South Park Fandom Sets up Safe Space to Complain About This Season of South Park -

  • Intermittent Denial of Service attack is causing downtime. Looks like a kiddie 5 min rental. Waiting on a response from upstream.

Jaimas

YOUR PEACEFUL LIFE IS NO MORE!!
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
I haven't seen a case of recursion this bad since 1d4chan's article on 1d4chan.

Welcome to SafePark, a Tumblr that is there so you can enjoy South Park without it offending your delicate sensibilities, because when you think of a show that isn't offensive at all, your thoughts go straight to South Park.

RtniMMr.jpg


Especially given that South Park's creators outright mock concepts like Safe Spaces:


So here's a collection of greats from this:

Okay, I’m not gonna touch on the main plot, simply because they kinda captured what’s wrong with Trump and his type of politics in general. I’m gonna focus on how South Park has been depicting Transgender individuals.

Okay, I’d be the first person to admit that Caitlyn Jenner is not a perfect person. Her negative stance on gay individuals has been highlighted pretty well on this website, and the fact that she may not got prosecuted for manslaughter (probably because she’s famous) has been highlighted in the media. So, I’m all on board for a thoughtful critique of how some people try to make her out to be infallible.

What I cannot approve of is South Park’s track record for making Transgendered people looking more like people in drag or making them look straight up bizarre looking.

Past cases of this include:

tumblr_inline_nv5vjibMPl1rb7uf7_500.jpg

tumblr_inline_nv5vjqZAKt1rb7uf7_500.png

And Most Recently

tumblr_nv5u3r3YfT1uuaytwo1_500.png

(I know Randy doesn’t technically count as transgendered but Randy was used pretty extensively as a comparison to the kid’s trans arc, so I’d say he fits the billing.)

The first two, I am willing to be lenient on. It wasn’t like Mr. Garrison was every an attractive individual, and the same pretty much goes for Randy. However, Caitlyn’s appearance seems to be altered simply to make her look unattractive and extremely unintelligent. I may have been able to let this go if Caitlyn had appeared as a character back on the show when the world knew her as Bruce and maintained a similar appearance, but the fact of the matter is, she didn’t. The Kardashians had appeared but never Jenner. You could argue that this simply South Park’s style of depicting Celebrities, but the fact of the matter is, they only do this to celebrities that they won’t to appear as unintelligent and attempt to devalue everything that the celebrity has to say, case in point.

In fact, the way that South Park has been depicting Transgendered individuals is the same way that they used to depict gay individuals. To be more specific, DMaB (Designated Male At Birth) characters whose entire characterization is based off of stereotypes, and usually only being utilized for humor. Examples of this being used for gay characters include Mr. Slave, Big Gay Al, Mr. Garrison, and the list goes on. I’d say this only really stopped around the episode, “Cartman Sucks”, which features a character named Bradley who is gay that befriends Butters.

Now, on the flip side, I would like to jump to the closest thing to a positive trans gender character in the series.

tumblr_inline_nv5wk3MD0L1rb7uf7_500.jpg

Now, when I first saw Wendy appear as Wendyl, I was really hoping that this would have been a permanent change to her character, rather than her just trying to aggravate Cartman. Honestly, Wendy is one of my favorite characters in the entirety of the show, so when I saw them utilizing her as a form of positive representation for Trans people, I honestly thought it was pretty cool.

Unfortunately, after the arc was over, they switched Wendyl back to Wendy and Stan questioning his gender was never really explored outside of a few throwaway lines.

Although, this did get me start thinking. Every time South Park has depicted a transwoman, including the time Cartman put a bow on his head, it’s always made to look like the equivalent of a male in drag. Yet, the one time they do depict some semblance of a Trans Male, it seems to be respectable. Like, she didn’t rub charcoal on her face to fake a beard or anything, and there’s nothing truly indicative that Wendy was born a girl. Honestly, if you removed the beret and told me it was a different character entirely, I would believe you.

I think this is less of just Transphobia in general, and more specifically Transmisogyny. Again, i’m not trying to call Matt or Trey transphobic, as this is pure speculation, but it honestly seems like at least a couple people on the creative team may be uncomfortable with the idea of trans women. Everything about the way they design their Transwoman Characters is indicative of them being disgusted with them in some regard.

