of product distributions to identify the probability and distribution of frauds in elections.” He had also used the eforensics statistical model to detect fraud in elections in Bolivia in 2019, the Democratic Republic of Congo in 2019, and Kenya in 2017.

The eforensics model “offers evidence that fraudulent votes occurred in the election that may have changed some election outcomes. The statistical model operationalizes the idea that ‘frauds’ occur when one party gains votes by a combination of manufacturing votes from abstentions and stealing votes from opposing parties. The Bayesian specification 2 allows posterior means and credible intervals for counts of ‘fraudulent’ votes to be determined both for the entire election and for observed individual aggregation units.” (p. 1)

The eforensics model shows that “Covariates for turnout and vote choice include indicators for pre-vote, voting post,abroad and disabled-ship status and fixed effects for the 253 constituencies included in the data. The two specifications agree that 446 aggregation units are fraudulent, but 761 additional units are fraudulent in the Democratic party specification and 807 additional units are fraudulent in the constituency-leading party specification.” (p. 6)

Mebane noted in the report that in the Democratic Party of Korea focused observations (Figure 4), “Visually and by the numbers, frauds occur most frequently for pre-vote units (28.7% are fraudulent), next most frequently for for district-level, election-day, not abroad unts (2.43% fraudulent) then next most frequently voting post election day units (.67% are fraudulent) then abroad units (.61% are fraudulent).” (p. 6) (...)

(...) Meanwhile, the winning party is also behaving oddly. It is remarkable by how muted the reaction has been from the Democratic Party of Korea. Yang Jung-cheol (양정철), the head of the Democratic Party of Korea’s think tank Institute for Democracy, which is responsible for the party’s election strategy, should have been elated at such a sweeping election victory, but was not. Yang, who is also President Moon Jae-in’s confidant, instead said he was terrified at the outcome and quickly resigned. When a journalist pointed out that he played the most important role in this election and asked for a comment, Yang’s answer was strange and cryptic.

Yang answered, “I’m terrified and afraid because they made such an enormous outcome (landslide victory for his party),” and expressed his desire to resign his position as the head of Institute for Democracy. Further, he expressed, “I’ll return to the backwaters and will stay quietly as if to wait for a sunset.” (...)

QR codes on ballots, tabulation sheets trigger conspiracy theory
(...) In South Korea, QR codes have been at the center of a controversy following the April 15 National Assembly elections in which 300 lawmakers were elected and the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) clinched a landslide victory. The two-dimensional bar codes were used twice over the course of the election; once on ballots for early and postal voting and again on voter-completed tabulation sheets printed from counting machines. (...)

(...) Despite these advantages, however, election cybersecurity expert Richard DeMillo says QR codes are "costly, unnecessary and risky features of modern voting systems," particularly in the U.S. where some states like Colorado allow the use of paper-less voting machines. "QR codes are not readable by human beings, so voters have no idea what is actually written on their ballots when they are scanned, decreasing voter confidence in the fairness of the election process," he told The Korea Times.

DeMillo, the Charlotte B. and Roger C. Warren Chair of Computer Science and professor of management at Georgia Tech, and one of three authors of the 2019 paper titled "Ballot-Marking Devices (BMDs) Cannot Assure the Will of the Voters," says QR codes are also vulnerable to cyberattacks as hackers can install malware on ballot marking devices and make undetectable changes to the code on the printed ballot. (...)

In the South Korean National Assembly elections, QR codes were featured on early and postal voting ballots but not on those used on the election day. The election results displayed a sharp divide between these "pre-election" votes and election day voting. In the latter, the ruling DPK and the main opposition United Future Party were in a close contest, with the UFP gaining one more seat than the ruling party.

However, that lead, albeit narrow, was reversed overnight after pre-election votes were counted. The ruling Democratic Party won 163 seats and its sister party won 17. The election results were abysmal for the main opposition UFP. Together with its sister party, the UFP secured a mere 103 seats. A popular explanation for the unusual results states that many ruling party supporters were encouraged to turn out for early voting while conservative voters supporting the main opposition party primarily turned out on election day.

Some, however, do not buy this explanation and have begun to cast doubt on the pre-election votes. Park Young-ah, a physics professor at Myongji University in Seoul, said the odds of such an election result occurring were almost non-existent. "It's as improbable as flipping a coin 1,000 times and getting heads every single time," she wrote on Facebook, April 20. "This happened without a rigged election?"

Election expert Walter Mebane Jr.'s analysis paper of the 2020 Korean National Assembly election has fueled suspicions about the results. Mebane Jr., a professor of political science and statistics at the University of Michigan Ann Arbor, used "eforensics" to analyze election data on the website of the National Election Commission (NEC) and found "anomalies that strongly suggest election data were fraudulently manipulated," suggesting that an investigation into what happened would be needed. (...)

