Steven Joel Akins / Penelope "Penny" Verity Oaken / u/Bardfinn / Penny Witchette / Finning Widget / MutabileSemper - "Incest is not unethical" - Troon Reddit powermod who orchestrates the posting of CP to subs they hate, pathological liar with a massive ego, domestic abuser and multiple felon

[yanderekko]

'Hating pitbulls is racist because Stonetoss'

I unironically believe thats the case with this clown

Pretty much. But yes people making comments about the intrinsic properties of dog breeds (especially concerning violence or other negative properties) is considered problematic because that's seen as a slippery slope to making comments about the intrinsic properties of human races. /pol/-tier memelords have embraced this sort of dogwhistling (no pun intended) before and there have been many cases of "innocuous" subreddits being shut down because of this (my favorite example was iirc there was a subreddit dedicated to air conditioner reviews or something like that that was really just coded Holocaust denialism. Anyone remember what I'm talking about?)

Since Bardfinn considers any community that does not hyperaggressively police against this sort of possible dogwhistling rhetoric (and proactively ban users who are flagged by Masstagger) to be a hate sub, it's likely that the fact that these sorts of questionable posts do appear on /r/banpitbulls makes the sub a target for him.

 

[The stinky skink]

Pretty much. But yes people making comments about the intrinsic properties of dog breeds (especially concerning violence or other negative properties) is considered problematic because that's seen as a slippery slope to making comments about the intrinsic properties of human races. /pol/-tier memelords have embraced this sort of dogwhistling (no pun intended) before and there have been many cases of "innocuous" subreddits being shut down because of this (my favorite example was iirc there was a subreddit dedicated to air conditioner reviews or something like that that was really just coded Holocaust denialism. Anyone remember what I'm talking about?)

Since Bardfinn considers any community that does not hyperaggressively police against this sort of possible dogwhistling rhetoric (and proactively ban users who are flagged by Masstagger) to be a hate sub, it's likely that the fact that these sorts of questionable posts do appear on /r/banpitbulls makes the sub a target for him.

Based on his commenting, I think you are wrong. I think he likes pitbulls. He referred someone to "velvet hippos"...which is apparently a pitbull appreciation subreddit.

I think that Steve just doesn't like it that people are saying that a dog is bred to be vicious. He's conflating dogs and humans. There are breeds of dogs that specialize in certain things. Rat terriers were bred to attack small furry animals. Herding dogs herd animals. The desire to do these things is innate in the breeds. But, of course, dogs aren't humans and conflating this is messed up.

Wew... this is EVERYTHING wrong with Steve in one post.

https://archive.fo/TpPgd

"MassTagger doesn't make decisions. People do. If they decide that you were participating in a rightwing extremist subreddit for a good reason (which there's not any good reason to participate in one; Don't feed the sociopaths) -- then they can use the "Whitelist" button to whitelist you and then you won't get a flair for that person any longer."

So it's totally possible for humans to remove the tags from people. But the truth is that masstagger does tag people. You have to request to have your "tags" removed.

"But things like this comment in /r/conservative:

"The left need an *ss whooping. I hope they lose 2024. 2028. And 2032."

... means that you do not have a reputation left to manage."

Speaking of reputations, Steve... you are a wife beater and child maintenance payment avoider.

"You enthusiastically want civilisation to descend into corrupt, incompetent (or worse, competent) fascism rather than climb out of the pit Donald Trump and his toadies dug in an attempt to have a racially and ideologically motivated violent coup of the Constitution."

If you are not on the political left for Steven, you have no reputation and you want you want fascism.

"hmmm not "If you burn down buildings you also tested positive [for stupid]" -- hey, did you know that the people in BLM protests who were burning down buildings weren't the protestors, but undercover cops and professionally hired white supremacist instigators? Funny how that works -- peaceful protest for rights, one dude comes along and throws a molotov and suddenly the cops have a pretext to go kneel on peaceful protestors' necks ... hmmmm

lemme keep looking"

Guess what? Steve knows that all of the instances of arson during the protests were caused by cops.

"First they want to legalize transgender reassignment surgery for kids ..."

You know what? That's an outright lie, and that's enough for me to ban you here. You've no business complaining when we warn people about your mendacity. You made a bad-faith misrepresentation of you screeching about sex education and bodily autonomy education for kids."

Report the bad moderator?

 

[DarkSoulsPhil]

Pretty much. But yes people making comments about the intrinsic properties of dog breeds (especially concerning violence or other negative properties) is considered problematic because that's seen as a slippery slope to making comments about the intrinsic properties of human races. /pol/-tier memelords have embraced this sort of dogwhistling (no pun intended) before and there have been many cases of "innocuous" subreddits being shut down because of this (my favorite example was iirc there was a subreddit dedicated to air conditioner reviews or something like that that was really just coded Holocaust denialism. Anyone remember what I'm talking about?)