I don’t know. Again, this is an arc of episodes so I really should be reserving judgement to the end, but I really would enjoy to have some intelligent conversation about this.

Again, if you didn’t read the last post,I am actually a fan of South Park, but I’m just finding some of the creative choices their going with right now as… questionable at the least. Just like this episode was trying to bring up, no one is infallible, even someone who you may view as inspiration. As far as I am concerned, Matt & Trey are not infallible either.

Presumably he's fine with transpeople who are fucking weird looking:


I’m profoundly disturbed by the idea that, owing to the positive reaction to “The Cissy,” Matt Stone and Trey Parker might be heralded as brave voices for positive trans representation, even as they continue to pepper less high-profile episodes with vicious transphobia. Stone and Parker have described themselves as “equal-opportunity offenders,” but continuously punching down at people who are already constantly and consistently treated as punchlines isn’t exactly equitable. Depicting trans women as pedophilic rapists isn’t upholding some bold satirical tradition. It’s violent bigotry.

morganoperandi:

fandomsandfeminism:

Bigots should always been uncomfortable in fandom space.

Bigots should feel threatened in fandom space.

Bigots should be rubbed the wrong way, turned off, and annoyed by the diversity within canon and celebration of diversity within fandom.

Bigots should be shunned from fandom unilaterally.

Bigots should never be tolerated in our spaces.

And, before you try that bullshit of “are you really going to ostracize someone for their opinion?”

It’s not like we’re talking about people who think pineapple is good on pizza or who dislike Jazz. We’re talking about people who have literally decided that other human beings are less worthy and less deserving of basic human rights than they are, just because they are of a different ethnicity/sexuality/whatever.

This is not a simple opinion. This is actively harmful, no matter what anybody tries to tell you, and you have every right to defend yourself against it.

chescaleigh:

katblaque:

In this video I talk about how I personally felt about the Sarah Silverman’s “The Gap” skit where she talks about getting a sex change for equal pay and about the “Cissy” episode of South Park about Transgender Bathrooms. Then I talk about transgender representation and an exciting opportunity that may be coming my way soon to curve that representation!

If you like this video, share it!

Not only is this video awesome and so necessary, BUT it also has captions! Yeeeea educational content that’s accessible!

“In the age of information, ignorance is a choice.”

This one had a video link and also multiple links to the creator's storefront, but I'm not giving her views and her video is boring, preachy, and stupid, so I removed it from the section. If you do want to watch it, it's here.

So... Yeah. Without a hint of irony, we have the Tumblrina crowd trying to say South Park needs to be less offensive and completely missing the joke.

I don't even.

Whilst I have not ruled out the possibility of this being a Jace Connors-esque satirical piece, the active connections to other SJW communities certainly suggest against it.
 

Problematic Kawaii

Nohr, the Path of Tiddy
kiwifarms.net
I haven't seen a case of recursion this bad since 1d4chan's article on 1d4chan.

Welcome to SafePark, a Tumblr that is there so you can enjoy South Park without it offending your delicate sensibilities, because when you think of a show that isn't offensive at all, your thoughts go straight to South Park.

RtniMMr.jpg


Especially given that South Park's creators outright mock concepts like Safe Spaces:


So here's a collection of greats from this:

Presumably he's fine with transpeople who are fucking weird looking:




This one had a video link and also multiple links to the creator's storefront, but I'm not giving her views and her video is boring, preachy, and stupid, so I removed it from the section. If you do want to watch it, it's here.

So... Yeah. Without a hint of irony, we have the Tumblrina crowd trying to say South Park needs to be less offensive and completely missing the joke.

I don't even.

Whilst I have not ruled out the possibility of this being a Jace Connors-esque satirical piece, the active connections to other SJW communities certainly suggest against it.

Tumblr kids are gonna have a bad time if they seriously think South Park should appeal to them.

Safe spaces suck. What's the point of discourse without some disagreement?
You have to be autistic to complain about a show offending people when it's entire purpose is to offend people.

They might learn from other views or see some of theirs might be wrong, which is bad discourse apparently.
 

Similar threads

  • Locked
A Catholic refutation of Protestant Christianity
Replies
9
Views
4K
Top