Not sure you disagree when you circle back around to the point in your reasoning to the point I was making. To requote the Ron Moore interview we used to earlier in the thread:Voyager's problem isn't neccesarily that it abandoned its gimmick. Its that it never acquired another, better one to replace it, and also never had strong enough writing to make the show succeed in spite of that. Star Trek replicator technology is so fucking broken and overpowered that yeah, I'm fine with Voyager not being a post-apocalyptic scrap heap always running out of ammo and barely held together by duct tape and hope. My problem is the shallow characters, cliched storylines, and shitty writing. When you actually give Voyager a good plot to work with it totally succeeds regardless of whether or not its living up to the potential of its premise, it doesn't need to be serialized either. Fixing the show would really have been as simple as doing that honestly.
When you don’t give a shit, you’re telling the audience: don’t bother. Don’t bother to really learn this stuff, because it’s not going to matter next week, anything that happened this week.