Since Bardfinn considers any community that does not hyperaggressively police against this sort of possible dogwhistling rhetoric (and proactively ban users who are flagged by Masstagger) to be a hate sub, it's likely that the fact that these sorts of questionable posts do appear on /r/banpitbulls makes the sub a target for him.

Holy shit I remember that sub. It got way too obvious towards the end when they started using numbers and words in less coded ways. Was fun while it lasted (like all fun websites/subreddits)

 

[ThatCoconut]

Pretty much. But yes people making comments about the intrinsic properties of dog breeds (especially concerning violence or other negative properties) is considered problematic because that's seen as a slippery slope to making comments about the intrinsic properties of human races. /pol/-tier memelords have embraced this sort of dogwhistling (no pun intended) before and there have been many cases of "innocuous" subreddits being shut down because of this (my favorite example was iirc there was a subreddit dedicated to air conditioner reviews or something like that that was really just coded Holocaust denialism. Anyone remember what I'm talking about?)

Since Bardfinn considers any community that does not hyperaggressively police against this sort of possible dogwhistling rhetoric (and proactively ban users who are flagged by Masstagger) to be a hate sub, it's likely that the fact that these sorts of questionable posts do appear on /r/banpitbulls makes the sub a target for him.

No one cares what the freak thinks. Just his actions as a censor of rational dialogue. He, being an irrational wife beater should be shunned. Not allowed to arbitrate discussion.

This is how we know clown world has been achieved.

 

[Doggmatik]

He's only really a menace to redditors, a population of losers who deserve to be bullied by shitheads like him.

Can't argue with that. But there's something about being on the site that he's most known on and flaunting the rules in his face, and people like him. Idk, it adds a little extra spice for me at least.

If I'm not actively trolling the people I dislike, am I even online?

 

[Nykysnottrans]

Re: r/banpitbulls,

Stephen has apparently been on a mass report rampage in the post mentioned in this thread...

They should've made their sub private the moment they learned they were being targeted, I guess these mods are young/new and don't realize how zealous he is. Now they're gonna find out the hard way. Really, there ought to be a warning system for subs that are being targeted by AHS. Like people actively reaching out to the subs they are planning to target and warning them.

"MassTagger doesn't make decisions. People do. If they decide that you were participating in a rightwing extremist subreddit for a good reason (which there's not any good reason to participate in one; Don't feed the sociopaths) -- then they can use the "Whitelist" button to whitelist you and then you won't get a flair for that person any longer."

So it's totally possible for humans to remove the tags from people. But the truth is that masstagger does tag people. You have to request to have your "tags" removed.

This statement you quoted is 100% a LIE. Nathan Beam does not and will not untag people in his blacklist. Once you're in the Masstagger blacklist, you're fucked for life (or until someone decides to finally hold Nathan Beam accountable - I mean in a strictly legal sense, before Bardfinn tries to misconstrue this statement.)

Here is someone showing up in /r/Masstagger asking to be untagged for having participated in /r/The_Donald, "So how can I unfuck that?", and they respond to him: "Can't be unfucked apparently"

So no, if Bardfinn claims they are now supposedly untagging people at their request, he is absolutely lying about this. They are lying about this now to make it seem like there is some kind of appeal process in place, when there isn't one and there never was one because the purpose of the Masstagger blacklist is get these accounts banned by Reddit Admins, so Masstagger was always set up to be a one-way ticket into being eventually suspended.

The reason they refuse to untag people is because they have to teach people a lesson for merely subscribing to a wrongthink subreddit or only participating there to debate opponents, because they want total control over the minds of their SJW cult members. So they have to Masstag casual participants as well, to indoctrinate their cult-members with the idea that merely looking up or interacting in any way with contraband material is verboten in the SJW cult.

Speaking of reputations, Steve... you are a wife beater and child maintenance payment avoider.

Not that his stellar reputation is keeping him up at night or anything...

 

[Deathclaw Tiddehs]

They should've made their sub private the moment they learned they were being targeted, I guess these mods are young/new and don't realize how zealous he is. Now they're gonna find out the hard way. Really, there ought to be a warning system for subs that are being targeted by AHS. Like people actively reaching out to the subs they are planning to target and warning them.

