Oh, I totally agree. But demonizing single moms and their children for things often beyond their control is still wrong.Tbf single mum households are bad for kids as many studies suggest, and just because Carson is successful doesn't mean it's not harmful or that it doesn't hold a kid back. There are successful people who came from hardships or had a tough upbringing.
A rather contentious issue over the past ~50 years is whether women should work or stay at home and be meek housewives. While the former is becoming increasingly more common, there are those who not only cling to the latter, but demonize anyone who dares suggest that the former has any merit.
Oh, I totally agree. But demonizing single moms and their children for things often beyond their control is still wrong.
This may be a bitSingle moms are the beginnings of communism.
It is only beyond their control if they were raped, and even then they could have gotten the child aborted.
Widows aren’t real.Widows exist.
Yeah, but the other way around is much more common. You demonstrate that yourself by saying 'meek housewives' and expecting asspats.
What do you mean often beyond their control? It isn't often beyond their control. The entire reason this situation has arisen is because women have a monopoly on reproductive rights and fathers have none.
It is only beyond their control if they were raped, and even then they could have gotten the child aborted. The majority of single mothers are not rape victims. Stop treating adult women like children. Actions have consequences. It is trivially easy to look up the stats of what happens to kids that grow up in single parent households. Any woman who chooses to have a child either alone or with a man they are not married to (and thus legally tied to) is unspeakably selfish and stupid.
Thanks for showing me this community though. They seem pretty based.
Widows exist.
Pretty much. It's where people went when Reddit banned subs that violated the rules.That aside, is Voat the dumping ground of Reddit?
Silly bean, feminists don't say that - they want their PhD in gender studies to be as well paid as STEM.So basically this is just the other side of the coin to feminists who claim that any woman who doesn't go into STEM is an uncle tom.
Silly bean, feminists don't say that - they want their PhD in gender/women studies to be as well paid as STEM.
From the little I know about Voat, the site strikes me as a Reddit clone that serves as an alt-right e-ghetto.That aside, is Voat the dumping ground of Reddit?
This may be a bitfftopic: but I can see that line being added to Liberty Prime's one-liners on the evils of communism.
Why does ANYONE want this is beyond me. Working 40+ hours in manufacturing just to come home to kids that hate you and a sexless marriage? How often was the father the actual 'authority' figure instead of being de-facto the mother by virtue of being home all day? I do not see what men got in exchange for all of this.who crave the return of 1950s style traditionalism behave like absolute degenerates in their personal lives.
There are cases where that's the lesser evil. Reminds me of a friend who grew up with a single mom due to her father having sent the mom and daughters (the youngest being an infant) to the hospital repeatedly. The mom busted her ass to provide for her daughters (since obviously no child support). Could it have been better? Obviously. But things being as they are she did a decent job.single mum households are bad for kids as many studies suggest
Very often this type isn't exactly meek and is in fact very demanding. I don't have anything against housewives per se, do what you have to do.'meek housewives'
That's actually more of a western liberal thing. In the soviet union for example women were kind of expected to be mothers, homemakers, workers and occasionally soldiers.Single moms are the beginnings of communism.