TheIncredibleLioness
kiwifarms.net
Raised Catholic, though the whole family's rather liberal leaning. Not very strong in the faith now, even though I've been Confirmed -- haven't went to Confession in years, but will go to Mass occasionally. I agree with Henry Bemis, in that I'm more a weak atheist/agnostic. I've never been fortunate enough to have any spiritual events of my own, though I have family who do. You could call it superstition or wanting to believe, but I see no harm in believing it since it comforts them.
That said, I do a lot of reading about Spiritualist stuff, and find it appealling - I wouldn't out and out call myself a Spiritualist, and I admit when it comes to stuff like mediums, you'd better take everything they say with a chunk of salt, but there's definitely a pull there. Even if some of the ideas are a little...out there? (For example, Anthony Borgia's Life in the World Unseen, purportedly channelled through Borgia by Monsignor Robert Hugh Benson...well, it's pretty and comforting, but there's a lot of stuff in there that feels almost...I don't know, like fanfiction? Too good to be true? I can't think of any other way to describe it.) This falls back into the agnostic/weak atheist category, since there's no real way to prove it, even if it is interesting.
Oh yes. I don't agree with burning books, no matter how much you don't like the content. It also irks me when people try to burn the Quran, like that one preacher in Florida a while back. I'm not Muslim myself, but having done some brief study on Islam and the history of the Islamic states, I have respect for it. It irks me when people say they're worshiping devils or moon gods, not the Abrahamic God. Then again, those people aren't really interested in learning more for themselves anyway.
That said, I do a lot of reading about Spiritualist stuff, and find it appealling - I wouldn't out and out call myself a Spiritualist, and I admit when it comes to stuff like mediums, you'd better take everything they say with a chunk of salt, but there's definitely a pull there. Even if some of the ideas are a little...out there? (For example, Anthony Borgia's Life in the World Unseen, purportedly channelled through Borgia by Monsignor Robert Hugh Benson...well, it's pretty and comforting, but there's a lot of stuff in there that feels almost...I don't know, like fanfiction? Too good to be true? I can't think of any other way to describe it.) This falls back into the agnostic/weak atheist category, since there's no real way to prove it, even if it is interesting.
Henry Bemis said:And, as a bibliophile, I get kinda angry when people casually speak about ripping up religious texts out of some forced attempt to be edgy. Not like there wasn't anything in any of those texts that can hold any value, real or fictional.
Which kinda leads to my next gripe: So what if the texts are all fiction? Fiction has value; fiction often teaches better than non-fiction; hell, we require fiction reading in our schools.
Oh yes. I don't agree with burning books, no matter how much you don't like the content. It also irks me when people try to burn the Quran, like that one preacher in Florida a while back. I'm not Muslim myself, but having done some brief study on Islam and the history of the Islamic states, I have respect for it. It irks me when people say they're worshiping devils or moon gods, not the Abrahamic God. Then again, those people aren't really interested in learning more for themselves anyway.