Unfortunately, they've said multiple times that they won't be privating the sub. I don't think they are new, but are being stubborn about the issue. The moderators have made multiple posts about wagering that the board contains the anti-pit talk. Unfortunately, it might cost them the sub, It seems like Steven operates by firing a warning shot, then engaging in the child pornography posting a few months later when everyone thinks it is safe. There are very few subs out there that haven't been shut down a few months after Steven has targeted them. Even then, the only one I know off the top of my head is WatchRedditDie. It is still very targeted because it is the only place people can talk about their experiences directly. The people being ejected are not militant lefties and thus, WRD is a "cesspool" (it's not nor should being critical of a platform be bannable) for that reason. Currently, WRD reads all comments and approves or denies them. This must be incredibly exhausting and is a battle of wills at this point. In my opinion it is a losing battle because the Reddit admins don't care to keep "wrongthink" contained.

I have noticed that in general, BanPitBulls was very strict about their moderation, even sometimes choosing to remove posts about self-defense. It seems to be more strict recently as I'm starting to notice more "removed by moderator" messages. Of course, this is total bullshit but Reddit doesn't care about what is technically right, they care about asspats with totalitarian dictator SJWs.

What does Steven and the Child Pornography Motley Crew have on the Reddit admins to make them kneel?

 

[The stinky skink]

. It seems to be more strict recently as I'm starting to notice more "removed by moderator" messages. Of course, this is total bullshit but Reddit doesn't care about what is technically right, they care about asspats with totalitarian dictator SJWs.

Or more posts are being removed by mods because people are making racist or rule-breaking posts now.

People focus on the spamming CP angle, but I have seen many mods complain that after a subreddit is targeted by againsthatesubreddits, there is an increase in people trying to post things that will get the subreddit punished. Like subreddits getting "transwomen are women" posts in order to try to bait users into saying something that can get them punished.

 

[The stinky skink]

View attachment 2289113

Maybe it's the fear of the lack of child maintenance reaching the level of a federal offense.

https://archive.fo/zbsqj

This is interesting. Suddenly Steven learns about the concept of trolls. The people that have for years signed up to reddit to get accounts that age so that they can use them whenever they want to. This has been happening on reddit for years and years.

"Typical, yes. Never commenting or posting anything isn't normal human behaviour when engaging in social media."

I wonder how many aged accounts Steven has in the wings to use?

https://archive.fo/DVM8H

"Yes. 80 million Trumpies voted because they’re angry White and frightened rich religious people."

That is it folks. The only reason anyone voted for Trump is because they are white, frightened, rich religious people. No other people voted for Trump.

"It’s racism and classism."

You forgot transpooobia Stevie!

"It was “God, Guns, and Glory”

Sounds kind of nice, really.

"Fox Lies and straight-up foreign election interference and propaganda, and outright complete ignorance of how government works"

Ah yes, Trump voters who voted don't know how government works.

"while their uncles, cousins, parents and kids die of Covid-19"

Ah, yes... throw Covid in there. So many Republican kids died of Covid 19....which doesn't seem to kill kids. Won't someone please think of those children who have parents that are completely capable of working at Wal Mart, mopping the floor, but instead choose to be unpaid internet janitors and so fail to pay any child support, expecting the government to pay to support their child instead. Steven apparently gets to spend time with the kid he's failing to pay to support. Oh for the day that Junior says to father, "I went on the internet and found out that you spent hours a day persecuting people for their opinions when you could have been working at a job so that mom did not have to be on as much welfare."


"and lose their homes to evictions and foreclosures"

Wait... Republicans are losing their homes now? You know who really needs to lose his home? The home where he lives with his parents that he constantly slanders on social media who are supporting his skint ass even as he talks about how he is doxxed by communists and fascists alike and is suffering constant torment which (IF TRUE) has to impact his parents? Steven. Steven needs to lose his home to an eviction by his enabling parents that he constantly trashes as bigots on social media. He could go right to jail for non payment of child maintenance. It would make angels sing.

Well, it keeps getting worse. Steven is psychoposting again. He is insane. Deeply off his rocker.

https://archive.fo/RgB4N

"The people who marched 6 million people of Jewish ancestry into trains, ovens, firing squads, concentration camps - they, too, were thought of as neighbors, family members, churchgoers and good citizens. They, too, turned to a strongman for a reason, and were angry.
But anger isn’t reasonable. Fear isn’t reasonable. They didn’t arrive at killing LGBTQ people by a process of reason, and it is vitally critical for the lives of the millions who didn’t die to the first two waves of COVID, to the trans kids and queer elders and lesbian college students and immigrants and homeless people in America that we come to terms with the fact that you cannot reason a mob out of their murderous rampage, even when it’s in slow motion building momentum. 10 years passed between Germany’s firebrand corporal being jailed and him assuming ultimate political power.
lesbian college students
You can only fight for the ones not armed and suicidal."

For Steven, these tens of millions of Americans who voted for Trump are all Nazis. All of them.

"But anger isn’t reasonable. Fear isn’t reasonable."

Steven is admittedly angry and afraid literally all of the time. So he's unreasonable by his own admission. Steven is fear-mongering here, in fact.

