Wikipedia is notorious for its terrible citations. And?
StoneToss / Red Panels -
- Thread starter Pointless Pedant
- Start date
-
Sister services, email, and search will continue to be negatively effected by the attacks. I made a thread to talk about it, if you're into networking.
The quality of the evidences match. But regardless I doubt a shitposter is going to get you to give up your religion, and I've already got one so I'll pass on yours.
round robin
kiwifarms.net
No it's Lou Albano
wtfNeedSignUp
kiwifarms.net
Even being a Jew I lol'ed. Though really today as long as the target for criticism isn't white or USA conservative then you'll find an apology quickly (and I'm pretty sure the cuck still argued that Israel is killing civvies, just not outright committing genocide, which is an exaggeration).
Though it is weird no one is pulling the leftist card of "genocide include fucking with the country culture" that they usually use to argue why it still counts.
Though it is weird no one is pulling the leftist card of "genocide include fucking with the country culture" that they usually use to argue why it still counts.
Ash Gassem
kiwifarms.net
UN defined it thus:
What is genocide?
The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (194defines genocide (article 2) as “any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group…” including:
1. (a) Killing members of the group;
2. (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
3. (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
4. (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
5. (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
I actually find this fair enough. It was intentionally broadly defined so as to be weaponized against Whites, so what's good for the goose is good for the gander. "Genocide" basically means murder of a bloodline. These basically all work toward that end. FWIW, 2, 3 & 4 are all in full force against Whites in virtually every White nation, plus 1 via anarcho-tyranny in many of them.
wtfNeedSignUp
kiwifarms.net
It's more intentionally defined to be acceptable by the USSR, notice that "national, ethnical, racial or religious" doesn't include the "political" label.
wtfNeedSignUp
kiwifarms.net
Mainly chronologically. While there was probably always anti white sentiment in the UN. The active organised push against white people seems to come around the 2000s, with the rise of big tech and globalism.
But I'd be interested to hear people's opinions on when it started.
Good question. I'll hazard my best guess and welcome criticism.
I'd say it started in the 1930s with trotsky's writing denouncing slavic ethnonationalism (slavophiles) and promotion of the new term "racism".
"White people" is just the new symbolic placeholder for uprooting a country and turning it over to internationalist masters.
--
--
One of the things that never ceases to surprise me, is that when you really dig into the roots of words and its initial people and goals, it's rarely some egalitarian noble thing that we believe it to be, like racism is only about prejudice not privilege+power, and feminism is only about equality, and transgender is okay but some vocal insufferables, but the modern problems that people think are a recent change when these issues were right there from the very beginning.
It's odd to say but the use of term racist (as differing from the formerly known "racialist") was itself racist from the get go. If you don't use the privilege+power definition that is.
Last edited:
DarkSoulsPhil
kiwifarms.net
This isnt pol. This thread is for stonetoss, not white genocide and its definition. Fuck sake man, i agree that shitskins, jews and women ruin everyones fun, just stop being this threads version of a shitskin, jew or woman
wtfNeedSignUp
kiwifarms.net
If there will be a comic worth talking about besides the "kinda funny"/"not original"/"here's the amogus" then people will talk about it.
The only other constructive thing I can say about the recent comic is that it applies far more for China than "Those Israelis". Saying a country commited genocide would have had him apologize regardless (unless it's a country lead by a right wing political figure globalists didn't like), while apologizing for saying a country exists is far more ridiculous.
Again, why not both?
You seem to raise redirections rather than refutations. These are usually pretty effective in conversations, but not when people can just scroll up and reread. Improve your pilpul.
The thing with retracting criticisms of Israel is that it only applies to the relative mainstream of the left. I'm not aware of Ilhan Omar ever really retracting most of her comments about Israel being a terrorist state other than some token comments to the effect of "not all Jews", which is basically true anyway since not all Jews support Zionism in the first place. Obviously you can't be an open anti-semite in public office but that doesn't mean the entirety of Congress goes to AIPAC meetings, especially representatives in cities with big black populations.
100 trillion from communism = believeable
6 million = omg too much
- Highlight
- #4,535
This, but unironically.
I know, logistics are totally a made up thing.
Caught this on twitter
wtfNeedSignUp
kiwifarms.net
- Highlight
- #4,538
A pretty spicy comic from the guy that was mentioned before
I love that it doesn't feel the need to explicitly say it's about abortion.
I love that it doesn't feel the need to explicitly say it's about abortion.
Pretty great. Could have been one step better if the last bubble said "they want you to tell me their names".
wtfNeedSignUp
kiwifarms.net
Here is another comics on the horribleness of cat calling
Similar threads
Scam Artist, Male Feminist Pretending to be Alt-Right, Possible Rapist?, Liar, Failed Economist
The Right wing Lovechild of Ben Garrison and Andrew Dobson