The cited article:
Anomalies and Frauds in the Korea 2020 Parliamentary Election, SMD and PR Voting with Comparison to 2016 SMD

What does everybody think?

Dick Justice

If you say "normie" you are that which you condemn
True & Honest Fan
Just like any other crime, is there means, is there motive, is there opportunity? The rest follows.


"a brain" - @REGENDarySumanai
True & Honest Fan
This is exceptional bullshit from conservatives buttmad that the South Korean elections were run over safe network hardware, rather than stuff backdoored by Unit 8200 and their puppets at the NSA.
The Colorado secretary of state announced in September last year that the U.S. state would remove QR codes from ballots to prevent possible election meddling by outsiders.

"I am proud that Colorado continues to lead the nation in election cybersecurity," Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold said in a press release on Sept. 16. One of her duties is ensuring the integrity of elections. "Voters should have the utmost confidence that their vote will count. Removing QR codes from ballots will enable voters to see for themselves that their ballots are correct and helps guard against cyber meddling," Griswold went on to say.
I am not a native English speaker, but for those who are, does this make sense to any of them?

I think what the low-rent chinks are trying to imply is that voter machine receipts with QR codes printed on them instead of the names of the knock off chinks they voted for are more confusing. This is, ah, 'interesting' to me as the Koreans are more obsessed with smartphones than any people on earth. If the losers from the 'United Future' party were somehow being cheated by changes to the votes within the machines, thousands of their voters who autistically scanned their receipts would have detected the fraud.
Last edited:


True & Honest Fan
>Huawei equipment

lol, a Chinese tech giant. JerryRigEverything and TechAltar shill the shit out of Huawei phones. Of course Huawei would make an appearance in an article about election fraud in SK.

I am not a native English speaker, but for those who are, does this make sense to any of them?

That doesn’t actually say anything. That blurb doesn’t go into any detail as to why removing the QR codes on the ballots prevents fraud, nor what those codes even do. That looks like techno-babble written for the tech-illiterate who don’t even know what QR codes are, to make them feel like their elections are more secure.

My state didn’t have any QR codes on our ballots at all. I didn’t know anyone had them.

Kosher Dill

Pumpkin Chips
True & Honest Fan
It's true that having a ballot with just a QR code makes it harder to tell if you got a ballot that says something different from what you're really trying to vote. But I think this is sort of a nonissue, because if someone's already inside your election hardware hacking stuff, they could presumably do much more than that, without leaving any traces whatsoever. Or conversely, wreck things so obviously and thoroughly that it'd derail operations.

Kosher Dill

Pumpkin Chips
True & Honest Fan
so the huaiwei fears are legitimate?
They're essentially talking about China doing a man-in-the-middle attack by exploiting compromised Huawei equipment. This isn't a new concept and hopefully this is something the Koreans are already making proper use of encryption and signatures to prevent.

The bit about China being able to intercept usernames and passwords would only happen in a case of vast incompetence. Given that we're talking about election systems, that's certainly possible, but it does seem unlikely.


RIP Brotherman Bill
True & Honest Fan
so the huaiwei fears are legitimate? It alleges a lot but doesn't give too much in terms of evidence. could easily be the KCIA or something.
Moon chae-in is a dictator and a lot of shady shit happens in Korea in terms of elections. This is not the best article to detail what exactly is wrong, but there is a uniparty in Korean right now. The reason there was no investigation is that the right wing party had more than half of their leadership abandon the party overnight after a scandal recently. The former leaders of the right summarily joined the left wing party and did not feel any consequence from their voters. As detailed by the article the election was a landslide, yet most people in the country, outside of Seoul and its metro, are pretty conservative. The numbers of this election simply do not add up. As they are forced out of the media, mostly state owned or subject to extreme oversight, all the right is really stuck with is accusing them on non journalistic platforms and so the issues never gain any international attention.


"a brain" - @REGENDarySumanai
True & Honest Fan
AFAIK, none of it is confirmed, but anything Huawei outside of China is lol because of how easily a hardware backdoor could be slipped in.
"I prefer my backdoors with Unit 8200 pushing them in"
Lol literally no human being ever cared more about 'Chinese intelligence' over 'demons' having backdoors into their systems.

They use QR codes in LA county. It's the only part of the ballot their voting machines read.

Honestly I think they are a great way to help voter confidence since the voter can scan the QR code with any mobile app and verify it matches their selection.


Professional Godwinson Impersonator
Imagine it, all of these coincidences! It's really a TESTAMENT to the luck of the people, who seem to have an interest in ruining the fabric of societies everywhere, that they always seem to get what they want either by cooperation or coercion. It's like we just can't say no to deals as good as these!

Similar threads

  • Poll
Probably a good idea to have a thread on this given how often it's discussed and will continue to be discussed even after November.