"you cannot reason a mob out of their murderous rampage"

Does this apply to transwomen who think that terfs need to be punched?

"lesbian college students "

I think Steven is just dreaming of bedding one, but what about the ones that don't want to suck the girldick and don't care about the mouthfeel? Odd group to just bring up out of the blue. Lesbian college students hate men like Steve who have a history of abuse and seek to hide it by suddenly saying, "I'm a gurl! A real lesbian gurl!" They recognize straight white men when they see them even if they are in goth makeup and a frock. Any lesbian college student would be horrified to know that Steven went to a group for female survivors of rape and got offended because they said that the feel like all men are potential abusers.

"You. Cannot. Fix. Them."

This is what the Nazis said about the Jews.

 

[AnOminous]

Any lesbian college student would be horrified to know that Steven went to a group for female survivors of rape and got offended because they said that the feel like all men are potential abusers.

From a strict Bayesian perspective, the less you know about someone, the more likely they are to be a potential rapist, murderer, whatever. There is absolutely nothing you can see on the surface of a person that eliminates that possibility. If you get to know more about them, the probability decreases. It's sort of like if you're playing cards, unless you've seen it already, the next card could always be the Ace of Spades.

The next person you meet could be a serial killer. The next person you meet could just shoot you for no reason.

Women are right to be wary of men, especially obviously mentally ill perverts like Tardfinn, except unlike normal men, the more you learn about this fucker, the more you realize that yes, he actually is a dangerous, predatory degenerate.

 

[The stinky skink]

https://archive.fo/VTxmW

We have a real treasure here, folks. Gather around and let me sing you the story of Steven the Pathetic.


"Hey, I've had this kind of thing happen to me as well.
You're going to have to start a spreadsheet, and every single time you file a report about "Targeted Harassment of Me" via https://reddit.com/report, in the Additional Information field, you're going to to have to put in links to other instances of the targeted harassment, to establish that there's a pattern. You're also going to need to mention that the username is your legal name. You'll also need to file an impersonation report via https://www.reddit.com/report?reason=it-impersonates-me, and you'll need to contact the moderators of the subreddits the account has been posting / commenting in, and mention that this user account is targeting you for harassment / impersonating you, and ask them to remove the comments and posts.
IF those moderators respond with anything that perpetuates the harassment - for instance, a refusal to remove the posts and comments - you'll need to file a Formal Moderator Complaint detailing their refusal to act on reports of Sitewide Rules Violations they've received regarding material (the Reddit User Agreement requires only one moderator "duty" of moderators: Acting on reports to remove the reported item, or escalating the issue to Reddit admins), and your modmail (which you'll need to link to in the formal moderator complaint) counts as a report of a sitewide rules violation.
A lot of the so-called "moderators" on this site are actually extremists who enable and encourage harassment, and Reddit doesn't have any real system to winnow them from actual moderators until and unless there's a crisis that the extremist subreddit operators fail to handle in a blatantly bad faith fashion.
As far as Google's results go, you'll want to file a takedown with them here: https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/9554939
NOTE that they only take down results that are returned on Google search pages for specific terms, and only take down results if there's doxxing info and an explicit or implicit threat or call to harass.. You can include in your filing that these incidents happened because of a campaign of harassment taking revenge on you for moderating a web forum, etc.
If you can find any other websites that your doxxing information have been posted to, those can be referenced, especially if they happen to contain threats to intimidate or harass you. You'll need the URLs and screenshots showing where the doxxing information is and where the threats are -- so, for the Reddit material, you'll need to screenshot it before the moderators / admins take it down.
I'm not an attorney; I can't give you legal advice. I can tell you that I've been dealing with this situation for ~20 months and that several easily-recognisable and easily-served-with-a-lawsuit persons are involved, and that all of these people in my incident are apparently absolutely flat broke - no appreciable capital / assets / funds to speak of, so there's apparently no sense in throwing $$$$$$ after suing them when they'll apparently show up in court and say "In my defense, no reasonable person would believe what I've claimed", and the judge would say "Right, case dismissed".
And this is where I'm at, after FBI involvement investigating the bomb threat on my life and the child porn they spammed all over Reddit to try frame me for it and induce "outraged" people to come assault and murder me.
But also you need to keep in mind: Fight. Keep all of this documentation you have about what you're doing, and if someone that's a potential employer or family needs to know, discuss it with them - that there are sociopaths who doxxed you and proceeded to use Reddit to try to systematically harass you.
And if your tickets filed via https://reddit.com/report get returned / closed as "not violating", kick them back to Safety via the process here: https://www.reddit.com/r/ModSupport/comments/mh85t7/how_to_seek_review_of_safety_team_actions_in_your/
Because all of this is connected to you acting as a moderator, and therefore ALL of this is going to ultimately be /r/modsupport's responsibility to make right."

What does this mean?

"and only take down results if there's doxxing info and an explicit or implicit threat or call to harass"

Steven has asked Google to remove results about him and they have said they will only do it if there's doxx AND a threat present. Otherwise they have told him to go fuck himself.

"I'm not an attorney; I can't give you legal advice. I can tell you that I've been dealing with this situation for ~20 months and that several easily-recognisable and easily-served-with-a-lawsuit persons are involved, and that all of these people in my incident are apparently absolutely flat broke - no appreciable capital / assets / funds to speak of, so there's apparently no sense in throwing $$$$$$ after suing them when they'll apparently show up in court and say "In my defense, no reasonable person would believe what I've claimed", and the judge would say "Right, case dismissed".

In short. Steven isn't pursuing any legal action against anyone and all of his threats have been empty. He's making up a story here claiming that he's not seeking action because there's no money for him in it. But the truth is he has no money with which to sue anyone for anything. Also, if anyone of us showed up in court we would claim that truth is a defense. Because everyone believes what we have said because we have backed it up with documentation. Under no circumstances would we say "In my defense, no reasonable person would believe what I've claimed", we would say, "Your honour, it appears that according to court documents Steven is a spouse abuser who doesn't pay child support. Steven is someone who victimizes others based on their political beliefs. Nothing I have claimed about Steven is untrue...ergo, it cannot be libel."

But in Steven's head he thinks we'd get in court and say, "What was claimed is so ridiculous that no one would believe it." If we, indeed, did that... we MIGHT be guilty of libel. But no one here is saying anything because we think it's false and ridiculous. That's not a defense for libel. That's how you get found guilty of it. How you are found innocent is saying, "It's the truth, what I said. It's based on Steven's own words and court documents."

"And this is where I'm at, after FBI involvement investigating the bomb threat on my life and the child porn they spammed all over Reddit to try frame me for it and induce "outraged" people to come assault and murder me."

I thought that Steven claimed that no child porn was ever spammed?

Also, Steven lives with parents that he regularly says horrible things about even knowing that commies and fascists alike have doxed him and know where he lives and that he lives with them. If some angry tranny comes to murder his parents for being bigots will Steven feel sorrow?

"But also you need to keep in mind: Fight. Keep all of this documentation you have about what you're doing, and if someone that's a potential employer or family needs to know, discuss it with them - that there are sociopaths who doxxed you and proceeded to use Reddit to try to systematically harass you."

But also...don't Google Bardfinn and find out Steven's entirely revealed and factually documented true history of being a spouse abuser who is completely behind in child maintenance payments.

"Because all of this is connected to you acting as a moderator, and therefore ALL of this is going to ultimately be /r/modsupport's responsibility to make right."

So if you are a reddit mod you can do whatever you want and be whatever you want to be and harass people across the site and get female only subreddits banned and be a straight white male spouse abuser and reddit has to make it right because you do it for free.

 

[Deathclaw Tiddehs]

https://archive.fo/VTxmW

We have a real treasure here, folks. Gather around and let me sing you the story of Steven the Pathetic.


"Hey, I've had this kind of thing happen to me as well.
You're going to have to start a spreadsheet, and every single time you file a report about "Targeted Harassment of Me" via https://reddit.com/report, in the Additional Information field, you're going to to have to put in links to other instances of the targeted harassment, to establish that there's a pattern. You're also going to need to mention that the username is your legal name. You'll also need to file an impersonation report via https://www.reddit.com/report?reason=it-impersonates-me, and you'll need to contact the moderators of the subreddits the account has been posting / commenting in, and mention that this user account is targeting you for harassment / impersonating you, and ask them to remove the comments and posts.

<SNIP>

Huh. I wonder if this is how Steven is getting around reporting for harassment. People even discussing him by mentioning his username on Reddit are getting suspended. Yep. Aimee Challenor all over again.

 

[The stinky skink]

"A lot of the so-called "moderators" on this site are actually extremists who enable and encourage harassment,"

Steven looking in his mirror again and not liking what he sees.

 

[Nykysnottrans]

There are very few subs out there that haven't been shut down a few months after Steven has targeted them.

I hope those pitbull people know this, they are really picking a fight with the wrong person. The way to fight this is to make your subreddit private and to complain to Reddit Admins about being targeted by AHS. Not to make your business public.

"you cannot reason a mob out of their murderous rampage"

Does this apply to transwomen who think that terfs need to be punched?

Not just "punch", Bardfin's bunch literally posts "memes" such as the following:

Spoiler: WARNING - GRAPHIC: an example of a highly offensive and violent meme from SJW TRAs

This is considered an "acceptable" internet meme by Bardfinn's fellow TRAs:



Feel free to upload this image in an image-based search engine to see where else this has been posted. TRAs post this meme on Twitter and Pinterest all the time. However, when a TERF account tries to post this meme as an example of what TRAs are allowed to get away with, that account gets suspended.

I'm not an attorney; I can't give you legal advice. I can tell you that I've been dealing with this situation for ~20 months and that several easily-recognisable and easily-served-with-a-lawsuit persons are involved, and that all of these people in my incident are apparently absolutely flat broke - no appreciable capital / assets / funds to speak of, so there's apparently no sense in throwing $$$$$$ after suing them when they'll apparently show up in court and say "In my defense, no reasonable person would believe what I've claimed", and the judge would say "Right, case dismissed".

So who are these "easily recognisable and easily-served-with-a-lawsuit persons"?
Is he referring to the person behind the AHS Whistleblower video?
Also, "all of these people in my incident are apparently absolutely flat broke", again, how does he know this? Sounds like whole lotta projection to me, LMAO! Most of the people that he claims were threatening him are just nyms on Reddit, so how does Bardfinn claim to know who's behind those nyms and what their financial situation is? DID NIKA DYEN GIVE HIM IP ADDIES?

Either he's just making shit up (the most likely scenario given that no reasonable person should ever believe anything he has ever claimed about anything), or this is evidence of behind the scenes collusion between him and Reddit, with Reddit secretly giving Bardfinn access to Reddit users' IP addresses and other private info.

As I said here before, I suspect the real reason he doesn't want to take anyone to court is because Dan the Attorney has explained to him that "discovery is a bitch", and he'd have to show how the managed to link a nym to an IRL person. If Nika Dyen was secretly passing him along Reddit users' private information like IP addresses, discovery would expose this collusion, and that would be the end of Reddit basically because it would expose the true level of as-of-yet-ASSUMED corruption and nepotism going on. It has long been assumed that SJW TRAs infiltrate social media companies to wrap them around their little finger, but no one (until Aimee) had ever provided conclusive evidence of this SJW TRA "fifth column" within social media companies, and I bet it was Reddit who begged Bardfinn to let it go because they don't want any trouble, because they want to keep this at the level of speculation as opposed to people having something "on paper".

And this is where I'm at, after FBI involvement investigating the bomb threat on my life and the child porn they spammed all over Reddit to try frame me for it and induce "outraged" people to come assault and murder me.

Oh yeah, the supposed "bomb threat" that was elsewhere a "SWATting", depending on which mood Bardfinn is in, LMAO.

And if your tickets filed via https://reddit.com/report get returned / closed as "not violating", kick them back to Safety via the process here: https://www.reddit.com/r/ModSupport/comments/mh85t7/how_to_seek_review_of_safety_team_actions_in_your/
Because all of this is connected to you acting as a moderator, and therefore ALL of this is going to ultimately be /r/modsupport's responsibility to make right."

LMAO, he really thinks /r/modsupport gives a flying fuck about him and is going to "make it right". Dude, they give as little fuck about you as they do about any of the moderators of the 2000+ subreddits they nuked, thanks to your vigilanteism. What did Stalin do after he got in power? There you go. Never forget this about your fellow leftists, leftist. Reddit will continue to exploit you until they finally realize (or are made to realize) that it's better to pay someone to do what you're doing for free. And then some Reddit Admin will quietly press "suspend" on Bardfinn's account without having Nika Dyen breathing down his neck saying: "No, not that one.".

we would say, "Your honour, it appears that according to court documents Steven is a spouse abuser who doesn't pay child support. Steven is someone who victimizes others based on their political beliefs. Nothing I have claimed about Steven is untrue...ergo, it cannot be libel."

Wait a minute, now he claims he's being defamed? I thought his original charge was that people on 4chan were plotting to have him assassinated by Neo-Natsees? I guess he realized that bullshit was never going to stick, so he walked back his accusations. I dunno, "I am being laughed at online for being a delusional meddlesome asshole", that just doesn't quite have the same ring of urgency to it as his previous hystrionics of "ONLINE NATSEES ARE PLOTTING TO ASSSINATE ME! I AM A DAMSEL IN DISTRESS!".

 

[The stinky skink]

Wait a minute, now he claims he's being defamed? I thought his original charge was that people on 4chan were plotting to have him assassinated by Neo-Natsees? I guess he realized that bullshit was never going to stick, so he walked back his accusations. I dunno, "I am being laughed at online for being a delusional meddlesome asshole", that just doesn't quite have the same ring of urgency to it as his previous hystrionics of "ONLINE NATSEES ARE PLOTTING TO ASSSINATE ME! I AM A DAMSEL IN DISTRESS!"

Steven has gone from "I was doxxed" to "everything claimed about me is so ridiculous that no one could possibly believe it."

Remember Steve claims to have done PR for a decade? That isn't necessarily something to brag about. PR can be unbelievably evil. There are situations where someone does something horribly wrong and a PR firm comes in and pays someone else to say that it never happened or that the injured party was actually the one at fault. PR is not a good, noble and honourable profession.

r/AgainstHateSubreddits - AntiHateCommunities & LoveForLandlords Were Created On The Same Day. Both Are Ban Evasion Subreddits For r/BrapBarn, r/DEUXrama, r/GodWeeps, r/LoveForLawEnforcement, r/Coomer & More.

427 votes and 65 comments so far on Reddit

www.reddit.com

Here you see that againsthatesubreddits has more targets. Some posit that this is yet another Bardfinn alt.

Look within: " Recently, they have falsely accused our moderators of domestic assault.


Another post accusing our moderator of domestic abuse, as well as dry doxxing them.


This thread is full of horrible false accusations and slander."

So, now people discussing Steven's completely verified history of being charged with family violence are being smeared as hate subreddits for knowing the truth about him.

 

[Deathclaw Tiddehs]

Steven has gone from "I was doxxed" to "everything claimed about me is so ridiculous that no one could possibly believe it."

It's funny how, out of all of the internet janitors on Reddit, NONE OF THEM have near the complaints deadbeat Steven has. Never in my life have I seen someone with such an impressive list, ever turn out to be an innocent person. The only even remotely similar circumstance is with ProJared, where some people accused him of being a pedo groomer, but it turns out those people accusing him couldn't prove it. Is he truly innocent? Can't say. The guy clearly has an addiction to sex, but I haven't seen a peep of the shitstorm since his video where he clears things up.

Steven's list is monumental. Let's be generous and assume people are lying. Why would people lie about this stuff to such a degree? Someone might respond with, "because Nahtzees are mad they are being de-platformed." OK. Maybe some Nahtzees are mad they are de-platformed. How does that explain people who are supportive of some political ideals that the far left likes also having complaints about Steven? "Well those people were Nahtzees LARPing. See. They said a thing we don't like 5 years ago," this hypothetical militant leftist says while jabbing somewhere on a 1,000 page spreadsheet with their sausage finger. So you might ask how do we know these people are LARPing? Couldn't they just be people who are discovering themselves? Someone changing their stance? "No!" this person cries, taking a hit from their cotton candy flavored vape, "they are still accountable for things they said because that's them and they must still believe it somewhere." If you continue to engage, they will say you're "concern trolling" or "sealioning."

If your head hasn't exploded at this point, it should have. The tactics these people constantly accuse the Nahtzees of; gaslighting, projection, and moving the goal posts- are common tactics they employ. If you have any complaint, your point is invalid because when you were 15, you said a word off the constantly expanding list of no no words on the Internet. It's not even just words, you had an unsavory political opinion, once. Gulag for you! These people convince themselves, in any way they can, that you're wrong and they're right. Thus, they never have to do any further reflection.

Also, hasn't Steven come out and say that archival services that Nahtzees use are "suspect to tampering" or some other insane bullshit? I remember he has said this about Ceddit or Reveddit. Has he also said this about Internet Archive? I know he denounces screenshots and disallows them for AHS posts.

So, now people discussing Steven's completely verified history of being charged with family violence are being smeared as hate subreddits for knowing the truth about him.

People discussing Steven are being reported for harassment, as well. I know Reddit is for faggots, but there are some boards that have helped me find local gems I might have missed and it has been a good place to discuss hot topics. At least a few I participate in that have been targeted by Steven and the Child Pornography Motley Crew. Sometimes posts in these places pop up from time to time and I went from 0 account standing in the almost decade long time I have had an account, to +2 and a temporary ban overnight. I made a post saying that Steven actively internet stalks people on a delusion of grandeur mission to de-platform all Nahtzees probably is on a report rampage. The man, himself, name searched through my history and reported my comments as "harassment." Twice. I expect he will do it again when my suspension wears off.

Never, has there been a better time for me to find another place to stare at cute animal pictures on the internet and discuss my city. I'm not militant left and because I'm not, I'm a problem.

The irony of the top comment in the archive just further reinforces my point in the first half of my post...

Doesn't matter. The libertarian laissez faire approach reddit takes towards moderation means that they'll avoid taking action against even the worst communities with a paper thin veneer of "ironic racism". Once T_D was banned the alt right scumbags realized that they needed to replace their outright bigotry with ironic bigotry and it's paid in dividends so far.

I doubt any action will be taken against subs of this particular ecosystem unless someone goes to the media about it and reddit faces a publicity backlash.

edit: lol I was reported to RedditCareResources after posting this comment.

I don't know about anyone else, but I've definitely been reported to the "don't commit suicide " robot for posts that were not super militant left. It always makes me paranoid that social media will go one step further by sending the police to my door and they will assume I'm suicidal and need saving.

 

[AnOminous]

Also, hasn't Steven come out and say that archival services that Nahtzees use are "suspect to tampering" or some other insane bullshit?

Anything's subject to tampering to some degree or another but it's really up to the person claiming this when it's an incredibly improbable claim to pony up some evidence. Steve's behavior has been remarkably consistent over the years, so any claim he makes he didn't do some completely in-character despicable thing is inherently improbable, considering he's also a pathological liar.

What he's mad about isn't that the information on those archive sites is false, but that it's 100% true and makes him look like the utter piece of shit he is, much like the legal records of his spousal and child abuse and years as a deadbeat dad.

 

[The stinky skink]

How does that explain people who are supportive of some political ideals that the far left likes also having complaints about Steven? "Well those people were Nahtzees LARPing. See. They said a thing we don't like 5 years ago," this hypothetical militant leftist says while jabbing somewhere on a 1,000 page spreadsheet with their sausage finger. So you might ask how do we know these people are LARPing? Couldn't they just be people who are discovering themselves? Someone changing their stance? "No!" this person cries, taking a hit from their cotton candy flavored vape, "they are still accountable for things they said because that's them and they must still believe it somewhere." If you continue to engage, they will say you're "concern trolling" or "sealioning."

If your head hasn't exploded at this point, it should have. The tactics these people constantly accuse the Nahtzees of; gaslighting, projection, and moving the goal posts- are common tactics they employ. If you have any complaint, your point is invalid because when you were 15, you said a word off the constantly expanding list of no no words on the Internet. It's not even just words, you had an unsavory political opinion, once. Gulag for you!

I unironically believe that Steve keeps his list because he believes that someday he will use it against people in real life.

I also recently captured him again saying that people cannot change. Or that "these" people he labels cannot be changed.

He has criticized Daryl Davis, who is a black man who literally meets with white supremacist racists to try to dialogue with them to get them to reconsider their views. Davis is a hero. Bardfinn thinks that when he does this, he is "revictimizing himself."

One can see young white men on social media expressing themselves as feeling as though society is telling them that they are evil and toxic. Some of them are ripe for white nationalists to exploit, but according to Steven, you should never step in and say, "I understand why you feel the way you do, but don't let yourself go down a dark path because there is hope."

And if "these people cannot be changed"... then what of Steven? He's a domestic abuser. Has he changed or is he, immutably, what he has always been? By his own standards of judging others, he's a terrible person to be avoided at all costs.

People discussing Steven are being reported for harassment, as well. I know Reddit is for faggots, but there are some boards that have helped me find local gems I might have missed and it has been a good place to discuss hot topics. At least a few I participate in that have been targeted by Steven and the Child Pornography Motley Crew. Sometimes posts in these places pop up from time to time and I went from 0 account standing in the almost decade long time I have had an account, to +2 and a temporary ban overnight. I made a post saying that Steven actively internet stalks people on a delusion of grandeur mission to de-platform all Nahtzees probably is on a report rampage. The man, himself, name searched through my history and reported my comments as "harassment." Twice. I expect he will do it again when my suspension wears off.

Steven can say whatever he wants to about other redditors, but redditors are prevented from telling the truth about Steven.

Never, has there been a better time for me to find another place to stare at cute animal pictures on the internet and discuss my city. I'm not militant left and because I'm not, I'm a problem.

The irony of the top comment in the archive just further reinforces my point in the first half of my post...

I don't know about anyone else, but I've definitely been reported to the "don't commit suicide " robot for posts that were not super militant left. It always makes me paranoid that social media will go one step further by sending the police to my door and they will assume I'm suicidal and need saving.

The left on reddit likes to pretend that the harassing modmails and false reports only happen to them. It's far from the truth. The trans community likes to pretend that they are targeted, but the lesbians who don't want the girldick get banned.

 

[AnOminous]

I also recently captured him again saying that people cannot change. Or that "these" people he labels cannot be changed.

So he's admitting he's still a man, still a wife-beater, still a child abuser, still a deadbeat dad.

 

[The stinky skink]

So he's admitting he's still a man, still a wife-beater, still a child abuser, still a deadbeat dad.

Steve's rules for everyone else never apply to Steve.

A dedicated troll would get an account on Second Life and LARP awhile as a bona fide female lesbian. Eventually meet Steve. Play coy. Give in eventually and in a private cyber sex scenario pull down panties to reveal a girl dick and tell him to enjoy the mouthfeel.

I'd place a tenner at bookie that he'd leave and report the other account to the Second Life admins for harassment.